Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition :: Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri /
In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of confli...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Leiden ; Boston :
Brill,
[2017]
|
Schriftenreihe: | Islamicate intellectual history.
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of conflicting opinions within each school, while simultaneously providing a process of rule formulation ( tarjīḥ ) by which one opinion is chosen as the binding precedent ( taqlīd ). The predominant forum of both activities, he shows, was the legal commentary. Through a careful reading of Ibn Quṭlūbughā's (d. 879/1474) al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ , Al-Azem presents a new periodisation of the Ḥanafī madhhab , analyses the theory of rule formulation, and demonstrates how this madhhab -law tradition facilitated both continuity and legal change while serving as the basis of a pluralistic Mamluk judicial system. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
ISBN: | 9789004323292 9004323295 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000008i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn959552374 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
008 | 160927t20172017ne ob 001 0 eng | ||
010 | |a 2016044570 | ||
040 | |a DLC |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DLC |d YDX |d N$T |d IDEBK |d OCLCF |d UAB |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d EBLCP |d IDB |d ESU |d U3W |d OCLCO |d AGLDB |d G3B |d IGB |d STF |d LEAUB |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d UKSSU |d CUV |d INT |d K6U |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d SXB |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO | ||
019 | |a 962447631 |a 962800699 |a 964400436 | ||
020 | |a 9789004323292 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 9004323295 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 9789004322837 |q (hardback) ; |q alk. paper) | ||
020 | |z 9004322833 |q ((hardback) ; |q alk. paper) | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)959552374 |z (OCoLC)962447631 |z (OCoLC)962800699 |z (OCoLC)964400436 | ||
037 | |a 4734086 |b Proquest Ebook Central | ||
042 | |a pcc | ||
050 | 1 | 0 | |a KBP440.43.I264 |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 101000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 044000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 052000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 071000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 098000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 079000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 340.5/9 |2 23 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Al-Azem, Talal, |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : |b Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / |c by Talal Al-Azem. |
263 | |a 1712 | ||
264 | 1 | |a Leiden ; |a Boston : |b Brill, |c [2017] | |
264 | 4 | |c ©2017 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Islamicate Intellectual History ; |v v. 2 | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
588 | 0 | |a Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. | |
505 | 0 | |a Contents; Preface; List of Figures; Transliteration, Dates, and Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1. Authors; 1. The Compendium Author: Qudūrī; 1.1. The Sunni Revival and the Probabilism of the Madhhab-Law Tradition; 2. The Commentator: Ibn Quṭlūbughā; 2.1. Madhhab Literary Tradition and Mamluk Legal Pluralism; Chapter 2. History; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Sources; 2. Periodisation; 2.1. Period 1: Foundational 'Ḥanafī' Opinions (ca. 150-200) [5 Jurists]; 2.2. Period 2: Formative Transmission (ca. 200-300) [12 Jurists, 29 References] | |
505 | 8 | |a 2.3. Period 3: Classical Consolidation (ca. 300-400) [11 Jurists, 109 References]2.4. Period 4: Tarjīḥ (ca. 400-650) [48 Jurists, 1,090 References]; 2.5. Period 5: Taṣḥīḥ (ca. 650-870) [19 Jurists, 900 References]; 2.6. Who are the 'Latter-Day Jurists' (al-mutaʼakhkhirūn)?; 3. Historical Geographical Patterns; 4. Periodisation and the Typologies of Jurists (ṭabaqāt al-fuqahāʼ); Chapter 3. Theory; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Introduction to al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ; 2. Analysis of the Topics; 2.1. Definitions; 2.2. The Procedures of Rule-Determinacy; 2.3. Judicial Discretion | |
505 | 8 | |a 3. Arguments for Binding Precedent3.1. The Ethico-Religious Argument; 3.2. The Argument from Legal-System Consistency; 3.3. The Argument from Legal-System Coherence; 3.4. The Argument from Strengthened Decision-Making; 3.5. The Argument from Predictability; 3.6. The Argument from Historical Determinism; 4. Historical Developments; 4.1. Target Audiences: Muftis and Muftis; 4.2. Rule-Formulation (tarjīḥ) vs. Rule-Review (taṣḥīḥ); 4.3. From Monist to Pluralistic Legal Systems; 4.4. Madhhab-Law: Tradition, System, Concurrent Jurisdictions | |
505 | 8 | |a 5. The (Lack of) Definition of ẓāhir al-riwāyaChapter 4. Practice; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Practice of Rule-Review; 2. The Functional Relationships of Commentary; 2.1. To Resolve a Juristic Dispute [406]; 2.2. To Clarify a Point of Ambiguity [149]; 2.3. To Identify the Opinion or the Transmission Used in the Rule-Formulation [185]; 2.4. To Further Expand upon the Passage [420]; 2.5. To Identify an Editorial Problem in the Passage Itself [25]; 3. Employed Legal Rhetorical Reasoning; 3.1. Arguments of Juristic Evidence (dalīl); 3.2. Arguments of Transmission (riwāya) | |
505 | 8 | |a 3.3. Arguments of Language and Logic3.4. Arguments from Revelation and the Early Muslim Community; 3.5. Arguments from Scholarship; 3.6. Justifications from Juristic Considerations; 3.7. Justifications from Context; 3.8. Justifications from Exigencies of Change and Necessity; 3.9. Justifications of Lifting Difficulty and Facilitating Ease; 3.10. Justifications of Preceding Juristic Authority; 4. Operative Principles of Rule-Determination; 5. The Degree of Congruence between Theory and Practice; Conclusion; Appendix 1. The Writings of Qudūrī | |
520 | |a In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of conflicting opinions within each school, while simultaneously providing a process of rule formulation ( tarjīḥ ) by which one opinion is chosen as the binding precedent ( taqlīd ). The predominant forum of both activities, he shows, was the legal commentary. Through a careful reading of Ibn Quṭlūbughā's (d. 879/1474) al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ , Al-Azem presents a new periodisation of the Ḥanafī madhhab , analyses the theory of rule formulation, and demonstrates how this madhhab -law tradition facilitated both continuity and legal change while serving as the basis of a pluralistic Mamluk judicial system. | ||
600 | 1 | 0 | |a Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, |d 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82247534 |
600 | 1 | 0 | |a Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, |d 972 or 973-1037. |t Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī. |
600 | 1 | 7 | |a Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, |d 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475 |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJwtqbByFmt3t88dDxPG73 |
630 | 0 | 7 | |a Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī (Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad) |2 fast |
650 | 0 | |a Islamic law |x Interpretation and construction. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85068455 | |
650 | 0 | |a Hanafites. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85058609 | |
650 | 6 | |a Droit islamique |x Interprétation. | |
650 | 6 | |a Hanafites. | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Essays. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x General Practice. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Jurisprudence. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Paralegals & Paralegalism. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Practical Guides. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Reference. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Hanafites |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Islamic law |x Interpretation and construction |2 fast | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Al-Azem, Talal. |t Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition. |d Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2016] |z 9789004322837 |w (DLC) 2016043463 |
830 | 0 | |a Islamicate intellectual history. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017067511 | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1414519 |3 Volltext |
938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL4734086 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1414519 | ||
938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis36850281 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13259083 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn959552374 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816882363247886336 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Al-Azem, Talal |
author_facet | Al-Azem, Talal |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Al-Azem, Talal |
author_variant | t a a taa |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KBP440 |
callnumber-raw | KBP440.43.I264 |
callnumber-search | KBP440.43.I264 |
callnumber-sort | KBP 3440.43 I264 |
callnumber-subject | KBP - Islamic Law |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Contents; Preface; List of Figures; Transliteration, Dates, and Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1. Authors; 1. The Compendium Author: Qudūrī; 1.1. The Sunni Revival and the Probabilism of the Madhhab-Law Tradition; 2. The Commentator: Ibn Quṭlūbughā; 2.1. Madhhab Literary Tradition and Mamluk Legal Pluralism; Chapter 2. History; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Sources; 2. Periodisation; 2.1. Period 1: Foundational 'Ḥanafī' Opinions (ca. 150-200) [5 Jurists]; 2.2. Period 2: Formative Transmission (ca. 200-300) [12 Jurists, 29 References] 2.3. Period 3: Classical Consolidation (ca. 300-400) [11 Jurists, 109 References]2.4. Period 4: Tarjīḥ (ca. 400-650) [48 Jurists, 1,090 References]; 2.5. Period 5: Taṣḥīḥ (ca. 650-870) [19 Jurists, 900 References]; 2.6. Who are the 'Latter-Day Jurists' (al-mutaʼakhkhirūn)?; 3. Historical Geographical Patterns; 4. Periodisation and the Typologies of Jurists (ṭabaqāt al-fuqahāʼ); Chapter 3. Theory; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Introduction to al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ; 2. Analysis of the Topics; 2.1. Definitions; 2.2. The Procedures of Rule-Determinacy; 2.3. Judicial Discretion 3. Arguments for Binding Precedent3.1. The Ethico-Religious Argument; 3.2. The Argument from Legal-System Consistency; 3.3. The Argument from Legal-System Coherence; 3.4. The Argument from Strengthened Decision-Making; 3.5. The Argument from Predictability; 3.6. The Argument from Historical Determinism; 4. Historical Developments; 4.1. Target Audiences: Muftis and Muftis; 4.2. Rule-Formulation (tarjīḥ) vs. Rule-Review (taṣḥīḥ); 4.3. From Monist to Pluralistic Legal Systems; 4.4. Madhhab-Law: Tradition, System, Concurrent Jurisdictions 5. The (Lack of) Definition of ẓāhir al-riwāyaChapter 4. Practice; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Practice of Rule-Review; 2. The Functional Relationships of Commentary; 2.1. To Resolve a Juristic Dispute [406]; 2.2. To Clarify a Point of Ambiguity [149]; 2.3. To Identify the Opinion or the Transmission Used in the Rule-Formulation [185]; 2.4. To Further Expand upon the Passage [420]; 2.5. To Identify an Editorial Problem in the Passage Itself [25]; 3. Employed Legal Rhetorical Reasoning; 3.1. Arguments of Juristic Evidence (dalīl); 3.2. Arguments of Transmission (riwāya) 3.3. Arguments of Language and Logic3.4. Arguments from Revelation and the Early Muslim Community; 3.5. Arguments from Scholarship; 3.6. Justifications from Juristic Considerations; 3.7. Justifications from Context; 3.8. Justifications from Exigencies of Change and Necessity; 3.9. Justifications of Lifting Difficulty and Facilitating Ease; 3.10. Justifications of Preceding Juristic Authority; 4. Operative Principles of Rule-Determination; 5. The Degree of Congruence between Theory and Practice; Conclusion; Appendix 1. The Writings of Qudūrī |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)959552374 |
dewey-full | 340.5/9 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
dewey-raw | 340.5/9 |
dewey-search | 340.5/9 |
dewey-sort | 3340.5 19 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>07687cam a22008298i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn959552374</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160927t20172017ne ob 001 0 eng </controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> 2016044570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DLC</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">DLC</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">IDB</subfield><subfield code="d">ESU</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">G3B</subfield><subfield code="d">IGB</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">LEAUB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UKSSU</subfield><subfield code="d">CUV</subfield><subfield code="d">INT</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">SXB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">962447631</subfield><subfield code="a">962800699</subfield><subfield code="a">964400436</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004323292</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9004323295</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9789004322837</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardback) ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9004322833</subfield><subfield code="q">((hardback) ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)959552374</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962447631</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962800699</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)964400436</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4734086</subfield><subfield code="b">Proquest Ebook Central</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KBP440.43.I264</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">101000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">044000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">052000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">071000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">098000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">079000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340.5/9</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Al-Azem, Talal,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition :</subfield><subfield code="b">Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri /</subfield><subfield code="c">by Talal Al-Azem.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="263" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1712</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden ;</subfield><subfield code="a">Boston :</subfield><subfield code="b">Brill,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2017]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Islamicate Intellectual History ;</subfield><subfield code="v">v. 2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Contents; Preface; List of Figures; Transliteration, Dates, and Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1. Authors; 1. The Compendium Author: Qudūrī; 1.1. The Sunni Revival and the Probabilism of the Madhhab-Law Tradition; 2. The Commentator: Ibn Quṭlūbughā; 2.1. Madhhab Literary Tradition and Mamluk Legal Pluralism; Chapter 2. History; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Sources; 2. Periodisation; 2.1. Period 1: Foundational 'Ḥanafī' Opinions (ca. 150-200) [5 Jurists]; 2.2. Period 2: Formative Transmission (ca. 200-300) [12 Jurists, 29 References]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2.3. Period 3: Classical Consolidation (ca. 300-400) [11 Jurists, 109 References]2.4. Period 4: Tarjīḥ (ca. 400-650) [48 Jurists, 1,090 References]; 2.5. Period 5: Taṣḥīḥ (ca. 650-870) [19 Jurists, 900 References]; 2.6. Who are the 'Latter-Day Jurists' (al-mutaʼakhkhirūn)?; 3. Historical Geographical Patterns; 4. Periodisation and the Typologies of Jurists (ṭabaqāt al-fuqahāʼ); Chapter 3. Theory; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Introduction to al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ; 2. Analysis of the Topics; 2.1. Definitions; 2.2. The Procedures of Rule-Determinacy; 2.3. Judicial Discretion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3. Arguments for Binding Precedent3.1. The Ethico-Religious Argument; 3.2. The Argument from Legal-System Consistency; 3.3. The Argument from Legal-System Coherence; 3.4. The Argument from Strengthened Decision-Making; 3.5. The Argument from Predictability; 3.6. The Argument from Historical Determinism; 4. Historical Developments; 4.1. Target Audiences: Muftis and Muftis; 4.2. Rule-Formulation (tarjīḥ) vs. Rule-Review (taṣḥīḥ); 4.3. From Monist to Pluralistic Legal Systems; 4.4. Madhhab-Law: Tradition, System, Concurrent Jurisdictions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5. The (Lack of) Definition of ẓāhir al-riwāyaChapter 4. Practice; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Practice of Rule-Review; 2. The Functional Relationships of Commentary; 2.1. To Resolve a Juristic Dispute [406]; 2.2. To Clarify a Point of Ambiguity [149]; 2.3. To Identify the Opinion or the Transmission Used in the Rule-Formulation [185]; 2.4. To Further Expand upon the Passage [420]; 2.5. To Identify an Editorial Problem in the Passage Itself [25]; 3. Employed Legal Rhetorical Reasoning; 3.1. Arguments of Juristic Evidence (dalīl); 3.2. Arguments of Transmission (riwāya)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.3. Arguments of Language and Logic3.4. Arguments from Revelation and the Early Muslim Community; 3.5. Arguments from Scholarship; 3.6. Justifications from Juristic Considerations; 3.7. Justifications from Context; 3.8. Justifications from Exigencies of Change and Necessity; 3.9. Justifications of Lifting Difficulty and Facilitating Ease; 3.10. Justifications of Preceding Juristic Authority; 4. Operative Principles of Rule-Determination; 5. The Degree of Congruence between Theory and Practice; Conclusion; Appendix 1. The Writings of Qudūrī</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of conflicting opinions within each school, while simultaneously providing a process of rule formulation ( tarjīḥ ) by which one opinion is chosen as the binding precedent ( taqlīd ). The predominant forum of both activities, he shows, was the legal commentary. Through a careful reading of Ibn Quṭlūbughā's (d. 879/1474) al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ , Al-Azem presents a new periodisation of the Ḥanafī madhhab , analyses the theory of rule formulation, and demonstrates how this madhhab -law tradition facilitated both continuity and legal change while serving as the basis of a pluralistic Mamluk judicial system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh,</subfield><subfield code="d">1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82247534</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad,</subfield><subfield code="d">972 or 973-1037.</subfield><subfield code="t">Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh,</subfield><subfield code="d">1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJwtqbByFmt3t88dDxPG73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī (Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85068455</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hanafites.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85058609</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Droit islamique</subfield><subfield code="x">Interprétation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Hanafites.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Essays.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">General Practice.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Jurisprudence.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Paralegals & Paralegalism.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Practical Guides.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Reference.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hanafites</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Al-Azem, Talal.</subfield><subfield code="t">Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition.</subfield><subfield code="d">Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2016]</subfield><subfield code="z">9789004322837</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2016043463</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islamicate intellectual history.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017067511</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1414519</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4734086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1414519</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis36850281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13259083</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn959552374 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:27:25Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9789004323292 9004323295 |
language | English |
lccn | 2016044570 |
oclc_num | 959552374 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSearch | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | Brill, |
record_format | marc |
series | Islamicate intellectual history. |
series2 | Islamicate Intellectual History ; |
spelling | Al-Azem, Talal, author. Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / by Talal Al-Azem. 1712 Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2017] ©2017 1 online resource text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Islamicate Intellectual History ; v. 2 Includes bibliographical references and index. Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. Contents; Preface; List of Figures; Transliteration, Dates, and Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1. Authors; 1. The Compendium Author: Qudūrī; 1.1. The Sunni Revival and the Probabilism of the Madhhab-Law Tradition; 2. The Commentator: Ibn Quṭlūbughā; 2.1. Madhhab Literary Tradition and Mamluk Legal Pluralism; Chapter 2. History; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Sources; 2. Periodisation; 2.1. Period 1: Foundational 'Ḥanafī' Opinions (ca. 150-200) [5 Jurists]; 2.2. Period 2: Formative Transmission (ca. 200-300) [12 Jurists, 29 References] 2.3. Period 3: Classical Consolidation (ca. 300-400) [11 Jurists, 109 References]2.4. Period 4: Tarjīḥ (ca. 400-650) [48 Jurists, 1,090 References]; 2.5. Period 5: Taṣḥīḥ (ca. 650-870) [19 Jurists, 900 References]; 2.6. Who are the 'Latter-Day Jurists' (al-mutaʼakhkhirūn)?; 3. Historical Geographical Patterns; 4. Periodisation and the Typologies of Jurists (ṭabaqāt al-fuqahāʼ); Chapter 3. Theory; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Introduction to al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ; 2. Analysis of the Topics; 2.1. Definitions; 2.2. The Procedures of Rule-Determinacy; 2.3. Judicial Discretion 3. Arguments for Binding Precedent3.1. The Ethico-Religious Argument; 3.2. The Argument from Legal-System Consistency; 3.3. The Argument from Legal-System Coherence; 3.4. The Argument from Strengthened Decision-Making; 3.5. The Argument from Predictability; 3.6. The Argument from Historical Determinism; 4. Historical Developments; 4.1. Target Audiences: Muftis and Muftis; 4.2. Rule-Formulation (tarjīḥ) vs. Rule-Review (taṣḥīḥ); 4.3. From Monist to Pluralistic Legal Systems; 4.4. Madhhab-Law: Tradition, System, Concurrent Jurisdictions 5. The (Lack of) Definition of ẓāhir al-riwāyaChapter 4. Practice; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Practice of Rule-Review; 2. The Functional Relationships of Commentary; 2.1. To Resolve a Juristic Dispute [406]; 2.2. To Clarify a Point of Ambiguity [149]; 2.3. To Identify the Opinion or the Transmission Used in the Rule-Formulation [185]; 2.4. To Further Expand upon the Passage [420]; 2.5. To Identify an Editorial Problem in the Passage Itself [25]; 3. Employed Legal Rhetorical Reasoning; 3.1. Arguments of Juristic Evidence (dalīl); 3.2. Arguments of Transmission (riwāya) 3.3. Arguments of Language and Logic3.4. Arguments from Revelation and the Early Muslim Community; 3.5. Arguments from Scholarship; 3.6. Justifications from Juristic Considerations; 3.7. Justifications from Context; 3.8. Justifications from Exigencies of Change and Necessity; 3.9. Justifications of Lifting Difficulty and Facilitating Ease; 3.10. Justifications of Preceding Juristic Authority; 4. Operative Principles of Rule-Determination; 5. The Degree of Congruence between Theory and Practice; Conclusion; Appendix 1. The Writings of Qudūrī In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of conflicting opinions within each school, while simultaneously providing a process of rule formulation ( tarjīḥ ) by which one opinion is chosen as the binding precedent ( taqlīd ). The predominant forum of both activities, he shows, was the legal commentary. Through a careful reading of Ibn Quṭlūbughā's (d. 879/1474) al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ , Al-Azem presents a new periodisation of the Ḥanafī madhhab , analyses the theory of rule formulation, and demonstrates how this madhhab -law tradition facilitated both continuity and legal change while serving as the basis of a pluralistic Mamluk judicial system. Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82247534 Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, 972 or 973-1037. Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī. Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475 fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJwtqbByFmt3t88dDxPG73 Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī (Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad) fast Islamic law Interpretation and construction. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85068455 Hanafites. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85058609 Droit islamique Interprétation. Hanafites. LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Hanafites fast Islamic law Interpretation and construction fast Print version: Al-Azem, Talal. Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition. Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2016] 9789004322837 (DLC) 2016043463 Islamicate intellectual history. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017067511 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1414519 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Al-Azem, Talal Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / Islamicate intellectual history. Contents; Preface; List of Figures; Transliteration, Dates, and Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1. Authors; 1. The Compendium Author: Qudūrī; 1.1. The Sunni Revival and the Probabilism of the Madhhab-Law Tradition; 2. The Commentator: Ibn Quṭlūbughā; 2.1. Madhhab Literary Tradition and Mamluk Legal Pluralism; Chapter 2. History; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Sources; 2. Periodisation; 2.1. Period 1: Foundational 'Ḥanafī' Opinions (ca. 150-200) [5 Jurists]; 2.2. Period 2: Formative Transmission (ca. 200-300) [12 Jurists, 29 References] 2.3. Period 3: Classical Consolidation (ca. 300-400) [11 Jurists, 109 References]2.4. Period 4: Tarjīḥ (ca. 400-650) [48 Jurists, 1,090 References]; 2.5. Period 5: Taṣḥīḥ (ca. 650-870) [19 Jurists, 900 References]; 2.6. Who are the 'Latter-Day Jurists' (al-mutaʼakhkhirūn)?; 3. Historical Geographical Patterns; 4. Periodisation and the Typologies of Jurists (ṭabaqāt al-fuqahāʼ); Chapter 3. Theory; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Introduction to al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ; 2. Analysis of the Topics; 2.1. Definitions; 2.2. The Procedures of Rule-Determinacy; 2.3. Judicial Discretion 3. Arguments for Binding Precedent3.1. The Ethico-Religious Argument; 3.2. The Argument from Legal-System Consistency; 3.3. The Argument from Legal-System Coherence; 3.4. The Argument from Strengthened Decision-Making; 3.5. The Argument from Predictability; 3.6. The Argument from Historical Determinism; 4. Historical Developments; 4.1. Target Audiences: Muftis and Muftis; 4.2. Rule-Formulation (tarjīḥ) vs. Rule-Review (taṣḥīḥ); 4.3. From Monist to Pluralistic Legal Systems; 4.4. Madhhab-Law: Tradition, System, Concurrent Jurisdictions 5. The (Lack of) Definition of ẓāhir al-riwāyaChapter 4. Practice; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Practice of Rule-Review; 2. The Functional Relationships of Commentary; 2.1. To Resolve a Juristic Dispute [406]; 2.2. To Clarify a Point of Ambiguity [149]; 2.3. To Identify the Opinion or the Transmission Used in the Rule-Formulation [185]; 2.4. To Further Expand upon the Passage [420]; 2.5. To Identify an Editorial Problem in the Passage Itself [25]; 3. Employed Legal Rhetorical Reasoning; 3.1. Arguments of Juristic Evidence (dalīl); 3.2. Arguments of Transmission (riwāya) 3.3. Arguments of Language and Logic3.4. Arguments from Revelation and the Early Muslim Community; 3.5. Arguments from Scholarship; 3.6. Justifications from Juristic Considerations; 3.7. Justifications from Context; 3.8. Justifications from Exigencies of Change and Necessity; 3.9. Justifications of Lifting Difficulty and Facilitating Ease; 3.10. Justifications of Preceding Juristic Authority; 4. Operative Principles of Rule-Determination; 5. The Degree of Congruence between Theory and Practice; Conclusion; Appendix 1. The Writings of Qudūrī Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82247534 Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, 972 or 973-1037. Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī. Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475 fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJwtqbByFmt3t88dDxPG73 Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī (Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad) fast Islamic law Interpretation and construction. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85068455 Hanafites. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85058609 Droit islamique Interprétation. Hanafites. LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Hanafites fast Islamic law Interpretation and construction fast |
subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82247534 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85068455 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85058609 |
title | Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / |
title_auth | Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / |
title_exact_search | Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / |
title_full | Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / by Talal Al-Azem. |
title_fullStr | Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / by Talal Al-Azem. |
title_full_unstemmed | Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / by Talal Al-Azem. |
title_short | Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : |
title_sort | rule formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab law tradition ibn qutlubugha s commentary on the compendium of quduri |
title_sub | Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / |
topic | Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82247534 Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, 972 or 973-1037. Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī. Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475 fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJwtqbByFmt3t88dDxPG73 Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī (Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad) fast Islamic law Interpretation and construction. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85068455 Hanafites. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85058609 Droit islamique Interprétation. Hanafites. LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Hanafites fast Islamic law Interpretation and construction fast |
topic_facet | Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475. Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, 972 or 973-1037. Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī. Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475 Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī (Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad) Islamic law Interpretation and construction. Hanafites. Droit islamique Interprétation. LAW Essays. LAW General Practice. LAW Jurisprudence. LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. LAW Practical Guides. LAW Reference. Hanafites Islamic law Interpretation and construction |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1414519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alazemtalal ruleformulationandbindingprecedentinthemadhhablawtraditionibnqutlubughascommentaryonthecompendiumofquduri |