Why dominant parties lose :: Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective /
Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties t...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2007.
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xvi, 350 pages :) |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 311-331) and index. |
ISBN: | 9780511335532 0511335539 0511333676 9780511333675 0511334958 9780511334955 9780511509803 0511509804 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn173845401 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240705115654.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
008 | 071009s2007 nyua ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 | |a N$T |b eng |e pn |c N$T |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCF |d OCLCO |d UX0 |d OCLCQ |d E7B |d AU@ |d IDEBK |d REDDC |d OCLCQ |d COCUF |d CCO |d COO |d ICG |d UAB |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d VT2 |d OCLCQ |d LVT |d WYU |d OCLCQ |d A6Q |d INARC |d UKAHL |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SFB | ||
019 | |a 191925192 |a 271785116 |a 647660634 |a 896186384 |a 1055407621 |a 1066622585 |a 1228546103 |a 1245900053 |a 1433228381 | ||
020 | |a 9780511335532 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 0511335539 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 0511333676 | ||
020 | |a 9780511333675 | ||
020 | |a 0511334958 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 9780511334955 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 9780521877190 |q (hardback) | ||
020 | |z 0521877199 |q (hardback) | ||
020 | |a 9780511509803 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 0511509804 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 0511334354 | ||
020 | |z 9780511334351 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)173845401 |z (OCoLC)191925192 |z (OCoLC)271785116 |z (OCoLC)647660634 |z (OCoLC)896186384 |z (OCoLC)1055407621 |z (OCoLC)1066622585 |z (OCoLC)1228546103 |z (OCoLC)1245900053 |z (OCoLC)1433228381 | ||
043 | |a n-mx--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a JF2051 |b .G75 2007eb | |
072 | 7 | |a POL |x 015000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 324.2 |2 22 | |
084 | |a 89.61 |2 bcl | ||
084 | |a MI 72329 |2 rvk | ||
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Greene, Kenneth F., |d 1969- |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjyTJkgC4MrrF99H3qfXh3 |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2007032357 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why dominant parties lose : |b Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / |c Kenneth F. Greene. |
260 | |a New York : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2007. | ||
300 | |a 1 online resource (xvi, 350 pages :) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 311-331) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | |a Introduction: The puzzle of single-party dominance -- A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development -- Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s-1990s -- Why participate? : a theory of elite activism in dominant party systems -- The empirical dynamics of elite activism -- Constrained to the core : opposition party organizations, 1980s-1990s -- Dominance defeated : voting behavior in the 2000 elections -- Extending the argument : Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan -- Conclusions and implications. | |
588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
520 | |a Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy. | ||
650 | 0 | |a One-party systems. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85094774 | |
650 | 0 | |a Opposition (Political science) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85095116 | |
650 | 0 | |a Democratization |z Mexico. | |
650 | 0 | |a Presidents |z Mexico |x Election |y 2000. | |
650 | 0 | |a Comparative government. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029298 | |
650 | 6 | |a Parti unique. | |
650 | 6 | |a Opposition (Science politique) | |
650 | 6 | |a Démocratisation |z Mexique. | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Political Process |x Political Parties. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Comparative government |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Democratization |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a One-party systems |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Opposition (Political science) |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Presidents |x Election |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a Mexico |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39QbtfRkxCrqQ3XXbCkdP63kc | |
648 | 7 | |a 2000 |2 fast | |
758 | |i has work: |a Why dominant parties lose (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFyrgbFJYJFkWWkTkcxhpP |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Greene, Kenneth F., 1969- |t Why dominant parties lose. |d New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007 |z 9780521877190 |z 0521877199 |w (DLC) 2007018740 |w (OCoLC)126227679 |
856 | 1 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=206844 |3 Volltext | |
856 | 1 | |l CBO01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=206844 |3 Volltext | |
938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH13420866 | ||
938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10193799 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 206844 | ||
938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n 104059 | ||
938 | |a Internet Archive |b INAR |n whydominantparti0000gree | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 2716220 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 2770220 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn173845401 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1813903305968975872 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Greene, Kenneth F., 1969- |
author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2007032357 |
author_facet | Greene, Kenneth F., 1969- |
author_role | |
author_sort | Greene, Kenneth F., 1969- |
author_variant | k f g kf kfg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | J - Political Science |
callnumber-label | JF2051 |
callnumber-raw | JF2051 .G75 2007eb |
callnumber-search | JF2051 .G75 2007eb |
callnumber-sort | JF 42051 G75 42007EB |
callnumber-subject | JF - Public Administration |
classification_rvk | MI 72329 |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Introduction: The puzzle of single-party dominance -- A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development -- Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s-1990s -- Why participate? : a theory of elite activism in dominant party systems -- The empirical dynamics of elite activism -- Constrained to the core : opposition party organizations, 1980s-1990s -- Dominance defeated : voting behavior in the 2000 elections -- Extending the argument : Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan -- Conclusions and implications. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)173845401 |
dewey-full | 324.2 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 324 - The political process |
dewey-raw | 324.2 |
dewey-search | 324.2 |
dewey-sort | 3324.2 |
dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
discipline | Politologie |
era | 2000 fast |
era_facet | 2000 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05475cam a2200817 a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn173845401</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240705115654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu---unuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">071009s2007 nyua ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">UX0</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">AU@</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">REDDC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">COCUF</subfield><subfield code="d">CCO</subfield><subfield code="d">COO</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">LVT</subfield><subfield code="d">WYU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">A6Q</subfield><subfield code="d">INARC</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">SFB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">191925192</subfield><subfield code="a">271785116</subfield><subfield code="a">647660634</subfield><subfield code="a">896186384</subfield><subfield code="a">1055407621</subfield><subfield code="a">1066622585</subfield><subfield code="a">1228546103</subfield><subfield code="a">1245900053</subfield><subfield code="a">1433228381</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511335532</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0511335539</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0511333676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511333675</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0511334958</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511334955</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780521877190</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0521877199</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511509803</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0511509804</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0511334354</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780511334351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)173845401</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)191925192</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)271785116</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)647660634</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)896186384</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1055407621</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1066622585</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1228546103</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1245900053</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1433228381</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-mx---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">JF2051</subfield><subfield code="b">.G75 2007eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">015000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">324.2</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.61</subfield><subfield code="2">bcl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MI 72329</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greene, Kenneth F.,</subfield><subfield code="d">1969-</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjyTJkgC4MrrF99H3qfXh3</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2007032357</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why dominant parties lose :</subfield><subfield code="b">Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective /</subfield><subfield code="c">Kenneth F. Greene.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">New York :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2007.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xvi, 350 pages :)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 311-331) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: The puzzle of single-party dominance -- A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development -- Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s-1990s -- Why participate? : a theory of elite activism in dominant party systems -- The empirical dynamics of elite activism -- Constrained to the core : opposition party organizations, 1980s-1990s -- Dominance defeated : voting behavior in the 2000 elections -- Extending the argument : Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan -- Conclusions and implications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">One-party systems.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85094774</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Opposition (Political science)</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85095116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democratization</subfield><subfield code="z">Mexico.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Presidents</subfield><subfield code="z">Mexico</subfield><subfield code="x">Election</subfield><subfield code="y">2000.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative government.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029298</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Parti unique.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Opposition (Science politique)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Démocratisation</subfield><subfield code="z">Mexique.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Political Process</subfield><subfield code="x">Political Parties.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Comparative government</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Democratization</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">One-party systems</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Opposition (Political science)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Presidents</subfield><subfield code="x">Election</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mexico</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39QbtfRkxCrqQ3XXbCkdP63kc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">2000</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Why dominant parties lose (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFyrgbFJYJFkWWkTkcxhpP</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Greene, Kenneth F., 1969-</subfield><subfield code="t">Why dominant parties lose.</subfield><subfield code="d">New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007</subfield><subfield code="z">9780521877190</subfield><subfield code="z">0521877199</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2007018740</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)126227679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=206844</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="l">CBO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=206844</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH13420866</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10193799</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">206844</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">104059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Internet Archive</subfield><subfield code="b">INAR</subfield><subfield code="n">whydominantparti0000gree</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">2716220</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">2770220</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Mexico fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39QbtfRkxCrqQ3XXbCkdP63kc |
geographic_facet | Mexico |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn173845401 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-10-25T16:16:35Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780511335532 0511335539 0511333676 9780511333675 0511334958 9780511334955 9780511509803 0511509804 |
language | English |
oclc_num | 173845401 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN |
owner_facet | MAIN |
physical | 1 online resource (xvi, 350 pages :) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press, |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Greene, Kenneth F., 1969- https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjyTJkgC4MrrF99H3qfXh3 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2007032357 Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / Kenneth F. Greene. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007. 1 online resource (xvi, 350 pages :) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references (pages 311-331) and index. Introduction: The puzzle of single-party dominance -- A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development -- Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s-1990s -- Why participate? : a theory of elite activism in dominant party systems -- The empirical dynamics of elite activism -- Constrained to the core : opposition party organizations, 1980s-1990s -- Dominance defeated : voting behavior in the 2000 elections -- Extending the argument : Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan -- Conclusions and implications. Print version record. Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy. One-party systems. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85094774 Opposition (Political science) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85095116 Democratization Mexico. Presidents Mexico Election 2000. Comparative government. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029298 Parti unique. Opposition (Science politique) Démocratisation Mexique. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process Political Parties. bisacsh Comparative government fast Democratization fast One-party systems fast Opposition (Political science) fast Presidents Election fast Mexico fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39QbtfRkxCrqQ3XXbCkdP63kc 2000 fast has work: Why dominant parties lose (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFyrgbFJYJFkWWkTkcxhpP https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Greene, Kenneth F., 1969- Why dominant parties lose. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007 9780521877190 0521877199 (DLC) 2007018740 (OCoLC)126227679 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=206844 Volltext CBO01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=206844 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Greene, Kenneth F., 1969- Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / Introduction: The puzzle of single-party dominance -- A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development -- Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s-1990s -- Why participate? : a theory of elite activism in dominant party systems -- The empirical dynamics of elite activism -- Constrained to the core : opposition party organizations, 1980s-1990s -- Dominance defeated : voting behavior in the 2000 elections -- Extending the argument : Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan -- Conclusions and implications. One-party systems. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85094774 Opposition (Political science) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85095116 Democratization Mexico. Presidents Mexico Election 2000. Comparative government. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029298 Parti unique. Opposition (Science politique) Démocratisation Mexique. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process Political Parties. bisacsh Comparative government fast Democratization fast One-party systems fast Opposition (Political science) fast Presidents Election fast |
subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85094774 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85095116 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029298 |
title | Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / |
title_auth | Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / |
title_exact_search | Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / |
title_full | Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / Kenneth F. Greene. |
title_fullStr | Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / Kenneth F. Greene. |
title_full_unstemmed | Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / Kenneth F. Greene. |
title_short | Why dominant parties lose : |
title_sort | why dominant parties lose mexico s democratization in comparative perspective |
title_sub | Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / |
topic | One-party systems. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85094774 Opposition (Political science) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85095116 Democratization Mexico. Presidents Mexico Election 2000. Comparative government. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029298 Parti unique. Opposition (Science politique) Démocratisation Mexique. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process Political Parties. bisacsh Comparative government fast Democratization fast One-party systems fast Opposition (Political science) fast Presidents Election fast |
topic_facet | One-party systems. Opposition (Political science) Democratization Mexico. Presidents Mexico Election 2000. Comparative government. Parti unique. Opposition (Science politique) Démocratisation Mexique. POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process Political Parties. Comparative government Democratization One-party systems Presidents Election Mexico |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=206844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenekennethf whydominantpartieslosemexicosdemocratizationincomparativeperspective |