Quarterly Review of Distance Education.: Volume 18, no. 2 /
Of ANOVA on Team Scores for Task Type3; 7.289; 0.135; 0.939; 80; 54.180; 3; 64.363; 2.122; 0.104; 80; 30.328; 217.276; 3; 72.425; 2.126; 0.103; 80; 34.066; Table 6; Lower Bias Compared to Higher Bias Team Personality by Task; RECOMMENDATIONS; LIMITATIONS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A; Week 1: Team Memo As...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Charlotte, NC :
Information Age Publishing,
2017.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Of ANOVA on Team Scores for Task Type3; 7.289; 0.135; 0.939; 80; 54.180; 3; 64.363; 2.122; 0.104; 80; 30.328; 217.276; 3; 72.425; 2.126; 0.103; 80; 34.066; Table 6; Lower Bias Compared to Higher Bias Team Personality by Task; RECOMMENDATIONS; LIMITATIONS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A; Week 1: Team Memo Assignment; APPENDIX B; Week 5; Marketplace Simulation Student Instructions. |
| Beschreibung: | STATE AUTHORIZATION RECIPROCITY AGREEMENT. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (112 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9781641130929 164113092X |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-on1012881707 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr |n|---||||| | ||
| 008 | 171125s2017 ncu o 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a EBLCP |b eng |e pn |c EBLCP |d OCLCQ |d YDX |d N$T |d IDB |d OCLCO |d N$T |d OCLCF |d EBLCP |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 1012342950 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781641130929 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 164113092X |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 1641130911 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781641130912 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1012881707 |z (OCoLC)1012342950 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a LC5800 |b .Q378 2017eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a EDU |x 041000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 371.35 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Quarterly Review of Distance Education. |n Volume 18, no. 2 / |c editors Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser. |
| 260 | |a Charlotte, NC : |b Information Age Publishing, |c 2017. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (112 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal | |
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Front Cover; Statement of Purpose; Quarterly Review of Distance Education; â#x80;#x9C;Research That Guides Practiceâ#x80;#x9D;; Volume 18, Number 2, 2017; ARTICLES; Quarterly Review of Distance Education Editors and Editorial Board; Editors; Assistant Editor; Editorial Assistant; Department Editors; International; Ray J. Amirault, Illinois State University Yusra Laila Visser, Illinois State University; Michelle Rogers-Estable, SUNY Delhi; Editorial Board; Global Standards for Enhancing Quality in Online Learning; Florence Martin and Drew Polly; University of North Carolina Charlotte. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Annika Jokiaho and Birgit MayLudwigsburg University of Education; The quality of online courses offered has been a topic of discussion in the recent years, and efforts have been taken to establish standards for developing online courses. In this study, the authors review 12 online learning standard documents and ex ... ; INTRODUCTION; ONLINE LEARNING STANDARDS; Purpose of This Study; 1. What are some of the global standard models that focus on enhancing quality in online learning and how many sections and standards are included in each of these standard models? | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2. What are the common elements (i.e., most and least emphasized, similarities and differences) of global standards related to online learning?METHOD; Data Sources; 1. Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet Based Distance Education; 2. Online Learning Consortium Quality Scorecard, 2005; 3. Blackboard Exemplary Course Rubric, 2000; 4. Quality Matters 2014, 5th Edition; 5. CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002; 6. Open eQuality Learning Standards, 2004; 7. NADEOSA (South Africa) 2005 revision of 1996 document. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 8. ACODE (Australia) 2014 revision of 2007 document9. Asian Association of Open Universities, no date; 10. ECBCheck 2012; 11. UNIQUe 2011; 12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO); Procedure; Data Analysis; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; Table 1; Standard Details; 7; 24; 4; 25; 8; 75; 4; 17; 8; 45; 7; 7; 13; 184; 8; 64; 10; 54; 13; 46; 10; 71; 7; 38; 8.25; 54.16; Table 2; Codes From Standard Analysis; 164; 115; 102; 77; 47; 45; 40; 33; 27; 650; Selection of the 12 Global Standard Documents; Differences in the Documents; Most-Emphasized Standards; Least-Emphasized Standards. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Similarities and DifferencesImplications for Future Research and the Improvement of Practice; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; Designing for Quality; An Analysis of Design and Pedagogical Issues in Online Course Development; Mapopa William Sanga; Southwestern Oklahoma State University; This study investigated the process through which 100 online courses were developed in compliance with a purpose-made rubric designed to bring the courses to a level that would meet requirements of membership in a state authorization reciprocity agre ... ; INTRODUCTION; QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING. | |
| 500 | |a STATE AUTHORIZATION RECIPROCITY AGREEMENT. | ||
| 520 | |a Of ANOVA on Team Scores for Task Type3; 7.289; 0.135; 0.939; 80; 54.180; 3; 64.363; 2.122; 0.104; 80; 30.328; 217.276; 3; 72.425; 2.126; 0.103; 80; 34.066; Table 6; Lower Bias Compared to Higher Bias Team Personality by Task; RECOMMENDATIONS; LIMITATIONS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A; Week 1: Team Memo Assignment; APPENDIX B; Week 5; Marketplace Simulation Student Instructions. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Distance education. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85038507 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Enseignement à distance. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION |x Distance, Open & Online Education. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Distance education |2 fast | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schlosser, Charles. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Simonson, Michael. |t Quarterly Review of Distance Education : Volume 18 #2. |d Charlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing, ©2017 |z 9781641130912 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1632267 |3 Volltext |
| 936 | |a BATCHLOAD | ||
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL5430292 | ||
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL5149539 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1632267 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 14983168 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-on1012881707 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882406871793664 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Schlosser, Charles |
| author2_role | |
| author2_variant | c s cs |
| author_facet | Schlosser, Charles |
| author_sort | Schlosser, Charles |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | L - Education |
| callnumber-label | LC5800 |
| callnumber-raw | LC5800 .Q378 2017eb |
| callnumber-search | LC5800 .Q378 2017eb |
| callnumber-sort | LC 45800 Q378 42017EB |
| callnumber-subject | LC - Social Aspects of Education |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Front Cover; Statement of Purpose; Quarterly Review of Distance Education; â#x80;#x9C;Research That Guides Practiceâ#x80;#x9D;; Volume 18, Number 2, 2017; ARTICLES; Quarterly Review of Distance Education Editors and Editorial Board; Editors; Assistant Editor; Editorial Assistant; Department Editors; International; Ray J. Amirault, Illinois State University Yusra Laila Visser, Illinois State University; Michelle Rogers-Estable, SUNY Delhi; Editorial Board; Global Standards for Enhancing Quality in Online Learning; Florence Martin and Drew Polly; University of North Carolina Charlotte. Annika Jokiaho and Birgit MayLudwigsburg University of Education; The quality of online courses offered has been a topic of discussion in the recent years, and efforts have been taken to establish standards for developing online courses. In this study, the authors review 12 online learning standard documents and ex ... ; INTRODUCTION; ONLINE LEARNING STANDARDS; Purpose of This Study; 1. What are some of the global standard models that focus on enhancing quality in online learning and how many sections and standards are included in each of these standard models? 2. What are the common elements (i.e., most and least emphasized, similarities and differences) of global standards related to online learning?METHOD; Data Sources; 1. Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet Based Distance Education; 2. Online Learning Consortium Quality Scorecard, 2005; 3. Blackboard Exemplary Course Rubric, 2000; 4. Quality Matters 2014, 5th Edition; 5. CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002; 6. Open eQuality Learning Standards, 2004; 7. NADEOSA (South Africa) 2005 revision of 1996 document. 8. ACODE (Australia) 2014 revision of 2007 document9. Asian Association of Open Universities, no date; 10. ECBCheck 2012; 11. UNIQUe 2011; 12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO); Procedure; Data Analysis; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; Table 1; Standard Details; 7; 24; 4; 25; 8; 75; 4; 17; 8; 45; 7; 7; 13; 184; 8; 64; 10; 54; 13; 46; 10; 71; 7; 38; 8.25; 54.16; Table 2; Codes From Standard Analysis; 164; 115; 102; 77; 47; 45; 40; 33; 27; 650; Selection of the 12 Global Standard Documents; Differences in the Documents; Most-Emphasized Standards; Least-Emphasized Standards. Similarities and DifferencesImplications for Future Research and the Improvement of Practice; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; Designing for Quality; An Analysis of Design and Pedagogical Issues in Online Course Development; Mapopa William Sanga; Southwestern Oklahoma State University; This study investigated the process through which 100 online courses were developed in compliance with a purpose-made rubric designed to bring the courses to a level that would meet requirements of membership in a state authorization reciprocity agre ... ; INTRODUCTION; QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1012881707 |
| dewey-full | 371.35 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 371 - Schools and their activities; special education |
| dewey-raw | 371.35 |
| dewey-search | 371.35 |
| dewey-sort | 3371.35 |
| dewey-tens | 370 - Education |
| discipline | Pädagogik |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05450cam a2200577 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-on1012881707</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|---|||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171125s2017 ncu o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">IDB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1012342950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781641130929</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">164113092X</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1641130911</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781641130912</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1012881707</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1012342950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LC5800</subfield><subfield code="b">.Q378 2017eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDU</subfield><subfield code="x">041000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">371.35</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quarterly Review of Distance Education.</subfield><subfield code="n">Volume 18, no. 2 /</subfield><subfield code="c">editors Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charlotte, NC :</subfield><subfield code="b">Information Age Publishing,</subfield><subfield code="c">2017.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (112 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Front Cover; Statement of Purpose; Quarterly Review of Distance Education; â#x80;#x9C;Research That Guides Practiceâ#x80;#x9D;; Volume 18, Number 2, 2017; ARTICLES; Quarterly Review of Distance Education Editors and Editorial Board; Editors; Assistant Editor; Editorial Assistant; Department Editors; International; Ray J. Amirault, Illinois State University Yusra Laila Visser, Illinois State University; Michelle Rogers-Estable, SUNY Delhi; Editorial Board; Global Standards for Enhancing Quality in Online Learning; Florence Martin and Drew Polly; University of North Carolina Charlotte.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Annika Jokiaho and Birgit MayLudwigsburg University of Education; The quality of online courses offered has been a topic of discussion in the recent years, and efforts have been taken to establish standards for developing online courses. In this study, the authors review 12 online learning standard documents and ex ... ; INTRODUCTION; ONLINE LEARNING STANDARDS; Purpose of This Study; 1. What are some of the global standard models that focus on enhancing quality in online learning and how many sections and standards are included in each of these standard models?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2. What are the common elements (i.e., most and least emphasized, similarities and differences) of global standards related to online learning?METHOD; Data Sources; 1. Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet Based Distance Education; 2. Online Learning Consortium Quality Scorecard, 2005; 3. Blackboard Exemplary Course Rubric, 2000; 4. Quality Matters 2014, 5th Edition; 5. CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002; 6. Open eQuality Learning Standards, 2004; 7. NADEOSA (South Africa) 2005 revision of 1996 document.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8. ACODE (Australia) 2014 revision of 2007 document9. Asian Association of Open Universities, no date; 10. ECBCheck 2012; 11. UNIQUe 2011; 12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO); Procedure; Data Analysis; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; Table 1; Standard Details; 7; 24; 4; 25; 8; 75; 4; 17; 8; 45; 7; 7; 13; 184; 8; 64; 10; 54; 13; 46; 10; 71; 7; 38; 8.25; 54.16; Table 2; Codes From Standard Analysis; 164; 115; 102; 77; 47; 45; 40; 33; 27; 650; Selection of the 12 Global Standard Documents; Differences in the Documents; Most-Emphasized Standards; Least-Emphasized Standards.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Similarities and DifferencesImplications for Future Research and the Improvement of Practice; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; Designing for Quality; An Analysis of Design and Pedagogical Issues in Online Course Development; Mapopa William Sanga; Southwestern Oklahoma State University; This study investigated the process through which 100 online courses were developed in compliance with a purpose-made rubric designed to bring the courses to a level that would meet requirements of membership in a state authorization reciprocity agre ... ; INTRODUCTION; QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">STATE AUTHORIZATION RECIPROCITY AGREEMENT.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Of ANOVA on Team Scores for Task Type3; 7.289; 0.135; 0.939; 80; 54.180; 3; 64.363; 2.122; 0.104; 80; 30.328; 217.276; 3; 72.425; 2.126; 0.103; 80; 34.066; Table 6; Lower Bias Compared to Higher Bias Team Personality by Task; RECOMMENDATIONS; LIMITATIONS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A; Week 1: Team Memo Assignment; APPENDIX B; Week 5; Marketplace Simulation Student Instructions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Distance education.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85038507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Enseignement à distance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDUCATION</subfield><subfield code="x">Distance, Open & Online Education.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Distance education</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schlosser, Charles.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Simonson, Michael.</subfield><subfield code="t">Quarterly Review of Distance Education : Volume 18 #2.</subfield><subfield code="d">Charlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing, ©2017</subfield><subfield code="z">9781641130912</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1632267</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BATCHLOAD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL5430292</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL5149539</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1632267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">14983168</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-on1012881707 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:28:07Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781641130929 164113092X |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 1012881707 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (112 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Information Age Publishing, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal. |
| series2 | Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal |
| spelling | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Volume 18, no. 2 / editors Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser. Charlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing, 2017. 1 online resource (112 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal Print version record. Front Cover; Statement of Purpose; Quarterly Review of Distance Education; â#x80;#x9C;Research That Guides Practiceâ#x80;#x9D;; Volume 18, Number 2, 2017; ARTICLES; Quarterly Review of Distance Education Editors and Editorial Board; Editors; Assistant Editor; Editorial Assistant; Department Editors; International; Ray J. Amirault, Illinois State University Yusra Laila Visser, Illinois State University; Michelle Rogers-Estable, SUNY Delhi; Editorial Board; Global Standards for Enhancing Quality in Online Learning; Florence Martin and Drew Polly; University of North Carolina Charlotte. Annika Jokiaho and Birgit MayLudwigsburg University of Education; The quality of online courses offered has been a topic of discussion in the recent years, and efforts have been taken to establish standards for developing online courses. In this study, the authors review 12 online learning standard documents and ex ... ; INTRODUCTION; ONLINE LEARNING STANDARDS; Purpose of This Study; 1. What are some of the global standard models that focus on enhancing quality in online learning and how many sections and standards are included in each of these standard models? 2. What are the common elements (i.e., most and least emphasized, similarities and differences) of global standards related to online learning?METHOD; Data Sources; 1. Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet Based Distance Education; 2. Online Learning Consortium Quality Scorecard, 2005; 3. Blackboard Exemplary Course Rubric, 2000; 4. Quality Matters 2014, 5th Edition; 5. CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002; 6. Open eQuality Learning Standards, 2004; 7. NADEOSA (South Africa) 2005 revision of 1996 document. 8. ACODE (Australia) 2014 revision of 2007 document9. Asian Association of Open Universities, no date; 10. ECBCheck 2012; 11. UNIQUe 2011; 12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO); Procedure; Data Analysis; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; Table 1; Standard Details; 7; 24; 4; 25; 8; 75; 4; 17; 8; 45; 7; 7; 13; 184; 8; 64; 10; 54; 13; 46; 10; 71; 7; 38; 8.25; 54.16; Table 2; Codes From Standard Analysis; 164; 115; 102; 77; 47; 45; 40; 33; 27; 650; Selection of the 12 Global Standard Documents; Differences in the Documents; Most-Emphasized Standards; Least-Emphasized Standards. Similarities and DifferencesImplications for Future Research and the Improvement of Practice; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; Designing for Quality; An Analysis of Design and Pedagogical Issues in Online Course Development; Mapopa William Sanga; Southwestern Oklahoma State University; This study investigated the process through which 100 online courses were developed in compliance with a purpose-made rubric designed to bring the courses to a level that would meet requirements of membership in a state authorization reciprocity agre ... ; INTRODUCTION; QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING. STATE AUTHORIZATION RECIPROCITY AGREEMENT. Of ANOVA on Team Scores for Task Type3; 7.289; 0.135; 0.939; 80; 54.180; 3; 64.363; 2.122; 0.104; 80; 30.328; 217.276; 3; 72.425; 2.126; 0.103; 80; 34.066; Table 6; Lower Bias Compared to Higher Bias Team Personality by Task; RECOMMENDATIONS; LIMITATIONS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A; Week 1: Team Memo Assignment; APPENDIX B; Week 5; Marketplace Simulation Student Instructions. Distance education. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85038507 Enseignement à distance. EDUCATION Distance, Open & Online Education. bisacsh Distance education fast Schlosser, Charles. Print version: Simonson, Michael. Quarterly Review of Distance Education : Volume 18 #2. Charlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing, ©2017 9781641130912 Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal. FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1632267 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal. Front Cover; Statement of Purpose; Quarterly Review of Distance Education; â#x80;#x9C;Research That Guides Practiceâ#x80;#x9D;; Volume 18, Number 2, 2017; ARTICLES; Quarterly Review of Distance Education Editors and Editorial Board; Editors; Assistant Editor; Editorial Assistant; Department Editors; International; Ray J. Amirault, Illinois State University Yusra Laila Visser, Illinois State University; Michelle Rogers-Estable, SUNY Delhi; Editorial Board; Global Standards for Enhancing Quality in Online Learning; Florence Martin and Drew Polly; University of North Carolina Charlotte. Annika Jokiaho and Birgit MayLudwigsburg University of Education; The quality of online courses offered has been a topic of discussion in the recent years, and efforts have been taken to establish standards for developing online courses. In this study, the authors review 12 online learning standard documents and ex ... ; INTRODUCTION; ONLINE LEARNING STANDARDS; Purpose of This Study; 1. What are some of the global standard models that focus on enhancing quality in online learning and how many sections and standards are included in each of these standard models? 2. What are the common elements (i.e., most and least emphasized, similarities and differences) of global standards related to online learning?METHOD; Data Sources; 1. Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet Based Distance Education; 2. Online Learning Consortium Quality Scorecard, 2005; 3. Blackboard Exemplary Course Rubric, 2000; 4. Quality Matters 2014, 5th Edition; 5. CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002; 6. Open eQuality Learning Standards, 2004; 7. NADEOSA (South Africa) 2005 revision of 1996 document. 8. ACODE (Australia) 2014 revision of 2007 document9. Asian Association of Open Universities, no date; 10. ECBCheck 2012; 11. UNIQUe 2011; 12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO); Procedure; Data Analysis; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; Table 1; Standard Details; 7; 24; 4; 25; 8; 75; 4; 17; 8; 45; 7; 7; 13; 184; 8; 64; 10; 54; 13; 46; 10; 71; 7; 38; 8.25; 54.16; Table 2; Codes From Standard Analysis; 164; 115; 102; 77; 47; 45; 40; 33; 27; 650; Selection of the 12 Global Standard Documents; Differences in the Documents; Most-Emphasized Standards; Least-Emphasized Standards. Similarities and DifferencesImplications for Future Research and the Improvement of Practice; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; Designing for Quality; An Analysis of Design and Pedagogical Issues in Online Course Development; Mapopa William Sanga; Southwestern Oklahoma State University; This study investigated the process through which 100 online courses were developed in compliance with a purpose-made rubric designed to bring the courses to a level that would meet requirements of membership in a state authorization reciprocity agre ... ; INTRODUCTION; QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING. Distance education. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85038507 Enseignement à distance. EDUCATION Distance, Open & Online Education. bisacsh Distance education fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85038507 |
| title | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. |
| title_auth | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. |
| title_exact_search | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. |
| title_full | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Volume 18, no. 2 / editors Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser. |
| title_fullStr | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Volume 18, no. 2 / editors Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Volume 18, no. 2 / editors Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser. |
| title_short | Quarterly Review of Distance Education. |
| title_sort | quarterly review of distance education |
| topic | Distance education. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85038507 Enseignement à distance. EDUCATION Distance, Open & Online Education. bisacsh Distance education fast |
| topic_facet | Distance education. Enseignement à distance. EDUCATION Distance, Open & Online Education. Distance education |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1632267 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT schlossercharles quarterlyreviewofdistanceeducationvolume18no2 |