Privatising the bbc.:
"This book makes a persuasive argument that the licence fee is no longer the right way to raise revenue for the BBC. While there was a case for this model when the only way to watch the BBC was through the ownership of a television, and there was no way to prevent anyone who owned a television...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
Inst Of Economic Affairs,
2016.
|
Schriftenreihe: | Hobart paperback (2015) ;
182. |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "This book makes a persuasive argument that the licence fee is no longer the right way to raise revenue for the BBC. While there was a case for this model when the only way to watch the BBC was through the ownership of a television, and there was no way to prevent anyone who owned a television from watching the BBC, technological developments have demolished this argument. Millennials consume more and more of their broadcast media through a tablet, computer or phone. Yet, non-payment of the licence fee now accounts for 10 per cent of all criminal convictions in the UK, so we may soon be in the invidious position where a majority of young people watch BBC programmes through devices that are not taxed, while older people who own a television but watch only ITV or Sky Sports are taxed and, in the case of non-compliance, subject to arrest. Those who support the continuation of the licence fee often do so using two arguments: that the BBC is vital for producing what has become known as 'public service broadcasting', and that the BBC produces news that is non-partisan together with unbiased coverage of current affairs. The authors of this book challenge both of these arguments and show that there are various ways in which the BBC could be made independent of the state and/or of compulsory funding."--Provided by publisher. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references. |
ISBN: | 9780255367264 0255367260 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000003 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn951835728 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240705115654.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr |n||||||||| | ||
008 | 160616s2016 xx ob 000 0 eng d | ||
040 | |a YDXCP |b eng |e pn |c YDXCP |d IDEBK |d N$T |d EBLCP |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d AGLDB |d HLS |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d IDB |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d STF |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d YDX |d CEF |d UKAHL |d VLY |d INARC |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
019 | |a 951749900 |a 951807692 |a 951977558 |a 1044424613 |a 1056582708 |a 1198185551 | ||
020 | |a 9780255367264 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 0255367260 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 0255367252 | ||
020 | |z 9780255367257 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)951835728 |z (OCoLC)951749900 |z (OCoLC)951807692 |z (OCoLC)951977558 |z (OCoLC)1044424613 |z (OCoLC)1056582708 |z (OCoLC)1198185551 | ||
037 | |a 931302 |b MIL | ||
043 | |a e-uk--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a HE8689.9.G7 |b I5 2016eb | |
072 | 7 | |a BUS |x 070060 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a TEC |x 041000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 384.540941 |2 23 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Booth, Philip. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Privatising the bbc. |
260 | |a [Place of publication not identified] : |b Inst Of Economic Affairs, |c 2016. | ||
300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Hobart paperback ; |v 182 | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
505 | 0 | |a _GoBack; 16; a2; n3; n13; n5; n6; The authors; Foreword; Acknowledgement; Summary; Tables, figures and boxes; 1 Introduction: broadcasting in the twenty-first century ; Philip Booth and Stephen Davies; The origins of the licence fee; The evolution to a hypothecated television tax; The collapse of the justification for licence fee funding; Television broadcasts are not a public good; The licence fee debate should be dead -- at least among economists; What might replace the licence fee model of funding the BBC?; Public service broadcasting; Bias and the BBC; Privatising the BBC; Conclusion. | |
505 | 8 | |a Is the BBC biased to the left?Institutional bias and the BBC; Shared values of BBC staff; The BBC, 'conventional wisdom' and the problem of nuanced views; Conclusion; References; 5 Privatising the BBC; Tim Congdon; Setting the scene; The case for ending the licence fee; The BBC in the digital era; Common defences of state funding of broadcasting; Final remarks on the licence fee; The case for the privatisation of the BBC; A possible alternative approach: a smaller BBC? ; References; About the IEA; Table(1 PSB channels and channels operated by public service broadcasters. | |
505 | 8 | |a Table(2 Think-tank citations by politicians and the BBC News websiteTable(3 Think-tank mentions and health warnings on the BBC website in the previous Parliament; Table(4 UK television industry metrics; Figure(1 Viewer shares by channel (aged 4+), 1988-2014; Figure(2 PSB and portfolio share of TV viewing, all individuals, by channel: 2004-14; Figure(3 How PSB channels are delivered to viewers, 2014; Figure(4 Public service broadcasting by non-public-service broadcasters; Figure(5 Total TV revenues by source, 2009-14. | |
505 | 8 | |a Figure(6 Number of citations by Labour politicians as a proportion of citations by Labour and Conservative politiciansFigure(7 EU interview comparisons; Figure(8 The financing of British television today (£ billion revenues); Figure(9 Is the BBC already an underdog?; Figure(10 Global TV industry revenues by source (£ billion); Box(1 Competition policy and the BBC. | |
520 | |a "This book makes a persuasive argument that the licence fee is no longer the right way to raise revenue for the BBC. While there was a case for this model when the only way to watch the BBC was through the ownership of a television, and there was no way to prevent anyone who owned a television from watching the BBC, technological developments have demolished this argument. Millennials consume more and more of their broadcast media through a tablet, computer or phone. Yet, non-payment of the licence fee now accounts for 10 per cent of all criminal convictions in the UK, so we may soon be in the invidious position where a majority of young people watch BBC programmes through devices that are not taxed, while older people who own a television but watch only ITV or Sky Sports are taxed and, in the case of non-compliance, subject to arrest. Those who support the continuation of the licence fee often do so using two arguments: that the BBC is vital for producing what has become known as 'public service broadcasting', and that the BBC produces news that is non-partisan together with unbiased coverage of current affairs. The authors of this book challenge both of these arguments and show that there are various ways in which the BBC could be made independent of the state and/or of compulsory funding."--Provided by publisher. | ||
610 | 2 | 0 | |a British Broadcasting Corporation |x Finance. |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a British Broadcasting Corporation |2 fast |
650 | 0 | |a Public broadcasting |z Great Britain |x Finance. | |
650 | 0 | |a Broadcasting |z Great Britain |x Finance. | |
650 | 6 | |a Radiodiffusion |z Grande-Bretagne |x Finances. | |
650 | 7 | |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS |x Industries |x Media & Communications. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING |x Telecommunications. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Broadcasting |x Finance |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Finance |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Public broadcasting |x Finance |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a Great Britain |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJdmp7p3cx8hpmJ8HvmTpP | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Booth, Philip. |t Privatising the bbc. |d [Place of publication not identified] : Inst Of Economic Affairs, 2016 |z 0255367252 |z 9780255367257 |w (OCoLC)946161440 |
830 | 0 | |a Hobart paperback (2015) ; |v 182. | |
856 | 1 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1250633 |3 Volltext | |
856 | 1 | |l CBO01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1250633 |3 Volltext | |
938 | |a Internet Archive |b INAR |n privatisingbbc0000boot | ||
938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL4556910 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1250633 | ||
938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis34872850 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13038137 | ||
938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH30892228 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn951835728 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1813903723046371328 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Booth, Philip |
author_facet | Booth, Philip |
author_role | |
author_sort | Booth, Philip |
author_variant | p b pb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HE8689 |
callnumber-raw | HE8689.9.G7 I5 2016eb |
callnumber-search | HE8689.9.G7 I5 2016eb |
callnumber-sort | HE 48689.9 G7 I5 42016EB |
callnumber-subject | HE - Transportation and Communications |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | _GoBack; 16; a2; n3; n13; n5; n6; The authors; Foreword; Acknowledgement; Summary; Tables, figures and boxes; 1 Introduction: broadcasting in the twenty-first century ; Philip Booth and Stephen Davies; The origins of the licence fee; The evolution to a hypothecated television tax; The collapse of the justification for licence fee funding; Television broadcasts are not a public good; The licence fee debate should be dead -- at least among economists; What might replace the licence fee model of funding the BBC?; Public service broadcasting; Bias and the BBC; Privatising the BBC; Conclusion. Is the BBC biased to the left?Institutional bias and the BBC; Shared values of BBC staff; The BBC, 'conventional wisdom' and the problem of nuanced views; Conclusion; References; 5 Privatising the BBC; Tim Congdon; Setting the scene; The case for ending the licence fee; The BBC in the digital era; Common defences of state funding of broadcasting; Final remarks on the licence fee; The case for the privatisation of the BBC; A possible alternative approach: a smaller BBC? ; References; About the IEA; Table(1 PSB channels and channels operated by public service broadcasters. Table(2 Think-tank citations by politicians and the BBC News websiteTable(3 Think-tank mentions and health warnings on the BBC website in the previous Parliament; Table(4 UK television industry metrics; Figure(1 Viewer shares by channel (aged 4+), 1988-2014; Figure(2 PSB and portfolio share of TV viewing, all individuals, by channel: 2004-14; Figure(3 How PSB channels are delivered to viewers, 2014; Figure(4 Public service broadcasting by non-public-service broadcasters; Figure(5 Total TV revenues by source, 2009-14. Figure(6 Number of citations by Labour politicians as a proportion of citations by Labour and Conservative politiciansFigure(7 EU interview comparisons; Figure(8 The financing of British television today (£ billion revenues); Figure(9 Is the BBC already an underdog?; Figure(10 Global TV industry revenues by source (£ billion); Box(1 Competition policy and the BBC. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)951835728 |
dewey-full | 384.540941 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 384 - Communications |
dewey-raw | 384.540941 |
dewey-search | 384.540941 |
dewey-sort | 3384.540941 |
dewey-tens | 380 - Commerce, communications, transportation |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06281cam a22006853 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn951835728</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240705115654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160616s2016 xx ob 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">HLS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">IDB</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">CEF</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">VLY</subfield><subfield code="d">INARC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">951749900</subfield><subfield code="a">951807692</subfield><subfield code="a">951977558</subfield><subfield code="a">1044424613</subfield><subfield code="a">1056582708</subfield><subfield code="a">1198185551</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780255367264</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0255367260</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0255367252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780255367257</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)951835728</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)951749900</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)951807692</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)951977558</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1044424613</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1056582708</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1198185551</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">931302</subfield><subfield code="b">MIL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">e-uk---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">HE8689.9.G7</subfield><subfield code="b">I5 2016eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">BUS</subfield><subfield code="x">070060</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TEC</subfield><subfield code="x">041000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">384.540941</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Booth, Philip.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Privatising the bbc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">[Place of publication not identified] :</subfield><subfield code="b">Inst Of Economic Affairs,</subfield><subfield code="c">2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hobart paperback ;</subfield><subfield code="v">182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">_GoBack; 16; a2; n3; n13; n5; n6; The authors; Foreword; Acknowledgement; Summary; Tables, figures and boxes; 1 Introduction: broadcasting in the twenty-first century ; Philip Booth and Stephen Davies; The origins of the licence fee; The evolution to a hypothecated television tax; The collapse of the justification for licence fee funding; Television broadcasts are not a public good; The licence fee debate should be dead -- at least among economists; What might replace the licence fee model of funding the BBC?; Public service broadcasting; Bias and the BBC; Privatising the BBC; Conclusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Is the BBC biased to the left?Institutional bias and the BBC; Shared values of BBC staff; The BBC, 'conventional wisdom' and the problem of nuanced views; Conclusion; References; 5 Privatising the BBC; Tim Congdon; Setting the scene; The case for ending the licence fee; The BBC in the digital era; Common defences of state funding of broadcasting; Final remarks on the licence fee; The case for the privatisation of the BBC; A possible alternative approach: a smaller BBC? ; References; About the IEA; Table(1 PSB channels and channels operated by public service broadcasters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Table(2 Think-tank citations by politicians and the BBC News websiteTable(3 Think-tank mentions and health warnings on the BBC website in the previous Parliament; Table(4 UK television industry metrics; Figure(1 Viewer shares by channel (aged 4+), 1988-2014; Figure(2 PSB and portfolio share of TV viewing, all individuals, by channel: 2004-14; Figure(3 How PSB channels are delivered to viewers, 2014; Figure(4 Public service broadcasting by non-public-service broadcasters; Figure(5 Total TV revenues by source, 2009-14.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Figure(6 Number of citations by Labour politicians as a proportion of citations by Labour and Conservative politiciansFigure(7 EU interview comparisons; Figure(8 The financing of British television today (£ billion revenues); Figure(9 Is the BBC already an underdog?; Figure(10 Global TV industry revenues by source (£ billion); Box(1 Competition policy and the BBC.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book makes a persuasive argument that the licence fee is no longer the right way to raise revenue for the BBC. While there was a case for this model when the only way to watch the BBC was through the ownership of a television, and there was no way to prevent anyone who owned a television from watching the BBC, technological developments have demolished this argument. Millennials consume more and more of their broadcast media through a tablet, computer or phone. Yet, non-payment of the licence fee now accounts for 10 per cent of all criminal convictions in the UK, so we may soon be in the invidious position where a majority of young people watch BBC programmes through devices that are not taxed, while older people who own a television but watch only ITV or Sky Sports are taxed and, in the case of non-compliance, subject to arrest. Those who support the continuation of the licence fee often do so using two arguments: that the BBC is vital for producing what has become known as 'public service broadcasting', and that the BBC produces news that is non-partisan together with unbiased coverage of current affairs. The authors of this book challenge both of these arguments and show that there are various ways in which the BBC could be made independent of the state and/or of compulsory funding."--Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">British Broadcasting Corporation</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">British Broadcasting Corporation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public broadcasting</subfield><subfield code="z">Great Britain</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Broadcasting</subfield><subfield code="z">Great Britain</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Radiodiffusion</subfield><subfield code="z">Grande-Bretagne</subfield><subfield code="x">Finances.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">BUSINESS & ECONOMICS</subfield><subfield code="x">Industries</subfield><subfield code="x">Media & Communications.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING</subfield><subfield code="x">Telecommunications.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Broadcasting</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Finance</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Public broadcasting</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Great Britain</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJdmp7p3cx8hpmJ8HvmTpP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Booth, Philip.</subfield><subfield code="t">Privatising the bbc.</subfield><subfield code="d">[Place of publication not identified] : Inst Of Economic Affairs, 2016</subfield><subfield code="z">0255367252</subfield><subfield code="z">9780255367257</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)946161440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hobart paperback (2015) ;</subfield><subfield code="v">182.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1250633</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="l">CBO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1250633</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Internet Archive</subfield><subfield code="b">INAR</subfield><subfield code="n">privatisingbbc0000boot</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4556910</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1250633</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis34872850</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13038137</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH30892228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Great Britain fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJdmp7p3cx8hpmJ8HvmTpP |
geographic_facet | Great Britain |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn951835728 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-10-25T16:23:13Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780255367264 0255367260 |
language | English |
oclc_num | 951835728 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN |
owner_facet | MAIN |
physical | 1 online resource |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | Inst Of Economic Affairs, |
record_format | marc |
series | Hobart paperback (2015) ; |
series2 | Hobart paperback ; |
spelling | Booth, Philip. Privatising the bbc. [Place of publication not identified] : Inst Of Economic Affairs, 2016. 1 online resource text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Hobart paperback ; 182 Includes bibliographical references. _GoBack; 16; a2; n3; n13; n5; n6; The authors; Foreword; Acknowledgement; Summary; Tables, figures and boxes; 1 Introduction: broadcasting in the twenty-first century ; Philip Booth and Stephen Davies; The origins of the licence fee; The evolution to a hypothecated television tax; The collapse of the justification for licence fee funding; Television broadcasts are not a public good; The licence fee debate should be dead -- at least among economists; What might replace the licence fee model of funding the BBC?; Public service broadcasting; Bias and the BBC; Privatising the BBC; Conclusion. Is the BBC biased to the left?Institutional bias and the BBC; Shared values of BBC staff; The BBC, 'conventional wisdom' and the problem of nuanced views; Conclusion; References; 5 Privatising the BBC; Tim Congdon; Setting the scene; The case for ending the licence fee; The BBC in the digital era; Common defences of state funding of broadcasting; Final remarks on the licence fee; The case for the privatisation of the BBC; A possible alternative approach: a smaller BBC? ; References; About the IEA; Table(1 PSB channels and channels operated by public service broadcasters. Table(2 Think-tank citations by politicians and the BBC News websiteTable(3 Think-tank mentions and health warnings on the BBC website in the previous Parliament; Table(4 UK television industry metrics; Figure(1 Viewer shares by channel (aged 4+), 1988-2014; Figure(2 PSB and portfolio share of TV viewing, all individuals, by channel: 2004-14; Figure(3 How PSB channels are delivered to viewers, 2014; Figure(4 Public service broadcasting by non-public-service broadcasters; Figure(5 Total TV revenues by source, 2009-14. Figure(6 Number of citations by Labour politicians as a proportion of citations by Labour and Conservative politiciansFigure(7 EU interview comparisons; Figure(8 The financing of British television today (£ billion revenues); Figure(9 Is the BBC already an underdog?; Figure(10 Global TV industry revenues by source (£ billion); Box(1 Competition policy and the BBC. "This book makes a persuasive argument that the licence fee is no longer the right way to raise revenue for the BBC. While there was a case for this model when the only way to watch the BBC was through the ownership of a television, and there was no way to prevent anyone who owned a television from watching the BBC, technological developments have demolished this argument. Millennials consume more and more of their broadcast media through a tablet, computer or phone. Yet, non-payment of the licence fee now accounts for 10 per cent of all criminal convictions in the UK, so we may soon be in the invidious position where a majority of young people watch BBC programmes through devices that are not taxed, while older people who own a television but watch only ITV or Sky Sports are taxed and, in the case of non-compliance, subject to arrest. Those who support the continuation of the licence fee often do so using two arguments: that the BBC is vital for producing what has become known as 'public service broadcasting', and that the BBC produces news that is non-partisan together with unbiased coverage of current affairs. The authors of this book challenge both of these arguments and show that there are various ways in which the BBC could be made independent of the state and/or of compulsory funding."--Provided by publisher. British Broadcasting Corporation Finance. British Broadcasting Corporation fast Public broadcasting Great Britain Finance. Broadcasting Great Britain Finance. Radiodiffusion Grande-Bretagne Finances. BUSINESS & ECONOMICS Industries Media & Communications. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Telecommunications. bisacsh Broadcasting Finance fast Finance fast Public broadcasting Finance fast Great Britain fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJdmp7p3cx8hpmJ8HvmTpP Print version: Booth, Philip. Privatising the bbc. [Place of publication not identified] : Inst Of Economic Affairs, 2016 0255367252 9780255367257 (OCoLC)946161440 Hobart paperback (2015) ; 182. FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1250633 Volltext CBO01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1250633 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Booth, Philip Privatising the bbc. Hobart paperback (2015) ; _GoBack; 16; a2; n3; n13; n5; n6; The authors; Foreword; Acknowledgement; Summary; Tables, figures and boxes; 1 Introduction: broadcasting in the twenty-first century ; Philip Booth and Stephen Davies; The origins of the licence fee; The evolution to a hypothecated television tax; The collapse of the justification for licence fee funding; Television broadcasts are not a public good; The licence fee debate should be dead -- at least among economists; What might replace the licence fee model of funding the BBC?; Public service broadcasting; Bias and the BBC; Privatising the BBC; Conclusion. Is the BBC biased to the left?Institutional bias and the BBC; Shared values of BBC staff; The BBC, 'conventional wisdom' and the problem of nuanced views; Conclusion; References; 5 Privatising the BBC; Tim Congdon; Setting the scene; The case for ending the licence fee; The BBC in the digital era; Common defences of state funding of broadcasting; Final remarks on the licence fee; The case for the privatisation of the BBC; A possible alternative approach: a smaller BBC? ; References; About the IEA; Table(1 PSB channels and channels operated by public service broadcasters. Table(2 Think-tank citations by politicians and the BBC News websiteTable(3 Think-tank mentions and health warnings on the BBC website in the previous Parliament; Table(4 UK television industry metrics; Figure(1 Viewer shares by channel (aged 4+), 1988-2014; Figure(2 PSB and portfolio share of TV viewing, all individuals, by channel: 2004-14; Figure(3 How PSB channels are delivered to viewers, 2014; Figure(4 Public service broadcasting by non-public-service broadcasters; Figure(5 Total TV revenues by source, 2009-14. Figure(6 Number of citations by Labour politicians as a proportion of citations by Labour and Conservative politiciansFigure(7 EU interview comparisons; Figure(8 The financing of British television today (£ billion revenues); Figure(9 Is the BBC already an underdog?; Figure(10 Global TV industry revenues by source (£ billion); Box(1 Competition policy and the BBC. British Broadcasting Corporation Finance. British Broadcasting Corporation fast Public broadcasting Great Britain Finance. Broadcasting Great Britain Finance. Radiodiffusion Grande-Bretagne Finances. BUSINESS & ECONOMICS Industries Media & Communications. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Telecommunications. bisacsh Broadcasting Finance fast Finance fast Public broadcasting Finance fast |
title | Privatising the bbc. |
title_auth | Privatising the bbc. |
title_exact_search | Privatising the bbc. |
title_full | Privatising the bbc. |
title_fullStr | Privatising the bbc. |
title_full_unstemmed | Privatising the bbc. |
title_short | Privatising the bbc. |
title_sort | privatising the bbc |
topic | British Broadcasting Corporation Finance. British Broadcasting Corporation fast Public broadcasting Great Britain Finance. Broadcasting Great Britain Finance. Radiodiffusion Grande-Bretagne Finances. BUSINESS & ECONOMICS Industries Media & Communications. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Telecommunications. bisacsh Broadcasting Finance fast Finance fast Public broadcasting Finance fast |
topic_facet | British Broadcasting Corporation Finance. British Broadcasting Corporation Public broadcasting Great Britain Finance. Broadcasting Great Britain Finance. Radiodiffusion Grande-Bretagne Finances. BUSINESS & ECONOMICS Industries Media & Communications. TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Telecommunications. Broadcasting Finance Finance Public broadcasting Finance Great Britain |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1250633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boothphilip privatisingthebbc |