Argumentation in Political Interviews :: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency.
In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusati...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
John Benjamins Publishing Company,
2013.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Argumentation in context ;
v. 5. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusation that the position they currently hold is inconsistent with a position they advanced before. The politicians' responses to such charges are examined for their strategic function by concentrating on a number of concrete cases and explaining how the arguers try to enhance their chances of win. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 1299736076 9781299736078 9027271755 9789027271754 |
| ISSN: | 1877-6884 ; |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn853238829 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr |n||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 130719s2013 xx ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | |z 2013013546 | ||
| 040 | |a IDEBK |b eng |e pn |c IDEBK |d EBLCP |d MHW |d E7B |d CDX |d CN3GA |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d CSJ |d OCLCQ |d LOA |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d AGLDB |d OCLCQ |d ICA |d OCLCQ |d MOR |d CCO |d PIFAG |d ZCU |d XFH |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d COO |d OCLCQ |d U3W |d D6H |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d ICG |d INT |d VT2 |d AU@ |d OCLCQ |d WYU |d OCLCQ |d DKC |d OCLCQ |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d HS0 |d UKCRE |d AJS |d S2H |d DST |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SXB |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 857711590 |a 960201367 |a 961564642 |a 962646181 |a 988494802 |a 991921109 |a 994396436 |a 1037797351 |a 1038613412 |a 1077230104 |a 1109233322 |a 1153531287 |a 1162038681 |a 1241890362 |a 1259108216 |a 1288250171 |a 1290070786 |a 1300524815 |a 1303317363 |a 1303429714 |a 1329085117 | ||
| 020 | |a 1299736076 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781299736078 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9027271755 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9789027271754 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9789027211224 |q (hb ; |q alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 9027211221 |q (hb ; |q alk. paper) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)853238829 |z (OCoLC)857711590 |z (OCoLC)960201367 |z (OCoLC)961564642 |z (OCoLC)962646181 |z (OCoLC)988494802 |z (OCoLC)991921109 |z (OCoLC)994396436 |z (OCoLC)1037797351 |z (OCoLC)1038613412 |z (OCoLC)1077230104 |z (OCoLC)1109233322 |z (OCoLC)1153531287 |z (OCoLC)1162038681 |z (OCoLC)1241890362 |z (OCoLC)1259108216 |z (OCoLC)1288250171 |z (OCoLC)1290070786 |z (OCoLC)1300524815 |z (OCoLC)1303317363 |z (OCoLC)1303429714 |z (OCoLC)1329085117 | ||
| 037 | |a 504858 |b MIL | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a P95.8 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 032000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 040000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 030000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 018000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 320.01 |a 320.01/4 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Andone, Corina. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Argumentation in Political Interviews : |b Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. |
| 260 | |b John Benjamins Publishing Company, |c 2013. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Argumentation in context, |x 1877-6884 ; |v v. 5 | |
| 520 | |a In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusation that the position they currently hold is inconsistent with a position they advanced before. The politicians' responses to such charges are examined for their strategic function by concentrating on a number of concrete cases and explaining how the arguers try to enhance their chances of win. | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Argumentation in Political Interviews; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Responding to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 1.2 A pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentation; 1.3 Objectives and method of the study; 1.4 Organization of the study; 2. Analytically relevant responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.2 Communicative and interactional purposes of an accusation of inconsistency; 2.1 Introduction; 2.3 Responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.4 Conclusion. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3. The political interview as an argumentative activity type3.1 The institutional goal of political interviews; 3.2 The initial situation; 3.3 Starting points; 3.4 Argumentative means; 3.5 The possible outcome; 3.6 Conclusion; 4. Strategic maneuvering in response to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.1 Accusations of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.2 Retracting a standpoint in response to an accusation of inconsistency; 4.3 Exploiting commitments to win the discussion; Pattern 1: 'it depends'; Pattern 2: 'we need to be clear' | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Pattern 3: 'there is a world of difference'4.4 Conclusion; 5. The reasonableness of responses to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 5.1 The reasonableness of confrontational strategic maneuvering; 5.2 Soundness conditions; 5.2.1 Soundness condition of openness; 5.2.2 Soundness condition of relevance; 5.2.3 Soundness condition of clarity; 5.3 Conclusion; 6. Conclusion; 6.1 Main findings; 6.2 Implications for further research; References; List of figures; Name index; Subject index. | |
| 546 | |a English. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Communication |x Political aspects. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89007279 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Persuasion (Rhetoric) |x Political aspects. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Rhetoric |x Political aspects. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113632 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Interviewing. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067550 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Inconsistency (Logic) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85064798 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Conversation analysis. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh94001018 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Reasoning. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85111790 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Communication |x Aspect politique. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Discours politique. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Entretiens. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Inconsistance (Logique) | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Analyse de la conversation. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Essays. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Government |x General. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Government |x National. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Reference. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Communication |x Political aspects |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Conversation analysis |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Inconsistency (Logic) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Interviewing |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Persuasion (Rhetoric) |x Political aspects |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Reasoning |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rhetoric |x Political aspects |2 fast | |
| 655 | 4 | |a Electronic book. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9781299736078 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Argumentation in context ; |v v. 5. |x 1877-6884 |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2009102468 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1422805 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH28555848 | ||
| 938 | |a Coutts Information Services |b COUT |n 25840770 | ||
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL1316678 | ||
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10734240 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1422805 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis25840770 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 10870999 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn853238829 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882238691737600 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Andone, Corina |
| author_facet | Andone, Corina |
| author_role | |
| author_sort | Andone, Corina |
| author_variant | c a ca |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | P - Language and Literature |
| callnumber-label | P95 |
| callnumber-raw | P95.8 |
| callnumber-search | P95.8 |
| callnumber-sort | P 295.8 |
| callnumber-subject | P - Philology and Linguistics |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Argumentation in Political Interviews; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Responding to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 1.2 A pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentation; 1.3 Objectives and method of the study; 1.4 Organization of the study; 2. Analytically relevant responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.2 Communicative and interactional purposes of an accusation of inconsistency; 2.1 Introduction; 2.3 Responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.4 Conclusion. 3. The political interview as an argumentative activity type3.1 The institutional goal of political interviews; 3.2 The initial situation; 3.3 Starting points; 3.4 Argumentative means; 3.5 The possible outcome; 3.6 Conclusion; 4. Strategic maneuvering in response to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.1 Accusations of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.2 Retracting a standpoint in response to an accusation of inconsistency; 4.3 Exploiting commitments to win the discussion; Pattern 1: 'it depends'; Pattern 2: 'we need to be clear' Pattern 3: 'there is a world of difference'4.4 Conclusion; 5. The reasonableness of responses to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 5.1 The reasonableness of confrontational strategic maneuvering; 5.2 Soundness conditions; 5.2.1 Soundness condition of openness; 5.2.2 Soundness condition of relevance; 5.2.3 Soundness condition of clarity; 5.3 Conclusion; 6. Conclusion; 6.1 Main findings; 6.2 Implications for further research; References; List of figures; Name index; Subject index. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)853238829 |
| dewey-full | 320.01 320.01/4 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| dewey-raw | 320.01 320.01/4 |
| dewey-search | 320.01 320.01/4 |
| dewey-sort | 3320.01 |
| dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| discipline | Politologie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06758cam a2200913Ma 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn853238829</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130719s2013 xx ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 2013013546</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">MHW</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">CDX</subfield><subfield code="d">CN3GA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">CSJ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">LOA</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">ICA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MOR</subfield><subfield code="d">CCO</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFAG</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">XFH</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">COO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">D6H</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">WRM</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">INT</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">AU@</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">WYU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">DKC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">HS0</subfield><subfield code="d">UKCRE</subfield><subfield code="d">AJS</subfield><subfield code="d">S2H</subfield><subfield code="d">DST</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">SXB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">857711590</subfield><subfield code="a">960201367</subfield><subfield code="a">961564642</subfield><subfield code="a">962646181</subfield><subfield code="a">988494802</subfield><subfield code="a">991921109</subfield><subfield code="a">994396436</subfield><subfield code="a">1037797351</subfield><subfield code="a">1038613412</subfield><subfield code="a">1077230104</subfield><subfield code="a">1109233322</subfield><subfield code="a">1153531287</subfield><subfield code="a">1162038681</subfield><subfield code="a">1241890362</subfield><subfield code="a">1259108216</subfield><subfield code="a">1288250171</subfield><subfield code="a">1290070786</subfield><subfield code="a">1300524815</subfield><subfield code="a">1303317363</subfield><subfield code="a">1303429714</subfield><subfield code="a">1329085117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1299736076</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781299736078</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9027271755</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789027271754</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9789027211224</subfield><subfield code="q">(hb ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9027211221</subfield><subfield code="q">(hb ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)853238829</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)857711590</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)960201367</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961564642</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962646181</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)988494802</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)991921109</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)994396436</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1037797351</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1038613412</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1077230104</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1109233322</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1153531287</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1162038681</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1241890362</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1259108216</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1288250171</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1290070786</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1300524815</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1303317363</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1303429714</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1329085117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">504858</subfield><subfield code="b">MIL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">P95.8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">032000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">040000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">030000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">320.01</subfield><subfield code="a">320.01/4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andone, Corina.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Argumentation in Political Interviews :</subfield><subfield code="b">Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">John Benjamins Publishing Company,</subfield><subfield code="c">2013.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Argumentation in context,</subfield><subfield code="x">1877-6884 ;</subfield><subfield code="v">v. 5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusation that the position they currently hold is inconsistent with a position they advanced before. The politicians' responses to such charges are examined for their strategic function by concentrating on a number of concrete cases and explaining how the arguers try to enhance their chances of win.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Argumentation in Political Interviews; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Responding to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 1.2 A pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentation; 1.3 Objectives and method of the study; 1.4 Organization of the study; 2. Analytically relevant responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.2 Communicative and interactional purposes of an accusation of inconsistency; 2.1 Introduction; 2.3 Responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.4 Conclusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3. The political interview as an argumentative activity type3.1 The institutional goal of political interviews; 3.2 The initial situation; 3.3 Starting points; 3.4 Argumentative means; 3.5 The possible outcome; 3.6 Conclusion; 4. Strategic maneuvering in response to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.1 Accusations of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.2 Retracting a standpoint in response to an accusation of inconsistency; 4.3 Exploiting commitments to win the discussion; Pattern 1: 'it depends'; Pattern 2: 'we need to be clear'</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pattern 3: 'there is a world of difference'4.4 Conclusion; 5. The reasonableness of responses to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 5.1 The reasonableness of confrontational strategic maneuvering; 5.2 Soundness conditions; 5.2.1 Soundness condition of openness; 5.2.2 Soundness condition of relevance; 5.2.3 Soundness condition of clarity; 5.3 Conclusion; 6. Conclusion; 6.1 Main findings; 6.2 Implications for further research; References; List of figures; Name index; Subject index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Communication</subfield><subfield code="x">Political aspects.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89007279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Persuasion (Rhetoric)</subfield><subfield code="x">Political aspects.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric</subfield><subfield code="x">Political aspects.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113632</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interviewing.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067550</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Inconsistency (Logic)</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85064798</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conversation analysis.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh94001018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reasoning.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85111790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Communication</subfield><subfield code="x">Aspect politique.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Discours politique.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Entretiens.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Inconsistance (Logique)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Analyse de la conversation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Essays.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Government</subfield><subfield code="x">General.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Government</subfield><subfield code="x">National.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Reference.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Communication</subfield><subfield code="x">Political aspects</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Conversation analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Inconsistency (Logic)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Interviewing</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Persuasion (Rhetoric)</subfield><subfield code="x">Political aspects</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reasoning</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rhetoric</subfield><subfield code="x">Political aspects</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic book.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="z">9781299736078</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Argumentation in context ;</subfield><subfield code="v">v. 5.</subfield><subfield code="x">1877-6884</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2009102468</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1422805</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH28555848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Coutts Information Services</subfield><subfield code="b">COUT</subfield><subfield code="n">25840770</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL1316678</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10734240</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1422805</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis25840770</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">10870999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | Electronic book. |
| genre_facet | Electronic book. |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn853238829 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:25:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1299736076 9781299736078 9027271755 9789027271754 |
| issn | 1877-6884 ; |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 853238829 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Argumentation in context ; |
| series2 | Argumentation in context, |
| spelling | Andone, Corina. Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2013. 1 online resource text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Argumentation in context, 1877-6884 ; v. 5 In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusation that the position they currently hold is inconsistent with a position they advanced before. The politicians' responses to such charges are examined for their strategic function by concentrating on a number of concrete cases and explaining how the arguers try to enhance their chances of win. Includes bibliographical references and index. Print version record. Argumentation in Political Interviews; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Responding to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 1.2 A pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentation; 1.3 Objectives and method of the study; 1.4 Organization of the study; 2. Analytically relevant responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.2 Communicative and interactional purposes of an accusation of inconsistency; 2.1 Introduction; 2.3 Responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.4 Conclusion. 3. The political interview as an argumentative activity type3.1 The institutional goal of political interviews; 3.2 The initial situation; 3.3 Starting points; 3.4 Argumentative means; 3.5 The possible outcome; 3.6 Conclusion; 4. Strategic maneuvering in response to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.1 Accusations of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.2 Retracting a standpoint in response to an accusation of inconsistency; 4.3 Exploiting commitments to win the discussion; Pattern 1: 'it depends'; Pattern 2: 'we need to be clear' Pattern 3: 'there is a world of difference'4.4 Conclusion; 5. The reasonableness of responses to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 5.1 The reasonableness of confrontational strategic maneuvering; 5.2 Soundness conditions; 5.2.1 Soundness condition of openness; 5.2.2 Soundness condition of relevance; 5.2.3 Soundness condition of clarity; 5.3 Conclusion; 6. Conclusion; 6.1 Main findings; 6.2 Implications for further research; References; List of figures; Name index; Subject index. English. Communication Political aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89007279 Persuasion (Rhetoric) Political aspects. Rhetoric Political aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113632 Interviewing. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067550 Inconsistency (Logic) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85064798 Conversation analysis. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh94001018 Reasoning. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85111790 Communication Aspect politique. Discours politique. Entretiens. Inconsistance (Logique) Analyse de la conversation. POLITICAL SCIENCE Essays. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government General. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government National. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Reference. bisacsh Communication Political aspects fast Conversation analysis fast Inconsistency (Logic) fast Interviewing fast Persuasion (Rhetoric) Political aspects fast Reasoning fast Rhetoric Political aspects fast Electronic book. Print version: 9781299736078 Argumentation in context ; v. 5. 1877-6884 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2009102468 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1422805 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Andone, Corina Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Argumentation in context ; Argumentation in Political Interviews; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Responding to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 1.2 A pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentation; 1.3 Objectives and method of the study; 1.4 Organization of the study; 2. Analytically relevant responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.2 Communicative and interactional purposes of an accusation of inconsistency; 2.1 Introduction; 2.3 Responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.4 Conclusion. 3. The political interview as an argumentative activity type3.1 The institutional goal of political interviews; 3.2 The initial situation; 3.3 Starting points; 3.4 Argumentative means; 3.5 The possible outcome; 3.6 Conclusion; 4. Strategic maneuvering in response to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.1 Accusations of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.2 Retracting a standpoint in response to an accusation of inconsistency; 4.3 Exploiting commitments to win the discussion; Pattern 1: 'it depends'; Pattern 2: 'we need to be clear' Pattern 3: 'there is a world of difference'4.4 Conclusion; 5. The reasonableness of responses to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 5.1 The reasonableness of confrontational strategic maneuvering; 5.2 Soundness conditions; 5.2.1 Soundness condition of openness; 5.2.2 Soundness condition of relevance; 5.2.3 Soundness condition of clarity; 5.3 Conclusion; 6. Conclusion; 6.1 Main findings; 6.2 Implications for further research; References; List of figures; Name index; Subject index. Communication Political aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89007279 Persuasion (Rhetoric) Political aspects. Rhetoric Political aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113632 Interviewing. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067550 Inconsistency (Logic) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85064798 Conversation analysis. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh94001018 Reasoning. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85111790 Communication Aspect politique. Discours politique. Entretiens. Inconsistance (Logique) Analyse de la conversation. POLITICAL SCIENCE Essays. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government General. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government National. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Reference. bisacsh Communication Political aspects fast Conversation analysis fast Inconsistency (Logic) fast Interviewing fast Persuasion (Rhetoric) Political aspects fast Reasoning fast Rhetoric Political aspects fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89007279 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113632 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067550 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85064798 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh94001018 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85111790 |
| title | Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. |
| title_auth | Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. |
| title_exact_search | Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. |
| title_full | Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. |
| title_fullStr | Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. |
| title_short | Argumentation in Political Interviews : |
| title_sort | argumentation in political interviews analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency |
| title_sub | Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. |
| topic | Communication Political aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89007279 Persuasion (Rhetoric) Political aspects. Rhetoric Political aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113632 Interviewing. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067550 Inconsistency (Logic) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85064798 Conversation analysis. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh94001018 Reasoning. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85111790 Communication Aspect politique. Discours politique. Entretiens. Inconsistance (Logique) Analyse de la conversation. POLITICAL SCIENCE Essays. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government General. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government National. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Reference. bisacsh Communication Political aspects fast Conversation analysis fast Inconsistency (Logic) fast Interviewing fast Persuasion (Rhetoric) Political aspects fast Reasoning fast Rhetoric Political aspects fast |
| topic_facet | Communication Political aspects. Persuasion (Rhetoric) Political aspects. Rhetoric Political aspects. Interviewing. Inconsistency (Logic) Conversation analysis. Reasoning. Communication Aspect politique. Discours politique. Entretiens. Inconsistance (Logique) Analyse de la conversation. POLITICAL SCIENCE Essays. POLITICAL SCIENCE Government General. POLITICAL SCIENCE Government National. POLITICAL SCIENCE Reference. Communication Political aspects Conversation analysis Interviewing Persuasion (Rhetoric) Political aspects Reasoning Rhetoric Political aspects Electronic book. |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1422805 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andonecorina argumentationinpoliticalinterviewsanalyzingandevaluatingresponsestoaccusationsofinconsistency |