The puzzle of unanimity :: consensus on the United States Supreme Court /
The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the ju...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Stanford, California :
Stanford Law Books,
[2013]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
ISBN: | 0804786321 9780804786324 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn841909856 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr |n||||||||| | ||
008 | 130506t20132013cau ob 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | |z 2012049306 | ||
040 | |a YDXCP |b eng |e pn |c YDXCP |d OCLCO |d MHW |d E7B |d DEBSZ |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCF |d NLGGC |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d AZK |d LOA |d STBDS |d AGLDB |d MOR |d PIFAG |d ZCU |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d U3W |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d NRAMU |d ICG |d INT |d VT2 |d AU@ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d WYU |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d LEAUB |d DKC |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d JSTOR |d UKCRE |d BOL |d VLY |d AJS |d SFB |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d GXR |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d OCLCQ |d INARC | ||
019 | |a 961671463 |a 962591247 |a 965981229 |a 988437387 |a 992114248 |a 1037789625 |a 1038617961 |a 1045476040 |a 1055386222 |a 1058060154 |a 1065717950 |a 1081269866 |a 1114444726 |a 1153510434 |a 1162185369 |a 1228543751 |a 1228546961 |a 1241805783 |a 1290104949 |a 1300543231 | ||
020 | |a 0804786321 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 9780804786324 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 9780804784726 |q (cloth ; |q alk. paper) | ||
020 | |z 0804784728 |q (cloth ; |q alk. paper) | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9780804786324 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (OCoLC)841909856 |z (OCoLC)961671463 |z (OCoLC)962591247 |z (OCoLC)965981229 |z (OCoLC)988437387 |z (OCoLC)992114248 |z (OCoLC)1037789625 |z (OCoLC)1038617961 |z (OCoLC)1045476040 |z (OCoLC)1055386222 |z (OCoLC)1058060154 |z (OCoLC)1065717950 |z (OCoLC)1081269866 |z (OCoLC)1114444726 |z (OCoLC)1153510434 |z (OCoLC)1162185369 |z (OCoLC)1228543751 |z (OCoLC)1228546961 |z (OCoLC)1241805783 |z (OCoLC)1290104949 |z (OCoLC)1300543231 | ||
037 | |a 22573/ctvqrmhs3 |b JSTOR | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a KF8742 |b .C69 2013 | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 012000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 062000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a POL |x 040030 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 025000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 347.73/26 |2 23 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Corley, Pamela C., |d 1967- |e author. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjKJpf3cQXWBCvBckcyvtq |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009035384 | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The puzzle of unanimity : |b consensus on the United States Supreme Court / |c Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. |
264 | 1 | |a Stanford, California : |b Stanford Law Books, |c [2013] | |
264 | 4 | |c ©2013 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
340 | |g polychrome. |2 rdacc |0 http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAColourContent/1003 | ||
347 | |a text file |2 rdaft |0 http://rdaregistry.info/termList/fileType/1002 | ||
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | |a The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting. | |
520 | |a The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C. | ||
588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
546 | |a English. | ||
610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 |
610 | 1 | 6 | |a États-Unis. |b Supreme Court. |
610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court |2 fast |
650 | 0 | |a Judicial process |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Consensus (Social sciences) |z United States. | |
650 | 6 | |a Processus judiciaire |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Civil Procedure. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Legal Services. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Government |x Judicial Branch. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW / Courts |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Consensus (Social sciences) |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Judicial process |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
650 | 7 | |a United States of America, USA. |2 thema | |
650 | 7 | |a Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law. |2 thema | |
650 | 7 | |a Legal systems: courts & procedure. |2 thema | |
650 | 7 | |a Law. |2 ukslc | |
700 | 1 | |a Steigerwalt, Amy, |d 1976- |e author. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjGgHYVBFc8TTQDr4T3Qhd |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009072304 | |
700 | 1 | |a Ward, Artemus, |d 1971- |e author. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjC9PFKPwXYWXc3PjtkVYP | |
758 | |i has work: |a The puzzle of unanimity (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFQXHvc66HdCcdC89v7TH3 |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9780804784726 |z 0804784728 |w (DLC) 2012049306 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=713591 |3 Volltext |
936 | |a BATCHLOAD | ||
938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10692205 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 713591 | ||
938 | |a Oxford University Press USA |b OUPR |n EDZ0000155773 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 10685509 | ||
938 | |a Internet Archive |b INAR |n puzzleofunanimit0000corl | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn841909856 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816882231440834560 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Corley, Pamela C., 1967- Steigerwalt, Amy, 1976- Ward, Artemus, 1971- |
author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009035384 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009072304 |
author_facet | Corley, Pamela C., 1967- Steigerwalt, Amy, 1976- Ward, Artemus, 1971- |
author_role | aut aut aut |
author_sort | Corley, Pamela C., 1967- |
author_variant | p c c pc pcc a s as a w aw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF8742 |
callnumber-raw | KF8742 .C69 2013 |
callnumber-search | KF8742 .C69 2013 |
callnumber-sort | KF 48742 C69 42013 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)841909856 |
dewey-full | 347.73/26 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.73/26 |
dewey-search | 347.73/26 |
dewey-sort | 3347.73 226 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05518cam a2200841 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn841909856</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130506t20132013cau ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 2012049306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">MHW</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">NLGGC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AZK</subfield><subfield code="d">LOA</subfield><subfield code="d">STBDS</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">MOR</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFAG</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">WRM</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">NRAMU</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">INT</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">AU@</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">WYU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">LEAUB</subfield><subfield code="d">DKC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">JSTOR</subfield><subfield code="d">UKCRE</subfield><subfield code="d">BOL</subfield><subfield code="d">VLY</subfield><subfield code="d">AJS</subfield><subfield code="d">SFB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">GXR</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">INARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">961671463</subfield><subfield code="a">962591247</subfield><subfield code="a">965981229</subfield><subfield code="a">988437387</subfield><subfield code="a">992114248</subfield><subfield code="a">1037789625</subfield><subfield code="a">1038617961</subfield><subfield code="a">1045476040</subfield><subfield code="a">1055386222</subfield><subfield code="a">1058060154</subfield><subfield code="a">1065717950</subfield><subfield code="a">1081269866</subfield><subfield code="a">1114444726</subfield><subfield code="a">1153510434</subfield><subfield code="a">1162185369</subfield><subfield code="a">1228543751</subfield><subfield code="a">1228546961</subfield><subfield code="a">1241805783</subfield><subfield code="a">1290104949</subfield><subfield code="a">1300543231</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0804786321</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780804786324</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780804784726</subfield><subfield code="q">(cloth ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0804784728</subfield><subfield code="q">(cloth ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9780804786324</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)841909856</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961671463</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962591247</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)965981229</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)988437387</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)992114248</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1037789625</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1038617961</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1045476040</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1055386222</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1058060154</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1065717950</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1081269866</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1114444726</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1153510434</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1162185369</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1228543751</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1228546961</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1241805783</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1290104949</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1300543231</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22573/ctvqrmhs3</subfield><subfield code="b">JSTOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF8742</subfield><subfield code="b">.C69 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">012000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">062000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">040030</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">025000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/26</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corley, Pamela C.,</subfield><subfield code="d">1967-</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjKJpf3cQXWBCvBckcyvtq</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009035384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The puzzle of unanimity :</subfield><subfield code="b">consensus on the United States Supreme Court /</subfield><subfield code="c">Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Stanford, California :</subfield><subfield code="b">Stanford Law Books,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2013]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (x, 201 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="340" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="g">polychrome.</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacc</subfield><subfield code="0">http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAColourContent/1003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield><subfield code="2">rdaft</subfield><subfield code="0">http://rdaregistry.info/termList/fileType/1002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">États-Unis.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Consensus (Social sciences)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Processus judiciaire</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Civil Procedure.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal Services.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Government</subfield><subfield code="x">Judicial Branch.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Courts</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Consensus (Social sciences)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States of America, USA.</subfield><subfield code="2">thema</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law.</subfield><subfield code="2">thema</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Legal systems: courts & procedure.</subfield><subfield code="2">thema</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Law.</subfield><subfield code="2">ukslc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steigerwalt, Amy,</subfield><subfield code="d">1976-</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjGgHYVBFc8TTQDr4T3Qhd</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009072304</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ward, Artemus,</subfield><subfield code="d">1971-</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjC9PFKPwXYWXc3PjtkVYP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">The puzzle of unanimity (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFQXHvc66HdCcdC89v7TH3</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="z">9780804784726</subfield><subfield code="z">0804784728</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2012049306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=713591</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BATCHLOAD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10692205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">713591</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oxford University Press USA</subfield><subfield code="b">OUPR</subfield><subfield code="n">EDZ0000155773</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">10685509</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Internet Archive</subfield><subfield code="b">INAR</subfield><subfield code="n">puzzleofunanimit0000corl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
geographic_facet | United States |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn841909856 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:25:19Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0804786321 9780804786324 |
language | English |
oclc_num | 841909856 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSearch | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | Stanford Law Books, |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Corley, Pamela C., 1967- author. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjKJpf3cQXWBCvBckcyvtq http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009035384 The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court / Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. Stanford, California : Stanford Law Books, [2013] ©2013 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier polychrome. rdacc http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAColourContent/1003 text file rdaft http://rdaregistry.info/termList/fileType/1002 Includes bibliographical references and index. The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting. The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C. Print version record. English. United States. Supreme Court. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 États-Unis. Supreme Court. United States. Supreme Court fast Judicial process United States. Consensus (Social sciences) United States. Processus judiciaire États-Unis. LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh LAW / Courts bisacsh Consensus (Social sciences) fast Judicial process fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq United States of America, USA. thema Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law. thema Legal systems: courts & procedure. thema Law. ukslc Steigerwalt, Amy, 1976- author. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjGgHYVBFc8TTQDr4T3Qhd http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2009072304 Ward, Artemus, 1971- author. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjC9PFKPwXYWXc3PjtkVYP has work: The puzzle of unanimity (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFQXHvc66HdCcdC89v7TH3 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: 9780804784726 0804784728 (DLC) 2012049306 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=713591 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Corley, Pamela C., 1967- Steigerwalt, Amy, 1976- Ward, Artemus, 1971- The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court / The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting. United States. Supreme Court. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 États-Unis. Supreme Court. United States. Supreme Court fast Judicial process United States. Consensus (Social sciences) United States. Processus judiciaire États-Unis. LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh LAW / Courts bisacsh Consensus (Social sciences) fast Judicial process fast United States of America, USA. thema Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law. thema Legal systems: courts & procedure. thema Law. ukslc |
subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 |
title | The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court / |
title_auth | The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court / |
title_exact_search | The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court / |
title_full | The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court / Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. |
title_fullStr | The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court / Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. |
title_full_unstemmed | The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court / Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. |
title_short | The puzzle of unanimity : |
title_sort | puzzle of unanimity consensus on the united states supreme court |
title_sub | consensus on the United States Supreme Court / |
topic | United States. Supreme Court. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 États-Unis. Supreme Court. United States. Supreme Court fast Judicial process United States. Consensus (Social sciences) United States. Processus judiciaire États-Unis. LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh LAW / Courts bisacsh Consensus (Social sciences) fast Judicial process fast United States of America, USA. thema Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law. thema Legal systems: courts & procedure. thema Law. ukslc |
topic_facet | United States. Supreme Court. États-Unis. Supreme Court. United States. Supreme Court Judicial process United States. Consensus (Social sciences) United States. Processus judiciaire États-Unis. LAW Civil Procedure. LAW Legal Services. POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. LAW / Courts Consensus (Social sciences) Judicial process United States United States of America, USA. Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law. Legal systems: courts & procedure. Law. |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=713591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corleypamelac thepuzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt AT steigerwaltamy thepuzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt AT wardartemus thepuzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt AT corleypamelac puzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt AT steigerwaltamy puzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt AT wardartemus puzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt |