Newton's apple and other myths about science /:
A falling apple inspired the law of gravity-or so the story goes. Is it true? Perhaps not. But why do such stories endure as explanations of how science happens? Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science brushes away popular misconceptions to provide a clearer picture of scientific breakthro...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Massachusetts :
Harvard University Press,
2015.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | A falling apple inspired the law of gravity-or so the story goes. Is it true? Perhaps not. But why do such stories endure as explanations of how science happens? Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science brushes away popular misconceptions to provide a clearer picture of scientific breakthroughs from ancient times to the present. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xiv, 287 pages) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9780674089167 0674089162 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn925305924 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 150414s2015 mau ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a UAB |b eng |e rda |e pn |c UAB |d OCLCO |d YAM |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d N$T |d OCLCO |d YDXCP |d EBLCP |d DEBSZ |d OCLCO |d JSTOR |d OCLCO |d DEBBG |d IDB |d AGLDB |d CUS |d JBG |d ICA |d IOG |d OCL |d DEGRU |d HEBIS |d OCLCF |d U3W |d D6H |d YDX |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d VTS |d IAT |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCA |d S9I |d OCLCO |d STF |d WAU |d LEAUB |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d M8D |d OCLCQ |d SFB |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d U9X |d MM9 |d AJS |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 942841849 |a 958009469 |a 962351330 |a 979575320 |a 992849543 |a 994405959 |a 1015829033 |a 1058145718 |a 1058399360 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780674089167 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 0674089162 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 0674967984 | ||
| 020 | |z 9780674967984 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4159/9780674089167 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 8 | |a 40025377339 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)925305924 |z (OCoLC)942841849 |z (OCoLC)958009469 |z (OCoLC)962351330 |z (OCoLC)979575320 |z (OCoLC)992849543 |z (OCoLC)994405959 |z (OCoLC)1015829033 |z (OCoLC)1058145718 |z (OCoLC)1058399360 | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/ctt1c7sp09 |b JSTOR | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a Q172.5.E77 |b N49 2015 | |
| 050 | 4 | |a Q172.5.P82 |b N48 2015 | |
| 060 | 4 | |a Q 172.5.E77 |b N561 2015 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a REF |x 018000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a SCI034000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 001.96 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Newton's apple and other myths about science / |c edited by Ronald L. Numbers and Kostas Kampourakis. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Massachusetts : |b Harvard University Press, |c 2015. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xiv, 287 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 | |t Medieval and early modern science -- |t Myth 1. That there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution / |r Michael H. Shank -- |t Myth 2. That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat / |r Lesley B. Cormack -- |t Myth 3. That the copernican revolution demoted the status of the Earth / |r Michael N. Keas -- |t Myth 4. That alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding / |r Lawrence M. Principe -- |t Myth 5. That Galileo publicly refuted Aristotle's conclusions about motion by repeated experiments made from the Campanile of Pisa / |r John L. Heilbron -- |t Myth 6. That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos / |r Patricia Fara -- |t Nineteenth century -- |t Myth 7. That Friedrich Wohler's synthesis of urea in 1828 destroyed vitalism and gave rise to organic chemistry / |r Peter J. Ramberg -- |t Myth 8. That William Paley raised scientific questions about biological origins that were eventually answered by Charles Darwin / |r Adam R. Shapiro -- |t Myth 9. That nineteenth-century geologists were divided into opposing camps of Catastrophists and Uniformitarians / |r Julie Newell -- |t Myth 10. That Lamarckian evolution relied largely on use and disuse and that Darwin rejected Lamarckian mechanisms / |r Richard W. Burkhardt Jr -- |t Myth 11. That Darwin worked on his theory in secret for twenty years, his fears causing him to delay publication / |r Robert J. Richards -- |t Myth 12. That Wallace's and Darwin's explanations of evolution were virtually the same / |r Michael Ruse -- |t Myth 13. That Darwinian natural selection has been "the only game in town" / |r Nicolaas Rupke -- |t Myth 14. That after Darwin (1871), sexual selection was largely ignored until Robert Trivers (1972) resurrected the theory / |r Erika Lorraine Milam -- |t Myth 15. That Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation on the basis of scientific objectivity / |r Garland E. Allen -- |t Myth 16. That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time / |r Kostas Kampourakis -- |t Myth 17. That "social Darwinism" has had a profound influence on social thought and policy, especially in the United States of America / |r Ronald L. Numbers -- |t Twentieth century -- |t Myth 18. That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity / |r Theodore Arabatzis and Kostas Gavroglu -- |t Myth 19. That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward / |r Mansoor Niaz -- |t Myth 20. That neo-Darwinism defines evolution as random mutation plus natural selection / |r David J. Depew -- |t Myth 21. That melanism in peppered moths is not a genuine example of evolution by natural selection / |r David W. Rudge -- |t Myth 22. That Linus Pauling's discovery of the molecular basis of sickle-cell anemia revolutionized medical practice / |r Bruno J. Strasser -- |t Myth 23. That the Soviet launch of Sputnik caused the revamping of American science -- |t Education / |r John L. Rudolph -- |t Generalizations -- |t Myth 24. That religion has typically impeded the progress of science / |r Peter Harrison -- |t Myth 25. That science has been largely a solitary enterprise / |r Kathryn M. Olesko -- |t Myth 26. That the "scientific method" accurately reflects what scientists actually do / |r Daniel P. Thurs -- |t Myth 27. That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience / |r Michael D. Gordin. |
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (JSTOR, viewed on February 5, 2019). | |
| 520 | |a A falling apple inspired the law of gravity-or so the story goes. Is it true? Perhaps not. But why do such stories endure as explanations of how science happens? Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science brushes away popular misconceptions to provide a clearer picture of scientific breakthroughs from ancient times to the present. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Science |x Public opinion |v Popular works. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Science |x History |v Popular works. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Discoveries in science |x History |v Popular works. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Science |x Methodology |v Popular works. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Errors, Scientific |v Popular works. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Errors, Scientific |x History |v Popular works. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Science. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118553 | |
| 650 | 1 | 2 | |a Science |
| 650 | 2 | 2 | |a Public Opinion |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sciences |x Opinion publique |v Ouvrages de vulgarisation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sciences |x Histoire |v Ouvrages de vulgarisation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Découvertes scientifiques |x Histoire |v Ouvrages de vulgarisation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sciences |x Méthodologie |v Ouvrages de vulgarisation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Erreurs scientifiques |v Ouvrages de vulgarisation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Erreurs scientifiques |x Histoire |v Ouvrages de vulgarisation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sciences. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a sciences (philosophy) |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a science (modern discipline) |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a REFERENCE |x Questions & Answers. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE |x History. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Science |x Public opinion |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Science |x Methodology |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Discoveries in science |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Errors, Scientific |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Science |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Naturwissenschaften |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Vorurteil |2 gnd |0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4064037-1 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Erreurs scientifiques |x Vulgarisation. |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Erreurs scientifiques |x Histoire |x Vulgarisation. |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Science |x Histoire |x Vulgarisation. |2 ram | |
| 655 | 2 | |a Popular Work | |
| 655 | 7 | |a History |2 fast | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Popular works |2 fast | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Numbers, Ronald L., |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kampourakis, Kostas, |e editor. | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Newton's apple and other myths about science (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGqVhy9fGD6XWmGyFyqjVK |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Newton's apple and other myths about science. |d Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2015 |z 9780674967984 |w (DLC) 2015014096 |w (OCoLC)906121832 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1133812 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a De Gruyter |b DEGR |n 9780674089167 | ||
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL4404091 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1133812 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 12582990 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn925305924 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882326800433152 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Numbers, Ronald L. Kampourakis, Kostas |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | r l n rl rln k k kk |
| author_additional | Michael H. Shank -- Lesley B. Cormack -- Michael N. Keas -- Lawrence M. Principe -- John L. Heilbron -- Patricia Fara -- Peter J. Ramberg -- Adam R. Shapiro -- Julie Newell -- Richard W. Burkhardt Jr -- Robert J. Richards -- Michael Ruse -- Nicolaas Rupke -- Erika Lorraine Milam -- Garland E. Allen -- Kostas Kampourakis -- Ronald L. Numbers -- Theodore Arabatzis and Kostas Gavroglu -- Mansoor Niaz -- David J. Depew -- David W. Rudge -- Bruno J. Strasser -- John L. Rudolph -- Peter Harrison -- Kathryn M. Olesko -- Daniel P. Thurs -- Michael D. Gordin. |
| author_facet | Numbers, Ronald L. Kampourakis, Kostas |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | Q - Science |
| callnumber-label | Q172 |
| callnumber-raw | Q172.5.E77 N49 2015 Q172.5.P82 N48 2015 |
| callnumber-search | Q172.5.E77 N49 2015 Q172.5.P82 N48 2015 |
| callnumber-sort | Q 3172.5 E77 N49 42015 |
| callnumber-subject | Q - General Science |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Medieval and early modern science -- Myth 1. That there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution / Myth 2. That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat / Myth 3. That the copernican revolution demoted the status of the Earth / Myth 4. That alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding / Myth 5. That Galileo publicly refuted Aristotle's conclusions about motion by repeated experiments made from the Campanile of Pisa / Myth 6. That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos / Nineteenth century -- Myth 7. That Friedrich Wohler's synthesis of urea in 1828 destroyed vitalism and gave rise to organic chemistry / Myth 8. That William Paley raised scientific questions about biological origins that were eventually answered by Charles Darwin / Myth 9. That nineteenth-century geologists were divided into opposing camps of Catastrophists and Uniformitarians / Myth 10. That Lamarckian evolution relied largely on use and disuse and that Darwin rejected Lamarckian mechanisms / Myth 11. That Darwin worked on his theory in secret for twenty years, his fears causing him to delay publication / Myth 12. That Wallace's and Darwin's explanations of evolution were virtually the same / Myth 13. That Darwinian natural selection has been "the only game in town" / Myth 14. That after Darwin (1871), sexual selection was largely ignored until Robert Trivers (1972) resurrected the theory / Myth 15. That Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation on the basis of scientific objectivity / Myth 16. That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time / Myth 17. That "social Darwinism" has had a profound influence on social thought and policy, especially in the United States of America / Twentieth century -- Myth 18. That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity / Myth 19. That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward / Myth 20. That neo-Darwinism defines evolution as random mutation plus natural selection / Myth 21. That melanism in peppered moths is not a genuine example of evolution by natural selection / Myth 22. That Linus Pauling's discovery of the molecular basis of sickle-cell anemia revolutionized medical practice / Myth 23. That the Soviet launch of Sputnik caused the revamping of American science -- Education / Generalizations -- Myth 24. That religion has typically impeded the progress of science / Myth 25. That science has been largely a solitary enterprise / Myth 26. That the "scientific method" accurately reflects what scientists actually do / Myth 27. That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience / |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)925305924 |
| dewey-full | 001.96 |
| dewey-hundreds | 000 - Computer science, information, general works |
| dewey-ones | 001 - Knowledge |
| dewey-raw | 001.96 |
| dewey-search | 001.96 |
| dewey-sort | 11.96 |
| dewey-tens | 000 - Computer science, information, general works |
| discipline | Allgemeines |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>08224cam a2200937 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn925305924</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150414s2015 mau ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">UAB</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">YAM</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">JSTOR</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBBG</subfield><subfield code="d">IDB</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">CUS</subfield><subfield code="d">JBG</subfield><subfield code="d">ICA</subfield><subfield code="d">IOG</subfield><subfield code="d">OCL</subfield><subfield code="d">DEGRU</subfield><subfield code="d">HEBIS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">D6H</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">IAT</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">S9I</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">WAU</subfield><subfield code="d">LEAUB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">SFB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">U9X</subfield><subfield code="d">MM9</subfield><subfield code="d">AJS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">942841849</subfield><subfield code="a">958009469</subfield><subfield code="a">962351330</subfield><subfield code="a">979575320</subfield><subfield code="a">992849543</subfield><subfield code="a">994405959</subfield><subfield code="a">1015829033</subfield><subfield code="a">1058145718</subfield><subfield code="a">1058399360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780674089167</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0674089162</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0674967984</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780674967984</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4159/9780674089167</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">40025377339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)925305924</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)942841849</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)958009469</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962351330</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)979575320</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)992849543</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)994405959</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1015829033</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1058145718</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1058399360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22573/ctt1c7sp09</subfield><subfield code="b">JSTOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Q172.5.E77</subfield><subfield code="b">N49 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Q172.5.P82</subfield><subfield code="b">N48 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="060" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Q 172.5.E77</subfield><subfield code="b">N561 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">REF</subfield><subfield code="x">018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCI034000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">001.96</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Newton's apple and other myths about science /</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Ronald L. Numbers and Kostas Kampourakis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Massachusetts :</subfield><subfield code="b">Harvard University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2015.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xiv, 287 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Medieval and early modern science --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 1. That there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution /</subfield><subfield code="r">Michael H. Shank --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 2. That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat /</subfield><subfield code="r">Lesley B. Cormack --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 3. That the copernican revolution demoted the status of the Earth /</subfield><subfield code="r">Michael N. Keas --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 4. That alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding /</subfield><subfield code="r">Lawrence M. Principe --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 5. That Galileo publicly refuted Aristotle's conclusions about motion by repeated experiments made from the Campanile of Pisa /</subfield><subfield code="r">John L. Heilbron --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 6. That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos /</subfield><subfield code="r">Patricia Fara --</subfield><subfield code="t">Nineteenth century --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 7. That Friedrich Wohler's synthesis of urea in 1828 destroyed vitalism and gave rise to organic chemistry /</subfield><subfield code="r">Peter J. Ramberg --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 8. That William Paley raised scientific questions about biological origins that were eventually answered by Charles Darwin /</subfield><subfield code="r">Adam R. Shapiro --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 9. That nineteenth-century geologists were divided into opposing camps of Catastrophists and Uniformitarians /</subfield><subfield code="r">Julie Newell --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 10. That Lamarckian evolution relied largely on use and disuse and that Darwin rejected Lamarckian mechanisms /</subfield><subfield code="r">Richard W. Burkhardt Jr --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 11. That Darwin worked on his theory in secret for twenty years, his fears causing him to delay publication /</subfield><subfield code="r">Robert J. Richards --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 12. That Wallace's and Darwin's explanations of evolution were virtually the same /</subfield><subfield code="r">Michael Ruse --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 13. That Darwinian natural selection has been "the only game in town" /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolaas Rupke --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 14. That after Darwin (1871), sexual selection was largely ignored until Robert Trivers (1972) resurrected the theory /</subfield><subfield code="r">Erika Lorraine Milam --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 15. That Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation on the basis of scientific objectivity /</subfield><subfield code="r">Garland E. Allen --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 16. That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time /</subfield><subfield code="r">Kostas Kampourakis --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 17. That "social Darwinism" has had a profound influence on social thought and policy, especially in the United States of America /</subfield><subfield code="r">Ronald L. Numbers --</subfield><subfield code="t">Twentieth century --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 18. That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity /</subfield><subfield code="r">Theodore Arabatzis and Kostas Gavroglu --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 19. That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward /</subfield><subfield code="r">Mansoor Niaz --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 20. That neo-Darwinism defines evolution as random mutation plus natural selection /</subfield><subfield code="r">David J. Depew --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 21. That melanism in peppered moths is not a genuine example of evolution by natural selection /</subfield><subfield code="r">David W. Rudge --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 22. That Linus Pauling's discovery of the molecular basis of sickle-cell anemia revolutionized medical practice /</subfield><subfield code="r">Bruno J. Strasser --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 23. That the Soviet launch of Sputnik caused the revamping of American science --</subfield><subfield code="t">Education /</subfield><subfield code="r">John L. Rudolph --</subfield><subfield code="t">Generalizations --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 24. That religion has typically impeded the progress of science /</subfield><subfield code="r">Peter Harrison --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 25. That science has been largely a solitary enterprise /</subfield><subfield code="r">Kathryn M. Olesko --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 26. That the "scientific method" accurately reflects what scientists actually do /</subfield><subfield code="r">Daniel P. Thurs --</subfield><subfield code="t">Myth 27. That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience /</subfield><subfield code="r">Michael D. Gordin.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online resource; title from PDF title page (JSTOR, viewed on February 5, 2019).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A falling apple inspired the law of gravity-or so the story goes. Is it true? Perhaps not. But why do such stories endure as explanations of how science happens? Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science brushes away popular misconceptions to provide a clearer picture of scientific breakthroughs from ancient times to the present.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Public opinion</subfield><subfield code="v">Popular works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="v">Popular works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discoveries in science</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="v">Popular works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Methodology</subfield><subfield code="v">Popular works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Errors, Scientific</subfield><subfield code="v">Popular works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Errors, Scientific</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="v">Popular works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118553</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Public Opinion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Sciences</subfield><subfield code="x">Opinion publique</subfield><subfield code="v">Ouvrages de vulgarisation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Sciences</subfield><subfield code="x">Histoire</subfield><subfield code="v">Ouvrages de vulgarisation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Découvertes scientifiques</subfield><subfield code="x">Histoire</subfield><subfield code="v">Ouvrages de vulgarisation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Sciences</subfield><subfield code="x">Méthodologie</subfield><subfield code="v">Ouvrages de vulgarisation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Erreurs scientifiques</subfield><subfield code="v">Ouvrages de vulgarisation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Erreurs scientifiques</subfield><subfield code="x">Histoire</subfield><subfield code="v">Ouvrages de vulgarisation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Sciences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">sciences (philosophy)</subfield><subfield code="2">aat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">science (modern discipline)</subfield><subfield code="2">aat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">REFERENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Questions & Answers.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">History.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Public opinion</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Methodology</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Discoveries in science</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Errors, Scientific</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Naturwissenschaften</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vorurteil</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="0">http://d-nb.info/gnd/4064037-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erreurs scientifiques</subfield><subfield code="x">Vulgarisation.</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erreurs scientifiques</subfield><subfield code="x">Histoire</subfield><subfield code="x">Vulgarisation.</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Histoire</subfield><subfield code="x">Vulgarisation.</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Popular Work</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">History</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Popular works</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Numbers, Ronald L.,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kampourakis, Kostas,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Newton's apple and other myths about science (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGqVhy9fGD6XWmGyFyqjVK</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="t">Newton's apple and other myths about science.</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2015</subfield><subfield code="z">9780674967984</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2015014096</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)906121832</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1133812</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="b">DEGR</subfield><subfield code="n">9780674089167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4404091</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1133812</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">12582990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | Popular Work History fast Popular works fast |
| genre_facet | Popular Work History Popular works |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn925305924 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:26:50Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780674089167 0674089162 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 925305924 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (xiv, 287 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Harvard University Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Newton's apple and other myths about science / edited by Ronald L. Numbers and Kostas Kampourakis. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2015. 1 online resource (xiv, 287 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references and index. Medieval and early modern science -- Myth 1. That there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution / Michael H. Shank -- Myth 2. That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat / Lesley B. Cormack -- Myth 3. That the copernican revolution demoted the status of the Earth / Michael N. Keas -- Myth 4. That alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding / Lawrence M. Principe -- Myth 5. That Galileo publicly refuted Aristotle's conclusions about motion by repeated experiments made from the Campanile of Pisa / John L. Heilbron -- Myth 6. That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos / Patricia Fara -- Nineteenth century -- Myth 7. That Friedrich Wohler's synthesis of urea in 1828 destroyed vitalism and gave rise to organic chemistry / Peter J. Ramberg -- Myth 8. That William Paley raised scientific questions about biological origins that were eventually answered by Charles Darwin / Adam R. Shapiro -- Myth 9. That nineteenth-century geologists were divided into opposing camps of Catastrophists and Uniformitarians / Julie Newell -- Myth 10. That Lamarckian evolution relied largely on use and disuse and that Darwin rejected Lamarckian mechanisms / Richard W. Burkhardt Jr -- Myth 11. That Darwin worked on his theory in secret for twenty years, his fears causing him to delay publication / Robert J. Richards -- Myth 12. That Wallace's and Darwin's explanations of evolution were virtually the same / Michael Ruse -- Myth 13. That Darwinian natural selection has been "the only game in town" / Nicolaas Rupke -- Myth 14. That after Darwin (1871), sexual selection was largely ignored until Robert Trivers (1972) resurrected the theory / Erika Lorraine Milam -- Myth 15. That Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation on the basis of scientific objectivity / Garland E. Allen -- Myth 16. That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time / Kostas Kampourakis -- Myth 17. That "social Darwinism" has had a profound influence on social thought and policy, especially in the United States of America / Ronald L. Numbers -- Twentieth century -- Myth 18. That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity / Theodore Arabatzis and Kostas Gavroglu -- Myth 19. That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward / Mansoor Niaz -- Myth 20. That neo-Darwinism defines evolution as random mutation plus natural selection / David J. Depew -- Myth 21. That melanism in peppered moths is not a genuine example of evolution by natural selection / David W. Rudge -- Myth 22. That Linus Pauling's discovery of the molecular basis of sickle-cell anemia revolutionized medical practice / Bruno J. Strasser -- Myth 23. That the Soviet launch of Sputnik caused the revamping of American science -- Education / John L. Rudolph -- Generalizations -- Myth 24. That religion has typically impeded the progress of science / Peter Harrison -- Myth 25. That science has been largely a solitary enterprise / Kathryn M. Olesko -- Myth 26. That the "scientific method" accurately reflects what scientists actually do / Daniel P. Thurs -- Myth 27. That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience / Michael D. Gordin. Online resource; title from PDF title page (JSTOR, viewed on February 5, 2019). A falling apple inspired the law of gravity-or so the story goes. Is it true? Perhaps not. But why do such stories endure as explanations of how science happens? Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science brushes away popular misconceptions to provide a clearer picture of scientific breakthroughs from ancient times to the present. Science Public opinion Popular works. Science History Popular works. Discoveries in science History Popular works. Science Methodology Popular works. Errors, Scientific Popular works. Errors, Scientific History Popular works. Science. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118553 Science Public Opinion Sciences Opinion publique Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Découvertes scientifiques Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences Méthodologie Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences. sciences (philosophy) aat science (modern discipline) aat REFERENCE Questions & Answers. bisacsh SCIENCE History. bisacsh Science Public opinion fast Science Methodology fast Discoveries in science fast Errors, Scientific fast Science fast Naturwissenschaften gnd Vorurteil gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4064037-1 Erreurs scientifiques Vulgarisation. ram Erreurs scientifiques Histoire Vulgarisation. ram Science Histoire Vulgarisation. ram Popular Work History fast Popular works fast Numbers, Ronald L., editor. Kampourakis, Kostas, editor. has work: Newton's apple and other myths about science (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGqVhy9fGD6XWmGyFyqjVK https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Newton's apple and other myths about science. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2015 9780674967984 (DLC) 2015014096 (OCoLC)906121832 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1133812 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Newton's apple and other myths about science / Medieval and early modern science -- Myth 1. That there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution / Myth 2. That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat / Myth 3. That the copernican revolution demoted the status of the Earth / Myth 4. That alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding / Myth 5. That Galileo publicly refuted Aristotle's conclusions about motion by repeated experiments made from the Campanile of Pisa / Myth 6. That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos / Nineteenth century -- Myth 7. That Friedrich Wohler's synthesis of urea in 1828 destroyed vitalism and gave rise to organic chemistry / Myth 8. That William Paley raised scientific questions about biological origins that were eventually answered by Charles Darwin / Myth 9. That nineteenth-century geologists were divided into opposing camps of Catastrophists and Uniformitarians / Myth 10. That Lamarckian evolution relied largely on use and disuse and that Darwin rejected Lamarckian mechanisms / Myth 11. That Darwin worked on his theory in secret for twenty years, his fears causing him to delay publication / Myth 12. That Wallace's and Darwin's explanations of evolution were virtually the same / Myth 13. That Darwinian natural selection has been "the only game in town" / Myth 14. That after Darwin (1871), sexual selection was largely ignored until Robert Trivers (1972) resurrected the theory / Myth 15. That Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation on the basis of scientific objectivity / Myth 16. That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time / Myth 17. That "social Darwinism" has had a profound influence on social thought and policy, especially in the United States of America / Twentieth century -- Myth 18. That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity / Myth 19. That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward / Myth 20. That neo-Darwinism defines evolution as random mutation plus natural selection / Myth 21. That melanism in peppered moths is not a genuine example of evolution by natural selection / Myth 22. That Linus Pauling's discovery of the molecular basis of sickle-cell anemia revolutionized medical practice / Myth 23. That the Soviet launch of Sputnik caused the revamping of American science -- Education / Generalizations -- Myth 24. That religion has typically impeded the progress of science / Myth 25. That science has been largely a solitary enterprise / Myth 26. That the "scientific method" accurately reflects what scientists actually do / Myth 27. That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience / Science Public opinion Popular works. Science History Popular works. Discoveries in science History Popular works. Science Methodology Popular works. Errors, Scientific Popular works. Errors, Scientific History Popular works. Science. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118553 Science Public Opinion Sciences Opinion publique Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Découvertes scientifiques Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences Méthodologie Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences. sciences (philosophy) aat science (modern discipline) aat REFERENCE Questions & Answers. bisacsh SCIENCE History. bisacsh Science Public opinion fast Science Methodology fast Discoveries in science fast Errors, Scientific fast Science fast Naturwissenschaften gnd Vorurteil gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4064037-1 Erreurs scientifiques Vulgarisation. ram Erreurs scientifiques Histoire Vulgarisation. ram Science Histoire Vulgarisation. ram |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118553 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4064037-1 |
| title | Newton's apple and other myths about science / |
| title_alt | Medieval and early modern science -- Myth 1. That there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution / Myth 2. That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat / Myth 3. That the copernican revolution demoted the status of the Earth / Myth 4. That alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding / Myth 5. That Galileo publicly refuted Aristotle's conclusions about motion by repeated experiments made from the Campanile of Pisa / Myth 6. That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos / Nineteenth century -- Myth 7. That Friedrich Wohler's synthesis of urea in 1828 destroyed vitalism and gave rise to organic chemistry / Myth 8. That William Paley raised scientific questions about biological origins that were eventually answered by Charles Darwin / Myth 9. That nineteenth-century geologists were divided into opposing camps of Catastrophists and Uniformitarians / Myth 10. That Lamarckian evolution relied largely on use and disuse and that Darwin rejected Lamarckian mechanisms / Myth 11. That Darwin worked on his theory in secret for twenty years, his fears causing him to delay publication / Myth 12. That Wallace's and Darwin's explanations of evolution were virtually the same / Myth 13. That Darwinian natural selection has been "the only game in town" / Myth 14. That after Darwin (1871), sexual selection was largely ignored until Robert Trivers (1972) resurrected the theory / Myth 15. That Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation on the basis of scientific objectivity / Myth 16. That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time / Myth 17. That "social Darwinism" has had a profound influence on social thought and policy, especially in the United States of America / Twentieth century -- Myth 18. That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity / Myth 19. That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward / Myth 20. That neo-Darwinism defines evolution as random mutation plus natural selection / Myth 21. That melanism in peppered moths is not a genuine example of evolution by natural selection / Myth 22. That Linus Pauling's discovery of the molecular basis of sickle-cell anemia revolutionized medical practice / Myth 23. That the Soviet launch of Sputnik caused the revamping of American science -- Education / Generalizations -- Myth 24. That religion has typically impeded the progress of science / Myth 25. That science has been largely a solitary enterprise / Myth 26. That the "scientific method" accurately reflects what scientists actually do / Myth 27. That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience / |
| title_auth | Newton's apple and other myths about science / |
| title_exact_search | Newton's apple and other myths about science / |
| title_full | Newton's apple and other myths about science / edited by Ronald L. Numbers and Kostas Kampourakis. |
| title_fullStr | Newton's apple and other myths about science / edited by Ronald L. Numbers and Kostas Kampourakis. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Newton's apple and other myths about science / edited by Ronald L. Numbers and Kostas Kampourakis. |
| title_short | Newton's apple and other myths about science / |
| title_sort | newton s apple and other myths about science |
| topic | Science Public opinion Popular works. Science History Popular works. Discoveries in science History Popular works. Science Methodology Popular works. Errors, Scientific Popular works. Errors, Scientific History Popular works. Science. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118553 Science Public Opinion Sciences Opinion publique Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Découvertes scientifiques Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences Méthodologie Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences. sciences (philosophy) aat science (modern discipline) aat REFERENCE Questions & Answers. bisacsh SCIENCE History. bisacsh Science Public opinion fast Science Methodology fast Discoveries in science fast Errors, Scientific fast Science fast Naturwissenschaften gnd Vorurteil gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4064037-1 Erreurs scientifiques Vulgarisation. ram Erreurs scientifiques Histoire Vulgarisation. ram Science Histoire Vulgarisation. ram |
| topic_facet | Science Public opinion Popular works. Science History Popular works. Discoveries in science History Popular works. Science Methodology Popular works. Errors, Scientific Popular works. Errors, Scientific History Popular works. Science. Science Public Opinion Sciences Opinion publique Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Découvertes scientifiques Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences Méthodologie Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Histoire Ouvrages de vulgarisation. Sciences. sciences (philosophy) science (modern discipline) REFERENCE Questions & Answers. SCIENCE History. Science Public opinion Science Methodology Discoveries in science Errors, Scientific Naturwissenschaften Vorurteil Erreurs scientifiques Vulgarisation. Erreurs scientifiques Histoire Vulgarisation. Science Histoire Vulgarisation. Popular Work History Popular works |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1133812 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT numbersronaldl newtonsappleandothermythsaboutscience AT kampourakiskostas newtonsappleandothermythsaboutscience |