Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey
Investor-State dispute settlement mechanisms (ISDS) are an important component of most International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and have significant influence on how disputes between States and investors are resolved. This statistical survey of a large sample of 1,660 bilateral investment treaties...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2012
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Working Papers on International Investment
no.2012/02 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Investor-State dispute settlement mechanisms (ISDS) are an important component of most International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and have significant influence on how disputes between States and investors are resolved. This statistical survey of a large sample of 1,660 bilateral investment treaties (BITs) identifies the main parameters of ISDS regulation in BITs; traces their emergence, frequency and dissemination over time; and highlights past and recent country-specific treaty practice. The survey finds among other things that many countries define the procedural framework thinly compared to advanced domestic procedural frameworks, despite a broad trend toward greater regulation in treaties of parameters of ISDS. Many treaties offer foreign investors a range of procedural choices, such as a choice between arbitration fora. The survey also highlights the diversity that characterises the design of ISDS: over a thousand different combinations of rules regulating ISDS can be found in only 1,660 bilateral treaties -, with variation found both at editorial and substantial level. Differences in policy approaches between countries are the source of some of this variance, but it appears that much of it may not reflect differences in policy. The study also found little evidence of general convergence of approaches towards regulating ISDS in BITs, or indeed much development in the BIT negotiating practice of a number of countries. A different approach, characterised by significantly more thorough ISDS regulation and pioneered by some countries, seems to spread increasingly in multilateral IIAs and more comprehensive treaties. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (57 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061291250 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204121107.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)061291250 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061291250 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)5k8xb71nf628-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)061291250 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a K41 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a K33 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a P48 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a P45 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a F02 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a F21 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a F23 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a O38 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a F53 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a N40 |2 jelc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pohl, Joachim |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements |b A Large Sample Survey |c Joachim, Pohl, Kekeletso, Mashigo and Alexis, Nohen |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (57 p.) |c 21 x 29.7cm. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Working Papers on International Investment |v no.2012/02 | |
| 520 | |a Investor-State dispute settlement mechanisms (ISDS) are an important component of most International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and have significant influence on how disputes between States and investors are resolved. This statistical survey of a large sample of 1,660 bilateral investment treaties (BITs) identifies the main parameters of ISDS regulation in BITs; traces their emergence, frequency and dissemination over time; and highlights past and recent country-specific treaty practice. The survey finds among other things that many countries define the procedural framework thinly compared to advanced domestic procedural frameworks, despite a broad trend toward greater regulation in treaties of parameters of ISDS. Many treaties offer foreign investors a range of procedural choices, such as a choice between arbitration fora. The survey also highlights the diversity that characterises the design of ISDS: over a thousand different combinations of rules regulating ISDS can be found in only 1,660 bilateral treaties -, with variation found both at editorial and substantial level. Differences in policy approaches between countries are the source of some of this variance, but it appears that much of it may not reflect differences in policy. The study also found little evidence of general convergence of approaches towards regulating ISDS in BITs, or indeed much development in the BIT negotiating practice of a number of countries. A different approach, characterised by significantly more thorough ISDS regulation and pioneered by some countries, seems to spread increasingly in multilateral IIAs and more comprehensive treaties. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Finance and Investment | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mashigo, Kekeletso |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nohen, Alexis |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061291250 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816797336886575104 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Pohl, Joachim |
| author2 | Mashigo, Kekeletso Nohen, Alexis |
| author2_role | ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | k m km a n an |
| author_facet | Pohl, Joachim Mashigo, Kekeletso Nohen, Alexis |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pohl, Joachim |
| author_variant | j p jp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061291250 (DE-599)KEP061291250 (FR-PaOEC)5k8xb71nf628-en (EBP)061291250 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03141cam a22004812 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061291250</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121107.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061291250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061291250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)5k8xb71nf628-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061291250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K41</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K33</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P48</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P45</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F02</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F21</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F23</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O38</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F53</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N40</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pohl, Joachim</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements</subfield><subfield code="b">A Large Sample Survey</subfield><subfield code="c">Joachim, Pohl, Kekeletso, Mashigo and Alexis, Nohen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (57 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Working Papers on International Investment</subfield><subfield code="v">no.2012/02</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Investor-State dispute settlement mechanisms (ISDS) are an important component of most International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and have significant influence on how disputes between States and investors are resolved. This statistical survey of a large sample of 1,660 bilateral investment treaties (BITs) identifies the main parameters of ISDS regulation in BITs; traces their emergence, frequency and dissemination over time; and highlights past and recent country-specific treaty practice. The survey finds among other things that many countries define the procedural framework thinly compared to advanced domestic procedural frameworks, despite a broad trend toward greater regulation in treaties of parameters of ISDS. Many treaties offer foreign investors a range of procedural choices, such as a choice between arbitration fora. The survey also highlights the diversity that characterises the design of ISDS: over a thousand different combinations of rules regulating ISDS can be found in only 1,660 bilateral treaties -, with variation found both at editorial and substantial level. Differences in policy approaches between countries are the source of some of this variance, but it appears that much of it may not reflect differences in policy. The study also found little evidence of general convergence of approaches towards regulating ISDS in BITs, or indeed much development in the BIT negotiating practice of a number of countries. A different approach, characterised by significantly more thorough ISDS regulation and pioneered by some countries, seems to spread increasingly in multilateral IIAs and more comprehensive treaties.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mashigo, Kekeletso</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nohen, Alexis</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-061291250 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:58Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (57 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Working Papers on International Investment |
| spelling | Pohl, Joachim VerfasserIn aut Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey Joachim, Pohl, Kekeletso, Mashigo and Alexis, Nohen Paris OECD Publishing 2012 1 Online-Ressource (57 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Working Papers on International Investment no.2012/02 Investor-State dispute settlement mechanisms (ISDS) are an important component of most International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and have significant influence on how disputes between States and investors are resolved. This statistical survey of a large sample of 1,660 bilateral investment treaties (BITs) identifies the main parameters of ISDS regulation in BITs; traces their emergence, frequency and dissemination over time; and highlights past and recent country-specific treaty practice. The survey finds among other things that many countries define the procedural framework thinly compared to advanced domestic procedural frameworks, despite a broad trend toward greater regulation in treaties of parameters of ISDS. Many treaties offer foreign investors a range of procedural choices, such as a choice between arbitration fora. The survey also highlights the diversity that characterises the design of ISDS: over a thousand different combinations of rules regulating ISDS can be found in only 1,660 bilateral treaties -, with variation found both at editorial and substantial level. Differences in policy approaches between countries are the source of some of this variance, but it appears that much of it may not reflect differences in policy. The study also found little evidence of general convergence of approaches towards regulating ISDS in BITs, or indeed much development in the BIT negotiating practice of a number of countries. A different approach, characterised by significantly more thorough ISDS regulation and pioneered by some countries, seems to spread increasingly in multilateral IIAs and more comprehensive treaties. Finance and Investment Mashigo, Kekeletso MitwirkendeR ctb Nohen, Alexis MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Pohl, Joachim Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey Finance and Investment |
| title | Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey |
| title_auth | Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey |
| title_exact_search | Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey |
| title_full | Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey Joachim, Pohl, Kekeletso, Mashigo and Alexis, Nohen |
| title_fullStr | Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey Joachim, Pohl, Kekeletso, Mashigo and Alexis, Nohen |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey Joachim, Pohl, Kekeletso, Mashigo and Alexis, Nohen |
| title_short | Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements |
| title_sort | dispute settlement provisions in international investment agreements a large sample survey |
| title_sub | A Large Sample Survey |
| topic | Finance and Investment |
| topic_facet | Finance and Investment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pohljoachim disputesettlementprovisionsininternationalinvestmentagreementsalargesamplesurvey AT mashigokekeletso disputesettlementprovisionsininternationalinvestmentagreementsalargesamplesurvey AT nohenalexis disputesettlementprovisionsininternationalinvestmentagreementsalargesamplesurvey |