Free press vs. fair trials :: examining publicity's role in trial outcomes /

Current research on media and the law has generally been atheoretical and contradictory. This volume explains why pretrial publicity is unlikely to affect the outcome of most jury trials, despite many experimental studies claiming to show the influence of publicity. It reviews existing literature on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Bruschke, Jon
Weitere Verfasser: Loges, William E.
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Mahwah, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
Schriftenreihe:LEA's communication series.
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:DE-862
DE-863
Zusammenfassung:Current research on media and the law has generally been atheoretical and contradictory. This volume explains why pretrial publicity is unlikely to affect the outcome of most jury trials, despite many experimental studies claiming to show the influence of publicity. It reviews existing literature on the topic and includes results from the authors' own research in an effort to answer four questions: *Does pretrial publicity bias the outcome of trials? *If it has an effect, under what conditions does this effect emerge? *What remedies should courts apply in situations whe.
Beschreibung:1 online resource (xvii, 189 pages :)
Bibliographie:Includes bibliographical references (pages 165-173) and indexes.
ISBN:1410609634
9781410609632

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Volltext öffnen