Forensic science evidence :: can the law keep up with science? /
"Shelton describes the startling questions that have arisen about the reliability of many forms of scientific evidence which were traditionally regarded as reliable and have been routinely admitted to prove guilt. The exonerations resulting from the development of DNA have exposed the lack of t...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
El Paso :
LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC,
2012.
|
Schriftenreihe: | Criminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC)
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "Shelton describes the startling questions that have arisen about the reliability of many forms of scientific evidence which were traditionally regarded as reliable and have been routinely admitted to prove guilt. The exonerations resulting from the development of DNA have exposed the lack of truswortiness of much of the "scientific" evidence that was used to convict people who turned out to be innocent. The Congressionally commissioned report of the National Academy of Sciences documented the lack of scientific basis in many of these areas. Nevertheless, Shelton discloses that many courts continue to routinely admit such evidence in criminal cases, in spite of the obligation of judges to be the "gatekeepers" of forensic science evidence. He explores reasons for that phenomenon and describes whether and how it might change in the future."--Publisher. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (vii, 273 pages) |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
ISBN: | 1593325967 9781593325961 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn797171595 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr |n||||||||| | ||
008 | 120620s2012 txu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 | |a YDXCP |b eng |e pn |c YDXCP |d E7B |d OCLCO |d EBLCP |d RRP |d N$T |d OCLCF |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d MHW |d OCLCQ |d AZK |d INTCL |d AGLDB |d MOR |d PIFAG |d OTZ |d ZCU |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d JBG |d OCLCQ |d U3W |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d NRAMU |d ICG |d VT2 |d OCLCQ |d WYU |d TKN |d DKC |d AU@ |d OCLCQ |d M8D |d OCLCQ |d AJS |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d INARC |d OCLCL | ||
019 | |a 819514159 |a 961628576 |a 962696508 | ||
020 | |a 1593325967 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 9781593325961 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 9781593325176 |q (hardcover ; |q alk. paper) | ||
020 | |z 1593325177 |q (hardcover ; |q alk. paper) | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)797171595 |z (OCoLC)819514159 |z (OCoLC)961628576 |z (OCoLC)962696508 | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a KF9674 |b .S535 2012 | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 026000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 345.73/067 |2 23 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Shelton, Donald E. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Forensic science evidence : |b can the law keep up with science? / |c Donald E. Shelton. |
260 | |a El Paso : |b LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, |c 2012. | ||
300 | |a 1 online resource (vii, 273 pages) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
347 | |a data file |2 rda | ||
490 | 1 | |a Criminal justice: recent scholarship | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
520 | |a "Shelton describes the startling questions that have arisen about the reliability of many forms of scientific evidence which were traditionally regarded as reliable and have been routinely admitted to prove guilt. The exonerations resulting from the development of DNA have exposed the lack of truswortiness of much of the "scientific" evidence that was used to convict people who turned out to be innocent. The Congressionally commissioned report of the National Academy of Sciences documented the lack of scientific basis in many of these areas. Nevertheless, Shelton discloses that many courts continue to routinely admit such evidence in criminal cases, in spite of the obligation of judges to be the "gatekeepers" of forensic science evidence. He explores reasons for that phenomenon and describes whether and how it might change in the future."--Publisher. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 | |g Machine generated contents note: |g ch. 1 |t Introduction -- |g ch. 2 |t Historical Development of Forensic Scientific Evidence -- |g ch. 3 |t Admissibility Foundation Questions -- The Daubert Trilogy -- |g ch. 4 |t Admissibility of Social Science Evidence in Criminal Cases -- |g ch. 5 |t Pretrial Forensic Issues -- |g ch. 6 |t DNA Evidence -- |g ch. 7 |t Fingerprint Evidence -- |g ch. 8 |t Handwriting Comparison -- |g ch. 9 |t Hair Analysis -- |g ch. 10 |t Bite Mark Analysis -- |g ch. 11 |t Toolmarks, Firearms, and Bullet Lead Comparison -- |g ch. 12 |t Fire, Explosion and Arson Evidence -- |g ch. 13 |t Bloodstain Pattern Evidence -- |g ch. 14 |t Human Scent Evidence -- |g ch. 15 |t Juror Expectations about Scientific Evidence -- |g ch. 16 |t Summary and Conclusions -- |g ch. 17 |t Thoughts about the Future of Criminal Forensic Science. |
650 | 0 | |a Evidence, Expert |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Forensic sciences |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Evidence, Criminal |z United States. | |
650 | 6 | |a Expertises |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 6 | |a Criminalistique |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 6 | |a Preuve (Droit pénal) |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Criminal Law |x General. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Evidence, Criminal |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Evidence, Expert |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Forensic sciences |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
758 | |i has work: |a Forensic science evidence (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGWt4CkD7hBRm87PqXTtjC |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9781593325176 |z 1593325177 |w (DLC) 2012012955 |
830 | 0 | |a Criminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2001094770 | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520617 |3 Volltext |
938 | |a Internet Archive |b INAR |n forensicsciencee0000shel | ||
938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL1057854 | ||
938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10561090 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 520617 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 7582682 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn797171595 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816881800315666433 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Shelton, Donald E. |
author_facet | Shelton, Donald E. |
author_role | |
author_sort | Shelton, Donald E. |
author_variant | d e s de des |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF9674 |
callnumber-raw | KF9674 .S535 2012 |
callnumber-search | KF9674 .S535 2012 |
callnumber-sort | KF 49674 S535 42012 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Introduction -- Historical Development of Forensic Scientific Evidence -- Admissibility Foundation Questions -- The Daubert Trilogy -- Admissibility of Social Science Evidence in Criminal Cases -- Pretrial Forensic Issues -- DNA Evidence -- Fingerprint Evidence -- Handwriting Comparison -- Hair Analysis -- Bite Mark Analysis -- Toolmarks, Firearms, and Bullet Lead Comparison -- Fire, Explosion and Arson Evidence -- Bloodstain Pattern Evidence -- Human Scent Evidence -- Juror Expectations about Scientific Evidence -- Summary and Conclusions -- Thoughts about the Future of Criminal Forensic Science. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)797171595 |
dewey-full | 345.73/067 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 345 - Criminal law |
dewey-raw | 345.73/067 |
dewey-search | 345.73/067 |
dewey-sort | 3345.73 267 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04500cam a2200637Ma 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn797171595</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120620s2012 txu ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">RRP</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MHW</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AZK</subfield><subfield code="d">INTCL</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">MOR</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFAG</subfield><subfield code="d">OTZ</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">JBG</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">WRM</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">NRAMU</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">WYU</subfield><subfield code="d">TKN</subfield><subfield code="d">DKC</subfield><subfield code="d">AU@</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AJS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">INARC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">819514159</subfield><subfield code="a">961628576</subfield><subfield code="a">962696508</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1593325967</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781593325961</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781593325176</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardcover ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1593325177</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardcover ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)797171595</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)819514159</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961628576</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962696508</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF9674</subfield><subfield code="b">.S535 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">026000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.73/067</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shelton, Donald E.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forensic science evidence :</subfield><subfield code="b">can the law keep up with science? /</subfield><subfield code="c">Donald E. Shelton.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">El Paso :</subfield><subfield code="b">LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC,</subfield><subfield code="c">2012.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (vii, 273 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">data file</subfield><subfield code="2">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Criminal justice: recent scholarship</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Shelton describes the startling questions that have arisen about the reliability of many forms of scientific evidence which were traditionally regarded as reliable and have been routinely admitted to prove guilt. The exonerations resulting from the development of DNA have exposed the lack of truswortiness of much of the "scientific" evidence that was used to convict people who turned out to be innocent. The Congressionally commissioned report of the National Academy of Sciences documented the lack of scientific basis in many of these areas. Nevertheless, Shelton discloses that many courts continue to routinely admit such evidence in criminal cases, in spite of the obligation of judges to be the "gatekeepers" of forensic science evidence. He explores reasons for that phenomenon and describes whether and how it might change in the future."--Publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="g">Machine generated contents note:</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 1</subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 2</subfield><subfield code="t">Historical Development of Forensic Scientific Evidence --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 3</subfield><subfield code="t">Admissibility Foundation Questions -- The Daubert Trilogy --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 4</subfield><subfield code="t">Admissibility of Social Science Evidence in Criminal Cases --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 5</subfield><subfield code="t">Pretrial Forensic Issues --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 6</subfield><subfield code="t">DNA Evidence --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 7</subfield><subfield code="t">Fingerprint Evidence --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 8</subfield><subfield code="t">Handwriting Comparison --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 9</subfield><subfield code="t">Hair Analysis --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 10</subfield><subfield code="t">Bite Mark Analysis --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 11</subfield><subfield code="t">Toolmarks, Firearms, and Bullet Lead Comparison --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 12</subfield><subfield code="t">Fire, Explosion and Arson Evidence --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 13</subfield><subfield code="t">Bloodstain Pattern Evidence --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 14</subfield><subfield code="t">Human Scent Evidence --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 15</subfield><subfield code="t">Juror Expectations about Scientific Evidence --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 16</subfield><subfield code="t">Summary and Conclusions --</subfield><subfield code="g">ch. 17</subfield><subfield code="t">Thoughts about the Future of Criminal Forensic Science.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Expert</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forensic sciences</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Criminal</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Expertises</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Criminalistique</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Preuve (Droit pénal)</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Criminal Law</subfield><subfield code="x">General.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Criminal</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Expert</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forensic sciences</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Forensic science evidence (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGWt4CkD7hBRm87PqXTtjC</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="z">9781593325176</subfield><subfield code="z">1593325177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2012012955</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Criminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC)</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2001094770</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520617</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Internet Archive</subfield><subfield code="b">INAR</subfield><subfield code="n">forensicsciencee0000shel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL1057854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10561090</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">520617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">7582682</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
geographic_facet | United States |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn797171595 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:18:28Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 1593325967 9781593325961 |
language | English |
oclc_num | 797171595 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource (vii, 273 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2012 |
publishDateSearch | 2012 |
publishDateSort | 2012 |
publisher | LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, |
record_format | marc |
series | Criminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC) |
series2 | Criminal justice: recent scholarship |
spelling | Shelton, Donald E. Forensic science evidence : can the law keep up with science? / Donald E. Shelton. El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, 2012. 1 online resource (vii, 273 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier data file rda Criminal justice: recent scholarship Includes bibliographical references and index. "Shelton describes the startling questions that have arisen about the reliability of many forms of scientific evidence which were traditionally regarded as reliable and have been routinely admitted to prove guilt. The exonerations resulting from the development of DNA have exposed the lack of truswortiness of much of the "scientific" evidence that was used to convict people who turned out to be innocent. The Congressionally commissioned report of the National Academy of Sciences documented the lack of scientific basis in many of these areas. Nevertheless, Shelton discloses that many courts continue to routinely admit such evidence in criminal cases, in spite of the obligation of judges to be the "gatekeepers" of forensic science evidence. He explores reasons for that phenomenon and describes whether and how it might change in the future."--Publisher. Machine generated contents note: ch. 1 Introduction -- ch. 2 Historical Development of Forensic Scientific Evidence -- ch. 3 Admissibility Foundation Questions -- The Daubert Trilogy -- ch. 4 Admissibility of Social Science Evidence in Criminal Cases -- ch. 5 Pretrial Forensic Issues -- ch. 6 DNA Evidence -- ch. 7 Fingerprint Evidence -- ch. 8 Handwriting Comparison -- ch. 9 Hair Analysis -- ch. 10 Bite Mark Analysis -- ch. 11 Toolmarks, Firearms, and Bullet Lead Comparison -- ch. 12 Fire, Explosion and Arson Evidence -- ch. 13 Bloodstain Pattern Evidence -- ch. 14 Human Scent Evidence -- ch. 15 Juror Expectations about Scientific Evidence -- ch. 16 Summary and Conclusions -- ch. 17 Thoughts about the Future of Criminal Forensic Science. Evidence, Expert United States. Forensic sciences United States. Evidence, Criminal United States. Expertises États-Unis. Criminalistique États-Unis. Preuve (Droit pénal) États-Unis. LAW Criminal Law General. bisacsh Evidence, Criminal fast Evidence, Expert fast Forensic sciences fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq has work: Forensic science evidence (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGWt4CkD7hBRm87PqXTtjC https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: 9781593325176 1593325177 (DLC) 2012012955 Criminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2001094770 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520617 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Shelton, Donald E. Forensic science evidence : can the law keep up with science? / Criminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC) Introduction -- Historical Development of Forensic Scientific Evidence -- Admissibility Foundation Questions -- The Daubert Trilogy -- Admissibility of Social Science Evidence in Criminal Cases -- Pretrial Forensic Issues -- DNA Evidence -- Fingerprint Evidence -- Handwriting Comparison -- Hair Analysis -- Bite Mark Analysis -- Toolmarks, Firearms, and Bullet Lead Comparison -- Fire, Explosion and Arson Evidence -- Bloodstain Pattern Evidence -- Human Scent Evidence -- Juror Expectations about Scientific Evidence -- Summary and Conclusions -- Thoughts about the Future of Criminal Forensic Science. Evidence, Expert United States. Forensic sciences United States. Evidence, Criminal United States. Expertises États-Unis. Criminalistique États-Unis. Preuve (Droit pénal) États-Unis. LAW Criminal Law General. bisacsh Evidence, Criminal fast Evidence, Expert fast Forensic sciences fast |
title | Forensic science evidence : can the law keep up with science? / |
title_alt | Introduction -- Historical Development of Forensic Scientific Evidence -- Admissibility Foundation Questions -- The Daubert Trilogy -- Admissibility of Social Science Evidence in Criminal Cases -- Pretrial Forensic Issues -- DNA Evidence -- Fingerprint Evidence -- Handwriting Comparison -- Hair Analysis -- Bite Mark Analysis -- Toolmarks, Firearms, and Bullet Lead Comparison -- Fire, Explosion and Arson Evidence -- Bloodstain Pattern Evidence -- Human Scent Evidence -- Juror Expectations about Scientific Evidence -- Summary and Conclusions -- Thoughts about the Future of Criminal Forensic Science. |
title_auth | Forensic science evidence : can the law keep up with science? / |
title_exact_search | Forensic science evidence : can the law keep up with science? / |
title_full | Forensic science evidence : can the law keep up with science? / Donald E. Shelton. |
title_fullStr | Forensic science evidence : can the law keep up with science? / Donald E. Shelton. |
title_full_unstemmed | Forensic science evidence : can the law keep up with science? / Donald E. Shelton. |
title_short | Forensic science evidence : |
title_sort | forensic science evidence can the law keep up with science |
title_sub | can the law keep up with science? / |
topic | Evidence, Expert United States. Forensic sciences United States. Evidence, Criminal United States. Expertises États-Unis. Criminalistique États-Unis. Preuve (Droit pénal) États-Unis. LAW Criminal Law General. bisacsh Evidence, Criminal fast Evidence, Expert fast Forensic sciences fast |
topic_facet | Evidence, Expert United States. Forensic sciences United States. Evidence, Criminal United States. Expertises États-Unis. Criminalistique États-Unis. Preuve (Droit pénal) États-Unis. LAW Criminal Law General. Evidence, Criminal Evidence, Expert Forensic sciences United States |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520617 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheltondonalde forensicscienceevidencecanthelawkeepupwithscience |