The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action /
"Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention fo...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Körperschaft: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
East Lansing :
Michigan State University Press,
2018.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they sifted through arguments surrounding affirmative action policies to settle on diversity as affirmative action's best constitutional justification. Here M. Kelly Carr explores the goals, constraints, and argumentative tools of the various parties as they utilized the linguistic resources available to them, including arguments about race, merit, and the role of the public university in civic life. Using public address texts, legal briefs, memoranda, and draft opinions, Carr looks at how public arguments informed the amicus briefs, chambers memos, and legal principles before concluding that Powell's pragmatic decision making fused the principle of individualism with an appreciation of multiculturalism to accommodate his colleagues' differing opinions. She argues that Bakke is thus a legal and rhetorical milestone that helped to shift the justificatory grounds of race-conscious policy away from a recognition of historical discrimination and its call for reparative equality, and toward an appreciation of racial diversity." -- Publisher's website. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (pages cm.) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9781609175641 1609175646 9781628953312 1628953314 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-on1028954362 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr |||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 170530s2018 miu o 000 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | |z 2017025951 | ||
| 040 | |a P@U |b eng |c P@U |d YDX |d EBLCP |d OCLCF |d OCLCO |d IDB |d MERUC |d JSTOR |d RCJ |d OCLCA |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d UKAHL |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 1029208537 |a 1029244612 |a 1029321989 |a 1029448261 |a 1029495954 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781609175641 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1609175646 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781628953312 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1628953314 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781611862843 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781628963311 (kindle) | ||
| 020 | |z 1611862841 | ||
| 020 | |z 162896331X (kindle) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1028954362 |z (OCoLC)1029208537 |z (OCoLC)1029244612 |z (OCoLC)1029321989 |z (OCoLC)1029448261 |z (OCoLC)1029495954 | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/ctt21m32fg |b JSTOR | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | |a KF8748 |b .C26 2018 |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 013000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAN |x 015000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAN |x 000000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 347.73/26 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Carr, M. Kelly, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity |h [electronic resource] : |b Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / |c M. Kelly Carr. |
| 260 | |a East Lansing : |b Michigan State University Press, |c 2018. |e (Baltimore, Md. : |f Project MUSE, |g 2015) | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (pages cm.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Rhetoric and public affairs series | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on print version record. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Intro; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. Collaborative Rhetorical Inventionin Supreme Court Opinions; 2. Amicus Briefs as Argumentative Scene in Bakke; 3. The Intrachambers Inventional Process and the Pragmatic Roots of Diversity; 4. Prudential Supreme Court Opinion Writing; 5. The Rhetorical Supreme Court and the Legacy of Diversity; Notes; Index | |
| 520 | |a "Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they sifted through arguments surrounding affirmative action policies to settle on diversity as affirmative action's best constitutional justification. Here M. Kelly Carr explores the goals, constraints, and argumentative tools of the various parties as they utilized the linguistic resources available to them, including arguments about race, merit, and the role of the public university in civic life. Using public address texts, legal briefs, memoranda, and draft opinions, Carr looks at how public arguments informed the amicus briefs, chambers memos, and legal principles before concluding that Powell's pragmatic decision making fused the principle of individualism with an appreciation of multiculturalism to accommodate his colleagues' differing opinions. She argues that Bakke is thus a legal and rhetorical milestone that helped to shift the justificatory grounds of race-conscious policy away from a recognition of historical discrimination and its call for reparative equality, and toward an appreciation of racial diversity." -- Publisher's website. | ||
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 |
| 610 | 1 | 6 | |a États-Unis. |b Supreme Court. |
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court |2 fast |
| 650 | 0 | |a Judicial process |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Judicial opinions |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Rhetoric |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Law |z United States |x Language. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Processus judiciaire |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Jugements |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Rhétorique |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droit |z États-Unis |x Langage. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Civil Rights |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial opinions |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial process |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Law |x Language |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rhetoric |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Project Muse. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9781611862843 |z 1611862841 |z 9781628953312 |z 1628953314 |z 9781628963311 |z 162896331X |w (DLC) 2017025951 |w (OCoLC)988900596 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Book collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2154029 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH39852397 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 300584783 | ||
| 938 | |a Project MUSE |b MUSE |n muse67465 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 15224829 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL5321191 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 2154029 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-on1028954362 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882415983919104 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Carr, M. Kelly |
| author_corporate | Project Muse |
| author_corporate_role | |
| author_facet | Carr, M. Kelly Project Muse |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Carr, M. Kelly |
| author_variant | m k c mk mkc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF8748 |
| callnumber-raw | KF8748 .C26 2018 |
| callnumber-search | KF8748 .C26 2018 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 48748 C26 42018 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Intro; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. Collaborative Rhetorical Inventionin Supreme Court Opinions; 2. Amicus Briefs as Argumentative Scene in Bakke; 3. The Intrachambers Inventional Process and the Pragmatic Roots of Diversity; 4. Prudential Supreme Court Opinion Writing; 5. The Rhetorical Supreme Court and the Legacy of Diversity; Notes; Index |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1028954362 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 226 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05204cam a2200817Ma 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-on1028954362</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||nn|n</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170530s2018 miu o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 2017025951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P@U</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="c">P@U</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">IDB</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">JSTOR</subfield><subfield code="d">RCJ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1029208537</subfield><subfield code="a">1029244612</subfield><subfield code="a">1029321989</subfield><subfield code="a">1029448261</subfield><subfield code="a">1029495954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781609175641</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1609175646</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781628953312</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1628953314</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781611862843 (pbk. : alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781628963311 (kindle)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1611862841</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">162896331X (kindle)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1028954362</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1029208537</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1029244612</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1029321989</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1029448261</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1029495954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22573/ctt21m32fg</subfield><subfield code="b">JSTOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF8748</subfield><subfield code="b">.C26 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">013000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAN</subfield><subfield code="x">015000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAN</subfield><subfield code="x">000000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/26</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carr, M. Kelly,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity</subfield><subfield code="h">[electronic resource] :</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action /</subfield><subfield code="c">M. Kelly Carr.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">East Lansing :</subfield><subfield code="b">Michigan State University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield><subfield code="e">(Baltimore, Md. :</subfield><subfield code="f">Project MUSE,</subfield><subfield code="g">2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (pages cm.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rhetoric and public affairs series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. Collaborative Rhetorical Inventionin Supreme Court Opinions; 2. Amicus Briefs as Argumentative Scene in Bakke; 3. The Intrachambers Inventional Process and the Pragmatic Roots of Diversity; 4. Prudential Supreme Court Opinion Writing; 5. The Rhetorical Supreme Court and the Legacy of Diversity; Notes; Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they sifted through arguments surrounding affirmative action policies to settle on diversity as affirmative action's best constitutional justification. Here M. Kelly Carr explores the goals, constraints, and argumentative tools of the various parties as they utilized the linguistic resources available to them, including arguments about race, merit, and the role of the public university in civic life. Using public address texts, legal briefs, memoranda, and draft opinions, Carr looks at how public arguments informed the amicus briefs, chambers memos, and legal principles before concluding that Powell's pragmatic decision making fused the principle of individualism with an appreciation of multiculturalism to accommodate his colleagues' differing opinions. She argues that Bakke is thus a legal and rhetorical milestone that helped to shift the justificatory grounds of race-conscious policy away from a recognition of historical discrimination and its call for reparative equality, and toward an appreciation of racial diversity." -- Publisher's website.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">États-Unis.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial opinions</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Language.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Processus judiciaire</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Jugements</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Rhétorique</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Droit</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="x">Langage.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Civil Rights</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial opinions</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">Language</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Project Muse.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="z">9781611862843</subfield><subfield code="z">1611862841</subfield><subfield code="z">9781628953312</subfield><subfield code="z">1628953314</subfield><subfield code="z">9781628963311</subfield><subfield code="z">162896331X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2017025951</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)988900596</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Book collections on Project MUSE.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2154029</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH39852397</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">300584783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Project MUSE</subfield><subfield code="b">MUSE</subfield><subfield code="n">muse67465</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">15224829</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL5321191</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">2154029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
| geographic_facet | United States |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-on1028954362 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:28:15Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781609175641 1609175646 9781628953312 1628953314 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 1028954362 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (pages cm.) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Michigan State University Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Book collections on Project MUSE. |
| series2 | Rhetoric and public affairs series |
| spelling | Carr, M. Kelly, author. The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity [electronic resource] : Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / M. Kelly Carr. East Lansing : Michigan State University Press, 2018. (Baltimore, Md. : Project MUSE, 2015) 1 online resource (pages cm.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Rhetoric and public affairs series Includes bibliographical references and index. Description based on print version record. Intro; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. Collaborative Rhetorical Inventionin Supreme Court Opinions; 2. Amicus Briefs as Argumentative Scene in Bakke; 3. The Intrachambers Inventional Process and the Pragmatic Roots of Diversity; 4. Prudential Supreme Court Opinion Writing; 5. The Rhetorical Supreme Court and the Legacy of Diversity; Notes; Index "Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they sifted through arguments surrounding affirmative action policies to settle on diversity as affirmative action's best constitutional justification. Here M. Kelly Carr explores the goals, constraints, and argumentative tools of the various parties as they utilized the linguistic resources available to them, including arguments about race, merit, and the role of the public university in civic life. Using public address texts, legal briefs, memoranda, and draft opinions, Carr looks at how public arguments informed the amicus briefs, chambers memos, and legal principles before concluding that Powell's pragmatic decision making fused the principle of individualism with an appreciation of multiculturalism to accommodate his colleagues' differing opinions. She argues that Bakke is thus a legal and rhetorical milestone that helped to shift the justificatory grounds of race-conscious policy away from a recognition of historical discrimination and its call for reparative equality, and toward an appreciation of racial diversity." -- Publisher's website. United States. Supreme Court. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 États-Unis. Supreme Court. United States. Supreme Court fast Judicial process United States. Judicial opinions United States. Rhetoric United States. Law United States Language. Processus judiciaire États-Unis. Jugements États-Unis. Rhétorique États-Unis. Droit États-Unis Langage. LAW / Civil Rights bisacsh Judicial opinions fast Judicial process fast Law Language fast Rhetoric fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq Project Muse. Print version: 9781611862843 1611862841 9781628953312 1628953314 9781628963311 162896331X (DLC) 2017025951 (OCoLC)988900596 Book collections on Project MUSE. FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2154029 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Carr, M. Kelly The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / Book collections on Project MUSE. Intro; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. Collaborative Rhetorical Inventionin Supreme Court Opinions; 2. Amicus Briefs as Argumentative Scene in Bakke; 3. The Intrachambers Inventional Process and the Pragmatic Roots of Diversity; 4. Prudential Supreme Court Opinion Writing; 5. The Rhetorical Supreme Court and the Legacy of Diversity; Notes; Index United States. Supreme Court. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 États-Unis. Supreme Court. United States. Supreme Court fast Judicial process United States. Judicial opinions United States. Rhetoric United States. Law United States Language. Processus judiciaire États-Unis. Jugements États-Unis. Rhétorique États-Unis. Droit États-Unis Langage. LAW / Civil Rights bisacsh Judicial opinions fast Judicial process fast Law Language fast Rhetoric fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 |
| title | The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / |
| title_auth | The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / |
| title_exact_search | The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / |
| title_full | The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity [electronic resource] : Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / M. Kelly Carr. |
| title_fullStr | The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity [electronic resource] : Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / M. Kelly Carr. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity [electronic resource] : Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / M. Kelly Carr. |
| title_short | The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity |
| title_sort | rhetorical invention of diversity supreme court opinions public arguments and affirmative action |
| title_sub | Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action / |
| topic | United States. Supreme Court. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 États-Unis. Supreme Court. United States. Supreme Court fast Judicial process United States. Judicial opinions United States. Rhetoric United States. Law United States Language. Processus judiciaire États-Unis. Jugements États-Unis. Rhétorique États-Unis. Droit États-Unis Langage. LAW / Civil Rights bisacsh Judicial opinions fast Judicial process fast Law Language fast Rhetoric fast |
| topic_facet | United States. Supreme Court. États-Unis. Supreme Court. United States. Supreme Court Judicial process United States. Judicial opinions United States. Rhetoric United States. Law United States Language. Processus judiciaire États-Unis. Jugements États-Unis. Rhétorique États-Unis. Droit États-Unis Langage. LAW / Civil Rights Judicial opinions Judicial process Law Language Rhetoric United States |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2154029 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carrmkelly therhetoricalinventionofdiversitysupremecourtopinionspublicargumentsandaffirmativeaction AT projectmuse therhetoricalinventionofdiversitysupremecourtopinionspublicargumentsandaffirmativeaction AT carrmkelly rhetoricalinventionofdiversitysupremecourtopinionspublicargumentsandaffirmativeaction AT projectmuse rhetoricalinventionofdiversitysupremecourtopinionspublicargumentsandaffirmativeaction |