National Security in the Courts :: the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency.
Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they a...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
El Paso :
LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC,
2010.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Recht und Gesellschaft.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (273 pages) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
| ISBN: | 9781593326548 1593326548 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn818818944 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr unu|||||||| | ||
| 008 | 121124s2010 txu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | |z 2010022963 | ||
| 040 | |a EBLCP |b eng |e pn |c EBLCP |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d YDXCP |d DEBSZ |d OUN |d E7B |d N$T |d OCLCF |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d COCUF |d AGLDB |d MOR |d PIFAG |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d ZCU |d U3W |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d NRAMU |d ICG |d VT2 |d OCLCQ |d WYU |d TKN |d DKC |d OCLCQ |d M8D |d OCLCQ |d VLY |d AJS |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 817561308 |a 1162403201 |a 1259201965 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781593326548 | ||
| 020 | |a 1593326548 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781593324209 |q (hardcover ; |q alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 1593324200 |q (hardcover ; |q alk. paper) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)818818944 |z (OCoLC)817561308 |z (OCoLC)1162403201 |z (OCoLC)1259201965 | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a KF4774 .S57 2010 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 018000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 075000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 342.7308/53 |a 342.730853 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Silver, Derigan Almond. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a National Security in the Courts : |b the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |
| 260 | |a El Paso : |b LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, |c 2010. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (273 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Law and Society | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index. | |
| 520 | |a Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and indexes. | ||
| 546 | |a English. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Freedom of the press |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Freedom of information |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a National security |x Law and legislation |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Censorship |z United States. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Liberté de la presse |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Liberté d'information |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Constitutional. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Public. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Censorship |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Freedom of information |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Freedom of the press |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a National security |x Law and legislation |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a National Security in the Courts (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGpRTTc9JybbbxKKg7x4bd |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Silver, Derigan Almond. |t National Security in the Courts : The Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |d El Paso : LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, ©2010 |z 9781593324209 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Recht und Gesellschaft. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520606 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL1057857 | ||
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10622781 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 520606 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 9906812 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn818818944 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882214491652096 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Silver, Derigan Almond |
| author_facet | Silver, Derigan Almond |
| author_role | |
| author_sort | Silver, Derigan Almond |
| author_variant | d a s da das |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF4774 |
| callnumber-raw | KF4774 .S57 2010 |
| callnumber-search | KF4774 .S57 2010 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 44774 S57 42010 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access. Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)818818944 |
| dewey-full | 342.7308/53 342.730853 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.7308/53 342.730853 |
| dewey-search | 342.7308/53 342.730853 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.7308 253 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04531cam a2200697Mi 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn818818944</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr unu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">121124s2010 txu ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 2010022963</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OUN</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">COCUF</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">MOR</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFAG</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">WRM</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">NRAMU</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">WYU</subfield><subfield code="d">TKN</subfield><subfield code="d">DKC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">VLY</subfield><subfield code="d">AJS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">817561308</subfield><subfield code="a">1162403201</subfield><subfield code="a">1259201965</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781593326548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1593326548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781593324209</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardcover ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1593324200</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardcover ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)818818944</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)817561308</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1162403201</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1259201965</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF4774 .S57 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">075000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7308/53</subfield><subfield code="a">342.730853</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silver, Derigan Almond.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Security in the Courts :</subfield><subfield code="b">the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">El Paso :</subfield><subfield code="b">LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC,</subfield><subfield code="c">2010.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (273 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Law and Society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and indexes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of the press</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of information</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Censorship</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Liberté de la presse</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Liberté d'information</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Constitutional.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Public.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Censorship</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Freedom of information</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Freedom of the press</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">National Security in the Courts (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGpRTTc9JybbbxKKg7x4bd</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Silver, Derigan Almond.</subfield><subfield code="t">National Security in the Courts : The Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency.</subfield><subfield code="d">El Paso : LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, ©2010</subfield><subfield code="z">9781593324209</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Recht und Gesellschaft.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520606</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL1057857</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10622781</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">520606</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">9906812</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
| geographic_facet | United States |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn818818944 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:25:03Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781593326548 1593326548 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 818818944 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (273 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Recht und Gesellschaft. |
| series2 | Law and Society |
| spelling | Silver, Derigan Almond. National Security in the Courts : the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, 2010. 1 online resource (273 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Law and Society Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access. Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index. Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal. Print version record. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. English. Freedom of the press United States. Freedom of information United States. National security Law and legislation United States. Censorship United States. Liberté de la presse États-Unis. Liberté d'information États-Unis. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Censorship fast Freedom of information fast Freedom of the press fast National security Law and legislation fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq has work: National Security in the Courts (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGpRTTc9JybbbxKKg7x4bd https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Silver, Derigan Almond. National Security in the Courts : The Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. El Paso : LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, ©2010 9781593324209 Recht und Gesellschaft. FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520606 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Silver, Derigan Almond National Security in the Courts : the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. Recht und Gesellschaft. Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access. Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index. Freedom of the press United States. Freedom of information United States. National security Law and legislation United States. Censorship United States. Liberté de la presse États-Unis. Liberté d'information États-Unis. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Censorship fast Freedom of information fast Freedom of the press fast National security Law and legislation fast |
| title | National Security in the Courts : the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |
| title_auth | National Security in the Courts : the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |
| title_exact_search | National Security in the Courts : the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |
| title_full | National Security in the Courts : the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |
| title_fullStr | National Security in the Courts : the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |
| title_full_unstemmed | National Security in the Courts : the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |
| title_short | National Security in the Courts : |
| title_sort | national security in the courts the need for secrecy vs the requirement of transparency |
| title_sub | the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency. |
| topic | Freedom of the press United States. Freedom of information United States. National security Law and legislation United States. Censorship United States. Liberté de la presse États-Unis. Liberté d'information États-Unis. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Censorship fast Freedom of information fast Freedom of the press fast National security Law and legislation fast |
| topic_facet | Freedom of the press United States. Freedom of information United States. National security Law and legislation United States. Censorship United States. Liberté de la presse États-Unis. Liberté d'information États-Unis. LAW Constitutional. LAW Public. Censorship Freedom of information Freedom of the press National security Law and legislation United States |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520606 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT silverderiganalmond nationalsecurityinthecourtstheneedforsecrecyvstherequirementoftransparency |