Proportionality and the Rule of Law :: Rights, Justification, Reasoning /
"To speak of human rights is to speak of proportionality. It is no exaggeration to claim that proportionality has overtaken rights as the orienting idea in contemporary human rights law and scholarship. Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in continental...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2014.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "To speak of human rights is to speak of proportionality. It is no exaggeration to claim that proportionality has overtaken rights as the orienting idea in contemporary human rights law and scholarship. Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Israel, and South Africa, as well as the jurisprudence of treaty-based legal systems like the European Court of Human Rights, giving rise to claims of a global model, a received approach, or, simply, the best-practice standard of rights adjudication. Even in the United States, which is widely understood to have formally rejected proportionality, some argue that the various levels of scrutiny adopted by the US Supreme Court are analogous to the standard questions posed by proportionality. As proportionality scholars are well aware, some of the early literature on balancing and rights is American, with special reference to the First Amendment. Notwithstanding proportionality's popularity, there is no consensus on its methodology. Much less does the use of a proportionality doctrine guarantee consensus on substantive rights questions. What the principle of proportionality promises is a common analytical framework, a framework the significance of which is not in its ubiquity (a mere fact), but because its structure influences (some would say controls) how courts reason to conclusions in many of the great moral and political questions confronting political communities. As a framework, proportionality analysis is superficially straightforward, setting out four questions in evaluating whether the limitation of a right is justifiable. A serviceable - but by no means canonical"-- |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (ix, 421 pages) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9781139958202 1139958208 9781107565272 1107565278 9781139960311 1139960318 1139950746 9781139950749 9781139959254 1139959255 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn879202707 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 140505s2014 nyu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e rda |e pn |c N$T |d EBLCP |d YDXCP |d E7B |d CAMBR |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d QGK |d OCLCQ |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d YDX |d Z5A |d BUF |d UEJ |d UAB |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d FIE |d AU@ |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SFB |d OCLCQ |d SXB | ||
| 019 | |a 957614575 |a 960715892 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139958202 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1139958208 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107565272 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1107565278 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139960311 | ||
| 020 | |a 1139960318 | ||
| 020 | |a 1139950746 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139950749 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139959254 | ||
| 020 | |a 1139959255 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781107064072 | ||
| 020 | |z 1107064074 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781107647954 | ||
| 020 | |z 1107647959 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)879202707 |z (OCoLC)957614575 |z (OCoLC)960715892 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K247 |b .P79 2014eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 101000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 044000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 052000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 071000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 098000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 079000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 340/.11 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a LAW052000 |2 bisacsh | ||
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Proportionality and the Rule of Law : |b Rights, Justification, Reasoning / |c edited by Grant Huscroft, Western University, Canada ; Bradley W. Miller, Western University, Canada ; Grégoire Webber, London School of Economics. |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2014. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (ix, 421 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a "To speak of human rights is to speak of proportionality. It is no exaggeration to claim that proportionality has overtaken rights as the orienting idea in contemporary human rights law and scholarship. Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Israel, and South Africa, as well as the jurisprudence of treaty-based legal systems like the European Court of Human Rights, giving rise to claims of a global model, a received approach, or, simply, the best-practice standard of rights adjudication. Even in the United States, which is widely understood to have formally rejected proportionality, some argue that the various levels of scrutiny adopted by the US Supreme Court are analogous to the standard questions posed by proportionality. As proportionality scholars are well aware, some of the early literature on balancing and rights is American, with special reference to the First Amendment. Notwithstanding proportionality's popularity, there is no consensus on its methodology. Much less does the use of a proportionality doctrine guarantee consensus on substantive rights questions. What the principle of proportionality promises is a common analytical framework, a framework the significance of which is not in its ubiquity (a mere fact), but because its structure influences (some would say controls) how courts reason to conclusions in many of the great moral and political questions confronting political communities. As a framework, proportionality analysis is superficially straightforward, setting out four questions in evaluating whether the limitation of a right is justifiable. A serviceable - but by no means canonical"-- |c Provided by publisher | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction / Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller and Grégoire Webber -- The lost meaning of proportionality / Martin Luterán -- Proportionality is dead : long live proportionality! / Alison L. Young -- Human dignity and proportionality : deontic pluralism in balancing / Mattias Kumm and Alec D. Walen -- Between reason and strategy : some reflections on the normativity of proportionality / George Pavlakos -- On the loss of rights / Grégoire Webber -- Proportionality and rights inflation / Kai Möller -- Proportionality and the question of weight / Frederick Schauer -- Proportionality and the relevance of interpretation / Grant Huscroft -- Democracy, legality and proportionality / T.R.S. Allan -- Proportionality and deference in a culture of justification / David Dyzenhaus -- Proportionality and democratic constitutionalism / Stephen Gardbaum -- The rationalism of proportionality's culture of justification / Mark Antaki -- Proportionality and incommensurability / Timothy Endicott -- Legislating proportionately / Richard Ekins -- Proportionality's blind spot : 'neutrality' and political philosophy / Bradley W. Miller -- Mapping the American debate over balancing / Iddo Porat. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Proportionality in law. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Human rights. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026379 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Rule of law. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Human Rights |0 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006806 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Proportionnalité (Droit) | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droits de l'homme (Droit international) | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Règle de droit. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Jurisprudence. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Essays. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x General Practice. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Paralegals & Paralegalism. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Practical Guides. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Reference. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Human rights |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Proportionality in law |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rule of law |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Menschenrecht |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtsstaatsprinzip |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz |2 gnd |0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4191765-0 | |
| 655 | 4 | |a Electronic book. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huscroft, Grant, |e editor. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n98103263 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miller, Bradley W. |q (Bradley Wayne), |d 1968- |e editor. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJjMCv8tRQWBgqpTdfhrbd |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr2004035259 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Webber, Grégoire C. N. |q (Grégoire Charles N.), |e editor. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJqbr3cWBwrCJR4wxPjwG3 |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009035049 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Proportionality and the rule of law |z 9781107064072 |w (DLC) 2013044707 |w (OCoLC)862401019 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=761504 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH33401873 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH26386316 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH26272139 | ||
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL1658790 | ||
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10868090 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 761504 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11811262 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11801511 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11804597 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11859480 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn879202707 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882271133630464 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Huscroft, Grant Miller, Bradley W. (Bradley Wayne), 1968- Webber, Grégoire C. N. (Grégoire Charles N.) |
| author2_role | edt edt edt |
| author2_variant | g h gh b w m bw bwm g c n w gcn gcnw |
| author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n98103263 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr2004035259 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009035049 |
| author_facet | Huscroft, Grant Miller, Bradley W. (Bradley Wayne), 1968- Webber, Grégoire C. N. (Grégoire Charles N.) |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K247 |
| callnumber-raw | K247 .P79 2014eb |
| callnumber-search | K247 .P79 2014eb |
| callnumber-sort | K 3247 P79 42014EB |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Introduction / Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller and Grégoire Webber -- The lost meaning of proportionality / Martin Luterán -- Proportionality is dead : long live proportionality! / Alison L. Young -- Human dignity and proportionality : deontic pluralism in balancing / Mattias Kumm and Alec D. Walen -- Between reason and strategy : some reflections on the normativity of proportionality / George Pavlakos -- On the loss of rights / Grégoire Webber -- Proportionality and rights inflation / Kai Möller -- Proportionality and the question of weight / Frederick Schauer -- Proportionality and the relevance of interpretation / Grant Huscroft -- Democracy, legality and proportionality / T.R.S. Allan -- Proportionality and deference in a culture of justification / David Dyzenhaus -- Proportionality and democratic constitutionalism / Stephen Gardbaum -- The rationalism of proportionality's culture of justification / Mark Antaki -- Proportionality and incommensurability / Timothy Endicott -- Legislating proportionately / Richard Ekins -- Proportionality's blind spot : 'neutrality' and political philosophy / Bradley W. Miller -- Mapping the American debate over balancing / Iddo Porat. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)879202707 |
| dewey-full | 340/.11 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340/.11 |
| dewey-search | 340/.11 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 211 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>07275cam a2200973 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn879202707</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu---unuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140505s2014 nyu ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">CAMBR</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">QGK</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">Z5A</subfield><subfield code="d">BUF</subfield><subfield code="d">UEJ</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">FIE</subfield><subfield code="d">AU@</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">SFB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">SXB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">957614575</subfield><subfield code="a">960715892</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781139958202</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1139958208</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107565272</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1107565278</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781139960311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1139960318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1139950746</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781139950749</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781139959254</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1139959255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781107064072</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1107064074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781107647954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1107647959</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)879202707</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)957614575</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)960715892</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K247</subfield><subfield code="b">.P79 2014eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">101000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">044000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">052000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">071000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">098000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">079000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340/.11</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LAW052000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality and the Rule of Law :</subfield><subfield code="b">Rights, Justification, Reasoning /</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Grant Huscroft, Western University, Canada ; Bradley W. Miller, Western University, Canada ; Grégoire Webber, London School of Economics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2014.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (ix, 421 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"To speak of human rights is to speak of proportionality. It is no exaggeration to claim that proportionality has overtaken rights as the orienting idea in contemporary human rights law and scholarship. Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Israel, and South Africa, as well as the jurisprudence of treaty-based legal systems like the European Court of Human Rights, giving rise to claims of a global model, a received approach, or, simply, the best-practice standard of rights adjudication. Even in the United States, which is widely understood to have formally rejected proportionality, some argue that the various levels of scrutiny adopted by the US Supreme Court are analogous to the standard questions posed by proportionality. As proportionality scholars are well aware, some of the early literature on balancing and rights is American, with special reference to the First Amendment. Notwithstanding proportionality's popularity, there is no consensus on its methodology. Much less does the use of a proportionality doctrine guarantee consensus on substantive rights questions. What the principle of proportionality promises is a common analytical framework, a framework the significance of which is not in its ubiquity (a mere fact), but because its structure influences (some would say controls) how courts reason to conclusions in many of the great moral and political questions confronting political communities. As a framework, proportionality analysis is superficially straightforward, setting out four questions in evaluating whether the limitation of a right is justifiable. A serviceable - but by no means canonical"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction / Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller and Grégoire Webber -- The lost meaning of proportionality / Martin Luterán -- Proportionality is dead : long live proportionality! / Alison L. Young -- Human dignity and proportionality : deontic pluralism in balancing / Mattias Kumm and Alec D. Walen -- Between reason and strategy : some reflections on the normativity of proportionality / George Pavlakos -- On the loss of rights / Grégoire Webber -- Proportionality and rights inflation / Kai Möller -- Proportionality and the question of weight / Frederick Schauer -- Proportionality and the relevance of interpretation / Grant Huscroft -- Democracy, legality and proportionality / T.R.S. Allan -- Proportionality and deference in a culture of justification / David Dyzenhaus -- Proportionality and democratic constitutionalism / Stephen Gardbaum -- The rationalism of proportionality's culture of justification / Mark Antaki -- Proportionality and incommensurability / Timothy Endicott -- Legislating proportionately / Richard Ekins -- Proportionality's blind spot : 'neutrality' and political philosophy / Bradley W. Miller -- Mapping the American debate over balancing / Iddo Porat.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human rights.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026379</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule of law.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Human Rights</subfield><subfield code="0">https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006806</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Proportionnalité (Droit)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Droits de l'homme (Droit international)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Règle de droit.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Jurisprudence.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Essays.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">General Practice.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Paralegals & Paralegalism.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Practical Guides.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Reference.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human rights</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstaatsprinzip</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="0">http://d-nb.info/gnd/4191765-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic book.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huscroft, Grant,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n98103263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Bradley W.</subfield><subfield code="q">(Bradley Wayne),</subfield><subfield code="d">1968-</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJjMCv8tRQWBgqpTdfhrbd</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr2004035259</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Webber, Grégoire C. N.</subfield><subfield code="q">(Grégoire Charles N.),</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJqbr3cWBwrCJR4wxPjwG3</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009035049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="t">Proportionality and the rule of law</subfield><subfield code="z">9781107064072</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2013044707</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)862401019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=761504</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH33401873</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH26386316</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH26272139</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL1658790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10868090</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">761504</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">11811262</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">11801511</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">11804597</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">11859480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | Electronic book. |
| genre_facet | Electronic book. |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn879202707 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:25:57Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781139958202 1139958208 9781107565272 1107565278 9781139960311 1139960318 1139950746 9781139950749 9781139959254 1139959255 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 879202707 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (ix, 421 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning / edited by Grant Huscroft, Western University, Canada ; Bradley W. Miller, Western University, Canada ; Grégoire Webber, London School of Economics. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2014. 1 online resource (ix, 421 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier "To speak of human rights is to speak of proportionality. It is no exaggeration to claim that proportionality has overtaken rights as the orienting idea in contemporary human rights law and scholarship. Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Israel, and South Africa, as well as the jurisprudence of treaty-based legal systems like the European Court of Human Rights, giving rise to claims of a global model, a received approach, or, simply, the best-practice standard of rights adjudication. Even in the United States, which is widely understood to have formally rejected proportionality, some argue that the various levels of scrutiny adopted by the US Supreme Court are analogous to the standard questions posed by proportionality. As proportionality scholars are well aware, some of the early literature on balancing and rights is American, with special reference to the First Amendment. Notwithstanding proportionality's popularity, there is no consensus on its methodology. Much less does the use of a proportionality doctrine guarantee consensus on substantive rights questions. What the principle of proportionality promises is a common analytical framework, a framework the significance of which is not in its ubiquity (a mere fact), but because its structure influences (some would say controls) how courts reason to conclusions in many of the great moral and political questions confronting political communities. As a framework, proportionality analysis is superficially straightforward, setting out four questions in evaluating whether the limitation of a right is justifiable. A serviceable - but by no means canonical"-- Provided by publisher Includes bibliographical references and index. Print version record. Introduction / Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller and Grégoire Webber -- The lost meaning of proportionality / Martin Luterán -- Proportionality is dead : long live proportionality! / Alison L. Young -- Human dignity and proportionality : deontic pluralism in balancing / Mattias Kumm and Alec D. Walen -- Between reason and strategy : some reflections on the normativity of proportionality / George Pavlakos -- On the loss of rights / Grégoire Webber -- Proportionality and rights inflation / Kai Möller -- Proportionality and the question of weight / Frederick Schauer -- Proportionality and the relevance of interpretation / Grant Huscroft -- Democracy, legality and proportionality / T.R.S. Allan -- Proportionality and deference in a culture of justification / David Dyzenhaus -- Proportionality and democratic constitutionalism / Stephen Gardbaum -- The rationalism of proportionality's culture of justification / Mark Antaki -- Proportionality and incommensurability / Timothy Endicott -- Legislating proportionately / Richard Ekins -- Proportionality's blind spot : 'neutrality' and political philosophy / Bradley W. Miller -- Mapping the American debate over balancing / Iddo Porat. Proportionality in law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 Human rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026379 Rule of law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 Human Rights https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006806 Proportionnalité (Droit) Droits de l'homme (Droit international) Règle de droit. LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Human rights fast Proportionality in law fast Rule of law fast Menschenrecht gnd Rechtsstaatsprinzip gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4191765-0 Electronic book. Huscroft, Grant, editor. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n98103263 Miller, Bradley W. (Bradley Wayne), 1968- editor. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJjMCv8tRQWBgqpTdfhrbd http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr2004035259 Webber, Grégoire C. N. (Grégoire Charles N.), editor. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJqbr3cWBwrCJR4wxPjwG3 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009035049 Print version: Proportionality and the rule of law 9781107064072 (DLC) 2013044707 (OCoLC)862401019 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=761504 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning / Introduction / Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller and Grégoire Webber -- The lost meaning of proportionality / Martin Luterán -- Proportionality is dead : long live proportionality! / Alison L. Young -- Human dignity and proportionality : deontic pluralism in balancing / Mattias Kumm and Alec D. Walen -- Between reason and strategy : some reflections on the normativity of proportionality / George Pavlakos -- On the loss of rights / Grégoire Webber -- Proportionality and rights inflation / Kai Möller -- Proportionality and the question of weight / Frederick Schauer -- Proportionality and the relevance of interpretation / Grant Huscroft -- Democracy, legality and proportionality / T.R.S. Allan -- Proportionality and deference in a culture of justification / David Dyzenhaus -- Proportionality and democratic constitutionalism / Stephen Gardbaum -- The rationalism of proportionality's culture of justification / Mark Antaki -- Proportionality and incommensurability / Timothy Endicott -- Legislating proportionately / Richard Ekins -- Proportionality's blind spot : 'neutrality' and political philosophy / Bradley W. Miller -- Mapping the American debate over balancing / Iddo Porat. Proportionality in law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 Human rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026379 Rule of law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 Human Rights https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006806 Proportionnalité (Droit) Droits de l'homme (Droit international) Règle de droit. LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Human rights fast Proportionality in law fast Rule of law fast Menschenrecht gnd Rechtsstaatsprinzip gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4191765-0 |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026379 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006806 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4191765-0 |
| title | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning / |
| title_auth | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning / |
| title_exact_search | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning / |
| title_full | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning / edited by Grant Huscroft, Western University, Canada ; Bradley W. Miller, Western University, Canada ; Grégoire Webber, London School of Economics. |
| title_fullStr | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning / edited by Grant Huscroft, Western University, Canada ; Bradley W. Miller, Western University, Canada ; Grégoire Webber, London School of Economics. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning / edited by Grant Huscroft, Western University, Canada ; Bradley W. Miller, Western University, Canada ; Grégoire Webber, London School of Economics. |
| title_short | Proportionality and the Rule of Law : |
| title_sort | proportionality and the rule of law rights justification reasoning |
| title_sub | Rights, Justification, Reasoning / |
| topic | Proportionality in law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh96010689 Human rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026379 Rule of law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85115805 Human Rights https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006806 Proportionnalité (Droit) Droits de l'homme (Droit international) Règle de droit. LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Human rights fast Proportionality in law fast Rule of law fast Menschenrecht gnd Rechtsstaatsprinzip gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4191765-0 |
| topic_facet | Proportionality in law. Human rights. Rule of law. Human Rights Proportionnalité (Droit) Droits de l'homme (Droit international) Règle de droit. LAW Jurisprudence. LAW Essays. LAW General Practice. LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. LAW Practical Guides. LAW Reference. Human rights Proportionality in law Rule of law Menschenrecht Rechtsstaatsprinzip Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz Electronic book. |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=761504 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT huscroftgrant proportionalityandtheruleoflawrightsjustificationreasoning AT millerbradleyw proportionalityandtheruleoflawrightsjustificationreasoning AT webbergregoirecn proportionalityandtheruleoflawrightsjustificationreasoning |