Performance funding for higher education /:
Seeking greater accountability in higher education, many states have adopted performance funding, tying state financial support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance based on specific outcomes such as student retention, progression, and graduation. Now in place in over t...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Baltimore, Maryland :
Johns Hopkins University Press,
[2016]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Seeking greater accountability in higher education, many states have adopted performance funding, tying state financial support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance based on specific outcomes such as student retention, progression, and graduation. Now in place in over thirty states, performance funding for higher education has been endorsed by the US Department of Education and major funders like the Gates and Lumina foundations. Focusing on three states that are regarded as leaders in the movement--Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee--Performance Funding for Higher Education presents the findings of a three-year research study on its implementation and impacts. Written by leading authorities and drawing on extensive interviews with government officials and college and university staff members, this book describes the policy instruments states use to implement performance funding; explores the organizational processes colleges rely on to determine how to respond to performance funding; analyzes the influence of performance funding on institutional policies and programs; reviews the impacts of performance funding on student outcomes; examines the obstacles institutions encounter in responding to performance funding demands; investigates the unintended impacts of performance funding. The authors conclude that, while performance funding clearly grabs the attention of colleges and leads them to change their policies and practices, it also encounters major obstacles and has unintended impacts. Colleges subject to performance funding are hindered in posting good results by inappropriate performance measures, insufficient organizational infrastructure, and the commitment to enroll many students who are poorly prepared or not interested in degrees. These obstacles help explain why multivariate statistical studies have failed to date to find a significant impact of performance funding on student outcomes, and why colleges are tempted to resort to weakening academic quality and restricting the admission of less-prepared and less-advantaged students in order to improve their apparent performance. These findings have wide-ranging implications for policy and research. Ultimately, the authors recommend that states create new ways of helping colleges with many at-risk students, define performance indicators and measures better tailored to institutional missions, and improve the capacity of colleges to engage in organizational learning. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (x, 263 pages) |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 237-256) and index. |
ISBN: | 9781421420837 142142083X |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn957683403 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr |n||||||||| | ||
008 | 160902t20162016mdu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 | |a YDX |b eng |e rda |e pn |c YDX |d P@U |d OCLCO |d N$T |d EBLCP |d CCO |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d ANG |d IDB |d OTZ |d UAB |d VGM |d MERUC |d UPM |d OCLCQ |d NRC |d OCLCQ |d WRM |d EZ9 |d IAI |d OCLCQ |d TKN |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d UKAHL |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d OCLCQ | ||
019 | |a 957738704 |a 959592031 |a 959867896 |a 960091380 |a 960277121 |a 960708570 |a 960833265 |a 961248677 |a 961459097 |a 964292565 |a 964546118 |a 992828285 | ||
020 | |a 9781421420837 |q (electronic book) | ||
020 | |a 142142083X |q (electronic book) | ||
020 | |z 9781421420820 | ||
020 | |z 1421420821 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)957683403 |z (OCoLC)957738704 |z (OCoLC)959592031 |z (OCoLC)959867896 |z (OCoLC)960091380 |z (OCoLC)960277121 |z (OCoLC)960708570 |z (OCoLC)960833265 |z (OCoLC)961248677 |z (OCoLC)961459097 |z (OCoLC)964292565 |z (OCoLC)964546118 |z (OCoLC)992828285 | ||
037 | |a 4531470 |b Proquest Ebook Central | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a LB2342 |b .D668 2016eb | |
072 | 7 | |a EDU |x 015000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 378.1/06 |2 23 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dougherty, Kevin James, |e author. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86859905 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Performance funding for higher education / |c Kevin J. Dougherty, Sosanya M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Rebecca S. Natow, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy. |
264 | 1 | |a Baltimore, Maryland : |b Johns Hopkins University Press, |c [2016] | |
264 | 4 | |c ©2016 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 263 pages) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 237-256) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | |a Introduction. Widespread adoption of performance funding ; The different forms of performance funding ; Conceptualizing how performance funding works ; Chapter contents and preview of findings -- Research perspectives, questions, and methods. Existing scholarship on the impacts of performance funding and its limitations ; Enlisting insights from other bodies of literature ; Conceptual framework ; Research questions ; Research methods -- Policy instruments and their immediate impacts. Financial incentives ; Communication of state program goals and methods ; Communication of institutional performance on the state metrics ; Building up institutional capacity to respond to performance funding ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Organizational learning in response to performance funding. Deliberative processes used to respond to performance funding ; Variations in deliberative processes ; Aids and hindrances to deliberation ; Variations in aids and hindrances ; Summary and conclusions -- Changes to institutional policies, programs, and practices. Perceptions about the impact of performance funding ; Changes in academic policies, practices, and programs ; Student services changes ; Isomorphism and the institutionalization of campus changes ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Student outcomes. Descriptive data ; Multivariate study findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Obstacles to effective response. Student-body composition ; inappropriate performance funding measures ; Insufficient institutional capacity ; Insufficient state funding of higher education ; Institutional resistance to performance funding ; Insufficient knowledge of performance funding ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Unintended impacts of performance funding. Restrictions of student admission ; Weakening of academic standards ; Compliance costs ; Reduced institutional cooperation ; Lower faculty and staff morale ; Less faculty voice in academic governance ; Narrowing of institutional mission ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Summary and conclusions. Key findings ; Implications for policy ; Implications for research ; Concluding thoughts -- Appendixes. A. The nature and history of performance funding in Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee ; B. Interview protocol for state officials ; C. Interview protocol for university administrators and faculty. | |
520 | |a Seeking greater accountability in higher education, many states have adopted performance funding, tying state financial support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance based on specific outcomes such as student retention, progression, and graduation. Now in place in over thirty states, performance funding for higher education has been endorsed by the US Department of Education and major funders like the Gates and Lumina foundations. Focusing on three states that are regarded as leaders in the movement--Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee--Performance Funding for Higher Education presents the findings of a three-year research study on its implementation and impacts. Written by leading authorities and drawing on extensive interviews with government officials and college and university staff members, this book describes the policy instruments states use to implement performance funding; explores the organizational processes colleges rely on to determine how to respond to performance funding; analyzes the influence of performance funding on institutional policies and programs; reviews the impacts of performance funding on student outcomes; examines the obstacles institutions encounter in responding to performance funding demands; investigates the unintended impacts of performance funding. The authors conclude that, while performance funding clearly grabs the attention of colleges and leads them to change their policies and practices, it also encounters major obstacles and has unintended impacts. Colleges subject to performance funding are hindered in posting good results by inappropriate performance measures, insufficient organizational infrastructure, and the commitment to enroll many students who are poorly prepared or not interested in degrees. These obstacles help explain why multivariate statistical studies have failed to date to find a significant impact of performance funding on student outcomes, and why colleges are tempted to resort to weakening academic quality and restricting the admission of less-prepared and less-advantaged students in order to improve their apparent performance. These findings have wide-ranging implications for policy and research. Ultimately, the authors recommend that states create new ways of helping colleges with many at-risk students, define performance indicators and measures better tailored to institutional missions, and improve the capacity of colleges to engage in organizational learning. | ||
588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
650 | 0 | |a Universities and colleges |z United States |x Finance. | |
650 | 0 | |a Education, Higher |z United States |x Finance. | |
650 | 0 | |a Government aid to higher education |z United States. | |
650 | 6 | |a Universités |z États-Unis |x Finances. | |
650 | 6 | |a Aide de l'État à l'enseignement supérieur |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION |x Higher. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Education, Higher |x Finance |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Government aid to higher education |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Universities and colleges |x Finance |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
700 | 1 | |a Jones, Sosanya, |e author. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018093637 | |
700 | 1 | |a Lahr, Hana, |e author. | |
700 | 1 | |a Natow, Rebecca S., |e author. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2015004061 | |
700 | 1 | |a Pheatt, Lara, |e author. | |
700 | 1 | |a Reddy, Vikash, |e author. | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Dougherty, Kevin James. |t Performance funding for higher education. |d Baltimore, Maryland : Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016 |z 9781421420820 |w (DLC) 2016002107 |w (OCoLC)945434080 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1220107 |3 Volltext |
936 | |a BATCHLOAD | ||
938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH35312218 | ||
938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL4531470 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1220107 | ||
938 | |a Project MUSE |b MUSE |n muse53210 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13147237 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn957683403 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816882360329699329 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Dougherty, Kevin James Jones, Sosanya Lahr, Hana Natow, Rebecca S. Pheatt, Lara Reddy, Vikash |
author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86859905 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018093637 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2015004061 |
author_facet | Dougherty, Kevin James Jones, Sosanya Lahr, Hana Natow, Rebecca S. Pheatt, Lara Reddy, Vikash |
author_role | aut aut aut aut aut aut |
author_sort | Dougherty, Kevin James |
author_variant | k j d kj kjd s j sj h l hl r s n rs rsn l p lp v r vr |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | L - Education |
callnumber-label | LB2342 |
callnumber-raw | LB2342 .D668 2016eb |
callnumber-search | LB2342 .D668 2016eb |
callnumber-sort | LB 42342 D668 42016EB |
callnumber-subject | LB - Theory and Practice of Education |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Introduction. Widespread adoption of performance funding ; The different forms of performance funding ; Conceptualizing how performance funding works ; Chapter contents and preview of findings -- Research perspectives, questions, and methods. Existing scholarship on the impacts of performance funding and its limitations ; Enlisting insights from other bodies of literature ; Conceptual framework ; Research questions ; Research methods -- Policy instruments and their immediate impacts. Financial incentives ; Communication of state program goals and methods ; Communication of institutional performance on the state metrics ; Building up institutional capacity to respond to performance funding ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Organizational learning in response to performance funding. Deliberative processes used to respond to performance funding ; Variations in deliberative processes ; Aids and hindrances to deliberation ; Variations in aids and hindrances ; Summary and conclusions -- Changes to institutional policies, programs, and practices. Perceptions about the impact of performance funding ; Changes in academic policies, practices, and programs ; Student services changes ; Isomorphism and the institutionalization of campus changes ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Student outcomes. Descriptive data ; Multivariate study findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Obstacles to effective response. Student-body composition ; inappropriate performance funding measures ; Insufficient institutional capacity ; Insufficient state funding of higher education ; Institutional resistance to performance funding ; Insufficient knowledge of performance funding ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Unintended impacts of performance funding. Restrictions of student admission ; Weakening of academic standards ; Compliance costs ; Reduced institutional cooperation ; Lower faculty and staff morale ; Less faculty voice in academic governance ; Narrowing of institutional mission ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Summary and conclusions. Key findings ; Implications for policy ; Implications for research ; Concluding thoughts -- Appendixes. A. The nature and history of performance funding in Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee ; B. Interview protocol for state officials ; C. Interview protocol for university administrators and faculty. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)957683403 |
dewey-full | 378.1/06 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 378 - Higher education (Tertiary education) |
dewey-raw | 378.1/06 |
dewey-search | 378.1/06 |
dewey-sort | 3378.1 16 |
dewey-tens | 370 - Education |
discipline | Pädagogik |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>08359cam a2200685 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn957683403</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160902t20162016mdu ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YDX</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">P@U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">CCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">ANG</subfield><subfield code="d">IDB</subfield><subfield code="d">OTZ</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">VGM</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">UPM</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">NRC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">WRM</subfield><subfield code="d">EZ9</subfield><subfield code="d">IAI</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">TKN</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">957738704</subfield><subfield code="a">959592031</subfield><subfield code="a">959867896</subfield><subfield code="a">960091380</subfield><subfield code="a">960277121</subfield><subfield code="a">960708570</subfield><subfield code="a">960833265</subfield><subfield code="a">961248677</subfield><subfield code="a">961459097</subfield><subfield code="a">964292565</subfield><subfield code="a">964546118</subfield><subfield code="a">992828285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781421420837</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic book)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">142142083X</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic book)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781421420820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1421420821</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)957683403</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)957738704</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)959592031</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)959867896</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)960091380</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)960277121</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)960708570</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)960833265</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961248677</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961459097</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)964292565</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)964546118</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)992828285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4531470</subfield><subfield code="b">Proquest Ebook Central</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LB2342</subfield><subfield code="b">.D668 2016eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDU</subfield><subfield code="x">015000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">378.1/06</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dougherty, Kevin James,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86859905</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance funding for higher education /</subfield><subfield code="c">Kevin J. Dougherty, Sosanya M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Rebecca S. Natow, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baltimore, Maryland :</subfield><subfield code="b">Johns Hopkins University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2016]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (x, 263 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 237-256) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction. Widespread adoption of performance funding ; The different forms of performance funding ; Conceptualizing how performance funding works ; Chapter contents and preview of findings -- Research perspectives, questions, and methods. Existing scholarship on the impacts of performance funding and its limitations ; Enlisting insights from other bodies of literature ; Conceptual framework ; Research questions ; Research methods -- Policy instruments and their immediate impacts. Financial incentives ; Communication of state program goals and methods ; Communication of institutional performance on the state metrics ; Building up institutional capacity to respond to performance funding ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Organizational learning in response to performance funding. Deliberative processes used to respond to performance funding ; Variations in deliberative processes ; Aids and hindrances to deliberation ; Variations in aids and hindrances ; Summary and conclusions -- Changes to institutional policies, programs, and practices. Perceptions about the impact of performance funding ; Changes in academic policies, practices, and programs ; Student services changes ; Isomorphism and the institutionalization of campus changes ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Student outcomes. Descriptive data ; Multivariate study findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Obstacles to effective response. Student-body composition ; inappropriate performance funding measures ; Insufficient institutional capacity ; Insufficient state funding of higher education ; Institutional resistance to performance funding ; Insufficient knowledge of performance funding ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Unintended impacts of performance funding. Restrictions of student admission ; Weakening of academic standards ; Compliance costs ; Reduced institutional cooperation ; Lower faculty and staff morale ; Less faculty voice in academic governance ; Narrowing of institutional mission ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Summary and conclusions. Key findings ; Implications for policy ; Implications for research ; Concluding thoughts -- Appendixes. A. The nature and history of performance funding in Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee ; B. Interview protocol for state officials ; C. Interview protocol for university administrators and faculty.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seeking greater accountability in higher education, many states have adopted performance funding, tying state financial support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance based on specific outcomes such as student retention, progression, and graduation. Now in place in over thirty states, performance funding for higher education has been endorsed by the US Department of Education and major funders like the Gates and Lumina foundations. Focusing on three states that are regarded as leaders in the movement--Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee--Performance Funding for Higher Education presents the findings of a three-year research study on its implementation and impacts. Written by leading authorities and drawing on extensive interviews with government officials and college and university staff members, this book describes the policy instruments states use to implement performance funding; explores the organizational processes colleges rely on to determine how to respond to performance funding; analyzes the influence of performance funding on institutional policies and programs; reviews the impacts of performance funding on student outcomes; examines the obstacles institutions encounter in responding to performance funding demands; investigates the unintended impacts of performance funding. The authors conclude that, while performance funding clearly grabs the attention of colleges and leads them to change their policies and practices, it also encounters major obstacles and has unintended impacts. Colleges subject to performance funding are hindered in posting good results by inappropriate performance measures, insufficient organizational infrastructure, and the commitment to enroll many students who are poorly prepared or not interested in degrees. These obstacles help explain why multivariate statistical studies have failed to date to find a significant impact of performance funding on student outcomes, and why colleges are tempted to resort to weakening academic quality and restricting the admission of less-prepared and less-advantaged students in order to improve their apparent performance. These findings have wide-ranging implications for policy and research. Ultimately, the authors recommend that states create new ways of helping colleges with many at-risk students, define performance indicators and measures better tailored to institutional missions, and improve the capacity of colleges to engage in organizational learning.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education, Higher</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Government aid to higher education</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Universités</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="x">Finances.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Aide de l'État à l'enseignement supérieur</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDUCATION</subfield><subfield code="x">Higher.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Education, Higher</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Government aid to higher education</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Sosanya,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018093637</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lahr, Hana,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Natow, Rebecca S.,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2015004061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pheatt, Lara,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reddy, Vikash,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Dougherty, Kevin James.</subfield><subfield code="t">Performance funding for higher education.</subfield><subfield code="d">Baltimore, Maryland : Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016</subfield><subfield code="z">9781421420820</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2016002107</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)945434080</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1220107</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BATCHLOAD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH35312218</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4531470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1220107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Project MUSE</subfield><subfield code="b">MUSE</subfield><subfield code="n">muse53210</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13147237</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
geographic_facet | United States |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn957683403 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:27:22Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781421420837 142142083X |
language | English |
oclc_num | 957683403 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource (x, 263 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | Johns Hopkins University Press, |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Dougherty, Kevin James, author. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86859905 Performance funding for higher education / Kevin J. Dougherty, Sosanya M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Rebecca S. Natow, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy. Baltimore, Maryland : Johns Hopkins University Press, [2016] ©2016 1 online resource (x, 263 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references (pages 237-256) and index. Introduction. Widespread adoption of performance funding ; The different forms of performance funding ; Conceptualizing how performance funding works ; Chapter contents and preview of findings -- Research perspectives, questions, and methods. Existing scholarship on the impacts of performance funding and its limitations ; Enlisting insights from other bodies of literature ; Conceptual framework ; Research questions ; Research methods -- Policy instruments and their immediate impacts. Financial incentives ; Communication of state program goals and methods ; Communication of institutional performance on the state metrics ; Building up institutional capacity to respond to performance funding ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Organizational learning in response to performance funding. Deliberative processes used to respond to performance funding ; Variations in deliberative processes ; Aids and hindrances to deliberation ; Variations in aids and hindrances ; Summary and conclusions -- Changes to institutional policies, programs, and practices. Perceptions about the impact of performance funding ; Changes in academic policies, practices, and programs ; Student services changes ; Isomorphism and the institutionalization of campus changes ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Student outcomes. Descriptive data ; Multivariate study findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Obstacles to effective response. Student-body composition ; inappropriate performance funding measures ; Insufficient institutional capacity ; Insufficient state funding of higher education ; Institutional resistance to performance funding ; Insufficient knowledge of performance funding ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Unintended impacts of performance funding. Restrictions of student admission ; Weakening of academic standards ; Compliance costs ; Reduced institutional cooperation ; Lower faculty and staff morale ; Less faculty voice in academic governance ; Narrowing of institutional mission ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Summary and conclusions. Key findings ; Implications for policy ; Implications for research ; Concluding thoughts -- Appendixes. A. The nature and history of performance funding in Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee ; B. Interview protocol for state officials ; C. Interview protocol for university administrators and faculty. Seeking greater accountability in higher education, many states have adopted performance funding, tying state financial support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance based on specific outcomes such as student retention, progression, and graduation. Now in place in over thirty states, performance funding for higher education has been endorsed by the US Department of Education and major funders like the Gates and Lumina foundations. Focusing on three states that are regarded as leaders in the movement--Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee--Performance Funding for Higher Education presents the findings of a three-year research study on its implementation and impacts. Written by leading authorities and drawing on extensive interviews with government officials and college and university staff members, this book describes the policy instruments states use to implement performance funding; explores the organizational processes colleges rely on to determine how to respond to performance funding; analyzes the influence of performance funding on institutional policies and programs; reviews the impacts of performance funding on student outcomes; examines the obstacles institutions encounter in responding to performance funding demands; investigates the unintended impacts of performance funding. The authors conclude that, while performance funding clearly grabs the attention of colleges and leads them to change their policies and practices, it also encounters major obstacles and has unintended impacts. Colleges subject to performance funding are hindered in posting good results by inappropriate performance measures, insufficient organizational infrastructure, and the commitment to enroll many students who are poorly prepared or not interested in degrees. These obstacles help explain why multivariate statistical studies have failed to date to find a significant impact of performance funding on student outcomes, and why colleges are tempted to resort to weakening academic quality and restricting the admission of less-prepared and less-advantaged students in order to improve their apparent performance. These findings have wide-ranging implications for policy and research. Ultimately, the authors recommend that states create new ways of helping colleges with many at-risk students, define performance indicators and measures better tailored to institutional missions, and improve the capacity of colleges to engage in organizational learning. Print version record. Universities and colleges United States Finance. Education, Higher United States Finance. Government aid to higher education United States. Universités États-Unis Finances. Aide de l'État à l'enseignement supérieur États-Unis. EDUCATION Higher. bisacsh Education, Higher Finance fast Government aid to higher education fast Universities and colleges Finance fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq Jones, Sosanya, author. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018093637 Lahr, Hana, author. Natow, Rebecca S., author. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2015004061 Pheatt, Lara, author. Reddy, Vikash, author. Print version: Dougherty, Kevin James. Performance funding for higher education. Baltimore, Maryland : Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016 9781421420820 (DLC) 2016002107 (OCoLC)945434080 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1220107 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Dougherty, Kevin James Jones, Sosanya Lahr, Hana Natow, Rebecca S. Pheatt, Lara Reddy, Vikash Performance funding for higher education / Introduction. Widespread adoption of performance funding ; The different forms of performance funding ; Conceptualizing how performance funding works ; Chapter contents and preview of findings -- Research perspectives, questions, and methods. Existing scholarship on the impacts of performance funding and its limitations ; Enlisting insights from other bodies of literature ; Conceptual framework ; Research questions ; Research methods -- Policy instruments and their immediate impacts. Financial incentives ; Communication of state program goals and methods ; Communication of institutional performance on the state metrics ; Building up institutional capacity to respond to performance funding ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Organizational learning in response to performance funding. Deliberative processes used to respond to performance funding ; Variations in deliberative processes ; Aids and hindrances to deliberation ; Variations in aids and hindrances ; Summary and conclusions -- Changes to institutional policies, programs, and practices. Perceptions about the impact of performance funding ; Changes in academic policies, practices, and programs ; Student services changes ; Isomorphism and the institutionalization of campus changes ; Disaggregating our main patterns ; Summary and conclusions -- Student outcomes. Descriptive data ; Multivariate study findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Obstacles to effective response. Student-body composition ; inappropriate performance funding measures ; Insufficient institutional capacity ; Insufficient state funding of higher education ; Institutional resistance to performance funding ; Insufficient knowledge of performance funding ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Unintended impacts of performance funding. Restrictions of student admission ; Weakening of academic standards ; Compliance costs ; Reduced institutional cooperation ; Lower faculty and staff morale ; Less faculty voice in academic governance ; Narrowing of institutional mission ; Variations within our main findings ; Summary and conclusions -- Summary and conclusions. Key findings ; Implications for policy ; Implications for research ; Concluding thoughts -- Appendixes. A. The nature and history of performance funding in Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee ; B. Interview protocol for state officials ; C. Interview protocol for university administrators and faculty. Universities and colleges United States Finance. Education, Higher United States Finance. Government aid to higher education United States. Universités États-Unis Finances. Aide de l'État à l'enseignement supérieur États-Unis. EDUCATION Higher. bisacsh Education, Higher Finance fast Government aid to higher education fast Universities and colleges Finance fast |
title | Performance funding for higher education / |
title_auth | Performance funding for higher education / |
title_exact_search | Performance funding for higher education / |
title_full | Performance funding for higher education / Kevin J. Dougherty, Sosanya M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Rebecca S. Natow, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy. |
title_fullStr | Performance funding for higher education / Kevin J. Dougherty, Sosanya M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Rebecca S. Natow, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy. |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance funding for higher education / Kevin J. Dougherty, Sosanya M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Rebecca S. Natow, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy. |
title_short | Performance funding for higher education / |
title_sort | performance funding for higher education |
topic | Universities and colleges United States Finance. Education, Higher United States Finance. Government aid to higher education United States. Universités États-Unis Finances. Aide de l'État à l'enseignement supérieur États-Unis. EDUCATION Higher. bisacsh Education, Higher Finance fast Government aid to higher education fast Universities and colleges Finance fast |
topic_facet | Universities and colleges United States Finance. Education, Higher United States Finance. Government aid to higher education United States. Universités États-Unis Finances. Aide de l'État à l'enseignement supérieur États-Unis. EDUCATION Higher. Education, Higher Finance Government aid to higher education Universities and colleges Finance United States |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1220107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doughertykevinjames performancefundingforhighereducation AT jonessosanya performancefundingforhighereducation AT lahrhana performancefundingforhighereducation AT natowrebeccas performancefundingforhighereducation AT pheattlara performancefundingforhighereducation AT reddyvikash performancefundingforhighereducation |