Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa
This paper examines the redistributive impact of fiscal policy for Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa using comparable fiscal incidence analysis with data from around 2010. The largest redistributive effect is in South Africa and the smallest in Indonesia. Success in f...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2015
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers
no.171 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper examines the redistributive impact of fiscal policy for Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa using comparable fiscal incidence analysis with data from around 2010. The largest redistributive effect is in South Africa and the smallest in Indonesia. Success in fiscal redistribution is driven primarily by redistributive effort (share of social spending to GDP in each country) and the extent to which transfers/subsidies are targeted to the poor and direct taxes targeted to the rich. While fiscal policy always reduces inequality, this is not the case with poverty. Fiscal policy increases poverty in Brazil and Colombia (over and above market income poverty) due to high consumption taxes on basic goods. The marginal contribution of direct taxes, direct transfers and in-kind transfers is always equalizing. The marginal effect of net indirect taxes is unequalizing in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and South Africa. Total spending on education is pro-poor except for Indonesia, where it is neutral in absolute terms. Health spending is pro-poor in Brazil, Chile, Colombia and South Africa, roughly neutral in absolute terms in Mexico, and not pro-poor in Indonesia and Peru. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (46 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5jrrwdt037mv-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061314927 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204121158.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5jrrwdt037mv-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)061314927 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061314927 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)5jrrwdt037mv-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)061314927 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a H22 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a I3 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a D31 |2 jelc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lustig, Nora |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries |b Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa |c Nora, Lustig |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (46 p.) |c 21 x 29.7cm. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers |v no.171 | |
| 520 | |a This paper examines the redistributive impact of fiscal policy for Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa using comparable fiscal incidence analysis with data from around 2010. The largest redistributive effect is in South Africa and the smallest in Indonesia. Success in fiscal redistribution is driven primarily by redistributive effort (share of social spending to GDP in each country) and the extent to which transfers/subsidies are targeted to the poor and direct taxes targeted to the rich. While fiscal policy always reduces inequality, this is not the case with poverty. Fiscal policy increases poverty in Brazil and Colombia (over and above market income poverty) due to high consumption taxes on basic goods. The marginal contribution of direct taxes, direct transfers and in-kind transfers is always equalizing. The marginal effect of net indirect taxes is unequalizing in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and South Africa. Total spending on education is pro-poor except for Indonesia, where it is neutral in absolute terms. Health spending is pro-poor in Brazil, Chile, Colombia and South Africa, roughly neutral in absolute terms in Mexico, and not pro-poor in Indonesia and Peru. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Employment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Issues/Migration/Health | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrrwdt037mv-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061314927 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816797333470314496 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Lustig, Nora |
| author_facet | Lustig, Nora |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lustig, Nora |
| author_variant | n l nl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061314927 (DE-599)KEP061314927 (FR-PaOEC)5jrrwdt037mv-en (EBP)061314927 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5jrrwdt037mv-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02445cam a22003852 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061314927</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121158.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5jrrwdt037mv-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061314927</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061314927</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)5jrrwdt037mv-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061314927</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H22</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I3</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D31</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lustig, Nora</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries</subfield><subfield code="b">Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa</subfield><subfield code="c">Nora, Lustig</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (46 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper examines the redistributive impact of fiscal policy for Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa using comparable fiscal incidence analysis with data from around 2010. The largest redistributive effect is in South Africa and the smallest in Indonesia. Success in fiscal redistribution is driven primarily by redistributive effort (share of social spending to GDP in each country) and the extent to which transfers/subsidies are targeted to the poor and direct taxes targeted to the rich. While fiscal policy always reduces inequality, this is not the case with poverty. Fiscal policy increases poverty in Brazil and Colombia (over and above market income poverty) due to high consumption taxes on basic goods. The marginal contribution of direct taxes, direct transfers and in-kind transfers is always equalizing. The marginal effect of net indirect taxes is unequalizing in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and South Africa. Total spending on education is pro-poor except for Indonesia, where it is neutral in absolute terms. Health spending is pro-poor in Brazil, Chile, Colombia and South Africa, roughly neutral in absolute terms in Mexico, and not pro-poor in Indonesia and Peru.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Employment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Issues/Migration/Health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrrwdt037mv-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-061314927 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (46 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers |
| spelling | Lustig, Nora VerfasserIn aut Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa Nora, Lustig Paris OECD Publishing 2015 1 Online-Ressource (46 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers no.171 This paper examines the redistributive impact of fiscal policy for Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa using comparable fiscal incidence analysis with data from around 2010. The largest redistributive effect is in South Africa and the smallest in Indonesia. Success in fiscal redistribution is driven primarily by redistributive effort (share of social spending to GDP in each country) and the extent to which transfers/subsidies are targeted to the poor and direct taxes targeted to the rich. While fiscal policy always reduces inequality, this is not the case with poverty. Fiscal policy increases poverty in Brazil and Colombia (over and above market income poverty) due to high consumption taxes on basic goods. The marginal contribution of direct taxes, direct transfers and in-kind transfers is always equalizing. The marginal effect of net indirect taxes is unequalizing in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and South Africa. Total spending on education is pro-poor except for Indonesia, where it is neutral in absolute terms. Health spending is pro-poor in Brazil, Chile, Colombia and South Africa, roughly neutral in absolute terms in Mexico, and not pro-poor in Indonesia and Peru. Employment Social Issues/Migration/Health FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrrwdt037mv-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Lustig, Nora Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa Employment Social Issues/Migration/Health |
| title | Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa |
| title_auth | Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa |
| title_exact_search | Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa |
| title_full | Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa Nora, Lustig |
| title_fullStr | Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa Nora, Lustig |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa Nora, Lustig |
| title_short | Fiscal Redistribution In Middle Income Countries |
| title_sort | fiscal redistribution in middle income countries brazil chile colombia indonesia mexico peru and south africa |
| title_sub | Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru and South Africa |
| topic | Employment Social Issues/Migration/Health |
| topic_facet | Employment Social Issues/Migration/Health |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrrwdt037mv-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lustignora fiscalredistributioninmiddleincomecountriesbrazilchilecolombiaindonesiamexicoperuandsouthafrica |