Legal argumentation and the rule of law /:
"Modern legal systems are characterized by a tension between two commonplaces: the rule of law on the one hand, and the arguable character of law on the other. The rule of law calls for legal certainty, predictability and reasonableness; the argumentative character of law implies room for ratio...
Gespeichert in:
| Körperschaft: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Elektronisch Tagungsbericht E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
The Hague :
Eleven International Publishing,
[2016]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Modern legal systems are characterized by a tension between two commonplaces: the rule of law on the one hand, and the arguable character of law on the other. The rule of law calls for legal certainty, predictability and reasonableness; the argumentative character of law implies room for rational disagreement. In this book ... scholars come together to offer interdisciplinary approaches to debate this tension and its possible reconciliation. Central in their perspective is that reconciliation is possible when the rule of law also incorporates rules for reason-giving. Reason-giving should be part of a substantive conception of the rule of law. Requiring that legal decision-makers give reasons furthers reasonable outcomes. The analysis of the ideal of rational argumentation and the ideal of the rule of law show how insights of two traditions are connected. This collection of essays includes contributions from law, argumentation theory, logic and philosophical perspectives. This multifaceted approach demonstrates the variety of questions that emerge at the intersection of both commonplaces."-- |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (viii, 229 pages) : illustrations |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references. |
| ISBN: | 9789462745971 9462745978 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn960210586 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 161010s2016 ne a ob 100 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e rda |e pn |c N$T |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d IDEBK |d OCLCF |d YDX |d YLS |d OCLCQ |d AGLDB |d G3B |d IGB |d STF |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d LUU |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 967586166 |a 967772780 |a 968202280 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789462745971 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9462745978 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9789462367029 | ||
| 020 | |z 9462367027 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)960210586 |z (OCoLC)967586166 |z (OCoLC)967772780 |z (OCoLC)968202280 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K181 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 012000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 062000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 040030 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 347.075 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 111 | 2 | |a International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law |d (2015 : |c Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017012739 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legal argumentation and the rule of law / |c edited by E.T Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug and C.E. Smith. |
| 264 | 1 | |a The Hague : |b Eleven International Publishing, |c [2016] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2016 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (viii, 229 pages) : |b illustrations | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | 0 | |t International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law / |r Sanne Taekema -- |t Legal argumentation and the rule of law / |r Eveline Feteris, Harm Kloosterhuis, H. Jose´ Plug and Carel Smith -- |t Judicial discretion and the rule of law / |r Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet -- |t The rule of dual-natured law / |r Matthias Klatt -- |t Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions : a pragma-dialectical perspective / |r Evelin T. Feteris -- |t The legal characterization of facts at the International Criminal Court / |r Richard Gaskins -- |t The Facebook judge? : how transparency in social media conflicts with the rule of law / |r Paul van den Hoven -- |t Analogy and e contrario : the facts, pet issues of perpetration, damage and damages / |r Hendrick Kaptein -- |t The burden of rationality : why and how should the judge justify her decision? / |r Bart van Klink -- |t Four fallacies about analogical reasoning and the rule of law / |r Harm Kloosterhuis and Carel Smith -- |t Improving judicial argumentation about evidence in Dutch unus testis cases / |r Anne Ruth Mackor -- |t Legal argumentation between 'monologue' and 'dialogue' : from the absolute rule to the rule of law / |r Maurizio Manzin -- |t Fundamental rights and the rule of law : rule of law as argument for interference / |r Antoinette J. Muntjewerff and Kirsten van Loo -- |t Arguing for certainty in criminal decision-making and the rule of law / |r Marko Novak -- |t Legislative argument and the rule of law / |r A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana -- |t Argumentative contributions to the settlement of conflicts in administrative judicial decisions / |r H. Jose´ Plug -- |t Due process and the rule of law : the role of argumentation in the defence of a fair trial / |r Federico Puppo -- |t Rule of law and legal epistemology / |r T.F. Eric Tjong Tjin Tai -- |t Rhetorical status theory as an institutional framework for legal discussions / |r Jean H.M. Wagemans -- |t Debiasing and rule of law / |r Frank Zenker and Christian Dahlman. |
| 520 | |a "Modern legal systems are characterized by a tension between two commonplaces: the rule of law on the one hand, and the arguable character of law on the other. The rule of law calls for legal certainty, predictability and reasonableness; the argumentative character of law implies room for rational disagreement. In this book ... scholars come together to offer interdisciplinary approaches to debate this tension and its possible reconciliation. Central in their perspective is that reconciliation is possible when the rule of law also incorporates rules for reason-giving. Reason-giving should be part of a substantive conception of the rule of law. Requiring that legal decision-makers give reasons furthers reasonable outcomes. The analysis of the ideal of rational argumentation and the ideal of the rule of law show how insights of two traditions are connected. This collection of essays includes contributions from law, argumentation theory, logic and philosophical perspectives. This multifaceted approach demonstrates the variety of questions that emerge at the intersection of both commonplaces."-- |c Back cover. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Forensic orations. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85050550 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Rule of law. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Débats judiciaires. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Règle de droit. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Civil Procedure. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Legal Services. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Government |x Judicial Branch. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Forensic orations |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rule of law |2 fast | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feteris, E. T., |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kloosterhuis, H., |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Plug, H. J. |q (Henny José), |e editor. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjCCd6hmWpgYTF4djTR8vd |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2013047120 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Smith, C. E. | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Legal argumentation and the rule of law (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFBKXpXKWqJ4xhWTPdVdpK |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law (2015 : Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam). |t Legal argumentation and the rule of law. |d The Hague : Eleven International Publishing, [2016] |z 9789462367029 |w (OCoLC)958930273 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1366236 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1366236 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis36230159 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13188379 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn960210586 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882364888907776 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Feteris, E. T. Kloosterhuis, H. Plug, H. J. (Henny José) Smith, C. E. |
| author2_role | edt edt edt |
| author2_variant | e t f et etf h k hk h j p hj hjp c e s ce ces |
| author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2013047120 |
| author_additional | Sanne Taekema -- Eveline Feteris, Harm Kloosterhuis, H. Jose´ Plug and Carel Smith -- Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet -- Matthias Klatt -- Evelin T. Feteris -- Richard Gaskins -- Paul van den Hoven -- Hendrick Kaptein -- Bart van Klink -- Harm Kloosterhuis and Carel Smith -- Anne Ruth Mackor -- Maurizio Manzin -- Antoinette J. Muntjewerff and Kirsten van Loo -- Marko Novak -- A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana -- H. Jose´ Plug -- Federico Puppo -- T.F. Eric Tjong Tjin Tai -- Jean H.M. Wagemans -- Frank Zenker and Christian Dahlman. |
| author_corporate | International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam |
| author_corporate_role | |
| author_facet | Feteris, E. T. Kloosterhuis, H. Plug, H. J. (Henny José) Smith, C. E. International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam |
| author_sort | International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K181 |
| callnumber-raw | K181 |
| callnumber-search | K181 |
| callnumber-sort | K 3181 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law / Legal argumentation and the rule of law / Judicial discretion and the rule of law / The rule of dual-natured law / Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions : a pragma-dialectical perspective / The legal characterization of facts at the International Criminal Court / The Facebook judge? : how transparency in social media conflicts with the rule of law / Analogy and e contrario : the facts, pet issues of perpetration, damage and damages / The burden of rationality : why and how should the judge justify her decision? / Four fallacies about analogical reasoning and the rule of law / Improving judicial argumentation about evidence in Dutch unus testis cases / Legal argumentation between 'monologue' and 'dialogue' : from the absolute rule to the rule of law / Fundamental rights and the rule of law : rule of law as argument for interference / Arguing for certainty in criminal decision-making and the rule of law / Legislative argument and the rule of law / Argumentative contributions to the settlement of conflicts in administrative judicial decisions / Due process and the rule of law : the role of argumentation in the defence of a fair trial / Rule of law and legal epistemology / Rhetorical status theory as an institutional framework for legal discussions / Debiasing and rule of law / |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)960210586 |
| dewey-full | 347.075 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.075 |
| dewey-search | 347.075 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.075 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic Conference Proceeding eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06146cam a2200637 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn960210586</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu---unuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161010s2016 ne a ob 100 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">YLS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">G3B</subfield><subfield code="d">IGB</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">LUU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">967586166</subfield><subfield code="a">967772780</subfield><subfield code="a">968202280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789462745971</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9462745978</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9789462367029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9462367027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)960210586</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)967586166</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)967772780</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)968202280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">012000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">062000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">040030</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.075</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="111" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law</subfield><subfield code="d">(2015 :</subfield><subfield code="c">Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017012739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal argumentation and the rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by E.T Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug and C.E. Smith.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">The Hague :</subfield><subfield code="b">Eleven International Publishing,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2016]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (viii, 229 pages) :</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Sanne Taekema --</subfield><subfield code="t">Legal argumentation and the rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Eveline Feteris, Harm Kloosterhuis, H. Jose´ Plug and Carel Smith --</subfield><subfield code="t">Judicial discretion and the rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet --</subfield><subfield code="t">The rule of dual-natured law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Matthias Klatt --</subfield><subfield code="t">Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions : a pragma-dialectical perspective /</subfield><subfield code="r">Evelin T. Feteris --</subfield><subfield code="t">The legal characterization of facts at the International Criminal Court /</subfield><subfield code="r">Richard Gaskins --</subfield><subfield code="t">The Facebook judge? : how transparency in social media conflicts with the rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Paul van den Hoven --</subfield><subfield code="t">Analogy and e contrario : the facts, pet issues of perpetration, damage and damages /</subfield><subfield code="r">Hendrick Kaptein --</subfield><subfield code="t">The burden of rationality : why and how should the judge justify her decision? /</subfield><subfield code="r">Bart van Klink --</subfield><subfield code="t">Four fallacies about analogical reasoning and the rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Harm Kloosterhuis and Carel Smith --</subfield><subfield code="t">Improving judicial argumentation about evidence in Dutch unus testis cases /</subfield><subfield code="r">Anne Ruth Mackor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Legal argumentation between 'monologue' and 'dialogue' : from the absolute rule to the rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Maurizio Manzin --</subfield><subfield code="t">Fundamental rights and the rule of law : rule of law as argument for interference /</subfield><subfield code="r">Antoinette J. Muntjewerff and Kirsten van Loo --</subfield><subfield code="t">Arguing for certainty in criminal decision-making and the rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Marko Novak --</subfield><subfield code="t">Legislative argument and the rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="r">A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana --</subfield><subfield code="t">Argumentative contributions to the settlement of conflicts in administrative judicial decisions /</subfield><subfield code="r">H. Jose´ Plug --</subfield><subfield code="t">Due process and the rule of law : the role of argumentation in the defence of a fair trial /</subfield><subfield code="r">Federico Puppo --</subfield><subfield code="t">Rule of law and legal epistemology /</subfield><subfield code="r">T.F. Eric Tjong Tjin Tai --</subfield><subfield code="t">Rhetorical status theory as an institutional framework for legal discussions /</subfield><subfield code="r">Jean H.M. Wagemans --</subfield><subfield code="t">Debiasing and rule of law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Frank Zenker and Christian Dahlman.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Modern legal systems are characterized by a tension between two commonplaces: the rule of law on the one hand, and the arguable character of law on the other. The rule of law calls for legal certainty, predictability and reasonableness; the argumentative character of law implies room for rational disagreement. In this book ... scholars come together to offer interdisciplinary approaches to debate this tension and its possible reconciliation. Central in their perspective is that reconciliation is possible when the rule of law also incorporates rules for reason-giving. Reason-giving should be part of a substantive conception of the rule of law. Requiring that legal decision-makers give reasons furthers reasonable outcomes. The analysis of the ideal of rational argumentation and the ideal of the rule of law show how insights of two traditions are connected. This collection of essays includes contributions from law, argumentation theory, logic and philosophical perspectives. This multifaceted approach demonstrates the variety of questions that emerge at the intersection of both commonplaces."--</subfield><subfield code="c">Back cover.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forensic orations.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85050550</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule of law.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Débats judiciaires.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Règle de droit.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Civil Procedure.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal Services.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Government</subfield><subfield code="x">Judicial Branch.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forensic orations</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feteris, E. T.,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kloosterhuis, H.,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plug, H. J.</subfield><subfield code="q">(Henny José),</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjCCd6hmWpgYTF4djTR8vd</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2013047120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smith, C. E.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Legal argumentation and the rule of law (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFBKXpXKWqJ4xhWTPdVdpK</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law (2015 : Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam).</subfield><subfield code="t">Legal argumentation and the rule of law.</subfield><subfield code="d">The Hague : Eleven International Publishing, [2016]</subfield><subfield code="z">9789462367029</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)958930273</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1366236</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1366236</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis36230159</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13188379</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn960210586 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:27:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017012739 |
| isbn | 9789462745971 9462745978 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 960210586 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (viii, 229 pages) : illustrations |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Eleven International Publishing, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law (2015 : Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017012739 Legal argumentation and the rule of law / edited by E.T Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug and C.E. Smith. The Hague : Eleven International Publishing, [2016] ©2016 1 online resource (viii, 229 pages) : illustrations text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references. Print version record. International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law / Sanne Taekema -- Legal argumentation and the rule of law / Eveline Feteris, Harm Kloosterhuis, H. Jose´ Plug and Carel Smith -- Judicial discretion and the rule of law / Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet -- The rule of dual-natured law / Matthias Klatt -- Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions : a pragma-dialectical perspective / Evelin T. Feteris -- The legal characterization of facts at the International Criminal Court / Richard Gaskins -- The Facebook judge? : how transparency in social media conflicts with the rule of law / Paul van den Hoven -- Analogy and e contrario : the facts, pet issues of perpetration, damage and damages / Hendrick Kaptein -- The burden of rationality : why and how should the judge justify her decision? / Bart van Klink -- Four fallacies about analogical reasoning and the rule of law / Harm Kloosterhuis and Carel Smith -- Improving judicial argumentation about evidence in Dutch unus testis cases / Anne Ruth Mackor -- Legal argumentation between 'monologue' and 'dialogue' : from the absolute rule to the rule of law / Maurizio Manzin -- Fundamental rights and the rule of law : rule of law as argument for interference / Antoinette J. Muntjewerff and Kirsten van Loo -- Arguing for certainty in criminal decision-making and the rule of law / Marko Novak -- Legislative argument and the rule of law / A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana -- Argumentative contributions to the settlement of conflicts in administrative judicial decisions / H. Jose´ Plug -- Due process and the rule of law : the role of argumentation in the defence of a fair trial / Federico Puppo -- Rule of law and legal epistemology / T.F. Eric Tjong Tjin Tai -- Rhetorical status theory as an institutional framework for legal discussions / Jean H.M. Wagemans -- Debiasing and rule of law / Frank Zenker and Christian Dahlman. "Modern legal systems are characterized by a tension between two commonplaces: the rule of law on the one hand, and the arguable character of law on the other. The rule of law calls for legal certainty, predictability and reasonableness; the argumentative character of law implies room for rational disagreement. In this book ... scholars come together to offer interdisciplinary approaches to debate this tension and its possible reconciliation. Central in their perspective is that reconciliation is possible when the rule of law also incorporates rules for reason-giving. Reason-giving should be part of a substantive conception of the rule of law. Requiring that legal decision-makers give reasons furthers reasonable outcomes. The analysis of the ideal of rational argumentation and the ideal of the rule of law show how insights of two traditions are connected. This collection of essays includes contributions from law, argumentation theory, logic and philosophical perspectives. This multifaceted approach demonstrates the variety of questions that emerge at the intersection of both commonplaces."-- Back cover. Forensic orations. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85050550 Rule of law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 Débats judiciaires. Règle de droit. LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh Forensic orations fast Rule of law fast Feteris, E. T., editor. Kloosterhuis, H., editor. Plug, H. J. (Henny José), editor. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjCCd6hmWpgYTF4djTR8vd http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2013047120 Smith, C. E. has work: Legal argumentation and the rule of law (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFBKXpXKWqJ4xhWTPdVdpK https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law (2015 : Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam). Legal argumentation and the rule of law. The Hague : Eleven International Publishing, [2016] 9789462367029 (OCoLC)958930273 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1366236 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Legal argumentation and the rule of law / International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law / Legal argumentation and the rule of law / Judicial discretion and the rule of law / The rule of dual-natured law / Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions : a pragma-dialectical perspective / The legal characterization of facts at the International Criminal Court / The Facebook judge? : how transparency in social media conflicts with the rule of law / Analogy and e contrario : the facts, pet issues of perpetration, damage and damages / The burden of rationality : why and how should the judge justify her decision? / Four fallacies about analogical reasoning and the rule of law / Improving judicial argumentation about evidence in Dutch unus testis cases / Legal argumentation between 'monologue' and 'dialogue' : from the absolute rule to the rule of law / Fundamental rights and the rule of law : rule of law as argument for interference / Arguing for certainty in criminal decision-making and the rule of law / Legislative argument and the rule of law / Argumentative contributions to the settlement of conflicts in administrative judicial decisions / Due process and the rule of law : the role of argumentation in the defence of a fair trial / Rule of law and legal epistemology / Rhetorical status theory as an institutional framework for legal discussions / Debiasing and rule of law / Forensic orations. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85050550 Rule of law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 Débats judiciaires. Règle de droit. LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh Forensic orations fast Rule of law fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85050550 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 |
| title | Legal argumentation and the rule of law / |
| title_alt | International Conference on Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law / Legal argumentation and the rule of law / Judicial discretion and the rule of law / The rule of dual-natured law / Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions : a pragma-dialectical perspective / The legal characterization of facts at the International Criminal Court / The Facebook judge? : how transparency in social media conflicts with the rule of law / Analogy and e contrario : the facts, pet issues of perpetration, damage and damages / The burden of rationality : why and how should the judge justify her decision? / Four fallacies about analogical reasoning and the rule of law / Improving judicial argumentation about evidence in Dutch unus testis cases / Legal argumentation between 'monologue' and 'dialogue' : from the absolute rule to the rule of law / Fundamental rights and the rule of law : rule of law as argument for interference / Arguing for certainty in criminal decision-making and the rule of law / Legislative argument and the rule of law / Argumentative contributions to the settlement of conflicts in administrative judicial decisions / Due process and the rule of law : the role of argumentation in the defence of a fair trial / Rule of law and legal epistemology / Rhetorical status theory as an institutional framework for legal discussions / Debiasing and rule of law / |
| title_auth | Legal argumentation and the rule of law / |
| title_exact_search | Legal argumentation and the rule of law / |
| title_full | Legal argumentation and the rule of law / edited by E.T Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug and C.E. Smith. |
| title_fullStr | Legal argumentation and the rule of law / edited by E.T Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug and C.E. Smith. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legal argumentation and the rule of law / edited by E.T Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug and C.E. Smith. |
| title_short | Legal argumentation and the rule of law / |
| title_sort | legal argumentation and the rule of law |
| topic | Forensic orations. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85050550 Rule of law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 Débats judiciaires. Règle de droit. LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh Forensic orations fast Rule of law fast |
| topic_facet | Forensic orations. Rule of law. Débats judiciaires. Règle de droit. LAW Civil Procedure. LAW Legal Services. POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. Forensic orations Rule of law |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1366236 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT internationalconferenceonlegalargumentationandtheruleoflawerasmusuniversiteitrotterdam legalargumentationandtheruleoflaw AT feteriset legalargumentationandtheruleoflaw AT kloosterhuish legalargumentationandtheruleoflaw AT plughj legalargumentationandtheruleoflaw AT smithce legalargumentationandtheruleoflaw |