Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings.:
"The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits u...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill,
2015.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies."-- |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 375-387) and index. |
| ISBN: | 9004231412 9789004231412 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000007a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn932593795 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr |n||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 151218s2015 xx ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a IDEBK |b eng |e pn |c IDEBK |d YDXCP |d EBLCP |d OCLCO |d OCLCF |d YDX |d OCLCQ |d COO |d UAB |d FIE |d OCLCQ |d OTZ |d N$T |d LEAUB |d OL$ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d K6U |d OCL |d OCLCQ |d YWS |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 960086637 |a 1170092555 |a 1172518617 | ||
| 020 | |a 9004231412 |q (ebk) | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004231412 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9004231420 | ||
| 020 | |z 9789004231429 | ||
| 024 | 8 | |a 10.1163/9789004231412 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)932593795 |z (OCoLC)960086637 |z (OCoLC)1170092555 |z (OCoLC)1172518617 | ||
| 037 | |a 879113 |b MIL | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K3240.5 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LBBZ |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW026000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 051000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 341.5 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Croquet, Nicolas A. J. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |
| 260 | |b Brill, |c 2015. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 375-387) and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph -- Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights -- Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses -- Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures -- Implied External Limits upon the Accused's Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent -- Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy -- Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate. | |
| 520 | |a "The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies."-- |c Provided by Publisher | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a International criminal law. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010015367 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Proportionality in law. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a International law and human rights. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2012002128 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a International crimes. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067429 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droit international pénal. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Proportionnalité (Droit) | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droit international et droits de l'homme. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x International. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a International crimes |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a International criminal law |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a International law and human rights |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Proportionality in law |2 fast | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGxJVYrF9wK9rjQVxKFYfq |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Croquet, Nicolas A.J. |t Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |d Brill, 2015 |z 9789004231429 |z 9004231420 |w (OCoLC)932175386 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1940330 |3 Volltext |
| 936 | |a BATCHLOAD | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL4397543 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1940330 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis33365858 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 12866820 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn932593795 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882333506076672 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Croquet, Nicolas A. J. |
| author_facet | Croquet, Nicolas A. J. |
| author_role | |
| author_sort | Croquet, Nicolas A. J. |
| author_variant | n a j c naj najc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K3240 |
| callnumber-raw | K3240.5 |
| callnumber-search | K3240.5 |
| callnumber-sort | K 43240.5 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph -- Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights -- Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses -- Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures -- Implied External Limits upon the Accused's Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent -- Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy -- Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)932593795 |
| dewey-full | 341.5 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.5 |
| dewey-search | 341.5 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.5 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05610cam a22006617a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn932593795</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151218s2015 xx ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">COO</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">FIE</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OTZ</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">LEAUB</subfield><subfield code="d">OL$</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">YWS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">960086637</subfield><subfield code="a">1170092555</subfield><subfield code="a">1172518617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9004231412</subfield><subfield code="q">(ebk)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004231412</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9004231420</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9789004231429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1163/9789004231412</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)932593795</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)960086637</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1170092555</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1172518617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">879113</subfield><subfield code="b">MIL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K3240.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LBBZ</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW026000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">051000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.5</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Croquet, Nicolas A. J.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Brill,</subfield><subfield code="c">2015.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 375-387) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph -- Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights -- Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses -- Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures -- Implied External Limits upon the Accused's Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent -- Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy -- Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies."--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by Publisher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International criminal law.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010015367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International law and human rights.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2012002128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International crimes.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Droit international pénal.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Proportionnalité (Droit)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Droit international et droits de l'homme.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">International.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">International crimes</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">International criminal law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">International law and human rights</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGxJVYrF9wK9rjQVxKFYfq</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Croquet, Nicolas A.J.</subfield><subfield code="t">Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings.</subfield><subfield code="d">Brill, 2015</subfield><subfield code="z">9789004231429</subfield><subfield code="z">9004231420</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)932175386</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1940330</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BATCHLOAD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4397543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1940330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis33365858</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">12866820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn932593795 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:26:57Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9004231412 9789004231412 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 932593795 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Brill, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Croquet, Nicolas A. J. Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. Brill, 2015. 1 online resource text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Print version record. Includes bibliographical references (pages 375-387) and index. Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph -- Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights -- Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses -- Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures -- Implied External Limits upon the Accused's Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent -- Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy -- Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate. "The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies."-- Provided by Publisher International criminal law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010015367 Proportionality in law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 International law and human rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2012002128 International crimes. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067429 Droit international pénal. Proportionnalité (Droit) Droit international et droits de l'homme. LAW International. bisacsh International crimes fast International criminal law fast International law and human rights fast Proportionality in law fast has work: The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGxJVYrF9wK9rjQVxKFYfq https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Croquet, Nicolas A.J. Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. Brill, 2015 9789004231429 9004231420 (OCoLC)932175386 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1940330 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Croquet, Nicolas A. J. Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph -- Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights -- Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses -- Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures -- Implied External Limits upon the Accused's Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent -- Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy -- Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate. International criminal law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010015367 Proportionality in law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 International law and human rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2012002128 International crimes. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067429 Droit international pénal. Proportionnalité (Droit) Droit international et droits de l'homme. LAW International. bisacsh International crimes fast International criminal law fast International law and human rights fast Proportionality in law fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010015367 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2012002128 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067429 |
| title | Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |
| title_auth | Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |
| title_exact_search | Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |
| title_full | Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |
| title_fullStr | Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |
| title_short | Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings. |
| title_sort | role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings |
| topic | International criminal law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010015367 Proportionality in law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 International law and human rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2012002128 International crimes. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067429 Droit international pénal. Proportionnalité (Droit) Droit international et droits de l'homme. LAW International. bisacsh International crimes fast International criminal law fast International law and human rights fast Proportionality in law fast |
| topic_facet | International criminal law. Proportionality in law. International law and human rights. International crimes. Droit international pénal. Proportionnalité (Droit) Droit international et droits de l'homme. LAW International. International crimes International criminal law International law and human rights Proportionality in law |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1940330 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT croquetnicolasaj roleandextentofaproportionalityanalysisinthejudicialassessmentofhumanrightslimitationswithininternationalcriminalproceedings |