The Responsibility to Protect :: Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention.
This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocid...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Leiden :
BRILL,
2010.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. |
| Beschreibung: | 2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention? |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (552 pages). |
| ISBN: | 9789004215962 9004215964 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn833764516 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr un||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 130330s2010 ne o 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a EBLCP |b eng |e pn |c EBLCP |d OCLCQ |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d AGLDB |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d OCLCF |d VTS |d AU@ |d STF |d M8D |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCL |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 1087388310 |a 1297246464 |a 1297678953 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004215962 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9004215964 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)833764516 |z (OCoLC)1087388310 |z (OCoLC)1297246464 |z (OCoLC)1297678953 | ||
| 043 | |a f------ | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a KQE728.57.I58 K89 2011 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 051000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 341.5/84096 |a 341.584096 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kuwali, Dan. | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Responsibility to Protect : |b Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |
| 260 | |a Leiden : |b BRILL, |c 2010. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (552 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library | |
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity? | |
| 500 | |a 2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention? | ||
| 520 | |a This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. | ||
| 610 | 2 | 0 | |a African Union. |t Constitutive Act of the African Union. |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Constitutive Act of the African Union (African Union) |2 fast |
| 650 | 0 | |a Responsibility to protect (International law) |z Africa. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Intervention (International law) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067543 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Responsabilité de protéger (Droit international) |z Afrique. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Intervention (Droit international) | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x International. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Intervention (International law) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Responsibility to protect (International law) |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Africa |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJkHrMyfHC67yqRTycbrv3 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Law - Non-U.S. |2 hilcc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Law, Politics & Government. |2 hilcc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Law - Africa, Asia, Pacific & Antarctica. |2 hilcc | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Kuwali, Dan. |t Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |d Leiden : BRILL, ©2010 |z 9789004191716 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no97034866 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=552295 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL1159846 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 552295 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn833764516 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882226853314560 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Kuwali, Dan |
| author_facet | Kuwali, Dan |
| author_role | |
| author_sort | Kuwali, Dan |
| author_variant | d k dk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KQE728 |
| callnumber-raw | KQE728.57.I58 K89 2011 |
| callnumber-search | KQE728.57.I58 K89 2011 |
| callnumber-sort | KQE 3728.57 I58 K89 42011 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes. F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa. 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention. 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention. 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity? |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)833764516 |
| dewey-full | 341.5/84096 341.584096 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.5/84096 341.584096 |
| dewey-search | 341.5/84096 341.584096 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.5 584096 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05954cam a2200637Mi 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn833764516</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr un|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130330s2010 ne o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">AU@</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1087388310</subfield><subfield code="a">1297246464</subfield><subfield code="a">1297678953</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004215962</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9004215964</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)833764516</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1087388310</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1297246464</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1297678953</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">f------</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KQE728.57.I58 K89 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">051000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.5/84096</subfield><subfield code="a">341.584096</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kuwali, Dan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Responsibility to Protect :</subfield><subfield code="b">Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leiden :</subfield><subfield code="b">BRILL,</subfield><subfield code="c">2010.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (552 pages).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">African Union.</subfield><subfield code="t">Constitutive Act of the African Union.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Constitutive Act of the African Union (African Union)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Responsibility to protect (International law)</subfield><subfield code="z">Africa.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intervention (International law)</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Responsabilité de protéger (Droit international)</subfield><subfield code="z">Afrique.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Intervention (Droit international)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">International.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intervention (International law)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Responsibility to protect (International law)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Africa</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJkHrMyfHC67yqRTycbrv3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Law - Non-U.S.</subfield><subfield code="2">hilcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Law, Politics & Government.</subfield><subfield code="2">hilcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Law - Africa, Asia, Pacific & Antarctica.</subfield><subfield code="2">hilcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Kuwali, Dan.</subfield><subfield code="t">Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention.</subfield><subfield code="d">Leiden : BRILL, ©2010</subfield><subfield code="z">9789004191716</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no97034866</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=552295</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL1159846</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">552295</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Africa fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJkHrMyfHC67yqRTycbrv3 |
| geographic_facet | Africa |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn833764516 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:25:15Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789004215962 9004215964 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 833764516 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (552 pages). |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | BRILL, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library. |
| series2 | The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library |
| spelling | Kuwali, Dan. The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. Leiden : BRILL, 2010. 1 online resource (552 pages). text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library Print version record. Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes. F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa. 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention. 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention. 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity? 2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention? This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. African Union. Constitutive Act of the African Union. Constitutive Act of the African Union (African Union) fast Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa. Intervention (International law) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067543 Responsabilité de protéger (Droit international) Afrique. Intervention (Droit international) LAW International. bisacsh Intervention (International law) fast Responsibility to protect (International law) fast Africa fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJkHrMyfHC67yqRTycbrv3 Law - Non-U.S. hilcc Law, Politics & Government. hilcc Law - Africa, Asia, Pacific & Antarctica. hilcc Print version: Kuwali, Dan. Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. Leiden : BRILL, ©2010 9789004191716 Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no97034866 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=552295 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Kuwali, Dan The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library. Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes. F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa. 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention. 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention. 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity? African Union. Constitutive Act of the African Union. Constitutive Act of the African Union (African Union) fast Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa. Intervention (International law) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067543 Responsabilité de protéger (Droit international) Afrique. Intervention (Droit international) LAW International. bisacsh Intervention (International law) fast Responsibility to protect (International law) fast Law - Non-U.S. hilcc Law, Politics & Government. hilcc Law - Africa, Asia, Pacific & Antarctica. hilcc |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067543 |
| title | The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |
| title_auth | The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |
| title_exact_search | The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |
| title_full | The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |
| title_fullStr | The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |
| title_short | The Responsibility to Protect : |
| title_sort | responsibility to protect implementation of article 4 h intervention |
| title_sub | Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention. |
| topic | African Union. Constitutive Act of the African Union. Constitutive Act of the African Union (African Union) fast Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa. Intervention (International law) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067543 Responsabilité de protéger (Droit international) Afrique. Intervention (Droit international) LAW International. bisacsh Intervention (International law) fast Responsibility to protect (International law) fast Law - Non-U.S. hilcc Law, Politics & Government. hilcc Law - Africa, Asia, Pacific & Antarctica. hilcc |
| topic_facet | African Union. Constitutive Act of the African Union. Constitutive Act of the African Union (African Union) Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa. Intervention (International law) Responsabilité de protéger (Droit international) Afrique. Intervention (Droit international) LAW International. Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa Law - Non-U.S. Law, Politics & Government. Law - Africa, Asia, Pacific & Antarctica. |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=552295 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kuwalidan theresponsibilitytoprotectimplementationofarticle4hintervention AT kuwalidan responsibilitytoprotectimplementationofarticle4hintervention |