Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review /:
"Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim tha...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2014.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim that subjecting counter-terrorism measures to judicial review is crucial for maintaining a jurisdiction's principles of constitutionalism. This volume brings together voices from all sides of the debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia. It does not attempt to 'resolve' the argument but rather to explore it in all its dimensions. The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles"-- |
| Beschreibung: | "This collection emerged from a workshop held in Durham Human Rights Centre in June 2013, which was supported by a small grant from the British Academy and Leverhulme and by the Laureate Fellowship: Anti-Terror Laws and the Democratic Challenge Project in the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law, UNSW. There was a follow up symposium hosted by the NSW Bar Association in Sydney in November 2013"--CIP galley |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9781316073353 1316073351 9781107282124 1107282128 9781107662964 1107662966 9781316075715 1316075710 9781316056813 1316056813 9781316070994 1316070999 9781322176932 1322176930 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn891589544 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 140929s2014 enk ob 101 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e rda |e pn |c N$T |d YDXCP |d EBLCP |d CAMBR |d IDEBK |d CDX |d E7B |d CUS |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d OCL |d OCLCQ |d FIE |d ESU |d OCLCQ |d UEJ |d UAB |d OCLCQ |d UWO |d OCLCQ |d BWN |d OCLCQ |d LUN |d MM9 |d UKAHL |d UKQUB |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 891445760 |a 1067248085 |a 1167323613 |a 1171740806 |a 1233302775 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316073353 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1316073351 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107282124 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1107282128 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107662964 |q (paperback) | ||
| 020 | |a 1107662966 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316075715 |q (eBook) | ||
| 020 | |a 1316075710 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316056813 |q (eBook) | ||
| 020 | |a 1316056813 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316070994 |q (eBook) | ||
| 020 | |a 1316070999 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781322176932 |q (MyiLibrary) | ||
| 020 | |a 1322176930 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781107053618 | ||
| 020 | |z 1107053617 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781316078099 | ||
| 020 | |z 1316078094 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)891589544 |z (OCoLC)891445760 |z (OCoLC)1067248085 |z (OCoLC)1167323613 |z (OCoLC)1171740806 |z (OCoLC)1233302775 | ||
| 037 | |a 1754886 |b EBL | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K5256 |b .C75 2014eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 001000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 344.05/325 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a POL035010 |2 bisacsh | ||
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / |c edited by Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; |a New York : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2014. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a "This collection emerged from a workshop held in Durham Human Rights Centre in June 2013, which was supported by a small grant from the British Academy and Leverhulme and by the Laureate Fellowship: Anti-Terror Laws and the Democratic Challenge Project in the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law, UNSW. There was a follow up symposium hosted by the NSW Bar Association in Sydney in November 2013"--CIP galley | ||
| 520 | |a "Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim that subjecting counter-terrorism measures to judicial review is crucial for maintaining a jurisdiction's principles of constitutionalism. This volume brings together voices from all sides of the debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia. It does not attempt to 'resolve' the argument but rather to explore it in all its dimensions. The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles"-- |c Provided by publisher | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (Cambridge, viewed October 30, 2014). | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Cover; Half-title; Title page; Copyright information; Table of contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Counter-terrorism judicial review: beyond dichotomies; Part I Judging counter-terrorism judicial review; 1 Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism; I The cases; (a) Khadr; (b) Munaf; (c) Rahmatullah; II Judicial Technique of Internal/External Construction; III Regulatory constitutionalism and the apparent self-imposed limitation on judicial muscularity; Conclusion; 2 Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary; Introduction. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a I Background: role of the judiciary in Danish constitutional traditionII When the stakes get high: judicial review in counter-terrorism cases; III Recent Danish counter-terrorism case law: measured not deferential review; (a) Lawfulness of detention of alien terrorist suspects subject to expulsion orders; (b) Due process and the expulsion of alien terrorist suspects; (c) Non-refoulement and the extradition of terrorist suspects; (d) Nulla poena and the definition of terrorism in controversial circumstances; Conclusion. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3 When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgmentsIntroduction; I Cases gone bad; (a) Group I: rights trade-offs; ''Belmarsh''; Hamdi; (b) Group II: political blowback; Charkaoui; Rasul, Hamdan and Boumediene; II Good intentions, bad results; (a) What went wrong?; (b) Status distinctions; (c) Procedural rules; (d) Dysfunctional dialogue; Conclusion; 4 The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience; Introduction; I Boumediene and its negation; II Refusing to extend habeas corpus to detainees held in Afghanistan. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a III Failure of judiciary to provide accountability for tortureIV Explaining the disconnect between the Supreme Court''s assertive judicial review of detention decisions and the judiciary''spassivity; Conclusion; Part II Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review; 5 Emergency law as administrative law; Introduction; I Dimensions of War; II Administrative law as an alternative to ''emergency''law; II Accountability and administrative law; Conclusion; 6 The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny; I The basis of (my) judicial review scepticism. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a II Australia''sparliamentary scrutiny modelIII Models of dialogic review; Conclusion; 7 Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom; I Path to independent anti-terrorism review; II Official mandate; III Independence; IV Influence; Conclusion; Postscript; 8 Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review; Introduction; I Canada''sArar inquiry; II United Kingdom''sDetainee Inquiry; Conclusions; (a) Persistent transnational accountability gaps; (b) Plugging domestic accountability gaps. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Terrorism |x Prevention |x Law and legislation |v Congresses. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Judicial review |v Congresses. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Political questions and judicial power |v Congresses. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Contrôle juridictionnel des lois |v Congrès. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire |v Congrès. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Political Freedom & Security |x Human Rights. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial review |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Political questions and judicial power |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Terrorism |x Prevention |x Law and legislation |2 fast | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Conference papers and proceedings |2 fast | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Davis, Fergal Francis, |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a De Londras, Fiona, |e editor. | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Critical debates on counter-terrorism judicial review (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGgGH4hThhfrXcTJFYPc8y |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review |z 9781107053618 |w (DLC) 2014007627 |w (OCoLC)870896410 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=818042 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH28321716 | ||
| 938 | |a Coutts Information Services |b COUT |n 29889627 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL1754886 | ||
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10940491 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 818042 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis29889627 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 12090990 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 12115248 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 12092630 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 12307724 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn891589544 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882288645898240 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Davis, Fergal Francis De Londras, Fiona |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | f f d ff ffd l f d lf lfd |
| author_facet | Davis, Fergal Francis De Londras, Fiona |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K5256 |
| callnumber-raw | K5256 .C75 2014eb |
| callnumber-search | K5256 .C75 2014eb |
| callnumber-sort | K 45256 C75 42014EB |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Cover; Half-title; Title page; Copyright information; Table of contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Counter-terrorism judicial review: beyond dichotomies; Part I Judging counter-terrorism judicial review; 1 Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism; I The cases; (a) Khadr; (b) Munaf; (c) Rahmatullah; II Judicial Technique of Internal/External Construction; III Regulatory constitutionalism and the apparent self-imposed limitation on judicial muscularity; Conclusion; 2 Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary; Introduction. I Background: role of the judiciary in Danish constitutional traditionII When the stakes get high: judicial review in counter-terrorism cases; III Recent Danish counter-terrorism case law: measured not deferential review; (a) Lawfulness of detention of alien terrorist suspects subject to expulsion orders; (b) Due process and the expulsion of alien terrorist suspects; (c) Non-refoulement and the extradition of terrorist suspects; (d) Nulla poena and the definition of terrorism in controversial circumstances; Conclusion. 3 When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgmentsIntroduction; I Cases gone bad; (a) Group I: rights trade-offs; ''Belmarsh''; Hamdi; (b) Group II: political blowback; Charkaoui; Rasul, Hamdan and Boumediene; II Good intentions, bad results; (a) What went wrong?; (b) Status distinctions; (c) Procedural rules; (d) Dysfunctional dialogue; Conclusion; 4 The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience; Introduction; I Boumediene and its negation; II Refusing to extend habeas corpus to detainees held in Afghanistan. III Failure of judiciary to provide accountability for tortureIV Explaining the disconnect between the Supreme Court''s assertive judicial review of detention decisions and the judiciary''spassivity; Conclusion; Part II Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review; 5 Emergency law as administrative law; Introduction; I Dimensions of War; II Administrative law as an alternative to ''emergency''law; II Accountability and administrative law; Conclusion; 6 The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny; I The basis of (my) judicial review scepticism. II Australia''sparliamentary scrutiny modelIII Models of dialogic review; Conclusion; 7 Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom; I Path to independent anti-terrorism review; II Official mandate; III Independence; IV Influence; Conclusion; Postscript; 8 Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review; Introduction; I Canada''sArar inquiry; II United Kingdom''sDetainee Inquiry; Conclusions; (a) Persistent transnational accountability gaps; (b) Plugging domestic accountability gaps. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)891589544 |
| dewey-full | 344.05/325 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 344 - Labor, social, education & cultural law |
| dewey-raw | 344.05/325 |
| dewey-search | 344.05/325 |
| dewey-sort | 3344.05 3325 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>08253cam a2200925 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn891589544</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu---unuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140929s2014 enk ob 101 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">CAMBR</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">CDX</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">CUS</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">FIE</subfield><subfield code="d">ESU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UEJ</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UWO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">BWN</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">LUN</subfield><subfield code="d">MM9</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">UKQUB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">891445760</subfield><subfield code="a">1067248085</subfield><subfield code="a">1167323613</subfield><subfield code="a">1171740806</subfield><subfield code="a">1233302775</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316073353</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1316073351</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107282124</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1107282128</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107662964</subfield><subfield code="q">(paperback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1107662966</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316075715</subfield><subfield code="q">(eBook)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1316075710</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316056813</subfield><subfield code="q">(eBook)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1316056813</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316070994</subfield><subfield code="q">(eBook)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1316070999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781322176932</subfield><subfield code="q">(MyiLibrary)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1322176930</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781107053618</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1107053617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781316078099</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1316078094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)891589544</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)891445760</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1067248085</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1167323613</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1171740806</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1233302775</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1754886</subfield><subfield code="b">EBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K5256</subfield><subfield code="b">.C75 2014eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">001000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">344.05/325</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">POL035010</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review /</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom ;</subfield><subfield code="a">New York :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2014.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This collection emerged from a workshop held in Durham Human Rights Centre in June 2013, which was supported by a small grant from the British Academy and Leverhulme and by the Laureate Fellowship: Anti-Terror Laws and the Democratic Challenge Project in the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law, UNSW. There was a follow up symposium hosted by the NSW Bar Association in Sydney in November 2013"--CIP galley</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim that subjecting counter-terrorism measures to judicial review is crucial for maintaining a jurisdiction's principles of constitutionalism. This volume brings together voices from all sides of the debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia. It does not attempt to 'resolve' the argument but rather to explore it in all its dimensions. The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online resource; title from PDF title page (Cambridge, viewed October 30, 2014).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cover; Half-title; Title page; Copyright information; Table of contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Counter-terrorism judicial review: beyond dichotomies; Part I Judging counter-terrorism judicial review; 1 Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism; I The cases; (a) Khadr; (b) Munaf; (c) Rahmatullah; II Judicial Technique of Internal/External Construction; III Regulatory constitutionalism and the apparent self-imposed limitation on judicial muscularity; Conclusion; 2 Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary; Introduction.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I Background: role of the judiciary in Danish constitutional traditionII When the stakes get high: judicial review in counter-terrorism cases; III Recent Danish counter-terrorism case law: measured not deferential review; (a) Lawfulness of detention of alien terrorist suspects subject to expulsion orders; (b) Due process and the expulsion of alien terrorist suspects; (c) Non-refoulement and the extradition of terrorist suspects; (d) Nulla poena and the definition of terrorism in controversial circumstances; Conclusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3 When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgmentsIntroduction; I Cases gone bad; (a) Group I: rights trade-offs; ''Belmarsh''; Hamdi; (b) Group II: political blowback; Charkaoui; Rasul, Hamdan and Boumediene; II Good intentions, bad results; (a) What went wrong?; (b) Status distinctions; (c) Procedural rules; (d) Dysfunctional dialogue; Conclusion; 4 The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience; Introduction; I Boumediene and its negation; II Refusing to extend habeas corpus to detainees held in Afghanistan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">III Failure of judiciary to provide accountability for tortureIV Explaining the disconnect between the Supreme Court''s assertive judicial review of detention decisions and the judiciary''spassivity; Conclusion; Part II Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review; 5 Emergency law as administrative law; Introduction; I Dimensions of War; II Administrative law as an alternative to ''emergency''law; II Accountability and administrative law; Conclusion; 6 The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny; I The basis of (my) judicial review scepticism.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">II Australia''sparliamentary scrutiny modelIII Models of dialogic review; Conclusion; 7 Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom; I Path to independent anti-terrorism review; II Official mandate; III Independence; IV Influence; Conclusion; Postscript; 8 Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review; Introduction; I Canada''sArar inquiry; II United Kingdom''sDetainee Inquiry; Conclusions; (a) Persistent transnational accountability gaps; (b) Plugging domestic accountability gaps.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Terrorism</subfield><subfield code="x">Prevention</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial review</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Contrôle juridictionnel des lois</subfield><subfield code="v">Congrès.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Politique et pouvoir judiciaire</subfield><subfield code="v">Congrès.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Political Freedom & Security</subfield><subfield code="x">Human Rights.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial review</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Terrorism</subfield><subfield code="x">Prevention</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Conference papers and proceedings</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Davis, Fergal Francis,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Londras, Fiona,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Critical debates on counter-terrorism judicial review (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGgGH4hThhfrXcTJFYPc8y</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="t">Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review</subfield><subfield code="z">9781107053618</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2014007627</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)870896410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=818042</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH28321716</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Coutts Information Services</subfield><subfield code="b">COUT</subfield><subfield code="n">29889627</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL1754886</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10940491</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">818042</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis29889627</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">12090990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">12115248</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">12092630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">12307724</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | Conference papers and proceedings fast |
| genre_facet | Conference papers and proceedings |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn891589544 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:26:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781316073353 1316073351 9781107282124 1107282128 9781107662964 1107662966 9781316075715 1316075710 9781316056813 1316056813 9781316070994 1316070999 9781322176932 1322176930 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 891589544 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / edited by Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2014. 1 online resource text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier "This collection emerged from a workshop held in Durham Human Rights Centre in June 2013, which was supported by a small grant from the British Academy and Leverhulme and by the Laureate Fellowship: Anti-Terror Laws and the Democratic Challenge Project in the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law, UNSW. There was a follow up symposium hosted by the NSW Bar Association in Sydney in November 2013"--CIP galley "Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim that subjecting counter-terrorism measures to judicial review is crucial for maintaining a jurisdiction's principles of constitutionalism. This volume brings together voices from all sides of the debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia. It does not attempt to 'resolve' the argument but rather to explore it in all its dimensions. The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles"-- Provided by publisher Online resource; title from PDF title page (Cambridge, viewed October 30, 2014). Cover; Half-title; Title page; Copyright information; Table of contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Counter-terrorism judicial review: beyond dichotomies; Part I Judging counter-terrorism judicial review; 1 Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism; I The cases; (a) Khadr; (b) Munaf; (c) Rahmatullah; II Judicial Technique of Internal/External Construction; III Regulatory constitutionalism and the apparent self-imposed limitation on judicial muscularity; Conclusion; 2 Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary; Introduction. I Background: role of the judiciary in Danish constitutional traditionII When the stakes get high: judicial review in counter-terrorism cases; III Recent Danish counter-terrorism case law: measured not deferential review; (a) Lawfulness of detention of alien terrorist suspects subject to expulsion orders; (b) Due process and the expulsion of alien terrorist suspects; (c) Non-refoulement and the extradition of terrorist suspects; (d) Nulla poena and the definition of terrorism in controversial circumstances; Conclusion. 3 When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgmentsIntroduction; I Cases gone bad; (a) Group I: rights trade-offs; ''Belmarsh''; Hamdi; (b) Group II: political blowback; Charkaoui; Rasul, Hamdan and Boumediene; II Good intentions, bad results; (a) What went wrong?; (b) Status distinctions; (c) Procedural rules; (d) Dysfunctional dialogue; Conclusion; 4 The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience; Introduction; I Boumediene and its negation; II Refusing to extend habeas corpus to detainees held in Afghanistan. III Failure of judiciary to provide accountability for tortureIV Explaining the disconnect between the Supreme Court''s assertive judicial review of detention decisions and the judiciary''spassivity; Conclusion; Part II Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review; 5 Emergency law as administrative law; Introduction; I Dimensions of War; II Administrative law as an alternative to ''emergency''law; II Accountability and administrative law; Conclusion; 6 The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny; I The basis of (my) judicial review scepticism. II Australia''sparliamentary scrutiny modelIII Models of dialogic review; Conclusion; 7 Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom; I Path to independent anti-terrorism review; II Official mandate; III Independence; IV Influence; Conclusion; Postscript; 8 Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review; Introduction; I Canada''sArar inquiry; II United Kingdom''sDetainee Inquiry; Conclusions; (a) Persistent transnational accountability gaps; (b) Plugging domestic accountability gaps. Includes bibliographical references and index. Terrorism Prevention Law and legislation Congresses. Judicial review Congresses. Political questions and judicial power Congresses. Contrôle juridictionnel des lois Congrès. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Congrès. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Freedom & Security Human Rights. bisacsh LAW Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice. bisacsh Judicial review fast Political questions and judicial power fast Terrorism Prevention Law and legislation fast Conference papers and proceedings fast Davis, Fergal Francis, editor. De Londras, Fiona, editor. has work: Critical debates on counter-terrorism judicial review (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGgGH4hThhfrXcTJFYPc8y https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review 9781107053618 (DLC) 2014007627 (OCoLC)870896410 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=818042 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / Cover; Half-title; Title page; Copyright information; Table of contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Counter-terrorism judicial review: beyond dichotomies; Part I Judging counter-terrorism judicial review; 1 Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism; I The cases; (a) Khadr; (b) Munaf; (c) Rahmatullah; II Judicial Technique of Internal/External Construction; III Regulatory constitutionalism and the apparent self-imposed limitation on judicial muscularity; Conclusion; 2 Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary; Introduction. I Background: role of the judiciary in Danish constitutional traditionII When the stakes get high: judicial review in counter-terrorism cases; III Recent Danish counter-terrorism case law: measured not deferential review; (a) Lawfulness of detention of alien terrorist suspects subject to expulsion orders; (b) Due process and the expulsion of alien terrorist suspects; (c) Non-refoulement and the extradition of terrorist suspects; (d) Nulla poena and the definition of terrorism in controversial circumstances; Conclusion. 3 When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgmentsIntroduction; I Cases gone bad; (a) Group I: rights trade-offs; ''Belmarsh''; Hamdi; (b) Group II: political blowback; Charkaoui; Rasul, Hamdan and Boumediene; II Good intentions, bad results; (a) What went wrong?; (b) Status distinctions; (c) Procedural rules; (d) Dysfunctional dialogue; Conclusion; 4 The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience; Introduction; I Boumediene and its negation; II Refusing to extend habeas corpus to detainees held in Afghanistan. III Failure of judiciary to provide accountability for tortureIV Explaining the disconnect between the Supreme Court''s assertive judicial review of detention decisions and the judiciary''spassivity; Conclusion; Part II Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review; 5 Emergency law as administrative law; Introduction; I Dimensions of War; II Administrative law as an alternative to ''emergency''law; II Accountability and administrative law; Conclusion; 6 The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny; I The basis of (my) judicial review scepticism. II Australia''sparliamentary scrutiny modelIII Models of dialogic review; Conclusion; 7 Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom; I Path to independent anti-terrorism review; II Official mandate; III Independence; IV Influence; Conclusion; Postscript; 8 Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review; Introduction; I Canada''sArar inquiry; II United Kingdom''sDetainee Inquiry; Conclusions; (a) Persistent transnational accountability gaps; (b) Plugging domestic accountability gaps. Terrorism Prevention Law and legislation Congresses. Judicial review Congresses. Political questions and judicial power Congresses. Contrôle juridictionnel des lois Congrès. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Congrès. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Freedom & Security Human Rights. bisacsh LAW Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice. bisacsh Judicial review fast Political questions and judicial power fast Terrorism Prevention Law and legislation fast |
| title | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / |
| title_auth | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / |
| title_exact_search | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / |
| title_full | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / edited by Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras. |
| title_fullStr | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / edited by Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / edited by Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras. |
| title_short | Critical debates on counter-terrorist judicial review / |
| title_sort | critical debates on counter terrorist judicial review |
| topic | Terrorism Prevention Law and legislation Congresses. Judicial review Congresses. Political questions and judicial power Congresses. Contrôle juridictionnel des lois Congrès. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Congrès. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Freedom & Security Human Rights. bisacsh LAW Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice. bisacsh Judicial review fast Political questions and judicial power fast Terrorism Prevention Law and legislation fast |
| topic_facet | Terrorism Prevention Law and legislation Congresses. Judicial review Congresses. Political questions and judicial power Congresses. Contrôle juridictionnel des lois Congrès. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Congrès. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Freedom & Security Human Rights. LAW Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice. Judicial review Political questions and judicial power Terrorism Prevention Law and legislation Conference papers and proceedings |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=818042 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davisfergalfrancis criticaldebatesoncounterterroristjudicialreview AT delondrasfiona criticaldebatesoncounterterroristjudicialreview |