The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll:
The consequences of the pandemic for potential output will partly hinge on its impact on high productivity firms, and more generally the ongoing process of productivity-enhancing reallocation - the rate at which scarce resources are reallocated from less productive to more productive firms. While Sc...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2021
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Economics Department Working Papers
no.1677 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | The consequences of the pandemic for potential output will partly hinge on its impact on high productivity firms, and more generally the ongoing process of productivity-enhancing reallocation - the rate at which scarce resources are reallocated from less productive to more productive firms. While Schumpeter (1939) originally proposed that recessions can accelerate this process, the more 'random' nature of the COVID-19 shock coupled with a policy response that prioritised preservation (over reallocation) raises questions about whether job reallocation remained productivity-enhancing over the course of the pandemic. Despite these headwinds, our analysis based on novel high-frequency employment data for Australia shows that job reallocation (and firm exit) remained solidly connected to firm productivity over 2020. The greater resilience of high productivity firms is significant, given that an indiscriminate shakeout of such firms - and the associated destruction of firm-specific intangible capital - would have imparted significant scarring effects. As it turns out, the temporary nature of Australia's job retention scheme (JobKeeper) made an important (and surprising) positive contribution to this process, with material consequences for aggregate productivity. But the scheme appears to have become more distortive over time, justifying its timely withdraw - on productivity grounds at least. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (41 p.) |
DOI: | 10.1787/2f6e7cb1-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-068280254 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20231204120921.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210915s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/2f6e7cb1-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)068280254 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP068280254 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)2f6e7cb1-en | ||
035 | |a (EBP)068280254 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a J63 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a E24 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a E32 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a O4 |2 jelc | ||
100 | 1 | |a Andrews, Dan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll |c Dan, Andrews, Jonathan, Hambur and Elif, Bahar |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2021 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (41 p.) | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers |v no.1677 | |
520 | |a The consequences of the pandemic for potential output will partly hinge on its impact on high productivity firms, and more generally the ongoing process of productivity-enhancing reallocation - the rate at which scarce resources are reallocated from less productive to more productive firms. While Schumpeter (1939) originally proposed that recessions can accelerate this process, the more 'random' nature of the COVID-19 shock coupled with a policy response that prioritised preservation (over reallocation) raises questions about whether job reallocation remained productivity-enhancing over the course of the pandemic. Despite these headwinds, our analysis based on novel high-frequency employment data for Australia shows that job reallocation (and firm exit) remained solidly connected to firm productivity over 2020. The greater resilience of high productivity firms is significant, given that an indiscriminate shakeout of such firms - and the associated destruction of firm-specific intangible capital - would have imparted significant scarring effects. As it turns out, the temporary nature of Australia's job retention scheme (JobKeeper) made an important (and surprising) positive contribution to this process, with material consequences for aggregate productivity. But the scheme appears to have become more distortive over time, justifying its timely withdraw - on productivity grounds at least. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
650 | 4 | |a Australia | |
700 | 1 | |a Hambur, Jonathan |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Bahar, Elif |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/2f6e7cb1-en |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a BO | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-068280254 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816797325987676160 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Andrews, Dan |
author2 | Hambur, Jonathan Bahar, Elif |
author2_role | ctb ctb |
author2_variant | j h jh e b eb |
author_facet | Andrews, Dan Hambur, Jonathan Bahar, Elif |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Andrews, Dan |
author_variant | d a da |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)068280254 (DE-599)KEP068280254 (FR-PaOEC)2f6e7cb1-en (EBP)068280254 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/2f6e7cb1-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02740cam a22004212 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-068280254</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204120921.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210915s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/2f6e7cb1-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)068280254</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP068280254</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)2f6e7cb1-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)068280254</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J63</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E24</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E32</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O4</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andrews, Dan</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll</subfield><subfield code="c">Dan, Andrews, Jonathan, Hambur and Elif, Bahar</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (41 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Economics Department Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.1677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The consequences of the pandemic for potential output will partly hinge on its impact on high productivity firms, and more generally the ongoing process of productivity-enhancing reallocation - the rate at which scarce resources are reallocated from less productive to more productive firms. While Schumpeter (1939) originally proposed that recessions can accelerate this process, the more 'random' nature of the COVID-19 shock coupled with a policy response that prioritised preservation (over reallocation) raises questions about whether job reallocation remained productivity-enhancing over the course of the pandemic. Despite these headwinds, our analysis based on novel high-frequency employment data for Australia shows that job reallocation (and firm exit) remained solidly connected to firm productivity over 2020. The greater resilience of high productivity firms is significant, given that an indiscriminate shakeout of such firms - and the associated destruction of firm-specific intangible capital - would have imparted significant scarring effects. As it turns out, the temporary nature of Australia's job retention scheme (JobKeeper) made an important (and surprising) positive contribution to this process, with material consequences for aggregate productivity. But the scheme appears to have become more distortive over time, justifying its timely withdraw - on productivity grounds at least.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Australia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hambur, Jonathan</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bahar, Elif</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/2f6e7cb1-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-068280254 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:47Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (41 p.) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Economics Department Working Papers |
spelling | Andrews, Dan VerfasserIn aut The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll Dan, Andrews, Jonathan, Hambur and Elif, Bahar Paris OECD Publishing 2021 1 Online-Ressource (41 p.) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Economics Department Working Papers no.1677 The consequences of the pandemic for potential output will partly hinge on its impact on high productivity firms, and more generally the ongoing process of productivity-enhancing reallocation - the rate at which scarce resources are reallocated from less productive to more productive firms. While Schumpeter (1939) originally proposed that recessions can accelerate this process, the more 'random' nature of the COVID-19 shock coupled with a policy response that prioritised preservation (over reallocation) raises questions about whether job reallocation remained productivity-enhancing over the course of the pandemic. Despite these headwinds, our analysis based on novel high-frequency employment data for Australia shows that job reallocation (and firm exit) remained solidly connected to firm productivity over 2020. The greater resilience of high productivity firms is significant, given that an indiscriminate shakeout of such firms - and the associated destruction of firm-specific intangible capital - would have imparted significant scarring effects. As it turns out, the temporary nature of Australia's job retention scheme (JobKeeper) made an important (and surprising) positive contribution to this process, with material consequences for aggregate productivity. But the scheme appears to have become more distortive over time, justifying its timely withdraw - on productivity grounds at least. Economics Australia Hambur, Jonathan MitwirkendeR ctb Bahar, Elif MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/2f6e7cb1-en Volltext |
spellingShingle | Andrews, Dan The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll Economics Australia |
title | The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll |
title_auth | The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll |
title_exact_search | The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll |
title_full | The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll Dan, Andrews, Jonathan, Hambur and Elif, Bahar |
title_fullStr | The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll Dan, Andrews, Jonathan, Hambur and Elif, Bahar |
title_full_unstemmed | The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll Dan, Andrews, Jonathan, Hambur and Elif, Bahar |
title_short | The COVID-19 shock and productivity-enhancing reallocation in Australia: Real-time evidence from Single Touch Payroll |
title_sort | covid 19 shock and productivity enhancing reallocation in australia real time evidence from single touch payroll |
topic | Economics Australia |
topic_facet | Economics Australia |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/2f6e7cb1-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andrewsdan thecovid19shockandproductivityenhancingreallocationinaustraliarealtimeevidencefromsingletouchpayroll AT hamburjonathan thecovid19shockandproductivityenhancingreallocationinaustraliarealtimeevidencefromsingletouchpayroll AT baharelif thecovid19shockandproductivityenhancingreallocationinaustraliarealtimeevidencefromsingletouchpayroll AT andrewsdan covid19shockandproductivityenhancingreallocationinaustraliarealtimeevidencefromsingletouchpayroll AT hamburjonathan covid19shockandproductivityenhancingreallocationinaustraliarealtimeevidencefromsingletouchpayroll AT baharelif covid19shockandproductivityenhancingreallocationinaustraliarealtimeevidencefromsingletouchpayroll |