Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland:
The combination of different working-age benefits, childcare costs and income taxation creates complexity, reduces work incentives and holds back employment. This paper compares Finland's benefit system with two benefit reform scenarios: a uniform benefit for all ("basic income") and...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2018
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Economics Department Working Papers
no.1464 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | The combination of different working-age benefits, childcare costs and income taxation creates complexity, reduces work incentives and holds back employment. This paper compares Finland's benefit system with two benefit reform scenarios: a uniform benefit for all ("basic income") and a universal tapering rule ("universal credit"). The scenarios are modelled in the OECD TaxBen model and the TUJA microsimulation model. We find that replacing current benefits with a basic income would improve incentives for many, but with a drastic redistribution of income and likely increasing poverty as a result. Merging working-age benefits with similar aims and coordinating their tapering against earnings would on the other hand consistently improve work incentives and transparency, while preserving or improving social protection. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (30 p.) |
| DOI: | 10.1787/d8c0fbc4-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061307416 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204121143.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/d8c0fbc4-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)061307416 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061307416 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)d8c0fbc4-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)061307416 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a J38 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a H55 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a H53 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a D31 |2 jelc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pareliussen, Jon |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland |c Jon, Pareliussen, Hyunjeong, Hwang and Heikki, Viitamäki |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (30 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers |v no.1464 | |
| 520 | |a The combination of different working-age benefits, childcare costs and income taxation creates complexity, reduces work incentives and holds back employment. This paper compares Finland's benefit system with two benefit reform scenarios: a uniform benefit for all ("basic income") and a universal tapering rule ("universal credit"). The scenarios are modelled in the OECD TaxBen model and the TUJA microsimulation model. We find that replacing current benefits with a basic income would improve incentives for many, but with a drastic redistribution of income and likely increasing poverty as a result. Merging working-age benefits with similar aims and coordinating their tapering against earnings would on the other hand consistently improve work incentives and transparency, while preserving or improving social protection. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Finland | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hwang, Hyunjeong |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Viitamäki, Heikki |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/d8c0fbc4-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061307416 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1804748649896345600 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Pareliussen, Jon |
| author2 | Hwang, Hyunjeong Viitamäki, Heikki |
| author2_role | ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | h h hh h v hv |
| author_facet | Pareliussen, Jon Hwang, Hyunjeong Viitamäki, Heikki |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pareliussen, Jon |
| author_variant | j p jp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061307416 (DE-599)KEP061307416 (FR-PaOEC)d8c0fbc4-en (EBP)061307416 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/d8c0fbc4-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02180cam a22004212 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061307416</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121143.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/d8c0fbc4-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061307416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061307416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)d8c0fbc4-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061307416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J38</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H55</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H53</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D31</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pareliussen, Jon</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland</subfield><subfield code="c">Jon, Pareliussen, Hyunjeong, Hwang and Heikki, Viitamäki</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (30 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Economics Department Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.1464</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The combination of different working-age benefits, childcare costs and income taxation creates complexity, reduces work incentives and holds back employment. This paper compares Finland's benefit system with two benefit reform scenarios: a uniform benefit for all ("basic income") and a universal tapering rule ("universal credit"). The scenarios are modelled in the OECD TaxBen model and the TUJA microsimulation model. We find that replacing current benefits with a basic income would improve incentives for many, but with a drastic redistribution of income and likely increasing poverty as a result. Merging working-age benefits with similar aims and coordinating their tapering against earnings would on the other hand consistently improve work incentives and transparency, while preserving or improving social protection.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finland</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hwang, Hyunjeong</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Viitamäki, Heikki</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/d8c0fbc4-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-061307416 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-16T15:07:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (30 p.) |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Economics Department Working Papers |
| spelling | Pareliussen, Jon VerfasserIn aut Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland Jon, Pareliussen, Hyunjeong, Hwang and Heikki, Viitamäki Paris OECD Publishing 2018 1 Online-Ressource (30 p.) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Economics Department Working Papers no.1464 The combination of different working-age benefits, childcare costs and income taxation creates complexity, reduces work incentives and holds back employment. This paper compares Finland's benefit system with two benefit reform scenarios: a uniform benefit for all ("basic income") and a universal tapering rule ("universal credit"). The scenarios are modelled in the OECD TaxBen model and the TUJA microsimulation model. We find that replacing current benefits with a basic income would improve incentives for many, but with a drastic redistribution of income and likely increasing poverty as a result. Merging working-age benefits with similar aims and coordinating their tapering against earnings would on the other hand consistently improve work incentives and transparency, while preserving or improving social protection. Economics Finland Hwang, Hyunjeong MitwirkendeR ctb Viitamäki, Heikki MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/d8c0fbc4-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Pareliussen, Jon Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland Economics Finland |
| title | Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland |
| title_auth | Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland |
| title_exact_search | Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland |
| title_full | Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland Jon, Pareliussen, Hyunjeong, Hwang and Heikki, Viitamäki |
| title_fullStr | Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland Jon, Pareliussen, Hyunjeong, Hwang and Heikki, Viitamäki |
| title_full_unstemmed | Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland Jon, Pareliussen, Hyunjeong, Hwang and Heikki, Viitamäki |
| title_short | Basic income or a single tapering rule? Incentives, inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of Finland |
| title_sort | basic income or a single tapering rule incentives inclusiveness and affordability compared for the case of finland |
| topic | Economics Finland |
| topic_facet | Economics Finland |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/d8c0fbc4-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pareliussenjon basicincomeorasingletaperingruleincentivesinclusivenessandaffordabilitycomparedforthecaseoffinland AT hwanghyunjeong basicincomeorasingletaperingruleincentivesinclusivenessandaffordabilitycomparedforthecaseoffinland AT viitamakiheikki basicincomeorasingletaperingruleincentivesinclusivenessandaffordabilitycomparedforthecaseoffinland |