The Populist Paradox :: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation.
Do small but wealthy interest groups influence referendums, ballot initiatives, and other forms of direct legislation at the expense of the broader public interest? Many observers argue that they do, often lamenting that direct legislation has, paradoxically, been captured by the very same wealthy i...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton :
Princeton University Press,
2011.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Do small but wealthy interest groups influence referendums, ballot initiatives, and other forms of direct legislation at the expense of the broader public interest? Many observers argue that they do, often lamenting that direct legislation has, paradoxically, been captured by the very same wealthy interests whose power it was designed to curb. Elisabeth Gerber, however, challenges that argument. In this first systematic study of how money and interest group power actually affect direct legislation, she reveals that big spending does not necessarily mean big influence. Gerber bases her findings. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (186 pages) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9781400823307 1400823307 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn763158156 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr |n|---||||| | ||
| 008 | 111128s2011 nju ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a EBLCP |b eng |e pn |c EBLCP |d OCLCQ |d MEAUC |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d JSTOR |d OCLCF |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d IDEBK |d COO |d OCLCQ |d AGLDB |d ZCU |d OCLCQ |d MERUC |d IOG |d EZ9 |d OCLCQ |d VNS |d VTS |d ICG |d OCLCQ |d LVT |d STF |d DKC |d OCLCQ |d M8D |d OCLCQ |d MM9 |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 765124940 |a 816873086 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781400823307 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1400823307 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 0691002665 |q (cloth alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 0691002673 |q (pbk. alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 9780691002675 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)763158156 |z (OCoLC)765124940 |z (OCoLC)816873086 | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/cttts50 |b JSTOR | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a JF494 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 008000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 016000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL016000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 324.40973 |a 324/.4/0973 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gerber, Elisabeth R. | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Populist Paradox : |b Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |
| 260 | |a Princeton : |b Princeton University Press, |c 2011. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (186 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Cover; THE POPULIST PARADOX; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; 1. What Is the Populist Paradox?; A Theory of Interest Group Influence; Motivation: The Study of Interest Group Influence; Justification: Why Study Direct Legislation?; Plan of the Book; 2. Interest Group Choice; Forms of Influence; Interest Group Choice; Achieving Influence; Summary and Conclusions; 3. Direct Legislation Hurdles; Achieving Direct Modifying Influence; Achieving Direct Preserving Influence; Achieving Indirect Modifying Influence. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Achieving Indirect Preserving Influence: Opposing anInitiative to Signal the LegislatureBehavioral Hurdles; Summary and Conclusions; 4. Group Characteristics and Resources; Monetary and Personnel Resources; Using Resources to Overcome Hurdles; Membership Characteristics; Classifying Groups and Their Resources; Hypotheses about Motivations and Forms of Influence; Summary; 5. Motivations and Strategies; Methodology; What Do Groups Say They Do?; What Do Groups Actually Do?; Summary and Conclusions; 6. Direct Policy Consequences; Direct Policy Consequences; Summary and Conclusions. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 7. Indirect Policy ConsequencesState Policy Differences; Summary and Conclusions; 8. The Populist Paradox: Reality or Illusion?; Economic Group Limitations; Citizen Group Dominance; Implications for the Study of Direct Legislation; Implications for the Study of Interest Group Influence; Positive versus Normative Implications; A Final Assessment; Appendixes; A. Direct Legislation Institutions; B. Survey of Organizations; References; Index. | |
| 520 | |a Do small but wealthy interest groups influence referendums, ballot initiatives, and other forms of direct legislation at the expense of the broader public interest? Many observers argue that they do, often lamenting that direct legislation has, paradoxically, been captured by the very same wealthy interests whose power it was designed to curb. Elisabeth Gerber, however, challenges that argument. In this first systematic study of how money and interest group power actually affect direct legislation, she reveals that big spending does not necessarily mean big influence. Gerber bases her findings. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Pressure groups |z United States. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2005001985 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Referendum |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Referendum. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85112202 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Référendum |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Référendum. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Political Process |x Elections. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Political Process |x General. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Pressure groups |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Referendum |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Gerber, Elisabeth R. |t Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |d Princeton : Princeton University Press, ©2011 |z 9780691002675 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=408682 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL804865 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 408682 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n 333971 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn763158156 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816881778424545280 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Gerber, Elisabeth R. |
| author_facet | Gerber, Elisabeth R. |
| author_role | |
| author_sort | Gerber, Elisabeth R. |
| author_variant | e r g er erg |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | J - Political Science |
| callnumber-label | JF494 |
| callnumber-raw | JF494 |
| callnumber-search | JF494 |
| callnumber-sort | JF 3494 |
| callnumber-subject | JF - Public Administration |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Cover; THE POPULIST PARADOX; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; 1. What Is the Populist Paradox?; A Theory of Interest Group Influence; Motivation: The Study of Interest Group Influence; Justification: Why Study Direct Legislation?; Plan of the Book; 2. Interest Group Choice; Forms of Influence; Interest Group Choice; Achieving Influence; Summary and Conclusions; 3. Direct Legislation Hurdles; Achieving Direct Modifying Influence; Achieving Direct Preserving Influence; Achieving Indirect Modifying Influence. Achieving Indirect Preserving Influence: Opposing anInitiative to Signal the LegislatureBehavioral Hurdles; Summary and Conclusions; 4. Group Characteristics and Resources; Monetary and Personnel Resources; Using Resources to Overcome Hurdles; Membership Characteristics; Classifying Groups and Their Resources; Hypotheses about Motivations and Forms of Influence; Summary; 5. Motivations and Strategies; Methodology; What Do Groups Say They Do?; What Do Groups Actually Do?; Summary and Conclusions; 6. Direct Policy Consequences; Direct Policy Consequences; Summary and Conclusions. 7. Indirect Policy ConsequencesState Policy Differences; Summary and Conclusions; 8. The Populist Paradox: Reality or Illusion?; Economic Group Limitations; Citizen Group Dominance; Implications for the Study of Direct Legislation; Implications for the Study of Interest Group Influence; Positive versus Normative Implications; A Final Assessment; Appendixes; A. Direct Legislation Institutions; B. Survey of Organizations; References; Index. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)763158156 |
| dewey-full | 324.40973 324/.4/0973 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 324 - The political process |
| dewey-raw | 324.40973 324/.4/0973 |
| dewey-search | 324.40973 324/.4/0973 |
| dewey-sort | 3324.40973 |
| dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| discipline | Politologie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04882cam a2200637Mi 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn763158156</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|---|||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">111128s2011 nju ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MEAUC</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">JSTOR</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">COO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">IOG</subfield><subfield code="d">EZ9</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">VNS</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">LVT</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">DKC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MM9</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">765124940</subfield><subfield code="a">816873086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781400823307</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1400823307</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0691002665</subfield><subfield code="q">(cloth alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0691002673</subfield><subfield code="q">(pbk. alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780691002675</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)763158156</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)765124940</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)816873086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22573/cttts50</subfield><subfield code="b">JSTOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">JF494</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">008000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">016000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL016000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">324.40973</subfield><subfield code="a">324/.4/0973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gerber, Elisabeth R.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Populist Paradox :</subfield><subfield code="b">Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Princeton :</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2011.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (186 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cover; THE POPULIST PARADOX; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; 1. What Is the Populist Paradox?; A Theory of Interest Group Influence; Motivation: The Study of Interest Group Influence; Justification: Why Study Direct Legislation?; Plan of the Book; 2. Interest Group Choice; Forms of Influence; Interest Group Choice; Achieving Influence; Summary and Conclusions; 3. Direct Legislation Hurdles; Achieving Direct Modifying Influence; Achieving Direct Preserving Influence; Achieving Indirect Modifying Influence.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Achieving Indirect Preserving Influence: Opposing anInitiative to Signal the LegislatureBehavioral Hurdles; Summary and Conclusions; 4. Group Characteristics and Resources; Monetary and Personnel Resources; Using Resources to Overcome Hurdles; Membership Characteristics; Classifying Groups and Their Resources; Hypotheses about Motivations and Forms of Influence; Summary; 5. Motivations and Strategies; Methodology; What Do Groups Say They Do?; What Do Groups Actually Do?; Summary and Conclusions; 6. Direct Policy Consequences; Direct Policy Consequences; Summary and Conclusions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7. Indirect Policy ConsequencesState Policy Differences; Summary and Conclusions; 8. The Populist Paradox: Reality or Illusion?; Economic Group Limitations; Citizen Group Dominance; Implications for the Study of Direct Legislation; Implications for the Study of Interest Group Influence; Positive versus Normative Implications; A Final Assessment; Appendixes; A. Direct Legislation Institutions; B. Survey of Organizations; References; Index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Do small but wealthy interest groups influence referendums, ballot initiatives, and other forms of direct legislation at the expense of the broader public interest? Many observers argue that they do, often lamenting that direct legislation has, paradoxically, been captured by the very same wealthy interests whose power it was designed to curb. Elisabeth Gerber, however, challenges that argument. In this first systematic study of how money and interest group power actually affect direct legislation, she reveals that big spending does not necessarily mean big influence. Gerber bases her findings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pressure groups</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2005001985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Referendum</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Referendum.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85112202</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Référendum</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Référendum.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Political Process</subfield><subfield code="x">Elections.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Political Process</subfield><subfield code="x">General.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pressure groups</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Referendum</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Gerber, Elisabeth R.</subfield><subfield code="t">Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation.</subfield><subfield code="d">Princeton : Princeton University Press, ©2011</subfield><subfield code="z">9780691002675</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=408682</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL804865</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">408682</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">333971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
| geographic_facet | United States |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn763158156 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:18:07Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781400823307 1400823307 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 763158156 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (186 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Princeton University Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Gerber, Elisabeth R. The Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2011. 1 online resource (186 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Cover; THE POPULIST PARADOX; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; 1. What Is the Populist Paradox?; A Theory of Interest Group Influence; Motivation: The Study of Interest Group Influence; Justification: Why Study Direct Legislation?; Plan of the Book; 2. Interest Group Choice; Forms of Influence; Interest Group Choice; Achieving Influence; Summary and Conclusions; 3. Direct Legislation Hurdles; Achieving Direct Modifying Influence; Achieving Direct Preserving Influence; Achieving Indirect Modifying Influence. Achieving Indirect Preserving Influence: Opposing anInitiative to Signal the LegislatureBehavioral Hurdles; Summary and Conclusions; 4. Group Characteristics and Resources; Monetary and Personnel Resources; Using Resources to Overcome Hurdles; Membership Characteristics; Classifying Groups and Their Resources; Hypotheses about Motivations and Forms of Influence; Summary; 5. Motivations and Strategies; Methodology; What Do Groups Say They Do?; What Do Groups Actually Do?; Summary and Conclusions; 6. Direct Policy Consequences; Direct Policy Consequences; Summary and Conclusions. 7. Indirect Policy ConsequencesState Policy Differences; Summary and Conclusions; 8. The Populist Paradox: Reality or Illusion?; Economic Group Limitations; Citizen Group Dominance; Implications for the Study of Direct Legislation; Implications for the Study of Interest Group Influence; Positive versus Normative Implications; A Final Assessment; Appendixes; A. Direct Legislation Institutions; B. Survey of Organizations; References; Index. Do small but wealthy interest groups influence referendums, ballot initiatives, and other forms of direct legislation at the expense of the broader public interest? Many observers argue that they do, often lamenting that direct legislation has, paradoxically, been captured by the very same wealthy interests whose power it was designed to curb. Elisabeth Gerber, however, challenges that argument. In this first systematic study of how money and interest group power actually affect direct legislation, she reveals that big spending does not necessarily mean big influence. Gerber bases her findings. Print version record. Includes bibliographical references and index. Pressure groups United States. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2005001985 Referendum United States. Referendum. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85112202 Référendum États-Unis. Référendum. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process Elections. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process General. bisacsh Pressure groups fast Referendum fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq Print version: Gerber, Elisabeth R. Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton : Princeton University Press, ©2011 9780691002675 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=408682 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Gerber, Elisabeth R. The Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Cover; THE POPULIST PARADOX; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; 1. What Is the Populist Paradox?; A Theory of Interest Group Influence; Motivation: The Study of Interest Group Influence; Justification: Why Study Direct Legislation?; Plan of the Book; 2. Interest Group Choice; Forms of Influence; Interest Group Choice; Achieving Influence; Summary and Conclusions; 3. Direct Legislation Hurdles; Achieving Direct Modifying Influence; Achieving Direct Preserving Influence; Achieving Indirect Modifying Influence. Achieving Indirect Preserving Influence: Opposing anInitiative to Signal the LegislatureBehavioral Hurdles; Summary and Conclusions; 4. Group Characteristics and Resources; Monetary and Personnel Resources; Using Resources to Overcome Hurdles; Membership Characteristics; Classifying Groups and Their Resources; Hypotheses about Motivations and Forms of Influence; Summary; 5. Motivations and Strategies; Methodology; What Do Groups Say They Do?; What Do Groups Actually Do?; Summary and Conclusions; 6. Direct Policy Consequences; Direct Policy Consequences; Summary and Conclusions. 7. Indirect Policy ConsequencesState Policy Differences; Summary and Conclusions; 8. The Populist Paradox: Reality or Illusion?; Economic Group Limitations; Citizen Group Dominance; Implications for the Study of Direct Legislation; Implications for the Study of Interest Group Influence; Positive versus Normative Implications; A Final Assessment; Appendixes; A. Direct Legislation Institutions; B. Survey of Organizations; References; Index. Pressure groups United States. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2005001985 Referendum United States. Referendum. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85112202 Référendum États-Unis. Référendum. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process Elections. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process General. bisacsh Pressure groups fast Referendum fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2005001985 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85112202 |
| title | The Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |
| title_auth | The Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |
| title_exact_search | The Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |
| title_full | The Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |
| title_fullStr | The Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Populist Paradox : Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |
| title_short | The Populist Paradox : |
| title_sort | populist paradox interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation |
| title_sub | Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. |
| topic | Pressure groups United States. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2005001985 Referendum United States. Referendum. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85112202 Référendum États-Unis. Référendum. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process Elections. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process General. bisacsh Pressure groups fast Referendum fast |
| topic_facet | Pressure groups United States. Referendum United States. Referendum. Référendum États-Unis. Référendum. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process Elections. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process General. Pressure groups Referendum United States |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=408682 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gerberelisabethr thepopulistparadoxinterestgroupinfluenceandthepromiseofdirectlegislation AT gerberelisabethr populistparadoxinterestgroupinfluenceandthepromiseofdirectlegislation |