Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act :: an Institutionally Sensitive Approach.
A rigorous analysis of the relationship between proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act.
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2012.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | A rigorous analysis of the relationship between proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act. |
| Beschreibung: | 5 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of legislation: criminal justice. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (312 pages) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 1139003445 9781139003445 9781139423892 1139423894 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn794663500 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr |n|---||||| | ||
| 008 | 120604s2012 enk ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a EBLCP |b eng |e pn |c EBLCP |d CDX |d YDXCP |d OCLCO |d CAMBR |d DEBSZ |d OCLCF |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d N$T |d E7B |d OCLCQ |d BUF |d UEJ |d UAB |d OCLCQ |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d LUN |d MM9 |d YDX |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SFB |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 795008759 |a 795123420 |a 802069658 |a 1167364244 |a 1173838287 | ||
| 020 | |a 1139003445 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139003445 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139423892 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1139423894 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781139421850 | ||
| 020 | |z 1139421859 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781107013001 | ||
| 020 | |z 1107013003 | ||
| 024 | 8 | |a 9786613659927 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)794663500 |z (OCoLC)795008759 |z (OCoLC)795123420 |z (OCoLC)802069658 |z (OCoLC)1167364244 |z (OCoLC)1173838287 | ||
| 037 | |a 365992 |b MIL | ||
| 043 | |a e-uk--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a KD4080 |b .B73 2012eb | |
| 055 | 8 | |a KF4487.C5 |b B73 2012 |2 kfmod | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 018000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 075000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 342.41085 | |
| 084 | |a KM211 |b .B733 2012 |2 moys | ||
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brady, Alan D. P. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : |b an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |
| 260 | |a Cambridge : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2012. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (312 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Cover; PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFERENCE UNDER THE UK HUMAN RIGHTS ACT; Title; Copyright; Dedication; CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; TABLE OF CASES; TABLE OF STATUTES; 1 Proportionality, deference and institutional sensitivity; 1.1 Rights-based judicial review; 1.2 Proportionality -- A judicial tool for navigating rights; 1.2.1 Proportionality as an independent standard; 1.2.2 Proportionality as a secondary question; 1.2.3 A process-based approach; 1.3 Proportionality-based judicial review of the different forms of government action; 1.4 The problem of uncertainty and the need for deference. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1.4.1 Epistemic uncertainty1.4.2 Early spatial approaches; 1.5 Accounting for deference; 1.5.1 Due deference; 1.5.2 Non-doctrinalists; 1.6 Integrating deference within proportionality; 1.7 A framework for separation-of-powers arguments; 1.8 Building an institutionally sensitive approach; 2 An integrated account of proportionality and deference; 2.1 The inputs of proportionality; 2.1.1 Human rights norms; 2.1.2 Public interest norms; 2.1.3 Derivative norms; 2.2 The four stages of the proportionality test; 2.3 The process of proportionality; 2.3.1 Rational connection; 2.3.2 Minimal impairment. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2.3.3 Overall balancing2.3.4 A flexible process that produces human rights rules; 2.4 Integrating three categories of deference; 2.4.1 Structural deference; 2.4.2 Uncertainty and deference; 2.4.3 Empirical deference; 2.4.4 Normative deference; 2.4.5 The level of deference; 2.5 Conclusion; 3 An institutionally sensitive approach; 3.1 Forms of government activity; 3.2 Institutional factors that affect proportionality and deference; 3.2.1 Choice of objectives; 3.2.2 Range of options; 3.2.3 Scope of the decision: individual vs. general; 3.3 Multi-level decision-making. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3.4 Institutional sensitivity and the reasons for deference3.4.1 Democratic legitimacy; 3.4.2 Institutional competence; 3.4.3 Sections 3 and 4 of the HRA and Parliament; 3.5 Conclusion; 4 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of administrative decisions: immigration; 4.1 Inputs of the proportionality test; 4.1.1 Human rights principles; Prevention of permanent separation of family members; Best interests of children; Prevention of temporary separation of family members; No principle of a choice of place of residence; Making relationships beyond the family. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a The protection of mental healthFreedom of expression; 4.1.2 Public interest principles; Control of immigration; The prevention of queue-jumping; Prevention of crime -- deportation of convicted offenders; Prevention of disorder; National Security; Public interest in allowing a person to remain in the UK; 4.1.3 Rational connection; 4.2 Minimal impairment; 4.3 Overall balancing; 4.3.1 Overall balancing and empirical deference; 4.3.2 Overall balancing and normative deference; 4.3.3 Overall balancing and delay; 4.4 Conclusion. | |
| 500 | |a 5 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of legislation: criminal justice. | ||
| 520 | |a A rigorous analysis of the relationship between proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act. | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a Great Britain. |t Human Rights Act 1998. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no99014110 |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Human Rights Act 1998 (Great Britain) |2 fast |
| 650 | 0 | |a Civil rights |z Great Britain. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Constitutional. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Public. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Civil rights |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Great Britain |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJdmp7p3cx8hpmJ8HvmTpP | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGQ8fY3tt46PpjRxRQKdFC |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Brady, Alan D.P. |t Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : An Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, ©2012 |z 9781107013001 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=451723 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH23038397 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH37563131 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH33350497 | ||
| 938 | |a Coutts Information Services |b COUT |n 22588298 |c 60.00 GBP | ||
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL907146 | ||
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10568359 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 451723 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 8276414 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 7636129 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 8871596 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 7664274 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn794663500 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816881796898357249 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Brady, Alan D. P. |
| author_facet | Brady, Alan D. P. |
| author_role | |
| author_sort | Brady, Alan D. P. |
| author_variant | a d p b adp adpb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KD4080 |
| callnumber-raw | KD4080 .B73 2012eb |
| callnumber-search | KD4080 .B73 2012eb |
| callnumber-sort | KD 44080 B73 42012EB |
| callnumber-subject | KD - United Kingdom and Ireland |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Cover; PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFERENCE UNDER THE UK HUMAN RIGHTS ACT; Title; Copyright; Dedication; CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; TABLE OF CASES; TABLE OF STATUTES; 1 Proportionality, deference and institutional sensitivity; 1.1 Rights-based judicial review; 1.2 Proportionality -- A judicial tool for navigating rights; 1.2.1 Proportionality as an independent standard; 1.2.2 Proportionality as a secondary question; 1.2.3 A process-based approach; 1.3 Proportionality-based judicial review of the different forms of government action; 1.4 The problem of uncertainty and the need for deference. 1.4.1 Epistemic uncertainty1.4.2 Early spatial approaches; 1.5 Accounting for deference; 1.5.1 Due deference; 1.5.2 Non-doctrinalists; 1.6 Integrating deference within proportionality; 1.7 A framework for separation-of-powers arguments; 1.8 Building an institutionally sensitive approach; 2 An integrated account of proportionality and deference; 2.1 The inputs of proportionality; 2.1.1 Human rights norms; 2.1.2 Public interest norms; 2.1.3 Derivative norms; 2.2 The four stages of the proportionality test; 2.3 The process of proportionality; 2.3.1 Rational connection; 2.3.2 Minimal impairment. 2.3.3 Overall balancing2.3.4 A flexible process that produces human rights rules; 2.4 Integrating three categories of deference; 2.4.1 Structural deference; 2.4.2 Uncertainty and deference; 2.4.3 Empirical deference; 2.4.4 Normative deference; 2.4.5 The level of deference; 2.5 Conclusion; 3 An institutionally sensitive approach; 3.1 Forms of government activity; 3.2 Institutional factors that affect proportionality and deference; 3.2.1 Choice of objectives; 3.2.2 Range of options; 3.2.3 Scope of the decision: individual vs. general; 3.3 Multi-level decision-making. 3.4 Institutional sensitivity and the reasons for deference3.4.1 Democratic legitimacy; 3.4.2 Institutional competence; 3.4.3 Sections 3 and 4 of the HRA and Parliament; 3.5 Conclusion; 4 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of administrative decisions: immigration; 4.1 Inputs of the proportionality test; 4.1.1 Human rights principles; Prevention of permanent separation of family members; Best interests of children; Prevention of temporary separation of family members; No principle of a choice of place of residence; Making relationships beyond the family. The protection of mental healthFreedom of expression; 4.1.2 Public interest principles; Control of immigration; The prevention of queue-jumping; Prevention of crime -- deportation of convicted offenders; Prevention of disorder; National Security; Public interest in allowing a person to remain in the UK; 4.1.3 Rational connection; 4.2 Minimal impairment; 4.3 Overall balancing; 4.3.1 Overall balancing and empirical deference; 4.3.2 Overall balancing and normative deference; 4.3.3 Overall balancing and delay; 4.4 Conclusion. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)794663500 |
| dewey-full | 342.41085 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.41085 |
| dewey-search | 342.41085 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.41085 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06485cam a2200805Mi 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn794663500</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|---|||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120604s2012 enk ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">CDX</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">CAMBR</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">BUF</subfield><subfield code="d">UEJ</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">LUN</subfield><subfield code="d">MM9</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">SFB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">795008759</subfield><subfield code="a">795123420</subfield><subfield code="a">802069658</subfield><subfield code="a">1167364244</subfield><subfield code="a">1173838287</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1139003445</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781139003445</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781139423892</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1139423894</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781139421850</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1139421859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781107013001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1107013003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786613659927</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)794663500</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)795008759</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)795123420</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)802069658</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1167364244</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1173838287</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">365992</subfield><subfield code="b">MIL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">e-uk---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KD4080</subfield><subfield code="b">.B73 2012eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="055" ind1=" " ind2="8"><subfield code="a">KF4487.C5</subfield><subfield code="b">B73 2012</subfield><subfield code="2">kfmod</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">075000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.41085</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">KM211</subfield><subfield code="b">.B733 2012</subfield><subfield code="2">moys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brady, Alan D. P.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act :</subfield><subfield code="b">an Institutionally Sensitive Approach.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2012.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (312 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cover; PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFERENCE UNDER THE UK HUMAN RIGHTS ACT; Title; Copyright; Dedication; CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; TABLE OF CASES; TABLE OF STATUTES; 1 Proportionality, deference and institutional sensitivity; 1.1 Rights-based judicial review; 1.2 Proportionality -- A judicial tool for navigating rights; 1.2.1 Proportionality as an independent standard; 1.2.2 Proportionality as a secondary question; 1.2.3 A process-based approach; 1.3 Proportionality-based judicial review of the different forms of government action; 1.4 The problem of uncertainty and the need for deference.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1.4.1 Epistemic uncertainty1.4.2 Early spatial approaches; 1.5 Accounting for deference; 1.5.1 Due deference; 1.5.2 Non-doctrinalists; 1.6 Integrating deference within proportionality; 1.7 A framework for separation-of-powers arguments; 1.8 Building an institutionally sensitive approach; 2 An integrated account of proportionality and deference; 2.1 The inputs of proportionality; 2.1.1 Human rights norms; 2.1.2 Public interest norms; 2.1.3 Derivative norms; 2.2 The four stages of the proportionality test; 2.3 The process of proportionality; 2.3.1 Rational connection; 2.3.2 Minimal impairment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2.3.3 Overall balancing2.3.4 A flexible process that produces human rights rules; 2.4 Integrating three categories of deference; 2.4.1 Structural deference; 2.4.2 Uncertainty and deference; 2.4.3 Empirical deference; 2.4.4 Normative deference; 2.4.5 The level of deference; 2.5 Conclusion; 3 An institutionally sensitive approach; 3.1 Forms of government activity; 3.2 Institutional factors that affect proportionality and deference; 3.2.1 Choice of objectives; 3.2.2 Range of options; 3.2.3 Scope of the decision: individual vs. general; 3.3 Multi-level decision-making.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.4 Institutional sensitivity and the reasons for deference3.4.1 Democratic legitimacy; 3.4.2 Institutional competence; 3.4.3 Sections 3 and 4 of the HRA and Parliament; 3.5 Conclusion; 4 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of administrative decisions: immigration; 4.1 Inputs of the proportionality test; 4.1.1 Human rights principles; Prevention of permanent separation of family members; Best interests of children; Prevention of temporary separation of family members; No principle of a choice of place of residence; Making relationships beyond the family.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The protection of mental healthFreedom of expression; 4.1.2 Public interest principles; Control of immigration; The prevention of queue-jumping; Prevention of crime -- deportation of convicted offenders; Prevention of disorder; National Security; Public interest in allowing a person to remain in the UK; 4.1.3 Rational connection; 4.2 Minimal impairment; 4.3 Overall balancing; 4.3.1 Overall balancing and empirical deference; 4.3.2 Overall balancing and normative deference; 4.3.3 Overall balancing and delay; 4.4 Conclusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of legislation: criminal justice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A rigorous analysis of the relationship between proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Great Britain.</subfield><subfield code="t">Human Rights Act 1998.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no99014110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human Rights Act 1998 (Great Britain)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Civil rights</subfield><subfield code="z">Great Britain.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Constitutional.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Public.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Civil rights</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Great Britain</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJdmp7p3cx8hpmJ8HvmTpP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGQ8fY3tt46PpjRxRQKdFC</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Brady, Alan D.P.</subfield><subfield code="t">Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : An Institutionally Sensitive Approach.</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, ©2012</subfield><subfield code="z">9781107013001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=451723</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH23038397</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH37563131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH33350497</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Coutts Information Services</subfield><subfield code="b">COUT</subfield><subfield code="n">22588298</subfield><subfield code="c">60.00 GBP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL907146</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10568359</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">451723</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">8276414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">7636129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">8871596</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">7664274</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Great Britain fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJdmp7p3cx8hpmJ8HvmTpP |
| geographic_facet | Great Britain |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn794663500 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:18:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1139003445 9781139003445 9781139423892 1139423894 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 794663500 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (312 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Brady, Alan D. P. Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012. 1 online resource (312 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Print version record. Cover; PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFERENCE UNDER THE UK HUMAN RIGHTS ACT; Title; Copyright; Dedication; CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; TABLE OF CASES; TABLE OF STATUTES; 1 Proportionality, deference and institutional sensitivity; 1.1 Rights-based judicial review; 1.2 Proportionality -- A judicial tool for navigating rights; 1.2.1 Proportionality as an independent standard; 1.2.2 Proportionality as a secondary question; 1.2.3 A process-based approach; 1.3 Proportionality-based judicial review of the different forms of government action; 1.4 The problem of uncertainty and the need for deference. 1.4.1 Epistemic uncertainty1.4.2 Early spatial approaches; 1.5 Accounting for deference; 1.5.1 Due deference; 1.5.2 Non-doctrinalists; 1.6 Integrating deference within proportionality; 1.7 A framework for separation-of-powers arguments; 1.8 Building an institutionally sensitive approach; 2 An integrated account of proportionality and deference; 2.1 The inputs of proportionality; 2.1.1 Human rights norms; 2.1.2 Public interest norms; 2.1.3 Derivative norms; 2.2 The four stages of the proportionality test; 2.3 The process of proportionality; 2.3.1 Rational connection; 2.3.2 Minimal impairment. 2.3.3 Overall balancing2.3.4 A flexible process that produces human rights rules; 2.4 Integrating three categories of deference; 2.4.1 Structural deference; 2.4.2 Uncertainty and deference; 2.4.3 Empirical deference; 2.4.4 Normative deference; 2.4.5 The level of deference; 2.5 Conclusion; 3 An institutionally sensitive approach; 3.1 Forms of government activity; 3.2 Institutional factors that affect proportionality and deference; 3.2.1 Choice of objectives; 3.2.2 Range of options; 3.2.3 Scope of the decision: individual vs. general; 3.3 Multi-level decision-making. 3.4 Institutional sensitivity and the reasons for deference3.4.1 Democratic legitimacy; 3.4.2 Institutional competence; 3.4.3 Sections 3 and 4 of the HRA and Parliament; 3.5 Conclusion; 4 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of administrative decisions: immigration; 4.1 Inputs of the proportionality test; 4.1.1 Human rights principles; Prevention of permanent separation of family members; Best interests of children; Prevention of temporary separation of family members; No principle of a choice of place of residence; Making relationships beyond the family. The protection of mental healthFreedom of expression; 4.1.2 Public interest principles; Control of immigration; The prevention of queue-jumping; Prevention of crime -- deportation of convicted offenders; Prevention of disorder; National Security; Public interest in allowing a person to remain in the UK; 4.1.3 Rational connection; 4.2 Minimal impairment; 4.3 Overall balancing; 4.3.1 Overall balancing and empirical deference; 4.3.2 Overall balancing and normative deference; 4.3.3 Overall balancing and delay; 4.4 Conclusion. 5 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of legislation: criminal justice. A rigorous analysis of the relationship between proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act. Includes bibliographical references and index. Great Britain. Human Rights Act 1998. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no99014110 Human Rights Act 1998 (Great Britain) fast Civil rights Great Britain. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Civil rights fast Great Britain fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJdmp7p3cx8hpmJ8HvmTpP has work: Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGQ8fY3tt46PpjRxRQKdFC https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Brady, Alan D.P. Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : An Institutionally Sensitive Approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, ©2012 9781107013001 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=451723 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Brady, Alan D. P. Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. Cover; PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFERENCE UNDER THE UK HUMAN RIGHTS ACT; Title; Copyright; Dedication; CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; TABLE OF CASES; TABLE OF STATUTES; 1 Proportionality, deference and institutional sensitivity; 1.1 Rights-based judicial review; 1.2 Proportionality -- A judicial tool for navigating rights; 1.2.1 Proportionality as an independent standard; 1.2.2 Proportionality as a secondary question; 1.2.3 A process-based approach; 1.3 Proportionality-based judicial review of the different forms of government action; 1.4 The problem of uncertainty and the need for deference. 1.4.1 Epistemic uncertainty1.4.2 Early spatial approaches; 1.5 Accounting for deference; 1.5.1 Due deference; 1.5.2 Non-doctrinalists; 1.6 Integrating deference within proportionality; 1.7 A framework for separation-of-powers arguments; 1.8 Building an institutionally sensitive approach; 2 An integrated account of proportionality and deference; 2.1 The inputs of proportionality; 2.1.1 Human rights norms; 2.1.2 Public interest norms; 2.1.3 Derivative norms; 2.2 The four stages of the proportionality test; 2.3 The process of proportionality; 2.3.1 Rational connection; 2.3.2 Minimal impairment. 2.3.3 Overall balancing2.3.4 A flexible process that produces human rights rules; 2.4 Integrating three categories of deference; 2.4.1 Structural deference; 2.4.2 Uncertainty and deference; 2.4.3 Empirical deference; 2.4.4 Normative deference; 2.4.5 The level of deference; 2.5 Conclusion; 3 An institutionally sensitive approach; 3.1 Forms of government activity; 3.2 Institutional factors that affect proportionality and deference; 3.2.1 Choice of objectives; 3.2.2 Range of options; 3.2.3 Scope of the decision: individual vs. general; 3.3 Multi-level decision-making. 3.4 Institutional sensitivity and the reasons for deference3.4.1 Democratic legitimacy; 3.4.2 Institutional competence; 3.4.3 Sections 3 and 4 of the HRA and Parliament; 3.5 Conclusion; 4 Proportionality and deference in judicial review of administrative decisions: immigration; 4.1 Inputs of the proportionality test; 4.1.1 Human rights principles; Prevention of permanent separation of family members; Best interests of children; Prevention of temporary separation of family members; No principle of a choice of place of residence; Making relationships beyond the family. The protection of mental healthFreedom of expression; 4.1.2 Public interest principles; Control of immigration; The prevention of queue-jumping; Prevention of crime -- deportation of convicted offenders; Prevention of disorder; National Security; Public interest in allowing a person to remain in the UK; 4.1.3 Rational connection; 4.2 Minimal impairment; 4.3 Overall balancing; 4.3.1 Overall balancing and empirical deference; 4.3.2 Overall balancing and normative deference; 4.3.3 Overall balancing and delay; 4.4 Conclusion. Great Britain. Human Rights Act 1998. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no99014110 Human Rights Act 1998 (Great Britain) fast Civil rights Great Britain. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Civil rights fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no99014110 |
| title | Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |
| title_auth | Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |
| title_exact_search | Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |
| title_full | Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |
| title_fullStr | Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |
| title_short | Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act : |
| title_sort | proportionality and deference under the uk human rights act an institutionally sensitive approach |
| title_sub | an Institutionally Sensitive Approach. |
| topic | Great Britain. Human Rights Act 1998. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no99014110 Human Rights Act 1998 (Great Britain) fast Civil rights Great Britain. LAW Constitutional. bisacsh LAW Public. bisacsh Civil rights fast |
| topic_facet | Great Britain. Human Rights Act 1998. Human Rights Act 1998 (Great Britain) Civil rights Great Britain. LAW Constitutional. LAW Public. Civil rights Great Britain |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=451723 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bradyalandp proportionalityanddeferenceundertheukhumanrightsactaninstitutionallysensitiveapproach |