Fundamentals of neuroscience and the law :: square peg, round hole /

What does neuroscience tell us about voluntary movement? Why is the definition of ""volition"" so different from that of the legal definition of ""intent""? Why are courts dismissing medically accepted mental health diagnoses? How can we draft better laws that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Beecher-Monas, Erica (VerfasserIn), Garcia-Rill, Edgar (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Newcastle upon Tyne, England : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, [2020]
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Zusammenfassung:What does neuroscience tell us about voluntary movement? Why is the definition of ""volition"" so different from that of the legal definition of ""intent""? Why are courts dismissing medically accepted mental health diagnoses? How can we draft better laws that are more scientifically based? What can recent advances in neuroscience tell us about the way we apply the law? This volume provides groundbreaking insights into the areas of scientific evidence and the intersection of neuroscience and law, and is the product of a collaboration by two experts in their respective fields. It is a primer fo.
Beschreibung:1 online resource (415 pages)
ISBN:9781527543942
1527543943

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Volltext öffnen