Indian Financial System Reform: Selected Issues
India's financial sector has become much more diversified, with capital markets playing an increasingly important role. These markets have been substantially deregulated and, recent changes notwithstanding, many restrictions on capital flows have been eased, especially with respect to equity in...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2007
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | India's financial sector has become much more diversified, with capital markets playing an increasingly important role. These markets have been substantially deregulated and, recent changes notwithstanding, many restrictions on capital flows have been eased, especially with respect to equity inflows. As well, the health of the public banks, which initially had very weak balance sheets, has been restored. While India's regulatory, supervisory and financial policy authorities have made progress, they are likely to face challenges related to several aspects characterising the country's financial system, including its banking sector and its capital markets. Banks remain subject to government imposed constraints on their lending portfolios and the banking sector is still dominated by public institutions. Although the Indian government has intensified its efforts to develop corporate bond markets, the latter remain relatively underdeveloped. Equity markets, which have evolved considerably, have recently been characterised by substantial price increases, in part reflecting large foreign inflows. This development raises the question of sustainability of valuations under changing global monetary liquidity conditions and risk aversion. Different policy responses have been considered by Indian authorities. Representatives from these authorities expressed a reluctance to interfere with the market process. However, the recent decisions by policy authorities suggest that during the course of the ongoing deliberations by policy authorities, these considerations have been outweighed by concerns about the consequences of failing to constrain inflows. The decision by authorities to disallow issuance of "participatory notes" by foreign institutional investors has to be seen in this context. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (32 p.) |
DOI: | 10.1787/fmt-v2007-art17-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061320560 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20231204121210.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210204s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/fmt-v2007-art17-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061320560 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061320560 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)fmt-v2007-art17-en | ||
035 | |a (EBP)061320560 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schich, Sebastian |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Indian Financial System Reform |b Selected Issues |c Sebastian, Schich |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2007 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (32 p.) | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a India's financial sector has become much more diversified, with capital markets playing an increasingly important role. These markets have been substantially deregulated and, recent changes notwithstanding, many restrictions on capital flows have been eased, especially with respect to equity inflows. As well, the health of the public banks, which initially had very weak balance sheets, has been restored. While India's regulatory, supervisory and financial policy authorities have made progress, they are likely to face challenges related to several aspects characterising the country's financial system, including its banking sector and its capital markets. Banks remain subject to government imposed constraints on their lending portfolios and the banking sector is still dominated by public institutions. Although the Indian government has intensified its efforts to develop corporate bond markets, the latter remain relatively underdeveloped. Equity markets, which have evolved considerably, have recently been characterised by substantial price increases, in part reflecting large foreign inflows. This development raises the question of sustainability of valuations under changing global monetary liquidity conditions and risk aversion. Different policy responses have been considered by Indian authorities. Representatives from these authorities expressed a reluctance to interfere with the market process. However, the recent decisions by policy authorities suggest that during the course of the ongoing deliberations by policy authorities, these considerations have been outweighed by concerns about the consequences of failing to constrain inflows. The decision by authorities to disallow issuance of "participatory notes" by foreign institutional investors has to be seen in this context. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Finance and Investment | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Financial Market Trends |g Vol. 2007, no. 2, p. 167-198 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2007 |g year:2007 |g number:2 |g pages:167-198 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-v2007-art17-en |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC-article | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061320560 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816797351606484993 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Schich, Sebastian |
author_facet | Schich, Sebastian |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Schich, Sebastian |
author_variant | s s ss |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC ZDB-13-SOC-article |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061320560 (DE-599)KEP061320560 (FR-PaOEC)fmt-v2007-art17-en (EBP)061320560 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/fmt-v2007-art17-en |
format | Electronic Article |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02963caa a22003612 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061320560</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121210.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/fmt-v2007-art17-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061320560</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061320560</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)fmt-v2007-art17-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061320560</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schich, Sebastian</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indian Financial System Reform</subfield><subfield code="b">Selected Issues</subfield><subfield code="c">Sebastian, Schich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (32 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">India's financial sector has become much more diversified, with capital markets playing an increasingly important role. These markets have been substantially deregulated and, recent changes notwithstanding, many restrictions on capital flows have been eased, especially with respect to equity inflows. As well, the health of the public banks, which initially had very weak balance sheets, has been restored. While India's regulatory, supervisory and financial policy authorities have made progress, they are likely to face challenges related to several aspects characterising the country's financial system, including its banking sector and its capital markets. Banks remain subject to government imposed constraints on their lending portfolios and the banking sector is still dominated by public institutions. Although the Indian government has intensified its efforts to develop corporate bond markets, the latter remain relatively underdeveloped. Equity markets, which have evolved considerably, have recently been characterised by substantial price increases, in part reflecting large foreign inflows. This development raises the question of sustainability of valuations under changing global monetary liquidity conditions and risk aversion. Different policy responses have been considered by Indian authorities. Representatives from these authorities expressed a reluctance to interfere with the market process. However, the recent decisions by policy authorities suggest that during the course of the ongoing deliberations by policy authorities, these considerations have been outweighed by concerns about the consequences of failing to constrain inflows. The decision by authorities to disallow issuance of "participatory notes" by foreign institutional investors has to be seen in this context.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Financial Market Trends</subfield><subfield code="g">Vol. 2007, no. 2, p. 167-198</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:167-198</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-v2007-art17-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC-article</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-061320560 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:56:12Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (32 p.) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC ZDB-13-SOC-article |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Schich, Sebastian VerfasserIn aut Indian Financial System Reform Selected Issues Sebastian, Schich Paris OECD Publishing 2007 1 Online-Ressource (32 p.) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier India's financial sector has become much more diversified, with capital markets playing an increasingly important role. These markets have been substantially deregulated and, recent changes notwithstanding, many restrictions on capital flows have been eased, especially with respect to equity inflows. As well, the health of the public banks, which initially had very weak balance sheets, has been restored. While India's regulatory, supervisory and financial policy authorities have made progress, they are likely to face challenges related to several aspects characterising the country's financial system, including its banking sector and its capital markets. Banks remain subject to government imposed constraints on their lending portfolios and the banking sector is still dominated by public institutions. Although the Indian government has intensified its efforts to develop corporate bond markets, the latter remain relatively underdeveloped. Equity markets, which have evolved considerably, have recently been characterised by substantial price increases, in part reflecting large foreign inflows. This development raises the question of sustainability of valuations under changing global monetary liquidity conditions and risk aversion. Different policy responses have been considered by Indian authorities. Representatives from these authorities expressed a reluctance to interfere with the market process. However, the recent decisions by policy authorities suggest that during the course of the ongoing deliberations by policy authorities, these considerations have been outweighed by concerns about the consequences of failing to constrain inflows. The decision by authorities to disallow issuance of "participatory notes" by foreign institutional investors has to be seen in this context. Finance and Investment Enthalten in Financial Market Trends Vol. 2007, no. 2, p. 167-198 volume:2007 year:2007 number:2 pages:167-198 FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-v2007-art17-en Volltext |
spellingShingle | Schich, Sebastian Indian Financial System Reform Selected Issues Finance and Investment |
title | Indian Financial System Reform Selected Issues |
title_auth | Indian Financial System Reform Selected Issues |
title_exact_search | Indian Financial System Reform Selected Issues |
title_full | Indian Financial System Reform Selected Issues Sebastian, Schich |
title_fullStr | Indian Financial System Reform Selected Issues Sebastian, Schich |
title_full_unstemmed | Indian Financial System Reform Selected Issues Sebastian, Schich |
title_short | Indian Financial System Reform |
title_sort | indian financial system reform selected issues |
title_sub | Selected Issues |
topic | Finance and Investment |
topic_facet | Finance and Investment |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-v2007-art17-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schichsebastian indianfinancialsystemreformselectedissues |