Risk and Resilience: From Good Idea to Good Practice
Resilience has gained significant prominence following the re-examination of the performance of the humanitarian and development aid systems in light of the two major food security crises in East and West Africa over the last two years, coupled with ongoing 'post-2015' negotiations on key...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2013
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers
no.13 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Resilience has gained significant prominence following the re-examination of the performance of the humanitarian and development aid systems in light of the two major food security crises in East and West Africa over the last two years, coupled with ongoing 'post-2015' negotiations on key global disaster risk reduction, climate change and development policy and resourcing. Resilience has largely been communicated by donor and other key actors as a political agenda, devoid of clear technical guidance as to its added value and how it changes programming on the ground. As a result, country staff are either cynical of its value, are confused as to what it means, or use it as another opportunity to attract funding or to justify their narrow institutional mandate. There are relatively few actors who engage with resilience armed with specific technical guidance informed by comprehensive risk and vulnerability analyses. The continued 'improper' application of resilience reinforces some views that this is another 'buzzword' or 'fad', devoid of real meaning for programming, and will mean that the approach will be eventually dropped from policy and programming when 'the next big thing' comes along. This study argues that resilience has sufficient technical added-value (distinct from resilience as a political agenda) and outlines how it can be applied to programming, and, in response to challenges on the ground how donors and key partners can incentivise integrating resilience into programming. There are also recommendations for further study to support further integration of resilience into programming. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (63 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5k3ttg4cxcbp-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061315761 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204121536.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5k3ttg4cxcbp-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)061315761 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061315761 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)5k3ttg4cxcbp-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)061315761 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mitchell, Andrew |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk and Resilience |b From Good Idea to Good Practice |c Andrew, Mitchell |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (63 p.) |c 21 x 29.7cm. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers |v no.13 | |
| 520 | |a Resilience has gained significant prominence following the re-examination of the performance of the humanitarian and development aid systems in light of the two major food security crises in East and West Africa over the last two years, coupled with ongoing 'post-2015' negotiations on key global disaster risk reduction, climate change and development policy and resourcing. Resilience has largely been communicated by donor and other key actors as a political agenda, devoid of clear technical guidance as to its added value and how it changes programming on the ground. As a result, country staff are either cynical of its value, are confused as to what it means, or use it as another opportunity to attract funding or to justify their narrow institutional mandate. There are relatively few actors who engage with resilience armed with specific technical guidance informed by comprehensive risk and vulnerability analyses. The continued 'improper' application of resilience reinforces some views that this is another 'buzzword' or 'fad', devoid of real meaning for programming, and will mean that the approach will be eventually dropped from policy and programming when 'the next big thing' comes along. This study argues that resilience has sufficient technical added-value (distinct from resilience as a political agenda) and outlines how it can be applied to programming, and, in response to challenges on the ground how donors and key partners can incentivise integrating resilience into programming. There are also recommendations for further study to support further integration of resilience into programming. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Development | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3ttg4cxcbp-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061315761 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816797333359165440 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Mitchell, Andrew |
| author_facet | Mitchell, Andrew |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Mitchell, Andrew |
| author_variant | a m am |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061315761 (DE-599)KEP061315761 (FR-PaOEC)5k3ttg4cxcbp-en (EBP)061315761 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5k3ttg4cxcbp-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02662cam a22003372 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061315761</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121536.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5k3ttg4cxcbp-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061315761</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061315761</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)5k3ttg4cxcbp-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061315761</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mitchell, Andrew</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Risk and Resilience</subfield><subfield code="b">From Good Idea to Good Practice</subfield><subfield code="c">Andrew, Mitchell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (63 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Resilience has gained significant prominence following the re-examination of the performance of the humanitarian and development aid systems in light of the two major food security crises in East and West Africa over the last two years, coupled with ongoing 'post-2015' negotiations on key global disaster risk reduction, climate change and development policy and resourcing. Resilience has largely been communicated by donor and other key actors as a political agenda, devoid of clear technical guidance as to its added value and how it changes programming on the ground. As a result, country staff are either cynical of its value, are confused as to what it means, or use it as another opportunity to attract funding or to justify their narrow institutional mandate. There are relatively few actors who engage with resilience armed with specific technical guidance informed by comprehensive risk and vulnerability analyses. The continued 'improper' application of resilience reinforces some views that this is another 'buzzword' or 'fad', devoid of real meaning for programming, and will mean that the approach will be eventually dropped from policy and programming when 'the next big thing' comes along. This study argues that resilience has sufficient technical added-value (distinct from resilience as a political agenda) and outlines how it can be applied to programming, and, in response to challenges on the ground how donors and key partners can incentivise integrating resilience into programming. There are also recommendations for further study to support further integration of resilience into programming.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3ttg4cxcbp-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-061315761 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (63 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers |
| spelling | Mitchell, Andrew VerfasserIn aut Risk and Resilience From Good Idea to Good Practice Andrew, Mitchell Paris OECD Publishing 2013 1 Online-Ressource (63 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers no.13 Resilience has gained significant prominence following the re-examination of the performance of the humanitarian and development aid systems in light of the two major food security crises in East and West Africa over the last two years, coupled with ongoing 'post-2015' negotiations on key global disaster risk reduction, climate change and development policy and resourcing. Resilience has largely been communicated by donor and other key actors as a political agenda, devoid of clear technical guidance as to its added value and how it changes programming on the ground. As a result, country staff are either cynical of its value, are confused as to what it means, or use it as another opportunity to attract funding or to justify their narrow institutional mandate. There are relatively few actors who engage with resilience armed with specific technical guidance informed by comprehensive risk and vulnerability analyses. The continued 'improper' application of resilience reinforces some views that this is another 'buzzword' or 'fad', devoid of real meaning for programming, and will mean that the approach will be eventually dropped from policy and programming when 'the next big thing' comes along. This study argues that resilience has sufficient technical added-value (distinct from resilience as a political agenda) and outlines how it can be applied to programming, and, in response to challenges on the ground how donors and key partners can incentivise integrating resilience into programming. There are also recommendations for further study to support further integration of resilience into programming. Development FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3ttg4cxcbp-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Mitchell, Andrew Risk and Resilience From Good Idea to Good Practice Development |
| title | Risk and Resilience From Good Idea to Good Practice |
| title_auth | Risk and Resilience From Good Idea to Good Practice |
| title_exact_search | Risk and Resilience From Good Idea to Good Practice |
| title_full | Risk and Resilience From Good Idea to Good Practice Andrew, Mitchell |
| title_fullStr | Risk and Resilience From Good Idea to Good Practice Andrew, Mitchell |
| title_full_unstemmed | Risk and Resilience From Good Idea to Good Practice Andrew, Mitchell |
| title_short | Risk and Resilience |
| title_sort | risk and resilience from good idea to good practice |
| title_sub | From Good Idea to Good Practice |
| topic | Development |
| topic_facet | Development |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3ttg4cxcbp-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mitchellandrew riskandresiliencefromgoodideatogoodpractice |