Why did anticorruption policy fail? :: a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia /
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Charlotte, North Carolina :
Information Age Publishing, Inc.,
2014.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Research in public management.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (395 pages) : illustrations, charts, tables |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references. |
| ISBN: | 9781623967826 1623967821 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn891396870 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 140919t20142014ncuad ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a E7B |b eng |e rda |e pn |c E7B |d OCLCO |d N$T |d OCLCF |d YDXCP |d EBLCP |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d AGLDB |d CUS |d VNS |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d VTS |d INT |d REC |d OCLCQ |d STF |d OCLCQ |d M8D |d UKAHL |d ZCU |d OCLCQ |d AJS |d OCLCO |d QGK |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SXB | ||
| 019 | |a 907283723 |a 1259069920 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781623967826 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1623967821 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781623967802 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781623967819 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)891396870 |z (OCoLC)907283723 |z (OCoLC)1259069920 | ||
| 043 | |a a-io--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a HV6771.I5 |b .B738 2014eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a SOC |x 004000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 364.1323 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brata, Roby Arya, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why did anticorruption policy fail? : |b a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / |c Roby Arya Brata. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Charlotte, North Carolina : |b Information Age Publishing, Inc., |c 2014. | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (395 pages) : |b illustrations, charts, tables | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Research in Public Management | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (ebrary, viewed September 18, 2014). | |
| 505 | 0 | 0 | |g Machine generated contents note: |g 1. |t Introduction -- |t Failed Anticorruption Measures in Indonesia -- |t Policy Evaluation Research Focus -- |t Purpose of the Study -- |t Theoretical Context and Gaps -- |t Central Policy Research Question -- |t Central Policy Argument -- |t Theoretical and Methodological Approaches -- |t Justification for the Study -- |t Theoretical and Policy Significance of the Study -- |t Organization of the Book -- |g 2. |t Explaining Anticorruption Implementation Failure -- |t Introduction -- |t Anticorruption: Why Anticorruption Policy Implementation Can Fail -- |t Defining Corruption -- |t Categorizing Anticorruption Strategies -- |t Assessing the Strategies -- |t Explaining Anticorruption Policy Failure -- |t Why Did Public Policy Implementation Fail? -- |t Definitions -- |t Competing Analytical Frameworks on Implementation -- |t Comparison and Integration of Failure Factor Typologies -- |t Theoretical Framework for the Study -- |t Conclusion -- |g 3. |t Evaluation Methodology -- |t Introduction -- |t Research Method -- |t Evaluating Policy Performance -- |t Nature, Aims, and Functions of Policy Evaluation -- |t Problems in Crime Control/Anticorruption Policy Evaluation -- |t Evaluation Method for the Study -- |t Evaluation Method Employed -- |t Justifying the Pre-judgment of Implementation Failure -- |t Criteria for Policy Evaluation -- |t Evaluation Criterion for the Study -- |t Sources of Data -- |t Primary Sources of Data -- |t Secondary Sources of Data -- |t Data-Collection Method -- |t Interview -- |t Document and Literature Analysis -- |t Sample Survey -- |t Data Analysis and Analytical Approach -- |t Theory-Informed Analysis -- |t Content Analysis -- |t Macro-Analytical Approach -- |t Integrated Implementation Analysis -- |t Maintaining Data Validity and Reliability -- |t Ethical Issues -- |t Limitations of the Study -- |g 4. |t Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Authoritarian New Order Regime -- |t Introduction -- |t Authoritarian Leadership -- |t Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the New Order Regime -- |t Analysis of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- |t Background -- |t Policy Objectives -- |t Scope and Definitions of Corruption -- |t Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- |t Specific Criminal Procedures -- |t Legal Sanctions -- |t Related Legislation -- |t Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- |t Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- |t Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- |t Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System -- |t Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- |t Implementation Failure Factors of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- |t Policy Design Factor -- |t Political Factor -- |t Institutional Factor -- |t Managerial Factor -- |t Societal Factor -- |t Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian Political System -- |t Conclusion -- |g 5. |t Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Democratic Reform Order Regime -- |t Introduction -- |t Democratic Political System: Reforming the Constitutional Power Structures and Relations -- |t Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the Reform Order Regime -- |t Analysis ofthe Anticorruption Law 1999 -- |t Background -- |t Policy Objectives -- |t Scope and Definitions of Corruption -- |t Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- |t Specific Criminal Procedures -- |t Related Legislation -- |t Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1999 -- |t Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- |t Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- |t Public Confidence in the Capacity of the Criminal Justice System -- |t Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- |t Implementation Failure Factors of Anticorruption Law 1999 -- |t Policy Design Factor -- |t Political Factor -- |t Institutional Factor -- |t Managerial Factor -- |t Societal Factor -- |t Implementation as an Integral Function of the Political System of the Democratic Reform Governments -- |t Conclusions -- |g 6. |t Comparing the Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under Both Regimes -- |t Introduction -- |t Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws -- |t Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- |t Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- |t Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice Systems -- |t Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- |t Implementation Factors of the Anticorruption Laws -- |t Policy Design Factors -- |t Implementation Structures and Processes of the Anticorruption Laws -- |t Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- |t Specific Criminal Procedures -- |t Political Factors -- |t Institutional Factors -- |t Managerial Factors -- |t Societal Factor -- |t Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems -- |t Conclusions -- |g 7. |t Conclusions and Policy Recommendations -- |t About the Case Studies -- |t Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws -- |t Factors Contributing to the Implementation Failure -- |t Policy Design Factors -- |t Political Factors -- |t Institutional Factors -- |t Managerial Factors -- |t Societal Factors -- |t Defective Implementation Structures and Processes -- |t Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems -- |t Most Influential Factor(s), in Particular Those Factors Determining the Different Outcomes -- |t Theoretical Significance and Implications of the Study -- |t Agenda for Further Research -- |t Policy Significance and Recommendations -- |t Policy Design -- |t Political Policy -- |t Institutional Policy -- |t Management Policy -- |t Societal Empowerment Policy -- |t Political System Reform. |
| 546 | |a English. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Corruption |z Indonesia. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Political corruption |z Indonesia. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Corruption |z Indonésie. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Corruption (Politique) |z Indonésie. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SOCIAL SCIENCE |x Criminology. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Corruption |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Political corruption |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Indonesia |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcrbVHmQ674B9vYY3X8G3 | |
| 655 | 4 | |a Electronic book. | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Why did anticorruption policy fail? (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGqcKvvWKj8dX7GwyyVYGd |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Brata, Roby Arya. |t Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia. |d Charlotte, North Carolina : Information Age Publishing, Inc., ©2014 |h xxi, 372 pages |k Research in public management. |z 9781623967802 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Research in public management. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=844899 |3 Volltext |
| 936 | |a BATCHLOAD | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH31821345 | ||
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL3316045 | ||
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10929528 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 844899 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 12072063 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn891396870 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882288036675584 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Brata, Roby Arya |
| author_facet | Brata, Roby Arya |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Brata, Roby Arya |
| author_variant | r a b ra rab |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
| callnumber-label | HV6771 |
| callnumber-raw | HV6771.I5 .B738 2014eb |
| callnumber-search | HV6771.I5 .B738 2014eb |
| callnumber-sort | HV 46771 I5 B738 42014EB |
| callnumber-subject | HV - Social Pathology, Criminology |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Introduction -- Failed Anticorruption Measures in Indonesia -- Policy Evaluation Research Focus -- Purpose of the Study -- Theoretical Context and Gaps -- Central Policy Research Question -- Central Policy Argument -- Theoretical and Methodological Approaches -- Justification for the Study -- Theoretical and Policy Significance of the Study -- Organization of the Book -- Explaining Anticorruption Implementation Failure -- Anticorruption: Why Anticorruption Policy Implementation Can Fail -- Defining Corruption -- Categorizing Anticorruption Strategies -- Assessing the Strategies -- Explaining Anticorruption Policy Failure -- Why Did Public Policy Implementation Fail? -- Definitions -- Competing Analytical Frameworks on Implementation -- Comparison and Integration of Failure Factor Typologies -- Theoretical Framework for the Study -- Conclusion -- Evaluation Methodology -- Research Method -- Evaluating Policy Performance -- Nature, Aims, and Functions of Policy Evaluation -- Problems in Crime Control/Anticorruption Policy Evaluation -- Evaluation Method for the Study -- Evaluation Method Employed -- Justifying the Pre-judgment of Implementation Failure -- Criteria for Policy Evaluation -- Evaluation Criterion for the Study -- Sources of Data -- Primary Sources of Data -- Secondary Sources of Data -- Data-Collection Method -- Interview -- Document and Literature Analysis -- Sample Survey -- Data Analysis and Analytical Approach -- Theory-Informed Analysis -- Content Analysis -- Macro-Analytical Approach -- Integrated Implementation Analysis -- Maintaining Data Validity and Reliability -- Ethical Issues -- Limitations of the Study -- Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Authoritarian New Order Regime -- Authoritarian Leadership -- Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the New Order Regime -- Analysis of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Background -- Policy Objectives -- Scope and Definitions of Corruption -- Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- Specific Criminal Procedures -- Legal Sanctions -- Related Legislation -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System -- Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- Implementation Failure Factors of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Policy Design Factor -- Political Factor -- Institutional Factor -- Managerial Factor -- Societal Factor -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian Political System -- Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Democratic Reform Order Regime -- Democratic Political System: Reforming the Constitutional Power Structures and Relations -- Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the Reform Order Regime -- Analysis ofthe Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Public Confidence in the Capacity of the Criminal Justice System -- Implementation Failure Factors of Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Political System of the Democratic Reform Governments -- Conclusions -- Comparing the Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under Both Regimes -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice Systems -- Implementation Factors of the Anticorruption Laws -- Policy Design Factors -- Implementation Structures and Processes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Political Factors -- Institutional Factors -- Managerial Factors -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems -- Conclusions and Policy Recommendations -- About the Case Studies -- Factors Contributing to the Implementation Failure -- Societal Factors -- Defective Implementation Structures and Processes -- Most Influential Factor(s), in Particular Those Factors Determining the Different Outcomes -- Theoretical Significance and Implications of the Study -- Agenda for Further Research -- Policy Significance and Recommendations -- Policy Design -- Political Policy -- Institutional Policy -- Management Policy -- Societal Empowerment Policy -- Political System Reform. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)891396870 |
| dewey-full | 364.1323 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 364 - Criminology |
| dewey-raw | 364.1323 |
| dewey-search | 364.1323 |
| dewey-sort | 3364.1323 |
| dewey-tens | 360 - Social problems and services; associations |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>08355cam a2200637 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn891396870</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cn|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140919t20142014ncuad ob 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E7B</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">CUS</subfield><subfield code="d">VNS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">INT</subfield><subfield code="d">REC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AJS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">QGK</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">SXB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">907283723</subfield><subfield code="a">1259069920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781623967826</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1623967821</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781623967802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781623967819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)891396870</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)907283723</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1259069920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">a-io---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">HV6771.I5</subfield><subfield code="b">.B738 2014eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">004000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">364.1323</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brata, Roby Arya,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why did anticorruption policy fail? :</subfield><subfield code="b">a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia /</subfield><subfield code="c">Roby Arya Brata.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Charlotte, North Carolina :</subfield><subfield code="b">Information Age Publishing, Inc.,</subfield><subfield code="c">2014.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (395 pages) :</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations, charts, tables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Research in Public Management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online resource; title from PDF title page (ebrary, viewed September 18, 2014).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="g">Machine generated contents note:</subfield><subfield code="g">1.</subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Failed Anticorruption Measures in Indonesia --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Evaluation Research Focus --</subfield><subfield code="t">Purpose of the Study --</subfield><subfield code="t">Theoretical Context and Gaps --</subfield><subfield code="t">Central Policy Research Question --</subfield><subfield code="t">Central Policy Argument --</subfield><subfield code="t">Theoretical and Methodological Approaches --</subfield><subfield code="t">Justification for the Study --</subfield><subfield code="t">Theoretical and Policy Significance of the Study --</subfield><subfield code="t">Organization of the Book --</subfield><subfield code="g">2.</subfield><subfield code="t">Explaining Anticorruption Implementation Failure --</subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Anticorruption: Why Anticorruption Policy Implementation Can Fail --</subfield><subfield code="t">Defining Corruption --</subfield><subfield code="t">Categorizing Anticorruption Strategies --</subfield><subfield code="t">Assessing the Strategies --</subfield><subfield code="t">Explaining Anticorruption Policy Failure --</subfield><subfield code="t">Why Did Public Policy Implementation Fail? --</subfield><subfield code="t">Definitions --</subfield><subfield code="t">Competing Analytical Frameworks on Implementation --</subfield><subfield code="t">Comparison and Integration of Failure Factor Typologies --</subfield><subfield code="t">Theoretical Framework for the Study --</subfield><subfield code="t">Conclusion --</subfield><subfield code="g">3.</subfield><subfield code="t">Evaluation Methodology --</subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Research Method --</subfield><subfield code="t">Evaluating Policy Performance --</subfield><subfield code="t">Nature, Aims, and Functions of Policy Evaluation --</subfield><subfield code="t">Problems in Crime Control/Anticorruption Policy Evaluation --</subfield><subfield code="t">Evaluation Method for the Study --</subfield><subfield code="t">Evaluation Method Employed --</subfield><subfield code="t">Justifying the Pre-judgment of Implementation Failure --</subfield><subfield code="t">Criteria for Policy Evaluation --</subfield><subfield code="t">Evaluation Criterion for the Study --</subfield><subfield code="t">Sources of Data --</subfield><subfield code="t">Primary Sources of Data --</subfield><subfield code="t">Secondary Sources of Data --</subfield><subfield code="t">Data-Collection Method --</subfield><subfield code="t">Interview --</subfield><subfield code="t">Document and Literature Analysis --</subfield><subfield code="t">Sample Survey --</subfield><subfield code="t">Data Analysis and Analytical Approach --</subfield><subfield code="t">Theory-Informed Analysis --</subfield><subfield code="t">Content Analysis --</subfield><subfield code="t">Macro-Analytical Approach --</subfield><subfield code="t">Integrated Implementation Analysis --</subfield><subfield code="t">Maintaining Data Validity and Reliability --</subfield><subfield code="t">Ethical Issues --</subfield><subfield code="t">Limitations of the Study --</subfield><subfield code="g">4.</subfield><subfield code="t">Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Authoritarian New Order Regime --</subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Authoritarian Leadership --</subfield><subfield code="t">Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the New Order Regime --</subfield><subfield code="t">Analysis of the Anticorruption Law 1971 --</subfield><subfield code="t">Background --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Objectives --</subfield><subfield code="t">Scope and Definitions of Corruption --</subfield><subfield code="t">Powers of the Implementing Agencies --</subfield><subfield code="t">Specific Criminal Procedures --</subfield><subfield code="t">Legal Sanctions --</subfield><subfield code="t">Related Legislation --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1971 --</subfield><subfield code="t">Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Recovery of the State Assets Losses --</subfield><subfield code="t">Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System --</subfield><subfield code="t">Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation Failure Factors of the Anticorruption Law 1971 --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Design Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Political Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Institutional Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Managerial Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Societal Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian Political System --</subfield><subfield code="t">Conclusion --</subfield><subfield code="g">5.</subfield><subfield code="t">Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Democratic Reform Order Regime --</subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Democratic Political System: Reforming the Constitutional Power Structures and Relations --</subfield><subfield code="t">Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the Reform Order Regime --</subfield><subfield code="t">Analysis ofthe Anticorruption Law 1999 --</subfield><subfield code="t">Background --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Objectives --</subfield><subfield code="t">Scope and Definitions of Corruption --</subfield><subfield code="t">Powers of the Implementing Agencies --</subfield><subfield code="t">Specific Criminal Procedures --</subfield><subfield code="t">Related Legislation --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1999 --</subfield><subfield code="t">Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Recovery of the State Assets Losses --</subfield><subfield code="t">Public Confidence in the Capacity of the Criminal Justice System --</subfield><subfield code="t">Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation Failure Factors of Anticorruption Law 1999 --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Design Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Political Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Institutional Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Managerial Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Societal Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation as an Integral Function of the Political System of the Democratic Reform Governments --</subfield><subfield code="t">Conclusions --</subfield><subfield code="g">6.</subfield><subfield code="t">Comparing the Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under Both Regimes --</subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws --</subfield><subfield code="t">Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction --</subfield><subfield code="t">Recovery of the State Assets Losses --</subfield><subfield code="t">Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice Systems --</subfield><subfield code="t">Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation Factors of the Anticorruption Laws --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Design Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation Structures and Processes of the Anticorruption Laws --</subfield><subfield code="t">Powers of the Implementing Agencies --</subfield><subfield code="t">Specific Criminal Procedures --</subfield><subfield code="t">Political Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Institutional Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Managerial Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Societal Factor --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems --</subfield><subfield code="t">Conclusions --</subfield><subfield code="g">7.</subfield><subfield code="t">Conclusions and Policy Recommendations --</subfield><subfield code="t">About the Case Studies --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws --</subfield><subfield code="t">Factors Contributing to the Implementation Failure --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Design Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Political Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Institutional Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Managerial Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Societal Factors --</subfield><subfield code="t">Defective Implementation Structures and Processes --</subfield><subfield code="t">Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems --</subfield><subfield code="t">Most Influential Factor(s), in Particular Those Factors Determining the Different Outcomes --</subfield><subfield code="t">Theoretical Significance and Implications of the Study --</subfield><subfield code="t">Agenda for Further Research --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Significance and Recommendations --</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy Design --</subfield><subfield code="t">Political Policy --</subfield><subfield code="t">Institutional Policy --</subfield><subfield code="t">Management Policy --</subfield><subfield code="t">Societal Empowerment Policy --</subfield><subfield code="t">Political System Reform.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Corruption</subfield><subfield code="z">Indonesia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political corruption</subfield><subfield code="z">Indonesia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Corruption</subfield><subfield code="z">Indonésie.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Corruption (Politique)</subfield><subfield code="z">Indonésie.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SOCIAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Criminology.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Corruption</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Political corruption</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indonesia</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcrbVHmQ674B9vYY3X8G3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic book.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Why did anticorruption policy fail? (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGqcKvvWKj8dX7GwyyVYGd</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Brata, Roby Arya.</subfield><subfield code="t">Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia.</subfield><subfield code="d">Charlotte, North Carolina : Information Age Publishing, Inc., ©2014</subfield><subfield code="h">xxi, 372 pages</subfield><subfield code="k">Research in public management.</subfield><subfield code="z">9781623967802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Research in public management.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=844899</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BATCHLOAD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH31821345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL3316045</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10929528</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">844899</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">12072063</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | Electronic book. |
| genre_facet | Electronic book. |
| geographic | Indonesia fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcrbVHmQ674B9vYY3X8G3 |
| geographic_facet | Indonesia |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn891396870 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:26:13Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781623967826 1623967821 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 891396870 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (395 pages) : illustrations, charts, tables |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Information Age Publishing, Inc., |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Research in public management. |
| series2 | Research in Public Management |
| spelling | Brata, Roby Arya, author. Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / Roby Arya Brata. Charlotte, North Carolina : Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2014. ©2014 1 online resource (395 pages) : illustrations, charts, tables text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Research in Public Management Includes bibliographical references. Online resource; title from PDF title page (ebrary, viewed September 18, 2014). Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction -- Failed Anticorruption Measures in Indonesia -- Policy Evaluation Research Focus -- Purpose of the Study -- Theoretical Context and Gaps -- Central Policy Research Question -- Central Policy Argument -- Theoretical and Methodological Approaches -- Justification for the Study -- Theoretical and Policy Significance of the Study -- Organization of the Book -- 2. Explaining Anticorruption Implementation Failure -- Introduction -- Anticorruption: Why Anticorruption Policy Implementation Can Fail -- Defining Corruption -- Categorizing Anticorruption Strategies -- Assessing the Strategies -- Explaining Anticorruption Policy Failure -- Why Did Public Policy Implementation Fail? -- Definitions -- Competing Analytical Frameworks on Implementation -- Comparison and Integration of Failure Factor Typologies -- Theoretical Framework for the Study -- Conclusion -- 3. Evaluation Methodology -- Introduction -- Research Method -- Evaluating Policy Performance -- Nature, Aims, and Functions of Policy Evaluation -- Problems in Crime Control/Anticorruption Policy Evaluation -- Evaluation Method for the Study -- Evaluation Method Employed -- Justifying the Pre-judgment of Implementation Failure -- Criteria for Policy Evaluation -- Evaluation Criterion for the Study -- Sources of Data -- Primary Sources of Data -- Secondary Sources of Data -- Data-Collection Method -- Interview -- Document and Literature Analysis -- Sample Survey -- Data Analysis and Analytical Approach -- Theory-Informed Analysis -- Content Analysis -- Macro-Analytical Approach -- Integrated Implementation Analysis -- Maintaining Data Validity and Reliability -- Ethical Issues -- Limitations of the Study -- 4. Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Authoritarian New Order Regime -- Introduction -- Authoritarian Leadership -- Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the New Order Regime -- Analysis of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Background -- Policy Objectives -- Scope and Definitions of Corruption -- Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- Specific Criminal Procedures -- Legal Sanctions -- Related Legislation -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System -- Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- Implementation Failure Factors of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Policy Design Factor -- Political Factor -- Institutional Factor -- Managerial Factor -- Societal Factor -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian Political System -- Conclusion -- 5. Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Democratic Reform Order Regime -- Introduction -- Democratic Political System: Reforming the Constitutional Power Structures and Relations -- Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the Reform Order Regime -- Analysis ofthe Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Background -- Policy Objectives -- Scope and Definitions of Corruption -- Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- Specific Criminal Procedures -- Related Legislation -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- Public Confidence in the Capacity of the Criminal Justice System -- Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- Implementation Failure Factors of Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Policy Design Factor -- Political Factor -- Institutional Factor -- Managerial Factor -- Societal Factor -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Political System of the Democratic Reform Governments -- Conclusions -- 6. Comparing the Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under Both Regimes -- Introduction -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice Systems -- Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- Implementation Factors of the Anticorruption Laws -- Policy Design Factors -- Implementation Structures and Processes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- Specific Criminal Procedures -- Political Factors -- Institutional Factors -- Managerial Factors -- Societal Factor -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems -- Conclusions -- 7. Conclusions and Policy Recommendations -- About the Case Studies -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Factors Contributing to the Implementation Failure -- Policy Design Factors -- Political Factors -- Institutional Factors -- Managerial Factors -- Societal Factors -- Defective Implementation Structures and Processes -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems -- Most Influential Factor(s), in Particular Those Factors Determining the Different Outcomes -- Theoretical Significance and Implications of the Study -- Agenda for Further Research -- Policy Significance and Recommendations -- Policy Design -- Political Policy -- Institutional Policy -- Management Policy -- Societal Empowerment Policy -- Political System Reform. English. Corruption Indonesia. Political corruption Indonesia. Corruption Indonésie. Corruption (Politique) Indonésie. SOCIAL SCIENCE Criminology. bisacsh Corruption fast Political corruption fast Indonesia fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcrbVHmQ674B9vYY3X8G3 Electronic book. has work: Why did anticorruption policy fail? (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGqcKvvWKj8dX7GwyyVYGd https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Brata, Roby Arya. Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia. Charlotte, North Carolina : Information Age Publishing, Inc., ©2014 xxi, 372 pages Research in public management. 9781623967802 Research in public management. FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=844899 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Brata, Roby Arya Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / Research in public management. Introduction -- Failed Anticorruption Measures in Indonesia -- Policy Evaluation Research Focus -- Purpose of the Study -- Theoretical Context and Gaps -- Central Policy Research Question -- Central Policy Argument -- Theoretical and Methodological Approaches -- Justification for the Study -- Theoretical and Policy Significance of the Study -- Organization of the Book -- Explaining Anticorruption Implementation Failure -- Anticorruption: Why Anticorruption Policy Implementation Can Fail -- Defining Corruption -- Categorizing Anticorruption Strategies -- Assessing the Strategies -- Explaining Anticorruption Policy Failure -- Why Did Public Policy Implementation Fail? -- Definitions -- Competing Analytical Frameworks on Implementation -- Comparison and Integration of Failure Factor Typologies -- Theoretical Framework for the Study -- Conclusion -- Evaluation Methodology -- Research Method -- Evaluating Policy Performance -- Nature, Aims, and Functions of Policy Evaluation -- Problems in Crime Control/Anticorruption Policy Evaluation -- Evaluation Method for the Study -- Evaluation Method Employed -- Justifying the Pre-judgment of Implementation Failure -- Criteria for Policy Evaluation -- Evaluation Criterion for the Study -- Sources of Data -- Primary Sources of Data -- Secondary Sources of Data -- Data-Collection Method -- Interview -- Document and Literature Analysis -- Sample Survey -- Data Analysis and Analytical Approach -- Theory-Informed Analysis -- Content Analysis -- Macro-Analytical Approach -- Integrated Implementation Analysis -- Maintaining Data Validity and Reliability -- Ethical Issues -- Limitations of the Study -- Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Authoritarian New Order Regime -- Authoritarian Leadership -- Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the New Order Regime -- Analysis of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Background -- Policy Objectives -- Scope and Definitions of Corruption -- Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- Specific Criminal Procedures -- Legal Sanctions -- Related Legislation -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System -- Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- Implementation Failure Factors of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Policy Design Factor -- Political Factor -- Institutional Factor -- Managerial Factor -- Societal Factor -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian Political System -- Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Democratic Reform Order Regime -- Democratic Political System: Reforming the Constitutional Power Structures and Relations -- Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the Reform Order Regime -- Analysis ofthe Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Public Confidence in the Capacity of the Criminal Justice System -- Implementation Failure Factors of Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Political System of the Democratic Reform Governments -- Conclusions -- Comparing the Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under Both Regimes -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice Systems -- Implementation Factors of the Anticorruption Laws -- Policy Design Factors -- Implementation Structures and Processes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Political Factors -- Institutional Factors -- Managerial Factors -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems -- Conclusions and Policy Recommendations -- About the Case Studies -- Factors Contributing to the Implementation Failure -- Societal Factors -- Defective Implementation Structures and Processes -- Most Influential Factor(s), in Particular Those Factors Determining the Different Outcomes -- Theoretical Significance and Implications of the Study -- Agenda for Further Research -- Policy Significance and Recommendations -- Policy Design -- Political Policy -- Institutional Policy -- Management Policy -- Societal Empowerment Policy -- Political System Reform. Corruption Indonesia. Political corruption Indonesia. Corruption Indonésie. Corruption (Politique) Indonésie. SOCIAL SCIENCE Criminology. bisacsh Corruption fast Political corruption fast |
| title | Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / |
| title_alt | Introduction -- Failed Anticorruption Measures in Indonesia -- Policy Evaluation Research Focus -- Purpose of the Study -- Theoretical Context and Gaps -- Central Policy Research Question -- Central Policy Argument -- Theoretical and Methodological Approaches -- Justification for the Study -- Theoretical and Policy Significance of the Study -- Organization of the Book -- Explaining Anticorruption Implementation Failure -- Anticorruption: Why Anticorruption Policy Implementation Can Fail -- Defining Corruption -- Categorizing Anticorruption Strategies -- Assessing the Strategies -- Explaining Anticorruption Policy Failure -- Why Did Public Policy Implementation Fail? -- Definitions -- Competing Analytical Frameworks on Implementation -- Comparison and Integration of Failure Factor Typologies -- Theoretical Framework for the Study -- Conclusion -- Evaluation Methodology -- Research Method -- Evaluating Policy Performance -- Nature, Aims, and Functions of Policy Evaluation -- Problems in Crime Control/Anticorruption Policy Evaluation -- Evaluation Method for the Study -- Evaluation Method Employed -- Justifying the Pre-judgment of Implementation Failure -- Criteria for Policy Evaluation -- Evaluation Criterion for the Study -- Sources of Data -- Primary Sources of Data -- Secondary Sources of Data -- Data-Collection Method -- Interview -- Document and Literature Analysis -- Sample Survey -- Data Analysis and Analytical Approach -- Theory-Informed Analysis -- Content Analysis -- Macro-Analytical Approach -- Integrated Implementation Analysis -- Maintaining Data Validity and Reliability -- Ethical Issues -- Limitations of the Study -- Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Authoritarian New Order Regime -- Authoritarian Leadership -- Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the New Order Regime -- Analysis of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Background -- Policy Objectives -- Scope and Definitions of Corruption -- Powers of the Implementing Agencies -- Specific Criminal Procedures -- Legal Sanctions -- Related Legislation -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction -- Recovery of the State Assets Losses -- Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System -- Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes -- Implementation Failure Factors of the Anticorruption Law 1971 -- Policy Design Factor -- Political Factor -- Institutional Factor -- Managerial Factor -- Societal Factor -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian Political System -- Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Democratic Reform Order Regime -- Democratic Political System: Reforming the Constitutional Power Structures and Relations -- Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the Reform Order Regime -- Analysis ofthe Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Public Confidence in the Capacity of the Criminal Justice System -- Implementation Failure Factors of Anticorruption Law 1999 -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Political System of the Democratic Reform Governments -- Conclusions -- Comparing the Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under Both Regimes -- Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice Systems -- Implementation Factors of the Anticorruption Laws -- Policy Design Factors -- Implementation Structures and Processes of the Anticorruption Laws -- Political Factors -- Institutional Factors -- Managerial Factors -- Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems -- Conclusions and Policy Recommendations -- About the Case Studies -- Factors Contributing to the Implementation Failure -- Societal Factors -- Defective Implementation Structures and Processes -- Most Influential Factor(s), in Particular Those Factors Determining the Different Outcomes -- Theoretical Significance and Implications of the Study -- Agenda for Further Research -- Policy Significance and Recommendations -- Policy Design -- Political Policy -- Institutional Policy -- Management Policy -- Societal Empowerment Policy -- Political System Reform. |
| title_auth | Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / |
| title_exact_search | Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / |
| title_full | Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / Roby Arya Brata. |
| title_fullStr | Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / Roby Arya Brata. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Why did anticorruption policy fail? : a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / Roby Arya Brata. |
| title_short | Why did anticorruption policy fail? : |
| title_sort | why did anticorruption policy fail a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in indonesia |
| title_sub | a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia / |
| topic | Corruption Indonesia. Political corruption Indonesia. Corruption Indonésie. Corruption (Politique) Indonésie. SOCIAL SCIENCE Criminology. bisacsh Corruption fast Political corruption fast |
| topic_facet | Corruption Indonesia. Political corruption Indonesia. Corruption Indonésie. Corruption (Politique) Indonésie. SOCIAL SCIENCE Criminology. Corruption Political corruption Indonesia Electronic book. |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=844899 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bratarobyarya whydidanticorruptionpolicyfailastudyofanticorruptionpolicyimplementationfailureinindonesia |