Assessing the climate consistency of finance: Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives
This paper analyses existing methodologies developed by commercial services providers, research institutes or civil society organisations for investors and financial institutions, to assess the alignment of their assets and portfolios with the Paris Agreement temperature goal. The analysis is based...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2022
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Environment Working Papers
no.200 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper analyses existing methodologies developed by commercial services providers, research institutes or civil society organisations for investors and financial institutions, to assess the alignment of their assets and portfolios with the Paris Agreement temperature goal. The analysis is based on four main analytical dimensions: coverage of financial asset classes, choice of greenhouse gas (GHG) performance metrics, selection of climate change mitigation scenarios, and approach for aggregating alignment assessment for a given asset class and at portfolio level. Within these dimensions, the analysis highlights that a range of different and complex methodological choices, as well as current scope and data limitations, impact the environmental integrity and policy relevance of alignment or misalignment results. The paper provides suggestions for improved and more comprehensive financial sector alignment assessment. These include the development of different complementary methodologies to cover a broader range of financial asset classes than the current main focus on listed corporate equity, the development of more tailored mitigation scenarios by climate policy and science communities, better communication of uncertainties by all stakeholders, and the need for a series of indicators to assess progress and impacts that include but are not limited to GHG based alignment assessments. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (80 p.) 21 x 28cm. |
| DOI: | 10.1787/d12005e7-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-083003339 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204120951.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221129s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/d12005e7-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)083003339 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP083003339 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)d12005e7-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)083003339 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a G23 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a G24 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a Q56 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a Q54 |2 jelc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Noels, Jolien |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing the climate consistency of finance |b Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives |c Jolien, Noels and Raphaël, Jachnik |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2022 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (80 p.) |c 21 x 28cm. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Environment Working Papers |v no.200 | |
| 520 | |a This paper analyses existing methodologies developed by commercial services providers, research institutes or civil society organisations for investors and financial institutions, to assess the alignment of their assets and portfolios with the Paris Agreement temperature goal. The analysis is based on four main analytical dimensions: coverage of financial asset classes, choice of greenhouse gas (GHG) performance metrics, selection of climate change mitigation scenarios, and approach for aggregating alignment assessment for a given asset class and at portfolio level. Within these dimensions, the analysis highlights that a range of different and complex methodological choices, as well as current scope and data limitations, impact the environmental integrity and policy relevance of alignment or misalignment results. The paper provides suggestions for improved and more comprehensive financial sector alignment assessment. These include the development of different complementary methodologies to cover a broader range of financial asset classes than the current main focus on listed corporate equity, the development of more tailored mitigation scenarios by climate policy and science communities, better communication of uncertainties by all stakeholders, and the need for a series of indicators to assess progress and impacts that include but are not limited to GHG based alignment assessments. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Environment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Finance and Investment | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jachnik, Raphaël |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/d12005e7-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-083003339 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1804748635129249792 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Noels, Jolien |
| author2 | Jachnik, Raphaël |
| author2_role | ctb |
| author2_variant | r j rj |
| author_facet | Noels, Jolien Jachnik, Raphaël |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Noels, Jolien |
| author_variant | j n jn |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)083003339 (DE-599)KEP083003339 (FR-PaOEC)d12005e7-en (EBP)083003339 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/d12005e7-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02715cam a22004092 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-083003339</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204120951.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221129s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/d12005e7-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)083003339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP083003339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)d12005e7-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)083003339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">G23</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">G24</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Q56</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Q54</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Noels, Jolien</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing the climate consistency of finance</subfield><subfield code="b">Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives</subfield><subfield code="c">Jolien, Noels and Raphaël, Jachnik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (80 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 28cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Environment Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.200</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper analyses existing methodologies developed by commercial services providers, research institutes or civil society organisations for investors and financial institutions, to assess the alignment of their assets and portfolios with the Paris Agreement temperature goal. The analysis is based on four main analytical dimensions: coverage of financial asset classes, choice of greenhouse gas (GHG) performance metrics, selection of climate change mitigation scenarios, and approach for aggregating alignment assessment for a given asset class and at portfolio level. Within these dimensions, the analysis highlights that a range of different and complex methodological choices, as well as current scope and data limitations, impact the environmental integrity and policy relevance of alignment or misalignment results. The paper provides suggestions for improved and more comprehensive financial sector alignment assessment. These include the development of different complementary methodologies to cover a broader range of financial asset classes than the current main focus on listed corporate equity, the development of more tailored mitigation scenarios by climate policy and science communities, better communication of uncertainties by all stakeholders, and the need for a series of indicators to assess progress and impacts that include but are not limited to GHG based alignment assessments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jachnik, Raphaël</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/d12005e7-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-083003339 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-16T15:07:00Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (80 p.) 21 x 28cm. |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Environment Working Papers |
| spelling | Noels, Jolien VerfasserIn aut Assessing the climate consistency of finance Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives Jolien, Noels and Raphaël, Jachnik Paris OECD Publishing 2022 1 Online-Ressource (80 p.) 21 x 28cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Environment Working Papers no.200 This paper analyses existing methodologies developed by commercial services providers, research institutes or civil society organisations for investors and financial institutions, to assess the alignment of their assets and portfolios with the Paris Agreement temperature goal. The analysis is based on four main analytical dimensions: coverage of financial asset classes, choice of greenhouse gas (GHG) performance metrics, selection of climate change mitigation scenarios, and approach for aggregating alignment assessment for a given asset class and at portfolio level. Within these dimensions, the analysis highlights that a range of different and complex methodological choices, as well as current scope and data limitations, impact the environmental integrity and policy relevance of alignment or misalignment results. The paper provides suggestions for improved and more comprehensive financial sector alignment assessment. These include the development of different complementary methodologies to cover a broader range of financial asset classes than the current main focus on listed corporate equity, the development of more tailored mitigation scenarios by climate policy and science communities, better communication of uncertainties by all stakeholders, and the need for a series of indicators to assess progress and impacts that include but are not limited to GHG based alignment assessments. Environment Finance and Investment Jachnik, Raphaël MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/d12005e7-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Noels, Jolien Assessing the climate consistency of finance Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives Environment Finance and Investment |
| title | Assessing the climate consistency of finance Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives |
| title_auth | Assessing the climate consistency of finance Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives |
| title_exact_search | Assessing the climate consistency of finance Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives |
| title_full | Assessing the climate consistency of finance Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives Jolien, Noels and Raphaël, Jachnik |
| title_fullStr | Assessing the climate consistency of finance Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives Jolien, Noels and Raphaël, Jachnik |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the climate consistency of finance Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives Jolien, Noels and Raphaël, Jachnik |
| title_short | Assessing the climate consistency of finance |
| title_sort | assessing the climate consistency of finance taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives |
| title_sub | Taking stock of methodologies and their links to climate mitigation policy objectives |
| topic | Environment Finance and Investment |
| topic_facet | Environment Finance and Investment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/d12005e7-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT noelsjolien assessingtheclimateconsistencyoffinancetakingstockofmethodologiesandtheirlinkstoclimatemitigationpolicyobjectives AT jachnikraphael assessingtheclimateconsistencyoffinancetakingstockofmethodologiesandtheirlinkstoclimatemitigationpolicyobjectives |