Proportionality and judicial activism :: fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa /
"The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA :
Cambridge University Press,
2017.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"-- |
| Beschreibung: | Based on the author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9781316838624 1316838625 9781316823330 1316823334 9781316630822 131663082X |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn974926489 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 170309s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e rda |e pn |c N$T |d YDX |d EBLCP |d MERUC |d IDEBK |d LGG |d UAB |d OTZ |d MERER |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d CUI |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d U3W |d UEJ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d LUN |d MM9 |d K6U |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SFB |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 1170373885 |a 1171324725 |a 1172304718 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316838624 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1316838625 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316823330 | ||
| 020 | |a 1316823334 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316630822 |q (paperback) | ||
| 020 | |a 131663082X | ||
| 020 | |z 9781107177987 | ||
| 020 | |z 1107177987 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)974926489 |z (OCoLC)1170373885 |z (OCoLC)1171324725 |z (OCoLC)1172304718 | ||
| 043 | |a n-cn--- |a e-gx--- |a f-sa--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K3367 |b .P48 2017eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 018000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 075000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 342.08/5 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Petersen, Niels, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proportionality and judicial activism : |b fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / |c Niels Petersen, Professor of Public Law, International Law and EU Law, University of Münster, Faculty of Law. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; |a New York, NY, USA : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2017. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Based on the author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten. | ||
| 520 | |a "The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"-- |c Provided by publisher | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality. | |
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Political questions and judicial power |z Canada. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Political questions and judicial power |z Germany. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Political questions and judicial power |z South Africa. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Proportionality in law |z Canada. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Proportionality in law |z Germany. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Proportionality in law |z South Africa. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Courts of last resort |z Canada. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Courts of last resort |z Germany. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Courts of last resort |z South Africa. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire |z Canada. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire |z Allemagne. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire |z Afrique du Sud. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Proportionnalité (Droit) |z Canada. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Proportionnalité (Droit) |z Allemagne. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Proportionnalité (Droit) |z Afrique du Sud. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Constitutional. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Public. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Courts of last resort |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Political questions and judicial power |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Proportionality in law |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Canada |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJkMHVW4rfVXPrhVP4VwG3 | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Germany |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtCD3rcKcPDx6FHmjvrbd | |
| 651 | 7 | |a South Africa |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcWtkkqd3cMmFw9GBdYT3 | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Proportionality and judicial activism (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFJFgYC48B9qR7CYwVdgmm |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 775 | 0 | 8 | |i Revision of: |a Petersen, Niels. |t Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle. |d Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2015 |z 9783161535109 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Petersen, Niels. |t Proportionality and judicial activism. |d Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2017 |z 9781107177987 |w (DLC) 2016058544 |w (OCoLC)962230767 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1475828 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH33405220 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH32509375 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH32493037 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL4812334 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1475828 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis37763665 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13669723 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13633988 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13972537 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn974926489 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882381248790528 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Petersen, Niels |
| author_facet | Petersen, Niels |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Petersen, Niels |
| author_variant | n p np |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K3367 |
| callnumber-raw | K3367 .P48 2017eb |
| callnumber-search | K3367 .P48 2017eb |
| callnumber-sort | K 43367 P48 42017EB |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)974926489 |
| dewey-full | 342.08/5 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.08/5 |
| dewey-search | 342.08/5 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.08 15 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05821cam a2200889 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn974926489</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu---unuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170309s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">LGG</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">OTZ</subfield><subfield code="d">MERER</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">CUI</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">UEJ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">LUN</subfield><subfield code="d">MM9</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">SFB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1170373885</subfield><subfield code="a">1171324725</subfield><subfield code="a">1172304718</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316838624</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1316838625</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316823330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1316823334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316630822</subfield><subfield code="q">(paperback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">131663082X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781107177987</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1107177987</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)974926489</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1170373885</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1171324725</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1172304718</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-cn---</subfield><subfield code="a">e-gx---</subfield><subfield code="a">f-sa---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K3367</subfield><subfield code="b">.P48 2017eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">075000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.08/5</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petersen, Niels,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality and judicial activism :</subfield><subfield code="b">fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa /</subfield><subfield code="c">Niels Petersen, Professor of Public Law, International Law and EU Law, University of Münster, Faculty of Law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom ;</subfield><subfield code="a">New York, NY, USA :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2017.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on the author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">South Africa.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="z">South Africa.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Courts of last resort</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Courts of last resort</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Courts of last resort</subfield><subfield code="z">South Africa.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Politique et pouvoir judiciaire</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Politique et pouvoir judiciaire</subfield><subfield code="z">Allemagne.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Politique et pouvoir judiciaire</subfield><subfield code="z">Afrique du Sud.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Proportionnalité (Droit)</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Proportionnalité (Droit)</subfield><subfield code="z">Allemagne.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Proportionnalité (Droit)</subfield><subfield code="z">Afrique du Sud.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Constitutional.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Public.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Courts of last resort</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Canada</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJkMHVW4rfVXPrhVP4VwG3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Germany</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtCD3rcKcPDx6FHmjvrbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">South Africa</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcWtkkqd3cMmFw9GBdYT3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Proportionality and judicial activism (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFJFgYC48B9qR7CYwVdgmm</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Revision of:</subfield><subfield code="a">Petersen, Niels.</subfield><subfield code="t">Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle.</subfield><subfield code="d">Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2015</subfield><subfield code="z">9783161535109</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Petersen, Niels.</subfield><subfield code="t">Proportionality and judicial activism.</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2017</subfield><subfield code="z">9781107177987</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2016058544</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)962230767</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1475828</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH33405220</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH32509375</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH32493037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4812334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1475828</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis37763665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13669723</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13633988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13972537</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Canada fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJkMHVW4rfVXPrhVP4VwG3 Germany fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtCD3rcKcPDx6FHmjvrbd South Africa fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcWtkkqd3cMmFw9GBdYT3 |
| geographic_facet | Canada Germany South Africa |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn974926489 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:27:42Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781316838624 1316838625 9781316823330 1316823334 9781316630822 131663082X |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 974926489 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Petersen, Niels, author. Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / Niels Petersen, Professor of Public Law, International Law and EU Law, University of Münster, Faculty of Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2017. 1 online resource text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Based on the author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten. "The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"-- Provided by publisher Includes bibliographical references and index. Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality. Print version record. Political questions and judicial power Canada. Political questions and judicial power Germany. Political questions and judicial power South Africa. Proportionality in law Canada. Proportionality in law Germany. Proportionality in law South Africa. Courts of last resort Canada. Courts of last resort Germany. Courts of last resort South Africa. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Canada. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Allemagne. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Afrique du Sud. Proportionnalité (Droit) Canada. Proportionnalité (Droit) Allemagne. Proportionnalité (Droit) Afrique du Sud. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Courts of last resort fast Political questions and judicial power fast Proportionality in law fast Canada fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJkMHVW4rfVXPrhVP4VwG3 Germany fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtCD3rcKcPDx6FHmjvrbd South Africa fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcWtkkqd3cMmFw9GBdYT3 has work: Proportionality and judicial activism (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFJFgYC48B9qR7CYwVdgmm https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Revision of: Petersen, Niels. Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle. Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2015 9783161535109 Print version: Petersen, Niels. Proportionality and judicial activism. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2017 9781107177987 (DLC) 2016058544 (OCoLC)962230767 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1475828 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Petersen, Niels Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality. Political questions and judicial power Canada. Political questions and judicial power Germany. Political questions and judicial power South Africa. Proportionality in law Canada. Proportionality in law Germany. Proportionality in law South Africa. Courts of last resort Canada. Courts of last resort Germany. Courts of last resort South Africa. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Canada. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Allemagne. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Afrique du Sud. Proportionnalité (Droit) Canada. Proportionnalité (Droit) Allemagne. Proportionnalité (Droit) Afrique du Sud. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Courts of last resort fast Political questions and judicial power fast Proportionality in law fast |
| title | Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / |
| title_auth | Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / |
| title_exact_search | Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / |
| title_full | Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / Niels Petersen, Professor of Public Law, International Law and EU Law, University of Münster, Faculty of Law. |
| title_fullStr | Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / Niels Petersen, Professor of Public Law, International Law and EU Law, University of Münster, Faculty of Law. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / Niels Petersen, Professor of Public Law, International Law and EU Law, University of Münster, Faculty of Law. |
| title_short | Proportionality and judicial activism : |
| title_sort | proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in canada germany and south africa |
| title_sub | fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / |
| topic | Political questions and judicial power Canada. Political questions and judicial power Germany. Political questions and judicial power South Africa. Proportionality in law Canada. Proportionality in law Germany. Proportionality in law South Africa. Courts of last resort Canada. Courts of last resort Germany. Courts of last resort South Africa. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Canada. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Allemagne. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Afrique du Sud. Proportionnalité (Droit) Canada. Proportionnalité (Droit) Allemagne. Proportionnalité (Droit) Afrique du Sud. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Courts of last resort fast Political questions and judicial power fast Proportionality in law fast |
| topic_facet | Political questions and judicial power Canada. Political questions and judicial power Germany. Political questions and judicial power South Africa. Proportionality in law Canada. Proportionality in law Germany. Proportionality in law South Africa. Courts of last resort Canada. Courts of last resort Germany. Courts of last resort South Africa. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Canada. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Allemagne. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Afrique du Sud. Proportionnalité (Droit) Canada. Proportionnalité (Droit) Allemagne. Proportionnalité (Droit) Afrique du Sud. LAW Constitutional. LAW Public. Courts of last resort Political questions and judicial power Proportionality in law Canada Germany South Africa |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1475828 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT petersenniels proportionalityandjudicialactivismfundamentalrightsadjudicationincanadagermanyandsouthafrica |