Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics /:
Economic, academic, and social forces are causing undergraduate schools to start a fresh examination of teaching effectiveness. Administrators face the complex task of developing equitable, predictable ways to evaluate, encourage, and reward good teaching in science, math, engineering, and technolog...
Gespeichert in:
Körperschaft: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C. :
National Academies Press,
©2003.
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Economic, academic, and social forces are causing undergraduate schools to start a fresh examination of teaching effectiveness. Administrators face the complex task of developing equitable, predictable ways to evaluate, encourage, and reward good teaching in science, math, engineering, and technology. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology offers a vision for systematic evaluation of teaching practices and academic programs, with recommendations to the various stakeholders in higher education about how to achieve change. What is good undergraduate teaching? This book discusses how to evaluate undergraduate teaching of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology and what characterizes effective teaching in these fields. Why has it been difficult for colleges and universities to address the question of teaching effectiveness? The committee explores the implications of differences between the research andteaching cultures -- and how practices in rewarding researchers could be transferred to the teaching enterprise. How should administrators approach the evaluation of individual faculty members? And how should evaluation results be used? The committee discusses methodologies, offers practical guidelines, and points out pitfalls. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology provides a blueprint for institutions ready to build effective evaluation programs for teaching in science fields. |
Beschreibung: | Includes index. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xiv, 215 pages) |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 128-138) and index. |
ISBN: | 0309512115 9780309512114 1280185171 9781280185175 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocm52822423 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
008 | 030811s2003 dcu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 | |a N$T |b eng |e pn |c N$T |d YDXCP |d OCLCG |d OCLCQ |d COF |d OCLCQ |d NTE |d OCLCQ |d TUU |d OCLCQ |d TNF |d OCLCQ |d GRPVE |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OUN |d IDEBK |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d TJC |d BUF |d COO |d EBLCP |d OCLCQ |d AGLDB |d MOR |d PIFBR |d ZCU |d XFH |d OCLCQ |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d SAV |d OCLCQ |d WY@ |d U3W |d LUE |d UUM |d STF |d OCLCQ |d VTS |d UAB |d CRU |d ICG |d OCLCQ |d INT |d VT2 |d TOF |d OCLCQ |d AU@ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d LVT |d TKN |d OCLCQ |d DKC |d OCLCQ |d M8D |d OCLCQ |d NJT |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
019 | |a 51616540 |a 67834969 |a 814268793 |a 962597412 |a 994452968 | ||
020 | |a 0309512115 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 9780309512114 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 1280185171 | ||
020 | |a 9781280185175 | ||
020 | |z 0309072778 |q (pbk.) | ||
020 | |z 9780309072779 |q (pbk.) | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)52822423 |z (OCoLC)51616540 |z (OCoLC)67834969 |z (OCoLC)814268793 |z (OCoLC)962597412 |z (OCoLC)994452968 | ||
050 | 4 | |a Q181 |b .E93 2003eb | |
072 | 7 | |a SCI |x 063000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a PD |2 bicssc | |
082 | 7 | |a 507.1 |2 21 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / |c Marye Anne Fox and Norman Hackerman, editors ; Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. |
260 | |a Washington, D.C. : |b National Academies Press, |c ©2003. | ||
300 | |a 1 online resource (xiv, 215 pages) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Includes index. | ||
588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 128-138) and index. | ||
520 | 8 | |a Economic, academic, and social forces are causing undergraduate schools to start a fresh examination of teaching effectiveness. Administrators face the complex task of developing equitable, predictable ways to evaluate, encourage, and reward good teaching in science, math, engineering, and technology. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology offers a vision for systematic evaluation of teaching practices and academic programs, with recommendations to the various stakeholders in higher education about how to achieve change. What is good undergraduate teaching? This book discusses how to evaluate undergraduate teaching of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology and what characterizes effective teaching in these fields. Why has it been difficult for colleges and universities to address the question of teaching effectiveness? The committee explores the implications of differences between the research andteaching cultures -- and how practices in rewarding researchers could be transferred to the teaching enterprise. How should administrators approach the evaluation of individual faculty members? And how should evaluation results be used? The committee discusses methodologies, offers practical guidelines, and points out pitfalls. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology provides a blueprint for institutions ready to build effective evaluation programs for teaching in science fields. | |
546 | |a English. | ||
505 | 0 | |a Executive summary -- Part I. What is known : principles, research findings, and implementation issues -- Recent perspectives on undergraduate teaching and learning -- Characterizing and mobilizing effective undergraduate teaching -- Aligning the cultures of research and teaching in higher education -- Evaluating teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : principles and research findings -- Part II. Applying what is known : strategies for evaluating teaching effectiveness -- Evaluation methodologies -- Evaluation of individual faculty : criteria and benchmarks -- Evaluation of departmental undergraduate programs -- Recommendations -- Appendixes. Selected student evaluation instruments ; Samples of questionnaires used to evaluate undergraduate student learning ; Examples of questions for conducting peer evaluations of teaching ; Biographical sketches of committee members. | |
650 | 0 | |a Science |x Study and teaching |x Evaluation. | |
650 | 0 | |a College teaching |x Evaluation. | |
650 | 6 | |a Sciences |x Étude et enseignement |x Évaluation. | |
650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE |x Study & Teaching. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a College teaching |x Evaluation |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Science |x Study and teaching |x Evaluation |2 fast | |
700 | 1 | |a Fox, Marye Anne, |d 1947-2021. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcGr7m3WTcWh3wGwQVwG3 |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84220413 | |
700 | 1 | |a Hackerman, Norman. | |
710 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.). |b Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002160750 | |
758 | |i has work: |a Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFwRfjt7tWyWHPp4gjxfVP |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. |d Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, ©2003 |z 0309072778 |w (DLC) 2002013890 |w (OCoLC)50606363 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=86963 |3 Volltext |
938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH36615058 | ||
938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL3563996 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 86963 | ||
938 | |a Internet Archive |b INAR |n evaluatingimprov0000unse_f0v9 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 2293056 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocm52822423 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816881609815621632 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author2 | Fox, Marye Anne, 1947-2021 Hackerman, Norman |
author2_role | |
author2_variant | m a f ma maf n h nh |
author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84220413 |
author_corporate | National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching |
author_corporate_role | |
author_facet | Fox, Marye Anne, 1947-2021 Hackerman, Norman National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching |
author_sort | Fox, Marye Anne, 1947-2021 |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | Q - Science |
callnumber-label | Q181 |
callnumber-raw | Q181 .E93 2003eb |
callnumber-search | Q181 .E93 2003eb |
callnumber-sort | Q 3181 E93 42003EB |
callnumber-subject | Q - General Science |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Executive summary -- Part I. What is known : principles, research findings, and implementation issues -- Recent perspectives on undergraduate teaching and learning -- Characterizing and mobilizing effective undergraduate teaching -- Aligning the cultures of research and teaching in higher education -- Evaluating teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : principles and research findings -- Part II. Applying what is known : strategies for evaluating teaching effectiveness -- Evaluation methodologies -- Evaluation of individual faculty : criteria and benchmarks -- Evaluation of departmental undergraduate programs -- Recommendations -- Appendixes. Selected student evaluation instruments ; Samples of questionnaires used to evaluate undergraduate student learning ; Examples of questions for conducting peer evaluations of teaching ; Biographical sketches of committee members. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)52822423 |
dewey-full | 507.1 |
dewey-hundreds | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
dewey-ones | 507 - Education, research, related topics |
dewey-raw | 507.1 |
dewey-search | 507.1 |
dewey-sort | 3507.1 |
dewey-tens | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
discipline | Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06065cam a2200625 a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocm52822423 </controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cn|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">030811s2003 dcu ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCG</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">COF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">NTE</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">TUU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">TNF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">GRPVE</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OUN</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">TJC</subfield><subfield code="d">BUF</subfield><subfield code="d">COO</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">MOR</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFBR</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">XFH</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">SAV</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">WY@</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">LUE</subfield><subfield code="d">UUM</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">CRU</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">INT</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">TOF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AU@</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">LVT</subfield><subfield code="d">TKN</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">DKC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">NJT</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51616540</subfield><subfield code="a">67834969</subfield><subfield code="a">814268793</subfield><subfield code="a">962597412</subfield><subfield code="a">994452968</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309512115</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309512114</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1280185171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781280185175</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0309072778</subfield><subfield code="q">(pbk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780309072779</subfield><subfield code="q">(pbk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)52822423</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)51616540</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)67834969</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)814268793</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962597412</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)994452968</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Q181</subfield><subfield code="b">.E93 2003eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCI</subfield><subfield code="x">063000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PD</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">507.1</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics /</subfield><subfield code="c">Marye Anne Fox and Norman Hackerman, editors ; Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C. :</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">©2003.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xiv, 215 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 128-138) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Economic, academic, and social forces are causing undergraduate schools to start a fresh examination of teaching effectiveness. Administrators face the complex task of developing equitable, predictable ways to evaluate, encourage, and reward good teaching in science, math, engineering, and technology. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology offers a vision for systematic evaluation of teaching practices and academic programs, with recommendations to the various stakeholders in higher education about how to achieve change. What is good undergraduate teaching? This book discusses how to evaluate undergraduate teaching of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology and what characterizes effective teaching in these fields. Why has it been difficult for colleges and universities to address the question of teaching effectiveness? The committee explores the implications of differences between the research andteaching cultures -- and how practices in rewarding researchers could be transferred to the teaching enterprise. How should administrators approach the evaluation of individual faculty members? And how should evaluation results be used? The committee discusses methodologies, offers practical guidelines, and points out pitfalls. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology provides a blueprint for institutions ready to build effective evaluation programs for teaching in science fields.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Executive summary -- Part I. What is known : principles, research findings, and implementation issues -- Recent perspectives on undergraduate teaching and learning -- Characterizing and mobilizing effective undergraduate teaching -- Aligning the cultures of research and teaching in higher education -- Evaluating teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : principles and research findings -- Part II. Applying what is known : strategies for evaluating teaching effectiveness -- Evaluation methodologies -- Evaluation of individual faculty : criteria and benchmarks -- Evaluation of departmental undergraduate programs -- Recommendations -- Appendixes. Selected student evaluation instruments ; Samples of questionnaires used to evaluate undergraduate student learning ; Examples of questions for conducting peer evaluations of teaching ; Biographical sketches of committee members.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Study and teaching</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">College teaching</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Sciences</subfield><subfield code="x">Étude et enseignement</subfield><subfield code="x">Évaluation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Study & Teaching.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">College teaching</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Study and teaching</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fox, Marye Anne,</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-2021.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcGr7m3WTcWh3wGwQVwG3</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84220413</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hackerman, Norman.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Research Council (U.S.).</subfield><subfield code="b">Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002160750</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFwRfjt7tWyWHPp4gjxfVP</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="t">Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.</subfield><subfield code="d">Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, ©2003</subfield><subfield code="z">0309072778</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2002013890</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)50606363</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=86963</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH36615058</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL3563996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">86963</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Internet Archive</subfield><subfield code="b">INAR</subfield><subfield code="n">evaluatingimprov0000unse_f0v9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">2293056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocm52822423 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:15:27Z |
institution | BVB |
institution_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002160750 |
isbn | 0309512115 9780309512114 1280185171 9781280185175 |
language | English |
oclc_num | 52822423 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource (xiv, 215 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2003 |
publishDateSearch | 2003 |
publishDateSort | 2003 |
publisher | National Academies Press, |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / Marye Anne Fox and Norman Hackerman, editors ; Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, ©2003. 1 online resource (xiv, 215 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Includes index. Print version record. Includes bibliographical references (pages 128-138) and index. Economic, academic, and social forces are causing undergraduate schools to start a fresh examination of teaching effectiveness. Administrators face the complex task of developing equitable, predictable ways to evaluate, encourage, and reward good teaching in science, math, engineering, and technology. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology offers a vision for systematic evaluation of teaching practices and academic programs, with recommendations to the various stakeholders in higher education about how to achieve change. What is good undergraduate teaching? This book discusses how to evaluate undergraduate teaching of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology and what characterizes effective teaching in these fields. Why has it been difficult for colleges and universities to address the question of teaching effectiveness? The committee explores the implications of differences between the research andteaching cultures -- and how practices in rewarding researchers could be transferred to the teaching enterprise. How should administrators approach the evaluation of individual faculty members? And how should evaluation results be used? The committee discusses methodologies, offers practical guidelines, and points out pitfalls. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology provides a blueprint for institutions ready to build effective evaluation programs for teaching in science fields. English. Executive summary -- Part I. What is known : principles, research findings, and implementation issues -- Recent perspectives on undergraduate teaching and learning -- Characterizing and mobilizing effective undergraduate teaching -- Aligning the cultures of research and teaching in higher education -- Evaluating teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : principles and research findings -- Part II. Applying what is known : strategies for evaluating teaching effectiveness -- Evaluation methodologies -- Evaluation of individual faculty : criteria and benchmarks -- Evaluation of departmental undergraduate programs -- Recommendations -- Appendixes. Selected student evaluation instruments ; Samples of questionnaires used to evaluate undergraduate student learning ; Examples of questions for conducting peer evaluations of teaching ; Biographical sketches of committee members. Science Study and teaching Evaluation. College teaching Evaluation. Sciences Étude et enseignement Évaluation. SCIENCE Study & Teaching. bisacsh College teaching Evaluation fast Science Study and teaching Evaluation fast Fox, Marye Anne, 1947-2021. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcGr7m3WTcWh3wGwQVwG3 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84220413 Hackerman, Norman. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002160750 has work: Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFwRfjt7tWyWHPp4gjxfVP https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, ©2003 0309072778 (DLC) 2002013890 (OCoLC)50606363 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=86963 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / Executive summary -- Part I. What is known : principles, research findings, and implementation issues -- Recent perspectives on undergraduate teaching and learning -- Characterizing and mobilizing effective undergraduate teaching -- Aligning the cultures of research and teaching in higher education -- Evaluating teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : principles and research findings -- Part II. Applying what is known : strategies for evaluating teaching effectiveness -- Evaluation methodologies -- Evaluation of individual faculty : criteria and benchmarks -- Evaluation of departmental undergraduate programs -- Recommendations -- Appendixes. Selected student evaluation instruments ; Samples of questionnaires used to evaluate undergraduate student learning ; Examples of questions for conducting peer evaluations of teaching ; Biographical sketches of committee members. Science Study and teaching Evaluation. College teaching Evaluation. Sciences Étude et enseignement Évaluation. SCIENCE Study & Teaching. bisacsh College teaching Evaluation fast Science Study and teaching Evaluation fast |
title | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / |
title_auth | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / |
title_exact_search | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / |
title_full | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / Marye Anne Fox and Norman Hackerman, editors ; Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. |
title_fullStr | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / Marye Anne Fox and Norman Hackerman, editors ; Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / Marye Anne Fox and Norman Hackerman, editors ; Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. |
title_short | Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics / |
title_sort | evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science technology engineering and mathematics |
topic | Science Study and teaching Evaluation. College teaching Evaluation. Sciences Étude et enseignement Évaluation. SCIENCE Study & Teaching. bisacsh College teaching Evaluation fast Science Study and teaching Evaluation fast |
topic_facet | Science Study and teaching Evaluation. College teaching Evaluation. Sciences Étude et enseignement Évaluation. SCIENCE Study & Teaching. College teaching Evaluation Science Study and teaching Evaluation |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=86963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foxmaryeanne evaluatingandimprovingundergraduateteachinginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathematics AT hackermannorman evaluatingandimprovingundergraduateteachinginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathematics AT nationalresearchcounciluscommitteeonrecognizingevaluatingandrewardingundergraduateteaching evaluatingandimprovingundergraduateteachinginsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathematics |