Law's abnegation :: from law's empire to the administrative state /
"Ronald Dworkin once imagined law as an empire and judges as its princes. But over time, the arc of law has bent steadily toward deference to the administrative state. Adrian Vermeule argues that law has freely abandoned its imperial pretensions, and has done so for internal legal reasons. In a...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Massachusetts :
Harvard University Press,
2016.
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "Ronald Dworkin once imagined law as an empire and judges as its princes. But over time, the arc of law has bent steadily toward deference to the administrative state. Adrian Vermeule argues that law has freely abandoned its imperial pretensions, and has done so for internal legal reasons. In area after area, judges and lawyers, working out the logical implications of legal principles, have come to believe that administrators should be granted broad leeway to set policy, determine facts, interpret ambiguous statutes, and even define the boundaries of their own jurisdiction. Agencies have greater democratic legitimacy and technical competence to confront many issues than lawyers and judges do. And as the questions confronting the state involving climate change, terrorism, and biotechnology (to name a few) have become ever more complex, legal logic increasingly indicates that abnegation is the wisest course of action"-- |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (254 pages) |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
ISBN: | 9780674974739 0674974735 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn962753105 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
008 | 161116t20162016mau ob 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | |a 2016015023 | ||
040 | |a N$T |b eng |e rda |e pn |c N$T |d N$T |d EBLCP |d JSTOR |d YDX |d IDB |d CUS |d UAB |d IOG |d OCLCQ |d INT |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d OCLCQ |d UX1 |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d OCLCQ | ||
019 | |a 966403476 |a 1175629766 | ||
020 | |a 9780674974739 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 0674974735 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 9780674971448 | ||
020 | |z 0674971442 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)962753105 |z (OCoLC)966403476 |z (OCoLC)1175629766 | ||
037 | |a 22573/ctt1h96j87 |b JSTOR | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a KF5425 |b .V47 2016eb | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 018000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 075000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW060000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW018000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW025000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW001000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 342.73/06 |2 23 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Vermeule, Adrian, |d 1968- |e author. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJrWFP3HgqrTK7xckkG4MP |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002023505 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Law's abnegation : |b from law's empire to the administrative state / |c Adrian Vermeule. |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Massachusetts : |b Harvard University Press, |c 2016. | |
264 | 4 | |c ©2016 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (254 pages) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a "Ronald Dworkin once imagined law as an empire and judges as its princes. But over time, the arc of law has bent steadily toward deference to the administrative state. Adrian Vermeule argues that law has freely abandoned its imperial pretensions, and has done so for internal legal reasons. In area after area, judges and lawyers, working out the logical implications of legal principles, have come to believe that administrators should be granted broad leeway to set policy, determine facts, interpret ambiguous statutes, and even define the boundaries of their own jurisdiction. Agencies have greater democratic legitimacy and technical competence to confront many issues than lawyers and judges do. And as the questions confronting the state involving climate change, terrorism, and biotechnology (to name a few) have become ever more complex, legal logic increasingly indicates that abnegation is the wisest course of action"-- |c Provided by publisher. | ||
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and indexes. | ||
505 | 0 | |a Introduction : The abnegation of law's empire -- The legality of administrative law -- Separation of powers without idolatry -- Deference and due process -- Rationally arbitrary decisions -- Thin rationality review -- Appendix to Chapter 5 -- How law empowers nonlawyers -- Conclusion : Law on the margin. | |
588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed November 16, 2016). | |
650 | 0 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Administrative discretion |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Administrative agencies |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Administrative law |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Administrative procedure |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Rule of law |z United States. | |
650 | 6 | |a Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 6 | |a Pouvoir discrétionnaire (Droit administratif) |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 6 | |a Règle de droit |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Constitutional. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Public. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Legal History. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Administrative agencies |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Administrative discretion |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Administrative law |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Administrative procedure |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Rule of law |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Vermeule, Adrian, 1968- |t Law's abnegation. |d Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2016 |z 9780674971448 |w (DLC) 2016015023 |w (OCoLC)946975321 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1416417 |3 Volltext |
938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL4742338 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1416417 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13052057 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn962753105 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816882369348501504 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Vermeule, Adrian, 1968- |
author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002023505 |
author_facet | Vermeule, Adrian, 1968- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Vermeule, Adrian, 1968- |
author_variant | a v av |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF5425 |
callnumber-raw | KF5425 .V47 2016eb |
callnumber-search | KF5425 .V47 2016eb |
callnumber-sort | KF 45425 V47 42016EB |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Introduction : The abnegation of law's empire -- The legality of administrative law -- Separation of powers without idolatry -- Deference and due process -- Rationally arbitrary decisions -- Thin rationality review -- Appendix to Chapter 5 -- How law empowers nonlawyers -- Conclusion : Law on the margin. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)962753105 |
dewey-full | 342.73/06 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
dewey-raw | 342.73/06 |
dewey-search | 342.73/06 |
dewey-sort | 3342.73 16 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04510cam a2200769 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn962753105</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu---unuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161116t20162016mau ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> 2016015023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">JSTOR</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">IDB</subfield><subfield code="d">CUS</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">IOG</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">INT</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UX1</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">966403476</subfield><subfield code="a">1175629766</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780674974739</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0674974735</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780674971448</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0674971442</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)962753105</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)966403476</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1175629766</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22573/ctt1h96j87</subfield><subfield code="b">JSTOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF5425</subfield><subfield code="b">.V47 2016eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">075000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW060000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW025000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW001000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73/06</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vermeule, Adrian,</subfield><subfield code="d">1968-</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJrWFP3HgqrTK7xckkG4MP</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002023505</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law's abnegation :</subfield><subfield code="b">from law's empire to the administrative state /</subfield><subfield code="c">Adrian Vermeule.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Massachusetts :</subfield><subfield code="b">Harvard University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (254 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Ronald Dworkin once imagined law as an empire and judges as its princes. But over time, the arc of law has bent steadily toward deference to the administrative state. Adrian Vermeule argues that law has freely abandoned its imperial pretensions, and has done so for internal legal reasons. In area after area, judges and lawyers, working out the logical implications of legal principles, have come to believe that administrators should be granted broad leeway to set policy, determine facts, interpret ambiguous statutes, and even define the boundaries of their own jurisdiction. Agencies have greater democratic legitimacy and technical competence to confront many issues than lawyers and judges do. And as the questions confronting the state involving climate change, terrorism, and biotechnology (to name a few) have become ever more complex, legal logic increasingly indicates that abnegation is the wisest course of action"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and indexes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction : The abnegation of law's empire -- The legality of administrative law -- Separation of powers without idolatry -- Deference and due process -- Rationally arbitrary decisions -- Thin rationality review -- Appendix to Chapter 5 -- How law empowers nonlawyers -- Conclusion : Law on the margin.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed November 16, 2016).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Administrative discretion</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Administrative agencies</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Administrative law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Administrative procedure</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Pouvoir discrétionnaire (Droit administratif)</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Règle de droit</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Constitutional.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Public.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal History.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Administrative agencies</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Administrative discretion</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Administrative law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Administrative procedure</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Vermeule, Adrian, 1968-</subfield><subfield code="t">Law's abnegation.</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2016</subfield><subfield code="z">9780674971448</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2016015023</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)946975321</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1416417</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4742338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1416417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13052057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
geographic_facet | United States |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn962753105 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:27:31Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780674974739 0674974735 |
language | English |
lccn | 2016015023 |
oclc_num | 962753105 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource (254 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | Harvard University Press, |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Vermeule, Adrian, 1968- author. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJrWFP3HgqrTK7xckkG4MP http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002023505 Law's abnegation : from law's empire to the administrative state / Adrian Vermeule. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2016. ©2016 1 online resource (254 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier "Ronald Dworkin once imagined law as an empire and judges as its princes. But over time, the arc of law has bent steadily toward deference to the administrative state. Adrian Vermeule argues that law has freely abandoned its imperial pretensions, and has done so for internal legal reasons. In area after area, judges and lawyers, working out the logical implications of legal principles, have come to believe that administrators should be granted broad leeway to set policy, determine facts, interpret ambiguous statutes, and even define the boundaries of their own jurisdiction. Agencies have greater democratic legitimacy and technical competence to confront many issues than lawyers and judges do. And as the questions confronting the state involving climate change, terrorism, and biotechnology (to name a few) have become ever more complex, legal logic increasingly indicates that abnegation is the wisest course of action"-- Provided by publisher. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Introduction : The abnegation of law's empire -- The legality of administrative law -- Separation of powers without idolatry -- Deference and due process -- Rationally arbitrary decisions -- Thin rationality review -- Appendix to Chapter 5 -- How law empowers nonlawyers -- Conclusion : Law on the margin. Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed November 16, 2016). Judicial review of administrative acts United States. Administrative discretion United States. Administrative agencies United States. Administrative law United States. Administrative procedure United States. Rule of law United States. Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration États-Unis. Pouvoir discrétionnaire (Droit administratif) États-Unis. Règle de droit États-Unis. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh LAW Legal History. bisacsh Administrative agencies fast Administrative discretion fast Administrative law fast Administrative procedure fast Judicial review of administrative acts fast Rule of law fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq Print version: Vermeule, Adrian, 1968- Law's abnegation. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2016 9780674971448 (DLC) 2016015023 (OCoLC)946975321 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1416417 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Vermeule, Adrian, 1968- Law's abnegation : from law's empire to the administrative state / Introduction : The abnegation of law's empire -- The legality of administrative law -- Separation of powers without idolatry -- Deference and due process -- Rationally arbitrary decisions -- Thin rationality review -- Appendix to Chapter 5 -- How law empowers nonlawyers -- Conclusion : Law on the margin. Judicial review of administrative acts United States. Administrative discretion United States. Administrative agencies United States. Administrative law United States. Administrative procedure United States. Rule of law United States. Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration États-Unis. Pouvoir discrétionnaire (Droit administratif) États-Unis. Règle de droit États-Unis. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh LAW Legal History. bisacsh Administrative agencies fast Administrative discretion fast Administrative law fast Administrative procedure fast Judicial review of administrative acts fast Rule of law fast |
title | Law's abnegation : from law's empire to the administrative state / |
title_auth | Law's abnegation : from law's empire to the administrative state / |
title_exact_search | Law's abnegation : from law's empire to the administrative state / |
title_full | Law's abnegation : from law's empire to the administrative state / Adrian Vermeule. |
title_fullStr | Law's abnegation : from law's empire to the administrative state / Adrian Vermeule. |
title_full_unstemmed | Law's abnegation : from law's empire to the administrative state / Adrian Vermeule. |
title_short | Law's abnegation : |
title_sort | law s abnegation from law s empire to the administrative state |
title_sub | from law's empire to the administrative state / |
topic | Judicial review of administrative acts United States. Administrative discretion United States. Administrative agencies United States. Administrative law United States. Administrative procedure United States. Rule of law United States. Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration États-Unis. Pouvoir discrétionnaire (Droit administratif) États-Unis. Règle de droit États-Unis. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh LAW Legal History. bisacsh Administrative agencies fast Administrative discretion fast Administrative law fast Administrative procedure fast Judicial review of administrative acts fast Rule of law fast |
topic_facet | Judicial review of administrative acts United States. Administrative discretion United States. Administrative agencies United States. Administrative law United States. Administrative procedure United States. Rule of law United States. Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration États-Unis. Pouvoir discrétionnaire (Droit administratif) États-Unis. Règle de droit États-Unis. LAW Constitutional. LAW Public. LAW Legal History. Administrative agencies Administrative discretion Administrative law Administrative procedure Judicial review of administrative acts Rule of law United States |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1416417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vermeuleadrian lawsabnegationfromlawsempiretotheadministrativestate |