Defense acquisition trends, 2015 :: acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook /
Acquisition, Budgets, Force Structure, and Strategy all have critical distinctions and underlying interlinkages. The new CSIS initiative, Defense Outlook: A CSIS Series on Strategy, Budget, Forces, and Acquisition, aims to better explain each element of the continuum by better understanding the way...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, DC :
Center for Strategic & International Studies,
2016.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-862 DE-863 |
| Zusammenfassung: | Acquisition, Budgets, Force Structure, and Strategy all have critical distinctions and underlying interlinkages. The new CSIS initiative, Defense Outlook: A CSIS Series on Strategy, Budget, Forces, and Acquisition, aims to better explain each element of the continuum by better understanding the way they enable and limit one another. This report, the first of the series also represents a rebirth of the CSIS series on Defense Contract Trends. As before, the report relies significantly on empirical analysis undergirded by contracting transaction data from the open-source Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), which formed the crux of the analysis in that series of reports. This edition continues the approach of identifying and studying emergent trends in the contracting data and marries that analysis with discussion of changing goals and methods for the larger acquisition system. |
| Beschreibung: | "January 2016"--Cover |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (XVIII, 96 pages) : color illustrations |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references. |
| ISBN: | 9781442259195 1442259191 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn937218653 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr c|||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 160206t20162016dcua ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a DID |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DID |d DID |d N$T |d YDXCP |d IDEBK |d N$T |d OCLCF |d EBLCP |d TEFOD |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d K6U |d DLC |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d TMA |d OCLCQ |d SXB | ||
| 019 | |a 945136058 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781442259195 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1442259191 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781442259188 | ||
| 020 | |z 1442259183 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)937218653 |z (OCoLC)945136058 | ||
| 037 | |a D2E501D2-8924-4DBF-8CDC-F3E5747BC80B |b OverDrive, Inc. |n http://www.overdrive.com | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a UB193 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a HIS |x 027130 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a TEC |x 025000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 355.6/212 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ellman, Jesse, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : |b acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / |c principal authors Jesse Ellman, Andrew P. Hunter, Rhys McCormick, Gregory Sanders, contributing authors Kaitlyn Johnson, Gabriel Coll. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, DC : |b Center for Strategic & International Studies, |c 2016. | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2016 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (XVIII, 96 pages) : |b color illustrations | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a text file | ||
| 347 | |b PDF | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition | |
| 500 | |a "January 2016"--Cover | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
| 520 | |a Acquisition, Budgets, Force Structure, and Strategy all have critical distinctions and underlying interlinkages. The new CSIS initiative, Defense Outlook: A CSIS Series on Strategy, Budget, Forces, and Acquisition, aims to better explain each element of the continuum by better understanding the way they enable and limit one another. This report, the first of the series also represents a rebirth of the CSIS series on Defense Contract Trends. As before, the report relies significantly on empirical analysis undergirded by contracting transaction data from the open-source Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), which formed the crux of the analysis in that series of reports. This edition continues the approach of identifying and studying emergent trends in the contracting data and marries that analysis with discussion of changing goals and methods for the larger acquisition system. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (CSIS, viewed February 6, 2016). | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Figures; Tables; Executive Summary; What Is DoD Buying?; Birth of the Defense Innovation Initiative-Third Offset Strategy; A Five-Year Trough Has Developed in the Weapon Systems Pipeline; Services Contracts Surprisingly Resilient; How Is DoD Buying?; Major Acquisition Reform Efforts in 2015 Will Take Time to Deliver Results; Effective Competition Rates Are Steady, Despite Desire to Promote Competition; Contract Outcomes Can Be Examined Using Contract Data; Whom Is DoD Buying From?; Small Vendors Accounted for Their Largest-Ever Share of Defense Contracts in 2014. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a The Big 5 Defense Vendors Are Winning a Declining Share of R & D Contract ObligationsThe Present and Future of Defense Industry Consolidation; DoD Starts with a Narrow But Sustained Base for Outreach to Silicon Valley; What Are the Defense Components Buying?; Service Acquisition Portfolios Are Shifting In Distinct Ways; Army; Navy; Air Force; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Report Organization; 1.2. DoD Contract Spending in a Budgetary Context; 2. What Is DoD Buying?; 2.1. Innovation, R & D, and Technological Superiority; 2.1.1. Defense Innovation Initiative-"Third Offset Strategy." | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2.1.2. Defense Innovation Unit Experimental: Finding New Sources of Innovation2.1.3. Research and Development Contracting during the Budget Drawdown; 2.2. Defense Contract Obligations by Platform Portfolio; 2.3. Defense Contract Obligations by Budget Account; 2.3.1. Procurement; 2.3.2. Operations & Maintenance; 2.3.3. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; 3. How Is DoD Buying It?; 3.1. Reforming the Defense Acquisition System; 3.1.1. Better Buying Power; 3.1.2. 2016 National Defense Authorization Act; 3.2. Contract and Fee Type. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3.3. Defense Contract Obligation by Rate of Effective Competition3.4. Contract Outcomes beyond the Headlines; 3.4.1. Terminations; 3.4.2. Change Orders; 4. Whom Is DoD Buying From?; 4.1. Changes in the Composition of the Defense Industrial Base; 4.1.1. Army; 4.1.2. Navy; 4.1.3. Air Force; 4.1.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 4.1.5. Products; 4.1.6. Services; 4.1.7. Research and Development; 4.2. The Present and Future Consolidation of Defense Industry; 4.2.1. Top Products Vendors; 4.2.2. Top Services Vendors; 4.2.3. Top Research and Development Vendors. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 4.3. Silicon Valley Participation in the Defense Industrial Base4.3.1. Narrow Silicon Valley Base; 4.3.2. Persistence in the Top Tier, Tumult Below; 4.3.3. Silicon Valley Avoids Drawdown and Budget Cap Cuts Thanks to HP; 4.3.4. Implications for the Future; 5. What Are the Defense Components Buying?; 5.1. Army; 5.2. Navy; 5.3. Air Force; 5.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 5.5. Missile Defense Agency; 5.6. Other DoD; 6. Conclusion; Appendix A: Methodology; About the Authors. | |
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Department of Defense |x Procurement. |
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Department of Defense |x Appropriations and expenditures. |
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States. |b Department of Defense |2 fast |
| 651 | 0 | |a United States |x Armed Forces |x Procurement. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85139879 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Defense contracts |z United States. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Contrats de la défense |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a HISTORY |x Military |x Other. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING |x Military Science. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Armed Forces |x Procurement |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Defense contracts |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Expenditures, Public |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
| 655 | 4 | |a Electronic book. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hunter, Andrew P., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McCormick, Rhys, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Johnson, Kaitlyn, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Coll, Gabriel, |e author. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Center for Strategic and International Studies (Washington, D.C.), |e publisher. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86119921 | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Defense acquisition trends, 2015 (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGHbkMxFH7bJ4cWhHyYRYX |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Ellman, Jesse. |t Defense Acquisition Trends, 2015 : Acquisition in the Era of Budgetary Constraints. |d : Center for Strategic & International Studies, ©2016 |z 9781442259188 |
| 830 | 0 | |a CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition. | |
| 966 | 4 | 0 | |l DE-862 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1195347 |3 Volltext |
| 966 | 4 | 0 | |l DE-863 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1195347 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL4439564 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1195347 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis34113652 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 12877797 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-862 | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn937218653 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1826942105861226496 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Ellman, Jesse Hunter, Andrew P. McCormick, Rhys Johnson, Kaitlyn Coll, Gabriel |
| author_facet | Ellman, Jesse Hunter, Andrew P. McCormick, Rhys Johnson, Kaitlyn Coll, Gabriel |
| author_role | aut aut aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Ellman, Jesse |
| author_variant | j e je a p h ap aph r m rm k j kj g c gc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | U - Military Science |
| callnumber-label | UB193 |
| callnumber-raw | UB193 |
| callnumber-search | UB193 |
| callnumber-sort | UB 3193 |
| callnumber-subject | UB - Military Administration |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Figures; Tables; Executive Summary; What Is DoD Buying?; Birth of the Defense Innovation Initiative-Third Offset Strategy; A Five-Year Trough Has Developed in the Weapon Systems Pipeline; Services Contracts Surprisingly Resilient; How Is DoD Buying?; Major Acquisition Reform Efforts in 2015 Will Take Time to Deliver Results; Effective Competition Rates Are Steady, Despite Desire to Promote Competition; Contract Outcomes Can Be Examined Using Contract Data; Whom Is DoD Buying From?; Small Vendors Accounted for Their Largest-Ever Share of Defense Contracts in 2014. The Big 5 Defense Vendors Are Winning a Declining Share of R & D Contract ObligationsThe Present and Future of Defense Industry Consolidation; DoD Starts with a Narrow But Sustained Base for Outreach to Silicon Valley; What Are the Defense Components Buying?; Service Acquisition Portfolios Are Shifting In Distinct Ways; Army; Navy; Air Force; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Report Organization; 1.2. DoD Contract Spending in a Budgetary Context; 2. What Is DoD Buying?; 2.1. Innovation, R & D, and Technological Superiority; 2.1.1. Defense Innovation Initiative-"Third Offset Strategy." 2.1.2. Defense Innovation Unit Experimental: Finding New Sources of Innovation2.1.3. Research and Development Contracting during the Budget Drawdown; 2.2. Defense Contract Obligations by Platform Portfolio; 2.3. Defense Contract Obligations by Budget Account; 2.3.1. Procurement; 2.3.2. Operations & Maintenance; 2.3.3. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; 3. How Is DoD Buying It?; 3.1. Reforming the Defense Acquisition System; 3.1.1. Better Buying Power; 3.1.2. 2016 National Defense Authorization Act; 3.2. Contract and Fee Type. 3.3. Defense Contract Obligation by Rate of Effective Competition3.4. Contract Outcomes beyond the Headlines; 3.4.1. Terminations; 3.4.2. Change Orders; 4. Whom Is DoD Buying From?; 4.1. Changes in the Composition of the Defense Industrial Base; 4.1.1. Army; 4.1.2. Navy; 4.1.3. Air Force; 4.1.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 4.1.5. Products; 4.1.6. Services; 4.1.7. Research and Development; 4.2. The Present and Future Consolidation of Defense Industry; 4.2.1. Top Products Vendors; 4.2.2. Top Services Vendors; 4.2.3. Top Research and Development Vendors. 4.3. Silicon Valley Participation in the Defense Industrial Base4.3.1. Narrow Silicon Valley Base; 4.3.2. Persistence in the Top Tier, Tumult Below; 4.3.3. Silicon Valley Avoids Drawdown and Budget Cap Cuts Thanks to HP; 4.3.4. Implications for the Future; 5. What Are the Defense Components Buying?; 5.1. Army; 5.2. Navy; 5.3. Air Force; 5.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 5.5. Missile Defense Agency; 5.6. Other DoD; 6. Conclusion; Appendix A: Methodology; About the Authors. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)937218653 |
| dewey-full | 355.6/212 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 355 - Military science |
| dewey-raw | 355.6/212 |
| dewey-search | 355.6/212 |
| dewey-sort | 3355.6 3212 |
| dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
| discipline | Militärwissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>07433cam a2200829 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn937218653</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr c||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206t20162016dcua ob 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DID</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">DID</subfield><subfield code="d">DID</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">TEFOD</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">DLC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">TMA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">SXB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">945136058</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781442259195</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1442259191</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781442259188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1442259183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)937218653</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)945136058</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D2E501D2-8924-4DBF-8CDC-F3E5747BC80B</subfield><subfield code="b">OverDrive, Inc.</subfield><subfield code="n">http://www.overdrive.com</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UB193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HIS</subfield><subfield code="x">027130</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TEC</subfield><subfield code="x">025000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">355.6/212</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ellman, Jesse,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Defense acquisition trends, 2015 :</subfield><subfield code="b">acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook /</subfield><subfield code="c">principal authors Jesse Ellman, Andrew P. Hunter, Rhys McCormick, Gregory Sanders, contributing authors Kaitlyn Johnson, Gabriel Coll.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, DC :</subfield><subfield code="b">Center for Strategic & International Studies,</subfield><subfield code="c">2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (XVIII, 96 pages) :</subfield><subfield code="b">color illustrations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"January 2016"--Cover</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acquisition, Budgets, Force Structure, and Strategy all have critical distinctions and underlying interlinkages. The new CSIS initiative, Defense Outlook: A CSIS Series on Strategy, Budget, Forces, and Acquisition, aims to better explain each element of the continuum by better understanding the way they enable and limit one another. This report, the first of the series also represents a rebirth of the CSIS series on Defense Contract Trends. As before, the report relies significantly on empirical analysis undergirded by contracting transaction data from the open-source Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), which formed the crux of the analysis in that series of reports. This edition continues the approach of identifying and studying emergent trends in the contracting data and marries that analysis with discussion of changing goals and methods for the larger acquisition system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online resource; title from PDF title page (CSIS, viewed February 6, 2016).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Figures; Tables; Executive Summary; What Is DoD Buying?; Birth of the Defense Innovation Initiative-Third Offset Strategy; A Five-Year Trough Has Developed in the Weapon Systems Pipeline; Services Contracts Surprisingly Resilient; How Is DoD Buying?; Major Acquisition Reform Efforts in 2015 Will Take Time to Deliver Results; Effective Competition Rates Are Steady, Despite Desire to Promote Competition; Contract Outcomes Can Be Examined Using Contract Data; Whom Is DoD Buying From?; Small Vendors Accounted for Their Largest-Ever Share of Defense Contracts in 2014.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Big 5 Defense Vendors Are Winning a Declining Share of R & D Contract ObligationsThe Present and Future of Defense Industry Consolidation; DoD Starts with a Narrow But Sustained Base for Outreach to Silicon Valley; What Are the Defense Components Buying?; Service Acquisition Portfolios Are Shifting In Distinct Ways; Army; Navy; Air Force; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Report Organization; 1.2. DoD Contract Spending in a Budgetary Context; 2. What Is DoD Buying?; 2.1. Innovation, R & D, and Technological Superiority; 2.1.1. Defense Innovation Initiative-"Third Offset Strategy."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2.1.2. Defense Innovation Unit Experimental: Finding New Sources of Innovation2.1.3. Research and Development Contracting during the Budget Drawdown; 2.2. Defense Contract Obligations by Platform Portfolio; 2.3. Defense Contract Obligations by Budget Account; 2.3.1. Procurement; 2.3.2. Operations & Maintenance; 2.3.3. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; 3. How Is DoD Buying It?; 3.1. Reforming the Defense Acquisition System; 3.1.1. Better Buying Power; 3.1.2. 2016 National Defense Authorization Act; 3.2. Contract and Fee Type.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.3. Defense Contract Obligation by Rate of Effective Competition3.4. Contract Outcomes beyond the Headlines; 3.4.1. Terminations; 3.4.2. Change Orders; 4. Whom Is DoD Buying From?; 4.1. Changes in the Composition of the Defense Industrial Base; 4.1.1. Army; 4.1.2. Navy; 4.1.3. Air Force; 4.1.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 4.1.5. Products; 4.1.6. Services; 4.1.7. Research and Development; 4.2. The Present and Future Consolidation of Defense Industry; 4.2.1. Top Products Vendors; 4.2.2. Top Services Vendors; 4.2.3. Top Research and Development Vendors.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4.3. Silicon Valley Participation in the Defense Industrial Base4.3.1. Narrow Silicon Valley Base; 4.3.2. Persistence in the Top Tier, Tumult Below; 4.3.3. Silicon Valley Avoids Drawdown and Budget Cap Cuts Thanks to HP; 4.3.4. Implications for the Future; 5. What Are the Defense Components Buying?; 5.1. Army; 5.2. Navy; 5.3. Air Force; 5.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 5.5. Missile Defense Agency; 5.6. Other DoD; 6. Conclusion; Appendix A: Methodology; About the Authors.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Department of Defense</subfield><subfield code="x">Procurement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Department of Defense</subfield><subfield code="x">Appropriations and expenditures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Department of Defense</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Armed Forces</subfield><subfield code="x">Procurement.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85139879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Defense contracts</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Contrats de la défense</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HISTORY</subfield><subfield code="x">Military</subfield><subfield code="x">Other.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING</subfield><subfield code="x">Military Science.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Armed Forces</subfield><subfield code="x">Procurement</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Defense contracts</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Expenditures, Public</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic book.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hunter, Andrew P.,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McCormick, Rhys,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnson, Kaitlyn,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Coll, Gabriel,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Center for Strategic and International Studies (Washington, D.C.),</subfield><subfield code="e">publisher.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86119921</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Defense acquisition trends, 2015 (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGHbkMxFH7bJ4cWhHyYRYX</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Ellman, Jesse.</subfield><subfield code="t">Defense Acquisition Trends, 2015 : Acquisition in the Era of Budgetary Constraints.</subfield><subfield code="d">: Center for Strategic & International Studies, ©2016</subfield><subfield code="z">9781442259188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">DE-862</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1195347</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1195347</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4439564</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1195347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis34113652</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">12877797</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | Electronic book. |
| genre_facet | Electronic book. |
| geographic | United States Armed Forces Procurement. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85139879 United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
| geographic_facet | United States Armed Forces Procurement. United States |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn937218653 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-03-18T14:22:43Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86119921 |
| isbn | 9781442259195 1442259191 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 937218653 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-862 DE-BY-FWS DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-862 DE-BY-FWS DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (XVIII, 96 pages) : color illustrations |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Center for Strategic & International Studies, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition. |
| series2 | CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition |
| spelling | Ellman, Jesse, author. Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / principal authors Jesse Ellman, Andrew P. Hunter, Rhys McCormick, Gregory Sanders, contributing authors Kaitlyn Johnson, Gabriel Coll. Washington, DC : Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2016. ©2016 1 online resource (XVIII, 96 pages) : color illustrations text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier text file CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition "January 2016"--Cover Includes bibliographical references. Acquisition, Budgets, Force Structure, and Strategy all have critical distinctions and underlying interlinkages. The new CSIS initiative, Defense Outlook: A CSIS Series on Strategy, Budget, Forces, and Acquisition, aims to better explain each element of the continuum by better understanding the way they enable and limit one another. This report, the first of the series also represents a rebirth of the CSIS series on Defense Contract Trends. As before, the report relies significantly on empirical analysis undergirded by contracting transaction data from the open-source Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), which formed the crux of the analysis in that series of reports. This edition continues the approach of identifying and studying emergent trends in the contracting data and marries that analysis with discussion of changing goals and methods for the larger acquisition system. Online resource; title from PDF title page (CSIS, viewed February 6, 2016). Figures; Tables; Executive Summary; What Is DoD Buying?; Birth of the Defense Innovation Initiative-Third Offset Strategy; A Five-Year Trough Has Developed in the Weapon Systems Pipeline; Services Contracts Surprisingly Resilient; How Is DoD Buying?; Major Acquisition Reform Efforts in 2015 Will Take Time to Deliver Results; Effective Competition Rates Are Steady, Despite Desire to Promote Competition; Contract Outcomes Can Be Examined Using Contract Data; Whom Is DoD Buying From?; Small Vendors Accounted for Their Largest-Ever Share of Defense Contracts in 2014. The Big 5 Defense Vendors Are Winning a Declining Share of R & D Contract ObligationsThe Present and Future of Defense Industry Consolidation; DoD Starts with a Narrow But Sustained Base for Outreach to Silicon Valley; What Are the Defense Components Buying?; Service Acquisition Portfolios Are Shifting In Distinct Ways; Army; Navy; Air Force; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Report Organization; 1.2. DoD Contract Spending in a Budgetary Context; 2. What Is DoD Buying?; 2.1. Innovation, R & D, and Technological Superiority; 2.1.1. Defense Innovation Initiative-"Third Offset Strategy." 2.1.2. Defense Innovation Unit Experimental: Finding New Sources of Innovation2.1.3. Research and Development Contracting during the Budget Drawdown; 2.2. Defense Contract Obligations by Platform Portfolio; 2.3. Defense Contract Obligations by Budget Account; 2.3.1. Procurement; 2.3.2. Operations & Maintenance; 2.3.3. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; 3. How Is DoD Buying It?; 3.1. Reforming the Defense Acquisition System; 3.1.1. Better Buying Power; 3.1.2. 2016 National Defense Authorization Act; 3.2. Contract and Fee Type. 3.3. Defense Contract Obligation by Rate of Effective Competition3.4. Contract Outcomes beyond the Headlines; 3.4.1. Terminations; 3.4.2. Change Orders; 4. Whom Is DoD Buying From?; 4.1. Changes in the Composition of the Defense Industrial Base; 4.1.1. Army; 4.1.2. Navy; 4.1.3. Air Force; 4.1.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 4.1.5. Products; 4.1.6. Services; 4.1.7. Research and Development; 4.2. The Present and Future Consolidation of Defense Industry; 4.2.1. Top Products Vendors; 4.2.2. Top Services Vendors; 4.2.3. Top Research and Development Vendors. 4.3. Silicon Valley Participation in the Defense Industrial Base4.3.1. Narrow Silicon Valley Base; 4.3.2. Persistence in the Top Tier, Tumult Below; 4.3.3. Silicon Valley Avoids Drawdown and Budget Cap Cuts Thanks to HP; 4.3.4. Implications for the Future; 5. What Are the Defense Components Buying?; 5.1. Army; 5.2. Navy; 5.3. Air Force; 5.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 5.5. Missile Defense Agency; 5.6. Other DoD; 6. Conclusion; Appendix A: Methodology; About the Authors. United States. Department of Defense Procurement. United States. Department of Defense Appropriations and expenditures. United States. Department of Defense fast United States Armed Forces Procurement. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85139879 Defense contracts United States. Contrats de la défense États-Unis. HISTORY Military Other. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Military Science. bisacsh Armed Forces Procurement fast Defense contracts fast Expenditures, Public fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq Electronic book. Hunter, Andrew P., author. McCormick, Rhys, author. Johnson, Kaitlyn, author. Coll, Gabriel, author. Center for Strategic and International Studies (Washington, D.C.), publisher. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86119921 has work: Defense acquisition trends, 2015 (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGHbkMxFH7bJ4cWhHyYRYX https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Ellman, Jesse. Defense Acquisition Trends, 2015 : Acquisition in the Era of Budgetary Constraints. : Center for Strategic & International Studies, ©2016 9781442259188 CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition. |
| spellingShingle | Ellman, Jesse Hunter, Andrew P. McCormick, Rhys Johnson, Kaitlyn Coll, Gabriel Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition. Figures; Tables; Executive Summary; What Is DoD Buying?; Birth of the Defense Innovation Initiative-Third Offset Strategy; A Five-Year Trough Has Developed in the Weapon Systems Pipeline; Services Contracts Surprisingly Resilient; How Is DoD Buying?; Major Acquisition Reform Efforts in 2015 Will Take Time to Deliver Results; Effective Competition Rates Are Steady, Despite Desire to Promote Competition; Contract Outcomes Can Be Examined Using Contract Data; Whom Is DoD Buying From?; Small Vendors Accounted for Their Largest-Ever Share of Defense Contracts in 2014. The Big 5 Defense Vendors Are Winning a Declining Share of R & D Contract ObligationsThe Present and Future of Defense Industry Consolidation; DoD Starts with a Narrow But Sustained Base for Outreach to Silicon Valley; What Are the Defense Components Buying?; Service Acquisition Portfolios Are Shifting In Distinct Ways; Army; Navy; Air Force; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Report Organization; 1.2. DoD Contract Spending in a Budgetary Context; 2. What Is DoD Buying?; 2.1. Innovation, R & D, and Technological Superiority; 2.1.1. Defense Innovation Initiative-"Third Offset Strategy." 2.1.2. Defense Innovation Unit Experimental: Finding New Sources of Innovation2.1.3. Research and Development Contracting during the Budget Drawdown; 2.2. Defense Contract Obligations by Platform Portfolio; 2.3. Defense Contract Obligations by Budget Account; 2.3.1. Procurement; 2.3.2. Operations & Maintenance; 2.3.3. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; 3. How Is DoD Buying It?; 3.1. Reforming the Defense Acquisition System; 3.1.1. Better Buying Power; 3.1.2. 2016 National Defense Authorization Act; 3.2. Contract and Fee Type. 3.3. Defense Contract Obligation by Rate of Effective Competition3.4. Contract Outcomes beyond the Headlines; 3.4.1. Terminations; 3.4.2. Change Orders; 4. Whom Is DoD Buying From?; 4.1. Changes in the Composition of the Defense Industrial Base; 4.1.1. Army; 4.1.2. Navy; 4.1.3. Air Force; 4.1.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 4.1.5. Products; 4.1.6. Services; 4.1.7. Research and Development; 4.2. The Present and Future Consolidation of Defense Industry; 4.2.1. Top Products Vendors; 4.2.2. Top Services Vendors; 4.2.3. Top Research and Development Vendors. 4.3. Silicon Valley Participation in the Defense Industrial Base4.3.1. Narrow Silicon Valley Base; 4.3.2. Persistence in the Top Tier, Tumult Below; 4.3.3. Silicon Valley Avoids Drawdown and Budget Cap Cuts Thanks to HP; 4.3.4. Implications for the Future; 5. What Are the Defense Components Buying?; 5.1. Army; 5.2. Navy; 5.3. Air Force; 5.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 5.5. Missile Defense Agency; 5.6. Other DoD; 6. Conclusion; Appendix A: Methodology; About the Authors. United States. Department of Defense Procurement. United States. Department of Defense Appropriations and expenditures. United States. Department of Defense fast Defense contracts United States. Contrats de la défense États-Unis. HISTORY Military Other. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Military Science. bisacsh Armed Forces Procurement fast Defense contracts fast Expenditures, Public fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85139879 |
| title | Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / |
| title_auth | Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / |
| title_exact_search | Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / |
| title_full | Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / principal authors Jesse Ellman, Andrew P. Hunter, Rhys McCormick, Gregory Sanders, contributing authors Kaitlyn Johnson, Gabriel Coll. |
| title_fullStr | Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / principal authors Jesse Ellman, Andrew P. Hunter, Rhys McCormick, Gregory Sanders, contributing authors Kaitlyn Johnson, Gabriel Coll. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / principal authors Jesse Ellman, Andrew P. Hunter, Rhys McCormick, Gregory Sanders, contributing authors Kaitlyn Johnson, Gabriel Coll. |
| title_short | Defense acquisition trends, 2015 : |
| title_sort | defense acquisition trends 2015 acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints a report of defense outlook |
| title_sub | acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints : a report of Defense Outlook / |
| topic | United States. Department of Defense Procurement. United States. Department of Defense Appropriations and expenditures. United States. Department of Defense fast Defense contracts United States. Contrats de la défense États-Unis. HISTORY Military Other. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Military Science. bisacsh Armed Forces Procurement fast Defense contracts fast Expenditures, Public fast |
| topic_facet | United States. Department of Defense Procurement. United States. Department of Defense Appropriations and expenditures. United States. Department of Defense United States Armed Forces Procurement. Defense contracts United States. Contrats de la défense États-Unis. HISTORY Military Other. TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Military Science. Armed Forces Procurement Defense contracts Expenditures, Public United States Electronic book. |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ellmanjesse defenseacquisitiontrends2015acquisitionintheeraofbudgetaryconstraintsareportofdefenseoutlook AT hunterandrewp defenseacquisitiontrends2015acquisitionintheeraofbudgetaryconstraintsareportofdefenseoutlook AT mccormickrhys defenseacquisitiontrends2015acquisitionintheeraofbudgetaryconstraintsareportofdefenseoutlook AT johnsonkaitlyn defenseacquisitiontrends2015acquisitionintheeraofbudgetaryconstraintsareportofdefenseoutlook AT collgabriel defenseacquisitiontrends2015acquisitionintheeraofbudgetaryconstraintsareportofdefenseoutlook AT centerforstrategicandinternationalstudieswashingtondc defenseacquisitiontrends2015acquisitionintheeraofbudgetaryconstraintsareportofdefenseoutlook |