Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa:
Касноримска керамика Ђердапа
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
Beograd
Narodni muzej
2016
|
| Series: | Arheološke monografije
24 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Abstract |
| Item Description: | Literaturverzeichnis Seite 177-188 |
| Physical Description: | 214 Seiten Illustrationen 28 cm |
| ISBN: | 9788672691672 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044659646 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200102 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 171130s2016 xx a||| |||| 00||| srp d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788672691672 |9 978-86-7269-167-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)992119094 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ48279433X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a ALT |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |6 880-01 |a Cvjetićanin, Tatjana |d 1963- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1072548429 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |6 880-02 |a Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa |c Tatjana Cvjetićanin |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Late Roman pottery in the Iron Gates |
| 264 | 1 | |6 880-03 |a Beograd |b Narodni muzej |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a 214 Seiten |b Illustrationen |c 28 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |6 880-04 |a Arheološke monografije |v 24 | |
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis Seite 177-188 | ||
| 546 | |a Text serbisch. - Englische Zusammenfassung: Late Roman pottery in the Iron Gates | ||
| 546 | |b Kyrillisch | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Keramikgefäß |0 (DE-588)4136239-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Römerzeit |0 (DE-588)4076769-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Funde |0 (DE-588)4071507-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Eisernes Tor, Donau |0 (DE-588)4092445-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Eisernes Tor, Donau |0 (DE-588)4092445-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Keramikgefäß |0 (DE-588)4136239-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Funde |0 (DE-588)4071507-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Römerzeit |0 (DE-588)4076769-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Arheološke monografije |v 24 |w (DE-604)BV021635004 |9 24 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 880 | 1 | |6 100-01/(N |a Цвјетићанин, Татјана |a ut | |
| 880 | 1 | 0 | |6 245-02/(N |a Касноримска керамика Ђердапа |c Татјана Цвјетићанин |
| 880 | 1 | |6 264-03/(N |a Београд |b Народни музей |c 2016 | |
| 880 | 0 | |6 490-04/(N |a Археолошке монографије | |
| 940 | 1 | |f sla | |
| 940 | 1 | |n gbd | |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q gbd_JL_Z1612 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 307.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09015 |g 4971 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 930.1 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4971 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030057166 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1826763301272420352 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
7. УВОД 9 . ТЕРИТОРИЈА И ИСТОРИЈА ЂЕРДАПСКОГ ЛИМЕСА. ПРИСТУП ИСТРАЖИВАЊИМА КЕРАМИКЕ ЂЕРДАПА 17. ТИПОЛОГИЈА КАСНОРИМСКИХ ПОСУДА ЂЕРДАПА 17 . Зделе 45 . Цедиљке 45 . Тањири 49 . Крчази 62 . Пехари - шоље 71 . Лонци 98 . Поклопци 110 . Питоси 114.Амфоре 127 . НАЛАЗИШТА КАСНОРИМСКЕ КЕРАМИКЕ HA ЂЕРДАПСКОМ ЛИМЕСУ И СЛИКА КЕРАМИЧКЕ ЕВИДЕНЦИЈЕ 149. КАРАКТЕРИСТИКЕ КАСНОРИМСКЕ КЕРАМИКЕ ЂЕРДАПА 165 . ЗАКЉУЧНА РАЗМАТРАЊА 177 . ЛИТЕРАТУРА 189 . LATE ROMAN POTTERY IN THE IRON GATES (summary) 200 . APPENDIX 01: КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА: ТИПОВИ, КЛАСЕ И ХРОНОЛОШКО ОПРЕДЕЉЕЊЕ / LATE ROMAN POTTERY IN THE IRON GATES: TYPES, CERAMIC CLASSES AND DATING І !
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА 177 ЛИТЕРАТУРА Александров 1983 Г. Александров, Антична вила Но. 1 край Михайловград, Известия на музеите от Северозападна България 8, 39-73. Александров 1984 Г. Александров, Антична вила Но. 3 край Михайловград, Известия на музеите от Северозападна България 9, 11-42.
Аурелиан 1962 П. Аурелиан, Следы культуры Черняхов-Сынтана де Мурені в Малой Скифии, Dacia VI, 235-256. Babović 1986 Lj. Babović, “Zbrađila-Fund”, Korbovo, Compte-rendu des fouilles, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 116-132. Bavant, Ivaniševič 2007 B. Bavant, V. Ivaniševič, Iustiniana Prima (Caričin
Grad) - Eine spätantike Stadt vom Reißbrett, in Roms Erbe auf dem Balkan (U. Brandi, M. Vasić Hrsg.), Philipp von Zabern Verlag: Mainz, 108-129. Bartel et al. 1979 В. Bartel, V. Kondič, M. Werner, Excavations at Kraku’lu Yordan, Northeast Serbia: Preliminary Report, 1973-76 Seasons, Journal of the
Field Archaeology 6, 127-149. Bikić, Ivaniševič 2012 V. Bikić, V. Ivaniševič, Imported pottery in central Illyricum - a Case Study: Caričin Grad, Rei Cretaria Romanae Fautorum Acta 42, 41-49. Bichir 1973 Gh. Bichir, Cultura Carpica, Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste Romania: Bucuresti. Bichir
1976 G. Bichir, Archaeology and History of the Carpi from the Second to the Fourth Century A. D., British Archaeological Reports Supplementary Series 16(1): Oxford. Bjelajac 1990 Lj. Bjelajac, La céramique et les lampes, la quartier sud-ouest de la ville haute, in Caričin Grad II (B. Bavant, V.
Kondič, J. M. Spieser eds.), Collection de l’École française de Rome LXXV, École française de Rome, Institut
archéologique de Belgrade: Rome - Belgrade, 161-190. Bjelajac 1990a Lj. Bjelajac, Terra sigillata u Gornjoj Meziji - import i radionice Viminacium-Margum, Posebna izdanja 23, Arheološki institut: Beograd 1990. Bjelajac 1992 Љ. Бјелајац, Печатна керамика Сингидунума, Зборник Народної музеја XIV-I (Београд), 419-425. Bjelajac 1996 Lj. Bjelajac, Amfore gornjomezijskog Podunavlja, Posebna izdanja 30, Arheološki institut: Beograd. Bojović 1977 D. Bojović, Rimska keramika Singidunuma, Muzej grada Beograda: Beograd.
178 Bonis 1991 Е. Bonis, Glasierte Keramik der Spätrömerzeit aus Tokod, Acta archaeologica Academiae scientarum Hungaricae XL11I/1-2, 87-150. Bonifay 2004 M. Bonifay, Etudes sur la céramique romaine tardive d’Afrique, British Archaeological Reports International Series 1301, Archaeopress: Oxford. Böttger 1982 B. Böttger, Die Gefäßkeramik aus dem Kastell latrus, in latrus-Krivina. Spätantike Befestigung und frühmittelalterische Siedlung an der unteren Donau. Band II: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1966-1973, Schriften zur Geschichte und Kultur der Antike 17, Akademie Verlag: Berlin, 33-148. КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА Vagalinski 2002 L. F. Vagalinski, Burnished pottery from the First century to the beginning of the Seventh century AD from the Region South of the Lower Danube (Bulgaria), NOUS Publishers: Sofia. Vagalinski 2012 L. Vagalinski, The Problem of Destruction by Warfare in Late Antiquity: Archaeological Evidence from the Danubian Limes, in The Lower Danube Roman Limes (lst-6th c. AD) (L. Vagalinski, N. Sharankov, S. Torbarov), National Archaeological Institute with Museum - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences: Sofia, 313-326. Васић 1984 M. Васић, Чезава - castrum Novae, Старинар XXXIII-XXXIV (1982/83), 91-122. Böttger 1982 B. Böttger, Zur Lebensmittelversorgung der Kastelle am unteren Donaulimes in der Spätantike, Ratiariensia 3-4, 225-230. Vasié et al. 1989 M. Vasié, J. Karajin-Mundrić, S. Popovié, Horreum Margi-Ravno-Ćuprija (iskopavanja 1979. і 1986-1988. godine), Vesnik Vojnog muzeja 33, 7-36. Böttger 1991 B. Böttger, Die gefäskeramische Funde (1975-1981), in latrus-
Krivina. Spätantike Befestigung und frühmittelalterische Siedlung an der unteren Donau. Band IV: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1975-1981, Oldenbourg Akademieverlag: Berlin, 157-166. Vasié, Kondié 1986 М. Vasié, V. Kondié, Le limes romain et paléobyzantin des Portes de Fer, in Studien zu den
Militärgrenzen Roms III. 13 Internationaler Limeskongress Aalen 1983, Vorträge, Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg 20, Theiss: Stuttgart, 542-560. Brukner1981 O. Brukner, Rimska keramika и jugoslovenskom delu provincije Donje Panonije, Dissertiones et
Monographiae XXIV, Pokrajinski zavod za zaštitu spomenika kulture SAP Vojvodine - Savez arheoloških društava Jugoslavije: Beograd. Бугарски, Иванишевич 2012 И. Бугарски, В. Иванишевич, Пограничье Римской империи и варваров: система обороны Империи от Куция до Ледераты, in Лесная и лесостепная зоны
Восточной Европы в эпохи римских влияний и Великою переселения народов. Конференция 3 (А. М. Воронцова, И. О. Гавритухи ред.), Государственный Военно-Исторический и Природный Музей-Заповедник „Куликово Поле“, Российская Академия Наук Институт Археологии, Тула 2012, 482-511. Vasié, Petkovič 2010 M.
Vasié, S. Petkovič, The Results of Research of Multilayered Site Horreum Margi-Ravno-Ćuprija in 1990, Vesnik Vojnog muzeja 37, 9-25. Васић P. 1984 P. Васић, Бараће код Трајанове табле, праисторијско и античко насеље, Старинар XXXIII-XXXIV (1982/83), 355-356. Vasié R. 1986 R. Vasié, Compte-rendu des
fouilles du site préhistorique à Velesnica 1981-1982, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 264-285. Vasié R. et al. 1984 R.
Vasié, S. Ercegovié-Pavlovié, D. Minié, Velesnica. Prospection par sondage de 1980, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 125-132.
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА 179 Vikić-Belančić 1970 В. Vikié, Beitrag zur Problematik der keramischen Werkstätten in Sudpannonien in der römischen Kaiserzeit, Archeologia Iugoslavica XI, 29-44. Garašanin, Vasić 1987 M. Garašanin, M. Vasić, Castrum Pontes. Compte-rendu des fouilles en 1981-82, Cahiers des Portes de Fer IV, 71-116. Vučković-Todorović 1961 D. Vučković-Todorović, Iskopavanja kod Donjeg Milanovca i u Prahovú, u Limes u Jugoslaviji I, Zbornik radova sa Simpozijuma о limesu 1960. godine, Arheološko društvo Jugoslavije: Beograd, 137-139. Gassner et al. 2000 V. Gassner, S. Groh, S. Jilek, A. Katenberger, W. Pietsch, R. Sauer, H. Stiglitz, H. Záběhlický, Das Kastel Mautern - Favianis, Der römische Limes in Österreich 39, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Wien. Vučković-Todorović 1962 D. Vučković-Todorović, Tekija, Arheološki pregled 4, 210-211. Vučković-Todorović 1967 D. Vučković-Todorović, Ušće Porečke reke - antičko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 9, 62-65. Vučković-Todorović 1968 D. Vučković-Todorović, Ušće Porečke reke - rimsko-vizantijski bedemi i utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 10, 69-71. Vučković-Todorović 1969 D. Vučković-Todorović, Ušće Porečke Reke rimsko-vizantijsko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 11, 104-107. Vukmanović, Popovič P. 1986 M. Vukmanović, P. Popović, Recherches archéologiques sur la localité “Livade" près de Mala Vrbica, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 7-26. Gabričević 1986 D. Gabričević, Rtkovo - Glamija I - une forteresse de la basse antiquité, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 71-91. Garašanin et al. 1984 M. Garašanin, M.
Vasić, G. Marjanović-Vujović, Pontes - camp et pont de Trajan. Fouilles de 1980, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 25-84. Garašanin, Vasié 1982 M. Garašanin, M. Vasić, Le Pont de Trajan et le Castellum Pontes, Cahiers des Portes de Fer I, 7-50. Garašanin, Vasić 1985 M. Garašanin, M. Vasić, Kostol - kastrum Pontes, Arheološki pregled 26, 101-102. Grünewald 1977 M. Grünewald, Zum Frage der “nachvalentinianischen” Bewohner des Legionslager Carnuntum, in Limes: Akten des 11. internationalen Limeskongress, Székesfehérvár 30. 8. - 6. 9. 1976 (J. Fitz ed.), Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, 165-169. Grünewald 1979 M. Grünewald, Die Gefdßkeramik des Legionslagers von Carnuntum (Grabungen 1968-1974), Der römische Limes in Österreich 29, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Wien. Grünewald 1986 M. Grünewald, Keramik und Kleinfunde des Legionlagers von Carnuntum (Grabungen 1976-1977), Der römische Limes in Österreich 34, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Wien. Gudea 1977 N. Gudea, Gornea. Asezari din epoca romana si romana tirzie, Banatica, Resita. Drag. H. Dragendorff, Terra Sigillata. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechischen und römischen Keramik, Bonner Jahrbücher XCVI u.XCVlI, 1895, 18-155. Duval, Popovič 1984 N. Duval, V. Popović (eds.), Cáriéin Grad I, Collection de l’École française de Rome 75, École française de Rome, Institut archéologique de Belgrade: Rome - Belgrade. Dyczek 2001 P. Dyczek, Roman Amphorae of the lst֊3rd centuries AD Found on the Lower Danube. Typology, Wydawnistwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego: Warshaw.
180 Ercegović-Pavlović, Minié 1984 S. Ercegović-Pavlović, D. Minic, Grabovica, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 145-149. КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА Јанковић 1983а Ђ. Јанковић, Рановизантијски Гамзиград, у Гамзиїрад - касноантички царски дворац, Галерија Српске академије наука и уметности: Београд
Зеест 1960 И. Б. Зеест, Керамическая тара Боспора, Материалы и исследования по археологии СССР 83, Академия наук СССР: Москва. Jankovič Đ. i M. 1975 Đ. i M. Jankovič, Prahovo - fabrika, višeslojni lokalitet, Arheološki pregled 17, 51-55. Иванишевић 1988 В. Иванишевић, Рановизантијско утврђење на
Хуму код Тутина, Новопазарски зборник 12, 5-11. Jankovič 1.1964 I. Jankovič, Karatas - antičko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 6, 53-55. Ivaniševič, Kazański 2002 V. Ivaniševič, M. Kazański, La nécropole de l’époque des Grandes Migrations à Singidunum, in Singidunum 2 (M. Popovič ur.), Arheološki
institut: Beograd, 101-157. Jankovič 1.1969 I. Jankovič, Pecka bara - naselje starijeg gvozdenog doba, Arheološki pregled 11, 100-101. Иванишевич, Казанский 2010 В. Иванишевич, М. Казанский, Герулы Юстиниана в Северном Иллирикуме и их археологические следы, Stratum Plus. Archaeology and Cultural
Anthropology No. 5/2010, 147-157. Ivaniševič, Kazański 2014 V. Ivaniševič, M. Kazański, Illyricum Nord et les Barbares à l’époques des Grand Migrations (Ve-VIe siècle), Старинар LXIV, 131-160. Ivaniševič et al. 2006 V. Ivaniševič, M. Kazański, A. Mastykova, Les nécropolis de Viminacium à l'époque
des Grandes Migrations, Monographies 22, Collège de France CNRS Centre de recherché d’histoire et civilisation de
Byzance: Paris. Јанковић 1973/74 h· Јанковић, Покретни налази са некрополе и утврђења код Кладова, Старинар ХХІѴ-ХХѴ, 201-226. Jevremović 1987 N. Jevremović, La céramique des remparts sud et ouest decouverte sur le site Diana - Karatas, Cahiers des Portes de Fer IV, 49-70. Jeremić 2009 G. Jeremić,
Saldum. Roman and Early Byzantine Fortification, Cahiers des Portes de Fer, Monographies 6, Institut Archéologique: Belgrade. Јеремић 2014 Г. Јеремић, Каталог - керамичке посуде, у JaloguH Мала: касноантичка некройола, Народни музеј Ниш: Ниш. Јеремић, Гојгић 2012 Г. Јеремић, А. Гојгић, Римске терме
у Чачку, Прилози за историју Чачка 3, Народни музеј Чачак: Чачак. Јовановић 1984 A. Јовановић, Хајдучка Воденица, касноантичко и рановизантијско утврђење, Старинар XXXIII-XXXIV (1982/83), 319-331. Јанковић 1981 Ђ. Јанковић, Подунавски geo области Аквиса у VI и почетком VII века, Грађа, књига 5,
Археолошки институт: Београд. Jovanovič 1986 A. Jovanovič, Ruženjka - période antique, Cahiers des Portes de Fer Ill, 471-474. Јанковић 1983 Ђ. Јанковић, У сутону антике, у Гамзиїрад ֊ касноантички царски дворац, Галерија Српске академије наука и уметности: Београд. Jovanovič, Koráé 1984 A.
Jovanovič, M. Korać, Ušće Slatinske Reke - un castellum de la haute epoque Byzantine. Fouilles de 1980, Cahiers des Portes de Ferli, 191-196.
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА 181 Jovanovič et al. 1986 A. Jovanovič, M. Korać, Đ. Jankovič, L’embouchure de la rivière Slatinska Reka, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 378-400. Каниц 1985 Ф. Каниц, Србија, земља и становништво од римскоГ доба до краја XIX века, друга mula, Српска књижевна задруга -
ИРО Рад: Београд. Jovanovič B. 1964 B. Jovanovič, Sip, Arheološki pregled 6, 57-59. Kapitän 1972 G. Kapitän, Le anfore del relitto romano di Capo Ognina (Siracusa), in Recherches sur les amphores romaines, Collection de l’École française de Rome 10, École française de Rome: Roma, 243-252. Јовановић
К. 1940 К. Јовановић, Неготинска Крајина и Кључ. Насеље и порекло становништва, књ. 29, Сриеш етноїрафски зборник Српске краѣевске академије, књ. LV, Београд 1940. Јордовић 1994 Ч. Јордовић, Цигларски и грнчарски центар у Виминацијуму, Саопштења XXVI, 95-106. Junkelmann 1997 М. Junkelmann, Panis
militaris. Die Ernaahrung des römischen Soldaten oder der Grundstojf der Macht, Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt, Band 75, Philipp von Zabern Verlag: Mainz. Кабакчиева 1986 Г. Кабакчиева, Керамика от вилата при Ивайловград (II—IV в.), Разкопки и проучвания XV, Българска Академия на науките
Археологически институт с музей: София. Кабакчиева 2000 Г. Кабакчиева, Oescus. Castra Oescensia. Ранноримският военен лагер при устието на Искър, Албатрос: София. Кабакчиева 2005 Г. Кабакчиева, Римска и сива изльскана керамика, in Кастра Мартис. Квадрибургий и кастел (Й. Атанасова, Г. Кабакчиева, А.
Йоцова, Г. Кузманов, К. Димитров), Разкопки и проучвания XXXIII, Българска Академия на науките Археологически
институт с музей: София, 81-127. Кабакчиева 2013 Г. Кабакчиева, Северноафриканска фина керамика в диоцезите Тракия и Дакия, in In honorem professoris Георги Кузманов (В. Динчев ed.), Известия на Националния археологически институт XLI, София, 389-434. Keay 1984 S. J. Keay, Late Roman Amphorae in the
Western Mediterranean. A Tipology and Study: the Catalan Evidence I-II, British Archaeological Reports International Series 196, Oxford. Кленина 2006 Е. Ю. Кленина, Столовая и кухонная керамика III—VI веков из Нов (Северная Болгария), Novae. Studies and Materials II (A. В. Biernacki ed.),
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu: Poznań - Sevastopol. Kondič 1984 V. Kondič, Les formes des fortifications protobyzantines dams la région des Portes de Fer, in Villes et peuplement dans l'Illyricum protobyzantin (G. Dragon ed.), Collection de l’École française de Rome 77, École
française de Rome: Roma, 131-161. Kondič 1987 V. Kondič, Statio Cataractarum Diana, Cahiers des Portes de Fer IV, 43-48. Кондић J. 1989/90 J. Кондић, Diana - утврђење I века, Зборник Милутина Гарашанина, Старинар XL-XLI, 261-272. Кондић J. 2009 J. (Ранков) Кондић, Станица Диана на дунавским
катарактама. Station Cataractarum Diana - Polochrion Zanes. Пројекат Диана/Занес 1978/9-2008/9 (30 година пројекта Ђердап II), Зборник Народної музеја XIX-1 (Београд), 367-402. Kondič J. 2013 J. (Rankov) Kondič, Moesian Late Roman Limes on the Danube, in Constantin the Great and the Edict of Milan,
313. The Birth of Christianity in the Roman Provinces on
182 the Soil of Serbia (I. Popovič, В. Borić-Brešković eds.), National Museum in Belgrade: Belgrade, 36-59. Kondič J. 2013a J. (Rankov) Kondič, Catalogue, in Constantine the Great and the Edict of Milan 313: the Birth of Christianity in the Roman Provinces on the Soil of Serbia (I. Popovič, В. Borić-Brešković eds.), National Museum in Belgrade: Belgrade, cat. 103, 104, 108. Koráé 1986 М. Korać, Kasnoantičke i ranovizantijske fortifikacije kod Ljubičevca i Ušća Slatinske reke (magistarski rad u rukopisu, Univerzitet u Beogradu). Korać 1996 M. Korać, Late Roman and Early Byzantine Fort at Ljubičevac, in Roman Limes on the Middle and Lower Danube (P. Petrovič ed.), Cahiers des Portes de Fer, Monographies 2, Archaeological Institute: Belgrade, 105-109. Kostie 2011 Đ. S. Kostić, Dunavski limes Feliksa Kanka, Arheološki institut і Centar za nove tehnologije: Beograd - Viminacijum. Krekovič 1998 E. Krekovič, Römische Keramik aus Gerulata, Studia archaeologica et Mediaevalia IV, Katedra archeologie Filozofickej fakulty: Bratislava. Krstić 1984 D. Krstić, Obala - Korbovo. Fouilles de sondage de 1980, Cahiers des Portes de Fer 11, 101-107. Кузманов 1973 Г. Кузманов, Типология и хронология на ранновизантийските амфори (IV-VI в.), КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ђЕРДАПА Ergebnisse der deutsch-bulgarisch-österreichischen Ausgrabungen 1934-1937 (S. Uenze), Münchener Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte 43, Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege: München, 201-221. Kuzmanov 1998 G. Kuzmanov, Spätantike glasierte Keramik aus Bulgarien, Archaeologica Bulgarica 11/1998-1, 81-95. Кузманов 2005 Г.
Кузманов, Късноантична керамика, in Кастра Мартис. Квадрибуріий и кастел (Й. Атанасова, Г. Кабакчиева, А. Йоцова, Г. Кузманов, К. Димитров), Разкопки и проучвания XXXIII, Българска Академия на науките - Археологически институт с музей: София, 128-180. Кузманов 2009 Г. Кузманов, Ранновизантийска
битова керамика от Градището (северозападен сектор), in Бъліаро-британски разкопки на Градището при с. Дичин, Великотърновска област, 1996-2003, резултатите от проучванията на българския екип (В. Динчев, Г. Кузманов, П. Владкова, А. Чолакова, Ц. Попова), Разкопки и проучвания XXXIX, Българска
Академия на науките - Археологически институт с музей: София, 153-206. Кузманов, Грудев 2013 Г. Кузманов, И. Грудев, Късноантична керамика от Рациария (Крайбрежна Дакия), in ln honorem professoris Георги Кузманов (В. Динчев ed.), Известия на Националния археологически институт XLI, София, 337-388.
Лаловић, Јовановић 1981 A. Лаловић, A. Јовановић, Рготина, античко налазиште, Старинар XXXI (1980), 81-85. Археология 1, 14-21. Ludovici W. Ludowici, Stempel-Namen und Bilder römischer Töpfer, Кузманов 1985 Г. Кузманов, Ранновизантийска керамика от Тракия и Дакия, Разкопки и проучвания XIII,
Българска Академия на науките Археологически институт с музей: София. Legions-Ziegel-Stempel, Formen von Sigillata- und anderen Gefassen aus meinen Ausgrabungen in Rheinzabern 1901-1914, Katalog 5, Carl Ludowici: Speyer. Kuzmanov 1992 G. Kuzmanov, Die lokale Gefäß Keramik, in Die spätantiken
Befestigungen von Sadovec (Bulgarien). Любенова 1981 B. Любенова, Селището от римската и ранновизантийската епоха, in Перник
I. Поселищен живот на хълма Кракра от V хил. пр. н. е. до VI в. на н. е., Българска Академия на науките: София, 52-200.
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА 183 Magrini, Sbarra 2009 С. Magrini, F. Sbarra (eds.), Proceedings of the First Mirkovič 2003 M. Mirkovič, Römer an der mittleren Donau. International Meeting of Archaeology in Carlino: Late Roman Glazed Pottery Production in Eastern Alpine Area and Danubian Provinces:
first results of an international project, Carlino December 2007, Römische Strassen und Festungen von Singidunum bis Aquae, Kompromis-design: Beograd. Designgraf: Udine 2009. Magrini, Sbarra 2010 C. Magrini, F. Sbarra (eds.), Late Roman Glazed Pottery in Carlino and in Central-East Europe.
Production, Function and Distribution, British Archaeological Reports International Series 2068, Oxbow books: Oxford 2010. Marjanović-Vujović 1987 G. Marjanović-Vujović, Une representation interessante du kosmos sur un vase de Rtkovo, Cahiers des Portes de Fer IV, 149-151. Milinković 2002 M.
Milinković, Die byzantinische Höhenanlage auf der Jelica in Serbien - ein Beispiel aus dem nördlichen Illyricum des 6. Jh., Старинар LI (2001), 71-133. Милинковић 2010 M. Милинковић, Градина на Јелици. Рановизантијски град и средновековно насеѣе, Mirkovič 2007 M. Mirkovič, Moesia Superior. Eine
Provinz an der mittleren Donau, Orbis Provinciarum. Römische Provinzen, Philipp von Zabern Verlag: Mainz. Найденова 1985 В. Найденова, Римската вила в с. Кралев Дол, Пернишки окръг, Разкопки и проучвания XIV, Българска Академия на науките - Археологически институт с музей: София. Naceva 1984 V.
Naceva, Etude technologique du vernis rouge sur la céramique fine des ateliers Romains dans les villages de Butovo, Hotnica
et Pavlikeni, de la region de Veliko Tamovo, Rei Cretaria Romanae Fautorum Acta 23-24, 155-161. Nikolić-Đorđević 2000 S. Nikolić-Đorđević, Antička keramika Singidunuma. Oblici posuda, in Singidunum 2 (M. Popovič ur.), Arheološki institut: Beograd, 11-244. Завод за уџбенике: Београд 2010. Miloševič
1965 P. Miloševič, Sip - rimski kastel, Arheološki pregled 7, 102-105. Милошевић 1984 П. Милошевић, Сип, касноантичко утврђење, Старинар XXXIII-XXXIV (1982/83), 357-362. Miloševič, Jeremić 1986 P. Miloševič, M. Jeremić, Le castellum a Milutinovac, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 245-263. Минић,
Ерцеговић-Павловић 1984 Д. Минић, С. Ерцеговић-Павловић, Пецка Бара, праисторијско, античко и средњовековно налазиште, Старинар XXXIII-XXXIV (1982/83), 301-304. Mirkovič 1968 M. Mirkovič, Rimski gradovi na Dunavu u Gornjoj Meziji, Arheološko društvo Jugoslavije: Beograd. Ончевска Тодоровска 2004 М.
Ончевска Тодоровска, Доцноантичка грнчарија og Скупи (втора половина на IV-VI век), Музеј на град Скопје: Скопје. Ончевска Тодоровска 2010 М. Ончевска Тодоровска, Доцноантичка грнчарија во Република Македонија (доцен 3-ти / 6-ти век), Музеј на град Скопје: Скопје. Opaiţ 1996 А. Opaiţ, Aspecte ale
vieţii economice din provincia Scythia (secolele IV/VI p.Ch.). Producţia ceramicii lokale şi de import, Bibliotheca Thracologica XVI, Institui Român de Tracologie: Bucureşti. Opriş 2003 I. C. Opriş, Ceramica romana târzie si paleobizantina de la Capidava in contextul descoperirilor de la Dunarea de
Jos (sec. IV—VI p. Chr.), Editura Enciclopedica: Bucureşti.
184 КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА Ottományi 1989 К. Ottományi, Late Roman Pottery, in The Roman Fort at Ács-Vaspuszta (Hungary) on the Danubian Limes (D. Gabler ed.), British Archaeological Reports International Series 531, Oxford, 492-570. Petrovič N. 1961 N. Petrovič, Utvrđenja na limesu kod Negotina, u Limes u Jugoslaviji I, Zbornik radova sa Simpozijuma о limesu I960, godine, Arheološko društvo Jugoslavije: Beograd, 141-144. Ottományi 1991 К. Ottományi, Késő római kerámia a Leányfalu őrtoronyból, Studia Comitatensia 22, 5-144. Petrovič N. 1969 N. Petrovič, Hajdučka Vodenica - kasnoantičko i ranovizantijsko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 11, 97-99. Ottományi 1996 K. Ottományi, Eine Töpferwerkstalt der spätrömischen Keramik mit Glättverzierung in Pilsmarót-Malompatak, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae XLVIII, 71-133. Petrovič N. 1970 N. Petrovič, Hajdučka Vodenica - kasnoantičko i ranovizantijsko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 12, 54-57. Ottományi 1999 К. Ottományi, Late Roman Pottery in the Dunabogdány camp, in Pannónia and Beyond. Studies in Honour of Lásló Barkóéi (A. H. Vaday ed.), Antaeus 24, Budapest, 333-374. Ottományi, Sosztarits 1998 K. Ottományi, К. Sosztarits, Spätrömischer Töpferofen im südlichen Stadtteil von Savaria, Savaria 23/3 (1996-97), 145-216. Paprenica 1986 J. Paprenica, Grabovica - “Brzi Prun" ֊ gisement préhistorique, antique et medieval, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 362-368. Petrovič N., Pavlovič 1966 N. Petrovič, S. Pavlovič, Hajdučka Vodenica ranovizantijsko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 8, 99-100. Petrovič N., Zotovič 1960 N.
Petrovič, Lj. Zotovič, Kasnoantička utvrđenja na Dunavu, Arheološki pregled 2, 133-135. Petrovič P. 1970 P. Petrovič, Ušće Porečke reke - antičko utvrđenje i naselje, Arheološki pregled 12, 60-62. Петровић P. 1981 П. Петровић, О снабдевању римских трупа на ђердапском лимесу, Старинар XXXI (1980), 53-63. Paprenica 1986a J. Paprenica, Vajuga - Pesak, nécropole I, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 223-228. Петровић Р. 1984 П. Петровић, Поречка Река, сабирни центар за снабдевање римских трупа, Старинар ХХХІІІ-ХХХІѴ (1982-83), 285-291. Parović-Pešikan 1984 M. Parović-Pešikan, Ljubičevac - Glamija. Fouilles de 1980, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 137-144. Petrovič P. 1984а P. Petrovič, Brza Palanka - Egeta. Rapport sur les recherches archéologiques en 1980 (antiquité), Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 153-166. Peacock, Williams 1986 D. P. S. Peacock, D. F. Williams, Amphorae and the Roman Economy. An Introductory Guide, Longman Archaeology Series, Longman Pub. Group: London and New York. Petrovič P. 1986 P. Petrovič, Brza Palanka - Egeta. Recherches archéologiques menées en 1981-1982, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 369-377. Petkovič 1993 S. Petkovič, A jug from Pontes Decorated with Solar and Lunar Symbols, Старинар XLII (1991), 97-106. Petrovič, Vasić 1996 P. Petrovič, M. Vasié, The Roman Frontier in Upper Moesia: Archaeological Investigations in the Iron Gate Area - Main Results, in Roman Limes
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ДЕРДАПА on the Middle and Lower Danube (P. Petrovič ed.), ahiers des Portes de Fer, Monographies 2, Archaeological Institute: Belgrade 1996, 15-26. 185 Поповић Љ. 1984 Љ. Поповић, Мало и Велико Голубиње, римско византијско налазиште, Старинар XXXIII-XXXIV (1982/83), 297-299. Póczy 1957 K. S. Póczy, Keramik, in Intercissa II (Dunapentele). Geschichte der Stadt in der Römerzeit, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae XXVI (Budapest), 29-139. Popovič Lj. 1984а Popilian 1976 M. Popovič, Tvrđava Ras, Monografije 34, Arheološki institut: Beograd. Lj. Popovič, Vajuga - Karaula. Fouilles de sondage de 1980, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 109-110. Popovič M. 1999 G. Popilian, Ceramica Romana din Oltenia, Scrisul romanesc: Kraiova. Popovič M., Bikić 2009 Pop-Lazič 2013 M. Popovič, V. Bikić, Vrsenice. Kasnoantičko i srpsko srednjovekovno utvrđenje, Arheološki institut: Beograd. S. Pop-Lazić, Review of the Late Roman Army in Serbia, in Constantine the Great and the Edict of Milan 313: the Birth of Christianity in the Roman Provinces on the Soil of Serbia (L Popovič, В. Borić-Brešković eds.), National Museum in Belgrade: Belgrade, 60-73. P. Popovič, D. Mrkobrad, Prospection par sondage de la localité Ljubičevac - Obala, Cahiers des Portes de FerlII, 308-328. Popovič I. 2005 Popovič S. 1989 M. Tomovič, I. Popovič, В. Borić-Brešković, T. Cvjetićanin, S. Stefanovič, А. V. Popovič, Sarkamén (Eastern Serbia): A Tetrarchie Imperial Palace. The Memorial Complex (L Popovič ed.), Belgrade. S. Popovič, Antički pokretni nalazi sa lokaliteta Horreum Margi - Ćuprija
(iskopavanja 1986-1989), Vesnik Vojnog muzeja 33, 49-77. Поповиһ И. 2010 A. Poulter, Goths on the Lower Danube: their Impact upon and behind the Frontier, Antiquité Tardive 21/2013, 31-34. Popovič P., Mrkobrad 1986 Poulter 2013 И. Поповић (yp.), Felix Romuliana - Гамзтрад, Посебна издања 47, Археолошки институт: Београд. Premk 1978 Popovič Lj. 1967 Lj. Popovič, Malo Golubinje - rimski kastrum, Arheološki pregled 9, 61-62. A. Premk, Keramika iz zatvorenih slojeva IV veka u Sirmijumu (magistarski rad u rukopisu, Univerzitet u Beogradu). Popovič Lj. 1968 Premk et al. 1984 Lj. Popovič, Malo Golubinje - rimski castrum, Arheološki pregled 10, 68-69. A. Premk, P. Popovič, Lj. Bjelajac, Vajuga - Pesak. Fouilles de sondage de 1980, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 111-124. Popovič Lj. 1969 Lj. Popovič, Malo і Veliko Golubinje - praistorijsko naselje i antičko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 11, 102-103. Радиновић 2012 H. Радиновић, Печаћена керамика са локалитета Давидовац-Градиште код Врања, Гласник Српскої археолошкої друштва 27/2011, 105-133. Popovič Lj. 1970 Lj. Popovič, Malo і Veliko Golubinje - praistorijsko naselje i antičko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 12, 58-59. Raičković 2007 A. Raičković, Keramičke posude Zanatskog centra iz Viminacijuma, Arheologija i prirodne nauke,
186 Posebna izdanja 3, Centar za nove tehnologije Arheološki institut: Beograd. Raičković 2012 A. Raičković, Late Roman Pottery from Viminacìum thermae. The excavation of 2004, Rei Cretaria Romanae Fautorum Acta 42, 147-154. КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА Сазанов 1989 A. В. Сазанов, О хронологии
Боспора ранневизантийского времени, Советская археология 4/1989, 41-60. Sokolovska 1980 V. Sokolovska, Isar-Mravinci, researches in the old town, Arheologia Iugoslavica 20-21, 116-124. Rankov1982 J. Rankov, Les Fouilles de Karatas - Ier rapport préliminaire 1978/79, Cahiers des Portes de Fer I,
51-69. Sretenović 1984 M. Sretenović, Mokranjske stene. Site d’habitat stratifié, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 221-230. Rankov1984 J. Rankov, Statio Cataractarum Dianae: la porte sud, fouilles de 1980, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 7-14. Stalio 1986 B. Stalio, Le site préhistorique Ajmana à Mala
Vrbica, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 27-50. Rankov 1985 J. Rankov, Karatas - Statio Cataractarum Dianae, Arheološki pregled 26, 99-100. Scorpan 1976 C. Scorpan, Origini si linii evolutive in ceramica romano-bizantina (sec. IV-VII) din arrie mediteraniana si Pontie, Pontica IX, 155-185. Rankov1987
J. Rankov, Statio Cataractarum Diana: rapport des fouilles de 1982, Cahiers des Portes de Fer IV, 5-36. Султов 1962 Б. Султов, Един занаятчийски център в Долна Мизия, Археология 4/1962, 30-34. Райков 1988 J. Райков, Idimum - касноантичке терме (ископавања 1960-1962), Зборник Народної музеја ХІІІ-1,
111-125. Sultov 1979 В. Sultov, Centres antiques de poteries en Mésie Inférieure, Rei Cretariae Romanae
Fautorum Acta XIX-XX, 103-110. Rigoir 1968 J. Rigoir, Les sigillées paléochrétiennes grises et orangées, Gallia XXVI, 177-244. Swan 1984 V. G. Swan, The Pottery Kilns of Roman Britain, Royal Commission on Historical Monuments Supplementary Series 5, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office: London. Riley 1979 J. A. Riley, The Coarse Pottery from Berenice, in Excavations at Sidi Khrebish, Benghazi (Berenice) II (J. A. Lloyd ed.), Libya Antiqua Supplementum V.2, Tripoli, 91-467. Tejral 1985 J. Tejral, Spätrömische und völkerwanderungszeitliche Drehscheibenkeramik in Mähren, Archaeologia Austriaca 69, 105-145. Roth-Rubi 1979 K. Roth-Rubi, Untersuchungen an Krügen in Avenches, Rei Cretaria Romanae Fautores Acta Supplementa З, Augst, Kaiseraugst. Томовић 1984 M. Томовић, Текија, керамика ca утврђења, Старшар XXXIII-XXXIV (1982/83), 345-353. Ружић 1995 М. Ружић, Случајни налази касноантичког периода са локалитета Кљанц - Мајданпек, Гласник Српскої археолошкої друштеа 10, 139-150. Tomovič 1986 M. Tomovič, Mihajlovac “Blato” - une forteresse de la basse antiquité, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 401-431.
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА Trbuhović 1986 L. Trbuhović, Kurvingrad - compte-rendu des fouilles, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 59-70. Uenze1992 S. Uenze, Die spätantiken Befestigungen von Sadovec (Bulgarien). Ergebnisse der deutsch-bulgarisch österreichischen Ausgrabungen 1934-1937, Münchener Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte 43, Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege: München. Ferjančič 2013 S. Ferjančič, History of Roman Provinces in the territory of Modern Day Serbia in the Time of Tetrarchy and the Second Flavians (AD 284-363), in Constantine the Great and the Edict of Milan 313: the Birth of Christianity in the Roman Provinces on the Soil of Serbia (I. Popovič, В. Borić-Brešković eds.), National Museum in Belgrade: Belgrade 2013, 26-35. Friesinger, Kerchler 1981 H. Friesinger, H. Kerchler, Töpferöfen der Völkerwanderungszeit in Niederösterreich. Einn Beitrag zur völkerwanderungszeitlichen Keramik (2. Hälfte 4. - 6. Jahrhundert) in Niederösterreich, Oberösterreich und dem Burgenland, Archaeologia Austriaca 65, 193-266. Hayes 1972 J. W. Hayes, Late Roman Pottery, The British School at Rome: London. 187 Цвјетићанин 1988a Т. Цвјетићанин, Касноантичка и рановизантијска керамика ca градина из околине Чачка, Зборник радова Народної музеја XVIII (Чачак), 121-130. Cyjetićanin 1995 T. Cvjetičanin, Late Roman Glazed Pottery from Iron Gate Region (Dacia Ripensis), Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautorum Acta 34 / Alba Regia XXV, 27-32. Cyjetićanin 1996 T. Cvjetičanin, Some observations about Pottery Evidence from Diana, in Roman Limes on the Middle and Lower Danube (P. Petrovič
ed.), Cahiers des Portes de Fer, Monographies 2, Archaeological Institute: Belgrade, 93-99. Cyjetićanin 2000 T. Cvjetičanin, Grnčarska radionica u Singidunumu (lokalitet Narodno pozorište), in Singidunum 2 (M. Popovič ed.), Arheološki institut: Beograd, 245-254. Цвјетићанин 2001 T. Цвјетићанин, Глеђосана керамика Горѣе Мезије, Археолошке монографије 12, Народни музеј: Београд 2001. Cyjetićanin 2005 T. Cvjetičanin, An Interpretation of the Finds from the Tumulus and catalogue. Graves from tumulus (object C), in Sarkamén (Eastern Serbia): A Tetrarchie Imperial Palace. The Memorial Complex (I. Popovič ed.), Archaeological Institute: Belgrade, 95-98, 160-172. Hárshegyi, Ottományi 2013 P. Hárshegyi, К. Ottományi, Imported and Local Pottery in Late Roman Pannónia, in Local Economies? Cyjetićanin 2006 T. Cvjetičanin, Late Roman Glazed Pottery. Glazed Pottery Production and Exchange of Inland Regions in Late Antiquity (L. Lavan ed.), Late Antique Archaeology 10, from Moesia Prima, Dacia Ripensis, Dacia Mediterranea and Dardania, Archaeological Monographies 19, Koninklijke Brill NV: Leiden, 471-528. National Museum in Belgrade: Belgrade 2006. Cvijić 1966 J. Cvijić, Balkansko poluostrvo i južnoslovenske zemlje. Osnovi antropogeografije, knj. 1, Zavod za izdavanje udžbenika: Beograd. Cyjetićanin 2010 T. Cvjetičanin, Roman Pottery from Moesia Superior, National Museum in Belgrade: Belgrade 2010. Цвјетићанин 1988 T. Цвјетићанин, Римска керамика из Чачка и околине, Зборник радова Народної музеја XVIII (Чачак), 103-119. Cyjetićanin 2013 T. Cyjetićanin, Personal Piety. Objects of the
Christian Cult in Everyday Life, in Constantine the Great and the Edict of Milan 313: the Birth of Christianity in the Roman Provinces on the Soil of Serbia
188 (I. Popovič, В. Borić-Brešković eds.), National Museum in Belgrade: Belgrade, 206-217. Cermanović-Kuzmanović 1964 A. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, Donje Butorke, Kladovo - antički kastel, Arheološki pregled 6, 52-53. Cermanović-Kuzmanović 1968 A. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, Antički lokaliteti u Tekiji i
njenoj okolini, Arheološki pregled 10, 58-61. Cermanović-Kuzmanović 1969 A. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, Tekija - rimsko-vizantijski kastel i civilno (?) naselje, Arheološki pregled 11, 88-92. Cermanović-Kuzmanović 1970 A. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, Tekija - rimsko-vizantijski kastel i civilno naselje,
Arheološki pregled 12, 50-53. Цермановић-Кузмановић 1979 A. Цермановић-Кузмановић, Римско утврђење код Кладова, Старинар ХХѴІІІ-ХХІХ (1977/78), 127-134. Цермановић-Кузмановић 1984 А. Цермановић-Кузмановић, Текија (Transdierna), нека разматрања, Старинар XXXIII-XXXIV (1982/83), 337-343. Cermanović-
Kuzmanović, Jovanovič 2004 A. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, A. Jovanovič, Tekija, Đerdapske sveske, Monografije 4, Arheološki institut - Narodni muzej u Beogradu: Beograd. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, Stankovič 1984 A. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, S. Stankovič, Borđej. Forteresse de la basse antiquité. Fouilles de
1980, Cahiers des Portes de Fer II, 217-220. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, Stankovič 1986 A. Cermanović-Kuzmanović, S. Stankovič, La forteresse antique Mora Vagei près de Mihajlovac. Fouilles de 1981, Cahiers des Portes de Fer III, 453-466. Цермановић-Кузмановић et al. 1975 A. Цермановић-Кузмановић, 0.
Велимировић-Жижић, Д. Срејовић, Античка Дукѣа - некрополе, Обод: Цетиње. КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ТјЕРДАПА Coello 1996 T.
Coello, Unit Sizes in the Late Roman Army, British Archaeological Reports International Series 645, Tempus Reperatum: Oxford. Conrad 2007 S. Conrad, Die Gefässkeramik, in latrus - Krivina. Spätantike Befestigung und frühmittelalterliche Siedlung an der unteren Donau. Band VI: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1992-2000, Limesforschungen 28, Römisch-germanische Kommission des DAI Verlag Philipp von Zabern: Mainz, 209-264. Cool 2006 H. E. M. Cool, Eating and Drinking in Roman Britain, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Čemač-Ratković 2008 S. Černač-Ratković, Revival of the La Tene Tradition in the Middle Balkans in the 3rd century AD, Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautorum, Acta 40, 191-194. Čerškov 1967 E. Čerškov, Hajdučka Vodenica - Ćetaće, kasnoantički castellum, Arheološki pregled 9, 57-59. Čerškov 1968 E. Čerškov, Hajdučka Vodenica - rimsko i paleovizantijsko utvrđenje, Arheološki pregled 10, 65-67. Špehar 2010 P. Špehar, Materijalna kultura iz ranovizantijskih utvrđenja u Đerdapu, Cahiers des Portes de Fer, Monographies 7, Arheološki institut Narodni muzej: Beograd. Špehar 2012 P. Špehar, The Danubian Limes between Lederata and Aquae During the Migration Period, in The Pontic-Danubian Realm in the Period of the Great Migration (V. Ivaniševič, M. Kazański eds.), Monographies 36/Posebna izdanja, knjiga 51, Centre de recherche d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance - Arheološki institut: Paris ֊ Beograd, 35-56. Wilkes 2005 J. Wilkes, The Roman Danube: An Archaeological Survey, Journal of Roman Studies 95, 124-225.
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ђЕРДАПА 189 LATE ROMAN POTTERY IN THE IRON GATES (Summary) Late Roman pottery in the Iron Gates presents shapes - main pottery types, production and distribution characteristics, appearances and phenomena ֊ of the Late Roman and Early Byzantine pottery in the Iron Gates section of the Dacia Ripensis limes. This synthesis includes pottery evidence from 24 sites out of 30 where the structures from Late Roman and Early Byzantine period have been encountered. It is over 17.000 complete or fragmented typologically indicative vessels. It has been treated as an entirety that makes possible comprehension of diverse pro blems of pottery production and distribution in this border zone also contributing to understanding of various aspects of life on the frontier in the period from the end of 3rd to the end of 6th century. Section of the Dacia Ripensis limes in the Iron Gates (Đerdap) includes the Danube basin in the present-day eastern Serbia, regions of Poreč, Ključ and Krajina from the mouth of the Porečka River to the mouth of the Timok River, i.e. to Radujevac. This region as part of northern border area of the Roman Empire represented a specific zone mainly regarding the function it had within the concept of the Empire defense, function followed by distinct administrative and economic characteristics. Also, as it was the first contact zone, ambitions, influences and elements of new populations and their cultures in the Roman provincial forms are most apparent ֊ from destruc tion, conquering to settling. Besides traditional the mes like army infrastructure
and its characteristics and research of composition and equipment of the troops, there is wide spectrum of possibilities for studying different aspects of life on the frontier but also of the entire province as well. We have tried to establish characteristics of pot tery and changes discernible in its production and distribution during three centuries, from the end of 3rd to the end of 6th century. Those results were used to perceive changes in its use and changes of consu mers and also to establish elements of everyday life. Certain current and common theses in the inter pretation of the Late Roman period are also tested - poverty, decline of purchasing power, change in the population structure, and changes in the ideological sphere, in religion - spreading of Christianity. Pro blem of continuity is the main issue of the research, together with consequences of administrative, mili tary and economic changes on the pottery, demands resulting in the main characteristics of the Late Roman pottery being cheap, simple and mass pro duced commodity. Roman province of Dacia Ripensis was estab lished by reorganization of provinces of Upper and Lower Moesia in the course of new administrative division of the Empire in the end of 3rd century (Fig. 1). New organization of government as well as mili tary and economic changes resulted from an attempt to consolidate the Empire whose instability could have been noticed already from the end of 2nd - be ginning of 3rd century and was prompted by internal as much as external factors. When Aurelian aban doned Dacia in AD 271/274 it
had far-reaching con sequences for this area. The frontier was once again on the right Danube bank and the Iron Gates region
190 became first defensive zone in this part of the Empire once again. That moment marked a new phase in the activities on the limes: in the end of 3rd - begin ning of 4th century former linear fortified border with series of fortifications of diverse shape, size and function had been restored and also new fortifica tions were built, all in the process of strengthening the border zone status once again. Reforms in the period of tetrarchy stabilized the situation in the Empire for rather short period of time. The appe arance of new forces in the lower Danube region in the second half of the 4th century, i.e. great migra tions of the Goths, revealed defensive weakness of the Danube forts, which were destroyed in the final quarter of the 4th century. Restoration of fortifica tions in the end of 4th century along with building of new strongholds was intended to reinforce the frontier but Late Roman Danube limes came to an end with invasion of the Huns in the middle of the 5th century. Reconstruction of the frontier by Jus tinian (527-565) also proved to be unsuccessful be cause of the appearance of new enemies - Avars and Slavs. By the end of 6th - beginning of 7th century fortifications on the Danube frontier were comple tely destroyed and large towns disappeared. Early Byzantine period came to an end and the Slavs took over the leading role in that territory. Different phases of the Late Roman limes of Dacia Ripensis in the Iron Gates (Kondič 1984: 131-161; Vasic, Kondič 1986: 550-558; Petrovič, Vasié 1996: 15-26) are also known on the basis of large-scale
investigations (Kondič J. 2013: 36-59). The studied pottery comes from 24 sites (Fig. 2) ֊ 21 fortresses, forts and watchtowers, one necropolis investigated next to the fortification (that was studied together with finds from fort), two small settlements and one town (see chapter 4). Characteristics of pottery, shapes and way of use were not unchangeable during Late Roman times and diverse characteristics could be distinguished in different periods. As excavations showed, it is pos sible to attribute and group layers and assemblages within large Late Roman horizon to several phases, according to chronologically sensitive material and analogies, setting certain historical events as border markers. The precise stratigraphy allows to link pot КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ђЕРДАПА tery to those time segments within which we are looking for specifics in production and distribution. First is period A dating from the end of 3rd - begin ning of 4th century, from the time when Aurelian abandoned Dacia until establishing restored and re built, reinforced frontier system; period В - 4th cen tury (to the 380s, reign of Constantine and heirs; Valentiniani reinforcement of the limes); period C - end of the 4th - first half of the 5th century, from the Gothic to the Hunnic destruction of limes, with restorations; period D - 6th century, Early Byzantine restoration of limes until Avar and Slavic destruction. The repertoire of Late Roman and Early Byzan tine vessels of the sites in the Iron Gates section of Dacia Ripensis limes was established by typological analysis. From the end of 3rd to
the end of 6th/beginning of 7th centuries 313 types of vessels were identified that were used for preparing (kitchen ware), serving (tableware), storing and transporting (storage pottery) food, and they were classified on the basis of 17.3 56 complete and fragmented vessels. This typology - including 86 bowl types, 1 strainer type, 11 plate types, 31 types of flagons, 31 beaker types, 81 pot types, 38 types of lids, 13 types of pithoi and 24 amphora types is the result of present-day level of investigation and does not represent final repertoire of the Late Roman pottery forms in this area (see chapter 3 and Appendix 1). Further analysis established features of pottery production and distribution, in total and in the dis tinct periods, i.e., production and morphological characteristics, distinct pottery classes as well as the specific types, which are the phenomenon of border zone, possibly connected with military complex. Hence it was possible to compare this region with the neighboring areas along the Danube limes as well as those in the other territorially near provinces. This pottery is simple, practical and cheap, but pic ture of its appearance, frequency and distribution is complex. Period A vessels were recorded at Ušće Porečke Reke, in Tekija, at Diana, necropolis Donje Butorke, Pontes, Rtkovo - Glamija I, Ljubičevac and Mora Vagei. Pottery of this period was also found in Velesnica and at the site Ljubičevac - Obala (Fig. 11). They represent 18.8% of all pottery finds.
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА Quality of vessels of that period is as follows: most vessels were made of clay with admixture of fine-grained sand (72.2%), smaller quantity was made of sandy clay with admixture of quartz and mica (14.6%) and smallest amount was made of clay with admixture of coarse-grained sand and gravel (1.9%). There is 11.2% vessels of fine fabric made of clay with minimum or none non-plastic admixtures. Main characteristic of that period is the appearance of vessels containing quartz and mica, which are numerous at some sites (32.8 % of total ceramics at Pontes, 5.5% at Mora Vagei). Vessels were mostly gray fired and without sur face treatment (51.8%) and there are also many ves sels without surface treatment that are red (6.5%) and reddish-brown or brown fired (7.8%) or made of buff clay (6.6%). Surface treatments are the most diverse in this period: 9.1% vessels are red-fired and red color-coated; 3.4% are glazed; 1.9% vessels are with white slip; and 8.6% are gray-fired with bur nished surface or burnished decoration. Differences at various sites are noticeable only when we consid er characteristic treatments and not typical ones there are at Pontes 12.7% burnished vessels (and 7.2% of them are bluish-gray-fired vessels), at Mora Vagei, 16.25% and at Ljubičevac they were not re corded. At Donje Butorke necropolis, with specific potteiy finds, 54% of evidence are vessels with bur nished surface. Together with coarse gray pottery, gray bur nished and red color-coated typical for this period are stamp-decorated vessels. Functional analysis revealed
that considering to tal number of period A vessels most numerous by far are pots (39.9%), then lids (24.2%), bowls (18.2%), while amphoras (6%) and flagons (4.5%) appear in considerably smaller quantity as well as plates (2.1%), beakers (2.4%) and pithoi (2.3%). Prevalence of kitchen pottery was encountered at almost all sites except at Ljubičevac where amphoras were prevail ing. Difference in the incidence of amphoras was recorded also at Pontes where they were discovered in significantly smaller quantity, as well as at Mora Vagei where they do not appear at all. Donje Butor ke necropolis is absolutely standing out considering its repertoire of vessels. 191 Forty-nine types were dated to the end of 3rd and beginning of 4th century and most abundant is the repertoire of bowls (16) and pots (11). Then fol low beakers (8) and amphoras (7). Influence of the provincial 2nd-3rd century production could be rec ognized in the forms of that period. In period A appear 29 types, which production continued also during the entire 4th century. Most numerous among them are bowls (8), lids (7) and pots (6). Period В is dated to the advanced 4th century, including rather long period of peaceful living until the first big destruction at the beginning of final quarter of the 4th century. That period was clearly stratigraphically identified at Ušće Porečke Reke, Hajdučka Vodenica, Tekija, Sip, Diana, fortification at Donje Butorke, Pontes, Rtkovo ֊ Glamija I Ljubi čevac, Mihajlovac - Blato and Mora Vagei, while certain mixing of this and later material was con firmed at Vajuga. Vessels
from the 4th century also appear at Grabovica as well as in Prahovo (Fig. 11). They represent 26.43% of the material. Technological attributes of this period pottery refer to the characteristics already established at the beginning of the Late Roman times. Largest amount of vessels was made of clay with admixture of fine grained sand (84.3%), while there is much smaller quantity of vessels of sandy fabric with admixture of quartz and mica (9.3%) as well as vessels of very coarse (3.7%), and fine fabric (2.5%). Such incidence of coarse pottery has been recorded at all sites, while vessels containing quartz and mica were recorded in greater quantity at Pontes. Largest quantity of vessels was fired to the shades of gray color and without surface treatment (54.7%) and there is also considerable quantity of reddish-brown or brownfired vessels without surface treatment (15.8%). Pottery fired to the shades of red color and without surface treatment makes 5.2%, while 0.7% vessels are with color-coated surface, 12.5% are glazed and 3.4% vessels are with white slip. Vessels with bur nished surface could be gray (3.6%) or brown-fired (0.4%). Such proportions were encountered at almost all sites. Briefly, along the coarse gray kitchen pot tery glazed ware is the most distinctive feature of the period B.
192 Pots make 42% of period В vessels, lids 20.2%, bowls 19.6%, amphoras 6.2%, plates 5.4%, flagons 4.1%, pithoil.2% and beakers 1%. More extensive use of kitchenware was confirmed at all sites in si milar extent. The difference is noticed at Donje Butorke, Pontes and Mihajlovac where little or none transportation pottery was found in contrast to Ljubičevac and Vajuga where this pottery predomi nates - quantity of amphoras is greatest. These data could be of some help in an attempt to determine additional functions of the limes fortifications. Fifty types are characteristic of period B. Most numerous are bowls (23 types), then pots (10) and flagons (6). Additional forty-nine types, which appear in the 4th century, had been also produced in the first half of the 5th century. Bowls are among them also most numerous (16), then pots (12) and flagons (6) and beakers (6) are following. Period C covers the time between two big de structions of structures on the limes, at the begin ning of last quarter of the 4th century and in the middle of the 5th century, so it is dated to the end of 4th - first half of the 5th century. Although some authors think that archaeological records do not cor roborate those great destructions, sometimes not even the later Hunnic destruction (Vagalinski 2012: 317), they are evident at the Iron Gates sites as well as the changes in the pottery material. That horizon has been distinguished at Pecka Bara, Hajdučka Vo denica, Tekija, Diana, fortification and necropolis at Donje Butorke, Pontes, Rtkovo - Glamija I, Vajuga, Ljubičevac, Mihajlovac ֊
Blato and Mora Vagei (Fig. 11). Vessels of period C make 20.1% of the total material from the limes. Most of the vessels (83%) were made of clay with admixture of fine-grained sand, while vessels of coarse fabric with quartz and mica (10.4%) and vessels of very coarse (4.6%) and fine fabric (1.9%) are much less frequent. The coarse pottery prevails in the material from all sites. Gray-fired vessels with out surface treatment are most frequently encoun tered in the pottery evidence (41.9%) and there is an increase in quantity of reddish-brown or brownfired vessels without surface treatment (25.4%). Vessels fired to the nuances of red color without surface treatment make 10.1% of the material, those КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА red-fired and glazed 13.3% and there are 3.6% of vessels with white slip. Burnished vessels appear fired to the nuances of gray (2.7%) or brown (0.2%) color. There were also recorded vessels made of buff clay - amphoras (2.7%). In brief, distinguished fea tures, along with coarse gray pottery; represent glazed vessels as well as vessels decorated with bur nished netlike ornament. Most frequently used in this period were pots (38.4%), bowls (19%) and lids (15.3%) - kitchen pottery, while transportation and storage pottery is recorded in smaller quantity (amphoras 12.2%% and pithoi 2.4%). There are 6.9% plates, 4.4% flagons and 1.1% cups recorded in this period. The greatest exceptions in the material from certain sites con sidering complete functional picture of the region were definitely noticed in period C. The kitchen pot tery had been mostly
used at Pontes but frequency of amphoras is considerably smaller, while trans portation pottery was not recorded at the site Donje Butorke. Amount of tableware (particularly plates) is significant at Mihajlovac in contrast to Mora Vagei where alongside pots and bowls there were slightly more amphoras, while other vessels were not used so much. Amphoras are still most numer ous at Ljubičevac. Period C is characterized by 39 types of which most numerous are bowls (13), pots (8) and then follows flagons (6) and beakers (5). In this period was also recorded only one typologically indicative strainer. In addition, 12 types appear in period C that are manufactured as well later in the 6th cen tury. Most frequent among them are amphoras (5) and lids (4). In the Late Roman period have also been iden tified 29 types, which appear from the end of 3rd to the mid 5th century, either produced during the whole time or their precise dating is impossible be cause of the small number of specimens. Most numerous of them are pots (14) then lids (4) and flagons (4). Period D includes activities in the Early Byzantine times - the 6th century period. Intermit tent transformation in the pottery industry resulted from social, economic, cultural changes introduced in that period. After many years of desolation and
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА depopulation (?) as the sources describe it, or at least after economic slowdown, inclusion once again of that area in the frontier, defensive zone of the Empire instigated pottery industry of somewhat different type than it was in the Late Roman period. Impulse for development of the pottery industry in that area was the restoration of limes by Justinian. An attempt to regain variability and quality of pottery as it has had at least in the previous times was not realized. The echoes of luxurious production only reach limes, while pottery did not exceed limits of functionality regarding any of its features. This horizon of occupation has been encounte red at most fortifications on the Iron Gates limes. It was clearly distinguished and documented at Haj dučka Vodenica, Tekija, Sip, Diana, Pontes, Milutinovac, Ljubičevac, Ušće Slatinske Reke and Mora Vagei. Pottery from the 6th century has been also recorded at Ušće Porečke Reke, Rtkovo ֊ Glamija I, Vajuga, Grabovica ֊ Brzi Prun, Prahovo, Kovilovgrad, Vidrovgrad, Mokranjske Stene and Raduj evac (Fig. 11). Vessels of this period represent 21.5% of the whole pottery evidence. Pottery of this period was mostly made of clay with admixture of fine-grained sand (84.1%), while vessels of sandy fabric with admixtures of quartz and mica (7.8%), of very coarse (4.8%) and fine fabric (3.2%) were recorded in much smaller quantity. Largest amount of vessels was fired to the shades of reddish-brown and brown color (27.7%) or red color (24%) without surface treatment, but gray-fired vessels are also frequent
(19.6%). Amphoras made of buff clay represent 14.2% of the material. There are 10.8% amphoras fired to the nuances of red color and with surface coated with white slip. The vessels with burnished surface are gray (1.1%) or brown-fired (0.1%), while glazed pottery is redfired (2.3%). In brief, brown kitchen vessels along the amphoras of various fabrics are typical for the period. Most frequent vessel types of that period are amphoras making 50.3% of material; there are 26.9% pots, 10.6% lids, 5% pithoi, 4.9% bowls and plates, while flagons and beakers together make only 2% of the material. Transportation and storage pottery is prevailing except at Pontes where kitchen 193 pottery makes 61.17% and at Mora Vagei where kitchenware makes 77.7%. Only 19 shapes are typical for period D and these are 5 bowls, 4 pots and 3 lids. Certain types cover rather long time span, from the 4th to the 6th century (20 types) or even from the end of 3rd to the 6th century (14). Their production and morpho logical characteristics are either chronologically in conclusive or they appear in small quantity, so their more precise dating was impossible. Most numer ous of those are pots (12), lids (9) and pithoi (7). Second half of the 5th century is not confirmed with certainty in the archaeological layers at the sites in this area. However, it is possible that total evacuation of this section of province was not car ried out and that some fortifications or their parts were still in use but not as military structures or segments of the defensive system. This is suggested by rather small
interventions recorded at Diana (Rankov 1987: 21-22). Pottery material from that period is difficult to distinguish by typological ana lysis but at certain sites, as we already mentioned Late Roman vessels have been recorded in clearly distinguished layers and closed assemblages of the Early Byzantine period. It is possible that in fact they indicate the stages of gradual transition from the Late Roman to the Early Byzantine period or suggest the direction where we should look for transitional shapes of pottery types belonging to this transfor mative period. Shapes of these vessels are simple having clear basic line - conical (T 46, По 6, По 17, По 18, По 22), ellipsoid (3 51, Л 53, Л 59, Л 63, К 20, П 16) or oval (Л 12, Л 40, Л 61, К 24). The rim is slightly obliquely/horizontally averted or of triangu lar shape (square in one instance). Vessel base is flat, broad and stable. They are coarse, gray, gray-brown or brown-fired and without surface treatment. Upper part of some vessels is ribbed. Next step in their evo lution is represented by typical shapes of the Early Byzantine period: 3 66, Л 66, Л 67, По 15 and По 30. Precise analysis also made possible changing of chronological determination of certain sites: vessels typical of the 6thcentury appear among the pottery from Ušće Porečke Reke thus extending period of occupation of that site or some of its sections to the Early Byzantine period and not only to the 4th-5th
194 centuries (Петровић Π. 1984: 285-291). Small amount of pottery from Pecka Bara (Ерцеговић Павловић, Минић 1984: 301-304) suggests that it is possible to date fortification to the end of 4th first half of the 5th century instead to the 3rd/4th centuries. Pottery at Sip includes also vessels from the second half of the 4th century indicating with other finds that fortification was built in the second half of the 4th century and restored but not built in the 6th century (Милошевић 1984: 357-362). In the pottery material from the fortification Rtkovo Glamija I there are vessels typical of period A and they open the possibility that first phase of fortifi cation dates from the end of 3rd - beginning of 4th century and period of intensive occupation was end of 4th ֊ first half of the 5th century when it had been assumed that fortification hadactually been built (Gabričević 1986: 71-91). Also pottery evidence from Vajuga suggests that fortification was built later i.e., in the second half of the 4th century and not in the end of 3rd - beginning of 4th century (Popovič Lj. 1984a: 109-110). Late Roman and Early Byzantine period represent stages in the evolution of Roman Empire, new, but not historically isolated phenomena whose various elements determined also by transformations hap pening in the entire Roman society point to the symptoms of decline and disintegration of that com plex. Destabilization of the Roman administration, sharp polarization in the society, pauperization of rather large segment of population, prosperous cen ters, which are not in the military zones
any more but in better protected areas of the Empire, i.e. in the interior, define also demands of the communities of that time and when pottery production is con cerned those demands are met by producing cheap products for everyday use and of evident function ality. Decline, however, does not concern the quan tity of production, which remains massive but its quality when compared to the early Roman period. Luxurious pottery with its diverse expensive tech niques of manufacture and decoration was not in the range of production in this border region. КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА Satisfying demands of communities in the Late Roman and Early Byzantine period resulted in a new approach in pottery production that could be recognized as transformation of the Early Roman provincial pottery. Late Roman pottery of the Dacia Ripensis limes in the Iron Gates, mainly coarse gray kitchen pottery differs from the pottery encountered in that region in the period from the 1st to the 3rd century (Garašanin et al. 1984: 30-40; Jevremović 1987: 49-70; Bjelajac 1990a; Cvjetićanin 1996: 94-97; Цвјетићанин 2001). Different needs and standards brought about different appearance and treatment of vessels, but there are links with the preceding period. Use and development of already known shapes reveal that general knowledge and experience of predecessors were still being used. In the beginning of the Late Roman period even iden tical concept of manufacture in all aspects was used, so it could be concluded and with reason that there was a continuity of pottery production, i.e. main taining
same pottery tradition in that area. Pottery, particularly in periods A and B, is in forms and in techniques that could be identified as Roman as it is particularly conspicuous in the group of table ware and kitchen pottery also indicating influences of earlier provincial production. The continuity is confirmed also by fine red color-coated pottery, which still existed in the end of 3rd and the begin ning of 4th century as well as the stamped pottery from the same period. That continuity is not notice able only as link between Roman-provincial and Late Roman production and in the transition period, but also during the entire Late Roman period. Also, Early Byzantine production despite being transformed is based on the identical pottery tradition. Conserva tiveness of this craft where technological basis was difficult to change is probably the reason for this continuity but it is related in the first place to the unified ‘Roman’ population, i.e. to the predominance of pottery tradition of one (and the same) bearer. Changes, like gray burnished pottery at the end of 4th - first half of the 5th century, are explained as a result of influence of new populations. Pottery is abundant and it seems that pottery production on the limes in the Late Roman times did not decrease despite possible decline in popula-
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА tion and its impoverishment. The main impression is uniformity, pottery homogeneity, standardization especially in the first phase, which directly follows Late Roman reforms, in periods A and B. Dominant coarse gray kitchen pottery as well as the glazed pottery from the 4th century also contribute to that impression. Nevertheless, within this pottery iden tical in appearance, there is great variety of shapes, distinctions at all sites and forms characteristic only of certain sites and only in the Iron Gates. Lack of parallels for almost one third of types indicates the distinctiveness and individuality of the region. In contrast to the preceding period when part of the pottery, tableware in particular, came from different western provinces of the Empire (Bjelajac 1990a: 9-142; Nikolić-Đorđević 2000: 187-198; Cyjetićanin 2010: 8-9) and another, larger part was from big production centers in Upper Moesia (Bje lajac 1990a: 143-172; Raičković 2007), while only fraction of kitchenware was assumed to have been produced in smaller local potteries (Cyjetićanin 2010: 12-14), Late Roman potteryin the Iron Gates was mostly locally produced. Unfortunately, the ana lyses to confirm these assumptions have not been performed. Local production is indicated also by distribution of types: some of them appear only at distinct sites (for example see pottery from Tekija, Diana, Pontes or Mora Vagei) or within small region showing distinction in the distribution pattern. They indicate pottery source as well as possible distribu tion centers. Rather small
individual workshops in the rural environment appear also in the neighboring areas (Кленина 2006: 171). This new way of procu rement of pottery products when long distance pot tery trade was significantly reduced was the general characteristic of the Late Roman period (cf. Cool 2006: 229-230). General contrast between the early Roman Empire economy concentrated around cities and the Late Roman period when production be came more decentralized is for the most part also apparent as trend in the pottery production. It is considered that establishing and development of certain industries and also pottery workshops was generally parallel to the development of rural estates (Swan 1984: 19). Workshops confirmed with cer tainty in a wider area of the Lower Danube limes in 195 the Early Roman period were attached to the cities, like Singidunum (Nikolić-Đorđević 2000: 193, 195; Cyjetićanin 2000: 245-254), Viminacium (Bjelajac 1990a: 143-172; Raičković 2007) or Oescus (Кабак чиева 2000: 60). Changes noticed in relations bet ween cities, rural areas and pottery workshops in other provinces where workshops had been mostly situated in the vicinity of cities in the Early Roman time and mostly in the rural areas in the Late Roman period, the so-called ruralization of ceramic industry (Tyers 1996: 29; Hárshegyi, Ottományi 2013: 486) is also likely for this area. Small individual local workshops are indicated also by the recorded kilns: two at Pontes from the second half of the 4th century and the end of 4th century - first half of the 5th century and three at Diana dated to the 4th,
second half of 4th and first half of the 5th centuries. Kiln at Grabovica did not yield any contents, so there was no basis for dating (Paprenica 1986: 363), and some of recorded struc tures, like for example at Ljubičevac (Parović-Pešikan 1984: 138), were not pottery kilns. All the kilns are circular or ellipsoid, semi-sunken and with almost circular chamber, with corbels or one central pede stal, typical of the Late Roman times, i.e. of the 4th century (Swan 1984: Fig. XIV). Indirectly, vessels with accidental traces of glaze (Cyjetićanin 2006: 160-169) as well as tubuli with traces of glaze sug gest local production. Besides Diana and Pontes, we suppose that possible workshops in the 4th-5th cen turies were at Tekija and Mora Vagei, while size and status of Aquae allow an assumption that there was also a workshop. It is possible that besides Aquae the workshop was active as well at Diana in the 6th century (Fig. 13). Besides coarse gray kitchen pottery (Fig. 4) and coarse brown kitchen pottery (Fig. 3), particularly of the 6th century, also glazed pottery, gray burnished pottery, gray pottery of the foederati and at the beginning of Late Roman time also stamped pottery are distinguished as distinct phenomena in the Late Roman period. Late Roman glazed pottery (Figs. 5-6) is a very important group of finds, numerous and widely spread, characteristic of Dacian and Moesian pro vinces but also of the wider area of middle and lower
196 Danube basin (Cvjetićanin 2006: 177-180; Hárshe gyi, Ottományi 2013: 489-499). Extensive studies re veal that it appears at no less than 481 sites through out the Empire (Cvjetićanin 2006: 265-270), and recent investigations even enlarged that list (Mag rini, Sbarra 2009; Magrini, Sbarra 2010). It has been recorded at 17 sites in the area of the Iron Gates limes in the Late Roman times. It appears from the end of 3rd century (П 7, 3 1), it is abundant in the 4th century possibly also standardized (3 68), with noticed individualities by the end of 4th and in the first half of the 5th century. Production was spo radic and very small in the northern frontier zone in the Early Byzantine times, that is, in the 6th cen tury. Investigations of this phenomenon within wider territory, which included information about finds in the Iron Gates section of the limes, indicate its connection to the army, i.e. the units stationed in the border zones as main consumers of the glazed pottery (Cvjetićanin 2006). Gray burnished pottery is another character istic phenomenon of the Late Roman period. Gray burnished pottery from the end of 3rd - beginning of the 4th century (Fig. 7) could be considered along side glazed vessels as luxurious pottery at the begin ning of the Late Roman period, in fact as the answer to the demands and new tastes of consumers in an attempt to compensate for the lack of metal and luxurious pottery vessels. Some authors think that it was renewal of Roman tradition (Ottomanyi 1996: 113, 120; Hárshegyi, Ottományi 2013: 500) or fash ion, which had been
introduced by East Germanic groups and the Sarmatians (Grünewald 1977: 165-169; Vagalinski 2002: 83). We think that it was the result of further evolution of Roman pottery tradition with possible impact of the so-called bar barian pottery traditions, which influenced the ap pearance of burnished linear motifs. Barbarian pot tery tradition was not copied but elements of pottery unfamiliar to Rome were used as stimulus for cre ating new class of pottery from the end of 3rd cen tury. But it is still in fact Roman pottery, new class coming into fashion and similar to other classes of gray pottery from the same period, numerous also in the neighboring regions (cf. Vagalinski 2002: 77; Кабакчиева 2005: 92-96; Hárshegyi, Ottományi КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ђЕРДАПА 2013: 501-502), spread also in the areas where no direct influences of the Goths or the Sarmatians were recorded (cf. Райков 1988: 111-125; Цвјетићанин 1988:117; Popovič S. 1989: 34; Vasić, Petkovič 2010: 9-25; Јеремић, Гојгић 2012: 50-71), and often along important communication like in the neighboring regions (Vagalinski 2002: 77). In contrast to the above-mentioned pottery, gray burnished ware from the end of 4th - first half of the 5th century (Figs. 8, 12) that was encountered in new shapes at 10 sites, shows the influences of non-Roman pottery tradition. It is mainly associated with foederati and pottery of the barbarian tribes in the border zones of the Empire (Conrad 2007: 236), although it is possible that everybody had been using it including army units with ‘barbaric’ elements, civilian population and groups
of the foederati (Poulter 2013: 37; Hárshegyi, Ottományi 2013: 507). It is the symbiosis of Roman and barbarian pottery (Nikolić-Đorđević 2000: 203; Hárshegyi, Ottományi 2013: 507), modified regarding the first group and with intensive Gothic influence and cha racteristics of the Chernyakhov culture (Бугарски, Иванишевич 2012: 491). We think that distribu tion and frequency at certain sites could be of some help also in identification of presence of newly set tled barbarian tribes or individuals. Burnished pottery of the foederati and glazed pottery appear together at nine out of ten sites, ex cept at Radujevac. That could speak in favor of the thesis that army (both limitanei and foederati) was the main consumer of both ceramic classes and that local workshops produced both classes of pottery although it is assumed for certain sites, e.g. Castra Martis, that foederati produced that pottery for themselves (Кабакчиева 2005: 102). It has been established that on certain occasions in Pannónia in the first half of the 5th century, both groups were fired in the same kilns, probably for the same cus tomers (Ottományi 1989: 540; Ottományi, Sosztarits 1998: 179, 181). Illustration of the connection between glazed pottery and foederati but also an example that lack ing of burnished foederati pottery does not mean the absence of the Eastern Germans are finds from sporadic burials from the end of 4th and first half
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА (beginning) of the 5th century at Pontes and Vajuga (Ivaniševič, Kazański 2014: 133, Fig. 2, 3), where glazed pottery was encountered together with typi cal East Germanic finds. Once again it seems that army, both limitanei and foederati, was the main consumer of both ceramic classes. Stamped pottery represents distinct group re corded on the limes mostly in layers from the be ginning of the Late Roman times (Figs. 9-10) and not in great quantity, while vessels with stamped ornament appear also in the 6th century. Stamped pottery from the end of 3rd and beginning of 4th century was recorded in forms, which are the variant of terra sigillata Drag. 37 type. There are also sim ple ellipsoid bowls with obliquely averted rim, deep bowls of composite shape and urns, frequent in the production of the 2nd and 3rd centuries. That pot tery is decorated using limited number of motifs. It is considered to be restoration of the technique known in the Early Roman pottery production, i.e. adaptation of previous tradition by local potters in order to substitute considerably reduced import of terra sigillata in that period (Бјелајац 1992: 424; Nikolič-Đordevic 2000: 200-202). It is difficult to assume in which workshops stamped pottery was produced as Late Roman pottery workshops are still not sufficiently known and they are also inade quately investigated (Бјелајац 1992: 419). Local production includes stamp-decorated pot tery characteristic of the 5th-6th centuries (БугарСКИ, Иванишевич 2012: Рис. 14), that is similar by its ornamental technique but it
does not originate from the same pottery tradition as stamped pottery from the beginning of the Late Roman period. It has been recorded at Diana (П 12) and Tekija (Špehar 2012: Fig. 47). Brown-fired vessels, mainly beakers, mostly decorated with stamped ornament covering the entire surface are related to the barbarian cera mic circle. It is a widespread opinion that this is the Gepidean pottery (Ivaniševič et al. 2006: 49, T. 26.19), while new investigations connect it to the Heruli (Бугарски, Иванишевич 2012: 494-495). Pottery analysis did not reveal distinct ornamen tal techniques and styles characteristic of only some sites but only certain forms, which appear at one site or within the micro-region. Differences in fre 197 quency of functionally diverse groups and variations in the repertoire of pottery were identified, reason ably more affluent if the pottery evidence was more abundant. We think that uniformity was the result of the sites functions - all of them except necropo lis at Donje Butorke and three settlements, were segments of the fortified frontier where army had predominant role. Exchange was taking place within this military zone, between garrisons from various fortifications as well as between the army and civilian population, merchants and craftsmen, and it was serving the army needs particularly as it seems in periods A and В and especially when glazed pottery is concerned. Individuality of production and dif ferences had to do with the taste of consumers. Changes in the army structure and new disposi tion of army units in the end of 3rdcentury
continued throughout the entire Late Roman period (Ferjan čič 2013: 29). Newly established stationary troops (limitanei) were deployed along the border and they consisted of traditional allae, cohortes, as well as numeri, but there were also new formations - cunei, équités, milites, auxilia, exploratores that are gener ally classified as ripenses (Coello 1996: 16; Mirkovič 2003: 45), under the supreme command of dux re sponsible for the entire province. Number of soldiers in those units is generally considered to have been smaller than in the early Roman period (Coello 1996: 55; Pop Lazič 2013: 66). Still, certain calculations indicate that army in the Dacia Ripensis in the 6th century consisted of 11.500 men (Špehar 2010:148). Supplying provisions for the army was to some extent centralized through annonae, bureaucratic system of the Late Roman times, but individual sup plying played important part. Soldiers were, in a spe cific way, also soldiers-peasants - armed peasants (Junkelmann 1997: 85; Poulter 2013: 44). Finds from the fortifications on the Iron Gates limes dating from the 6th century indicate advanced agriculture probably as most important activity alongside stock breeding and various crafts (Špehar 2010: 149). Trade of the local character was developed. Good communication network within that region made possible continuity and intensity of trade. Road along the riverbank connected all fortifications, while distinct branch of that road was running from Ušće
198 Porečke Reke via Miroč (Gerulatis) to Egeta. Another branch was running along the Porečka river via Štubik to Aquae, or along another track via Rimski Grad to Vidrovgrad and then to Aquae. In addition, main communication was the Danube and probably rivers Porečka and Timok were also partially navi gable. The very structure of limes as linear defen sive complex, which required permanent communi cation and contacts probably facilitated circulation of goods, in this case pottery. Local shortages and deficits were compensated by import, apart from short period at the end of the 3rd and the beginning of 4th century when trade in was very small and local amphoras were prevailing. Amphoras on the Iron Gates limes indicate con tinuous supplying mostly with olive oil and wine from the Pontic, i.e. Black Sea, East Mediterranean and North African regions from the 4th century on ward, while garum from the North African region appears not before the 5th century and particularly in the 6th century. Supplying with olive oil was part of annonae militaris, the tax, which was primarily in wheat but also in olive oil and to a smaller extent in wine and fruit. Procurement as well as redistri bution within the region was organized under cen tral army control. We could not establish precisely functions of distinct fortifications within the sys tem but we assume that in the Late Roman period distribution centers were at Ušće Porečke Reke, tra ding posts at Diana, Vajuga, Ljubičevac, Egeta (?) and Aquae (where piers had important role), while market places probably existed in the
-vicinity of all larger fortifications. Trading posts in the Early Byzan tine period were at Hajdučka Vodenica, Diana, Va juga, Ljubičevac, Egeta (?) and Aquae. Production and distribution network organized in such a way made possible each workshop and trading post to provide for few nearby forts (Fig. 13). Commercial relations of this area in the Late Roman and Early Byzantine period established on the basis of transportation pottery of foreign origin were connected to the eastern parts of the Empire. Flow of goods after intensive import from Italy and later Gaul and Germany (from the 1st to the mid 3rd centuries) changed its direction and Black Sea, Asia Minor and Aegean regions took over the primacy КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ЂЕРДАПА and also North African region in the 6th century. Danube was certainly main transportation route via the western Black Sea ports, either the goods were arriving from the southeast or the northeast. Also, land routes from the east via Naissus and road break ing off toward the Iron Gates limes played some but probably considerably smaller part in the exchange. In contrast to the Early Roman period when there was a lively market of ceramic goods, pottery by itself in the Iron Gates was rarely exclusive objects of long distance trade in the Late Roman and Early Byzantine time because of the impoverishment of rather large segment of population. Within abun dant evidence we distinguished only few examples of imported vessels originating from the North African workshops (T 10, T 11, 3 38?). Those few fragments made possible establishing relations
between those regions but character of the contact is difficult to identify. Small quantity of those ves sels suggests that they were not objects of intensive exchange. Mortarium with stamp on the rim (3 6) could also bear witness to the contacts with East as well as to the foreign craftsmen active in the local workshops but it could not be confirmed without analysis of the chemical composition. We think that large quantity of kitchen pottery and considerably less frequent tableware, besides being partial indication of economic status of the users, tell us about changing habits in serving food, not about changes in preparation and cooking. Smal ler quantity of table pottery, which in the Early Roman period composed individual serving sets (beaker, small bowl, bowl/dish) reveals that it was customary in that time to dine together, while it once was common characteristic only of the rural areas (Cool 2006: 54). Changes in the style of serv ing food appear also in other regions in the Late Roman period (Cool 2006: 234). In period C alongside kitchen pottery, particu larly pots, larger quantity of storage pottery appears as well. This possibly speaks about different struc ture of population within the fortifications, about families settling there (Pop-Lazić 2013: 66), i.e. about civilian occupation of the forts. It is certain that civilian population lived in fortifications along side soldiers in the 6th century (Špehar 2010: 148).
КАСНОРИМСКА КЕРАМИКА ђЕРДАПА Pottery evidence from the limes in Dacia Ripensis reveals general similarity to the neighboring border zones. It is reflected in all characteristics of the pottery production, dominance of coarse gray kitchen pottery, as in the phenomena -like glazed, gray burnished, gray burnished foederati ware, but also in the direct morphological parallels (cf. Póczy 1957:29-139; Ottományi 1989: 492-570; Hárshegyi, Ottományi 2013: 471-528; Böttger 1982: 33-148; Nikolić-Đorđević 2000: 11-244; Кленина 2006; Кузманов 2005: 128-180; Conrad 2007:209-264; Кузманов, Грудев 2013: 337-388). At the same time, the encountered differences relate in fact to the kitchen pottery and segment of local tableware, its forms and raw materials used. These differences are under standable: the pottery was mostly local product. We do not speak her about highly advanced manufac tures with mass production that supply large terri tories, which have disappeared at the beginning of the Late Roman period. Pottery was produced in smaller local workshops and production was the result of potters’ skills as well as identification of local needs and means of consumers, obviously of similar status. Differences could be also noticed between assem blages from the limes and the sites in the interior (Цвјетићанин 1988: 103-119; Цвјетићанин 1988a: 121-130; Bjelajac 1990a: 161-190; Popovié M. 1999: 73-138; Milinković 2002: 71-133; Popovié M., Bikić 2009: 35-95; Јеремић, Гојгић 2012: 50-71; Радиновић 2012: 105-133). They are particularly conspicuous from the second half of the 4th century with
further ruralization of pottery craft and incre asing number of individual workshops. Of course, it does not concern transportation pottery, which is not so frequent in the interior, as those sites were not an integral part of organized supplying system. Something that also distinguishes the Iron Gates is the minimal number of Mediterranean fine pot tery, terra sigillata as well as red color-coated pottery. It seems that they reached Moesia Secunda in some what larger quantity (cf. Conrad 2007: 223-232; Кабакчиева 2013: 389-434; Кузманов, Грудев 2013: 338, 363, T. 1.1-3) and their appearance more up stream was not the part of established trade route. 199 Of course, it should be taken into account that actu al scope of trade and one evident in archaeological records are in delicate relationship. Sites in the in terior are closer to the Mediterranean influences as it is conspicuous in the appearance of luxurious Mediterranean pottery (Popovié M. 1999: 107; Po povié M., Bikić 2009: 72-73; Bikić, Ivaniševič 2012: 42-43; Радиновић 2012: 107-108), and in some instances also pottery of Macedonian provenance (Радиновић 2012: 105-133). The new aesthetics and transformation in the religious climate of the Late Roman period are not discernible in the Iron Gates pottery. As we already said characteristic African sigillata with Christian symbols encountered in the neighboring areas (Böt tger 1982: T.35. 196, Opriş2003: 147-149; Ончевска Тодоровска 2010: 92-99), has not been recorded. Representations having Christian meaning were not recorded in kitchen, table and storage pottery
and only one find of cross-like stamp on the pithos rim Пи 66, could rather be explained as workshop mark and not Christian symbol (cf. Ончевска Тодоровска 2010: pithos with cross-like stamp T. 39.1). * * * Late Roman and Early Byzantine pottery in the Iron Gates section of Dacia Ripensis is the entirety, which supplements complex picture of the limes pottery but also of the Late Roman pottery in gen eral. Investigations of Late Roman pottery from the Iron Gates section of Dacia Ripensis have identified types of vessels, frequency of forms and functional groups, more precise chronologies, characteristic pottery classes, distinctions of certain sites as well as complete picture of pottery in this region. How ever, production details, workshops, organization of production and distribution remain the questions requiring further investigations, which might help in understanding complex picture of pottery pro duction and distribution on the limes. Within that picture the army, limitanei and foederati alike, have important place, which from the aspect of produc tion and distribution of pottery also requires fur ther investigations. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Cvjetićanin, Tatjana 1963- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1072548429 |
| author_facet | Cvjetićanin, Tatjana 1963- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Cvjetićanin, Tatjana 1963- |
| author_variant | t c tc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044659646 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)992119094 (DE-599)BSZ48279433X |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044659646</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200102</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171130s2016 xx a||| |||| 00||| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788672691672</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-7269-167-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)992119094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ48279433X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ALT</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">880-01</subfield><subfield code="a">Cvjetićanin, Tatjana</subfield><subfield code="d">1963-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1072548429</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">880-02</subfield><subfield code="a">Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa</subfield><subfield code="c">Tatjana Cvjetićanin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Late Roman pottery in the Iron Gates</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">880-03</subfield><subfield code="a">Beograd</subfield><subfield code="b">Narodni muzej</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">214 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield><subfield code="c">28 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">880-04</subfield><subfield code="a">Arheološke monografije</subfield><subfield code="v">24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverzeichnis Seite 177-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text serbisch. - Englische Zusammenfassung: Late Roman pottery in the Iron Gates</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Kyrillisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Keramikgefäß</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136239-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Römerzeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076769-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Funde</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071507-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Eisernes Tor, Donau</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4092445-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Eisernes Tor, Donau</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4092445-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Keramikgefäß</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136239-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Funde</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071507-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Römerzeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076769-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Arheološke monografije</subfield><subfield code="v">24</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021635004</subfield><subfield code="9">24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">100-01/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Цвјетићанин, Татјана</subfield><subfield code="a">ut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">245-02/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Касноримска керамика Ђердапа</subfield><subfield code="c">Татјана Цвјетићанин</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">264-03/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Београд</subfield><subfield code="b">Народни музей</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">490-04/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Археолошке монографије</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">sla</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">gbd_JL_Z1612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">307.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09015</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">930.1</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030057166</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Eisernes Tor, Donau (DE-588)4092445-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Eisernes Tor, Donau |
| id | DE-604.BV044659646 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-03-16T15:00:42Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788672691672 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030057166 |
| oclc_num | 992119094 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 214 Seiten Illustrationen 28 cm |
| psigel | gbd_JL_Z1612 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Narodni muzej |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Arheološke monografije |
| series2 | Arheološke monografije |
| spelling | 880-01 Cvjetićanin, Tatjana 1963- Verfasser (DE-588)1072548429 aut 880-02 Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa Tatjana Cvjetićanin Late Roman pottery in the Iron Gates 880-03 Beograd Narodni muzej 2016 214 Seiten Illustrationen 28 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier 880-04 Arheološke monografije 24 Literaturverzeichnis Seite 177-188 Text serbisch. - Englische Zusammenfassung: Late Roman pottery in the Iron Gates Kyrillisch Keramikgefäß (DE-588)4136239-1 gnd rswk-swf Römerzeit (DE-588)4076769-3 gnd rswk-swf Funde (DE-588)4071507-3 gnd rswk-swf Eisernes Tor, Donau (DE-588)4092445-2 gnd rswk-swf Eisernes Tor, Donau (DE-588)4092445-2 g Keramikgefäß (DE-588)4136239-1 s Funde (DE-588)4071507-3 s Römerzeit (DE-588)4076769-3 s DE-604 Arheološke monografije 24 (DE-604)BV021635004 24 Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract 100-01/(N Цвјетићанин, Татјана ut 245-02/(N Касноримска керамика Ђердапа Татјана Цвјетићанин 264-03/(N Београд Народни музей 2016 490-04/(N Археолошке монографије |
| spellingShingle | Cvjetićanin, Tatjana 1963- Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa Arheološke monografije Keramikgefäß (DE-588)4136239-1 gnd Römerzeit (DE-588)4076769-3 gnd Funde (DE-588)4071507-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4136239-1 (DE-588)4076769-3 (DE-588)4071507-3 (DE-588)4092445-2 |
| title | Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa |
| title_alt | Late Roman pottery in the Iron Gates |
| title_auth | Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa |
| title_exact_search | Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa |
| title_full | Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa Tatjana Cvjetićanin |
| title_fullStr | Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa Tatjana Cvjetićanin |
| title_full_unstemmed | Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa Tatjana Cvjetićanin |
| title_short | Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa |
| title_sort | kasnorimska keramika derdapa |
| topic | Keramikgefäß (DE-588)4136239-1 gnd Römerzeit (DE-588)4076769-3 gnd Funde (DE-588)4071507-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Keramikgefäß Römerzeit Funde Eisernes Tor, Donau |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030057166&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021635004 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cvjeticanintatjana kasnorimskakeramikađerdapa AT cvjeticanintatjana lateromanpotteryintheirongates |