Do government transfers reduce poverty in China?: Micro evidence from five regions
This paper estimates urban and rural poverty rates across five Chinese administrative regions (Shanghai, Liaoning, Guangdong, Henan and Gansu) in 2014 using representative household level data from the China Family Panel Studies survey. The types of government transfer payments that households in po...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2017
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Economics Department Working Papers
no.1415 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper estimates urban and rural poverty rates across five Chinese administrative regions (Shanghai, Liaoning, Guangdong, Henan and Gansu) in 2014 using representative household level data from the China Family Panel Studies survey. The types of government transfer payments that households in poverty received and the ability for such payments to lift households from poverty are also assessed. Consistent with official estimates, the results highlight substantial disparities in poverty rates between administrative regions. Smaller differences exist between urban and rural locations within the same administrative region. In 2014, the most common types of government transfer received by households in poverty were agricultural subsidies or social assistance - principally the dibao. Regarding the latter, the results suggest some improvement in payment targeting in rural areas, but most dibao recipients had income above the poverty line (as defined in this paper) in 2014. Furthermore, across all administrative regions, the vast majority of households living below the defined poverty line did not receive social assistance at that time. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (19 p.) |
DOI: | 10.1787/e5b343c1-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061301582 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20231204121504.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210204s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/e5b343c1-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061301582 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061301582 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)e5b343c1-en | ||
035 | |a (EBP)061301582 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a O53 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a R28 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a R20 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a I38 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a I32 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a I30 |2 jelc | ||
100 | 1 | |a Westmore, Ben |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? |b Micro evidence from five regions |c Ben, Westmore |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2017 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (19 p.) | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers |v no.1415 | |
520 | |a This paper estimates urban and rural poverty rates across five Chinese administrative regions (Shanghai, Liaoning, Guangdong, Henan and Gansu) in 2014 using representative household level data from the China Family Panel Studies survey. The types of government transfer payments that households in poverty received and the ability for such payments to lift households from poverty are also assessed. Consistent with official estimates, the results highlight substantial disparities in poverty rates between administrative regions. Smaller differences exist between urban and rural locations within the same administrative region. In 2014, the most common types of government transfer received by households in poverty were agricultural subsidies or social assistance - principally the dibao. Regarding the latter, the results suggest some improvement in payment targeting in rural areas, but most dibao recipients had income above the poverty line (as defined in this paper) in 2014. Furthermore, across all administrative regions, the vast majority of households living below the defined poverty line did not receive social assistance at that time. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
650 | 4 | |a China, People's Republic | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/e5b343c1-en |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a BO | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061301582 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1804748650913464320 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Westmore, Ben |
author_facet | Westmore, Ben |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Westmore, Ben |
author_variant | b w bw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061301582 (DE-599)KEP061301582 (FR-PaOEC)e5b343c1-en (EBP)061301582 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/e5b343c1-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02383cam a22004212 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061301582</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121504.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/e5b343c1-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061301582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061301582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)e5b343c1-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061301582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O53</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">R28</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">R20</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I38</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I32</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I30</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Westmore, Ben</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do government transfers reduce poverty in China?</subfield><subfield code="b">Micro evidence from five regions</subfield><subfield code="c">Ben, Westmore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (19 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Economics Department Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.1415</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper estimates urban and rural poverty rates across five Chinese administrative regions (Shanghai, Liaoning, Guangdong, Henan and Gansu) in 2014 using representative household level data from the China Family Panel Studies survey. The types of government transfer payments that households in poverty received and the ability for such payments to lift households from poverty are also assessed. Consistent with official estimates, the results highlight substantial disparities in poverty rates between administrative regions. Smaller differences exist between urban and rural locations within the same administrative region. In 2014, the most common types of government transfer received by households in poverty were agricultural subsidies or social assistance - principally the dibao. Regarding the latter, the results suggest some improvement in payment targeting in rural areas, but most dibao recipients had income above the poverty line (as defined in this paper) in 2014. Furthermore, across all administrative regions, the vast majority of households living below the defined poverty line did not receive social assistance at that time.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">China, People's Republic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/e5b343c1-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-061301582 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-16T15:07:15Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (19 p.) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSearch | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Economics Department Working Papers |
spelling | Westmore, Ben VerfasserIn aut Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions Ben, Westmore Paris OECD Publishing 2017 1 Online-Ressource (19 p.) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Economics Department Working Papers no.1415 This paper estimates urban and rural poverty rates across five Chinese administrative regions (Shanghai, Liaoning, Guangdong, Henan and Gansu) in 2014 using representative household level data from the China Family Panel Studies survey. The types of government transfer payments that households in poverty received and the ability for such payments to lift households from poverty are also assessed. Consistent with official estimates, the results highlight substantial disparities in poverty rates between administrative regions. Smaller differences exist between urban and rural locations within the same administrative region. In 2014, the most common types of government transfer received by households in poverty were agricultural subsidies or social assistance - principally the dibao. Regarding the latter, the results suggest some improvement in payment targeting in rural areas, but most dibao recipients had income above the poverty line (as defined in this paper) in 2014. Furthermore, across all administrative regions, the vast majority of households living below the defined poverty line did not receive social assistance at that time. Economics China, People's Republic FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/e5b343c1-en Volltext |
spellingShingle | Westmore, Ben Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions Economics China, People's Republic |
title | Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions |
title_auth | Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions |
title_exact_search | Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions |
title_full | Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions Ben, Westmore |
title_fullStr | Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions Ben, Westmore |
title_full_unstemmed | Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions Ben, Westmore |
title_short | Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? |
title_sort | do government transfers reduce poverty in china micro evidence from five regions |
title_sub | Micro evidence from five regions |
topic | Economics China, People's Republic |
topic_facet | Economics China, People's Republic |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/e5b343c1-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT westmoreben dogovernmenttransfersreducepovertyinchinamicroevidencefromfiveregions |