Multi-dimensional Living Standards: A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences
We compute a distribution-adjusted welfare measure that aggregates outcomes in three dimensions of well-being, namely income, employment and longevity. Aggregation weights reflect preferences of people on these dimensions. The welfare measure is calculated for 26 OECD countries and selected emerging...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2016
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Statistics Working Papers
no.2016/05 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | We compute a distribution-adjusted welfare measure that aggregates outcomes in three dimensions of well-being, namely income, employment and longevity. Aggregation weights reflect preferences of people on these dimensions. The welfare measure is calculated for 26 OECD countries and selected emerging economies, and covers about three decades. Relying on a single theoretical model of a hypothetical representative agent, we combine life satisfaction regressions to capture the full welfare losses of unemployment with a calibration approach to capture the value of longevity. We test for robustness of results over a series of datasets and specifications and find that the resulting estimated shadow prices of (one percentage point of) unemployment and one year of longevity average 2% and 6% of income respectively. While we assume an identical utility function for all individuals, shadow prices of unemployment and longevity vary both across countries and within countries across income groups. We find that economic growth differs significantly from the growth of our welfare measure. The latter grew faster than GDP thanks to the gains that countries experienced on longevity, but was also more volatile due to changes in unemployment. Rising income inequality exerts a negative effect on our welfare measure. Gains in longevity have almost the same impact on welfare as income growth, while the long-term impact of employment was smaller. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (53 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
DOI: | 10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061284602 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20231204121425.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210204s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061284602 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061284602 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)5jlpq7qvxc6f-en | ||
035 | |a (EBP)061284602 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a J17 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a J18 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a I18 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a I38 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a I31 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a I32 |2 jelc | ||
100 | 1 | |a Boarini, Romina |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Multi-dimensional Living Standards |b A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences |c Romina, Boarini ... [et al] |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2016 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (53 p.) |c 21 x 29.7cm. | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Statistics Working Papers |v no.2016/05 | |
520 | |a We compute a distribution-adjusted welfare measure that aggregates outcomes in three dimensions of well-being, namely income, employment and longevity. Aggregation weights reflect preferences of people on these dimensions. The welfare measure is calculated for 26 OECD countries and selected emerging economies, and covers about three decades. Relying on a single theoretical model of a hypothetical representative agent, we combine life satisfaction regressions to capture the full welfare losses of unemployment with a calibration approach to capture the value of longevity. We test for robustness of results over a series of datasets and specifications and find that the resulting estimated shadow prices of (one percentage point of) unemployment and one year of longevity average 2% and 6% of income respectively. While we assume an identical utility function for all individuals, shadow prices of unemployment and longevity vary both across countries and within countries across income groups. We find that economic growth differs significantly from the growth of our welfare measure. The latter grew faster than GDP thanks to the gains that countries experienced on longevity, but was also more volatile due to changes in unemployment. Rising income inequality exerts a negative effect on our welfare measure. Gains in longevity have almost the same impact on welfare as income growth, while the long-term impact of employment was smaller. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Social Issues/Migration/Health | |
650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
700 | 1 | |a Murtin, Fabrice |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Schreyer, Paul |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Fleurbaey, Marc |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a BO | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061284602 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816797337873285120 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Boarini, Romina |
author2 | Murtin, Fabrice Schreyer, Paul Fleurbaey, Marc |
author2_role | ctb ctb ctb |
author2_variant | f m fm p s ps m f mf |
author_facet | Boarini, Romina Murtin, Fabrice Schreyer, Paul Fleurbaey, Marc |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Boarini, Romina |
author_variant | r b rb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061284602 (DE-599)KEP061284602 (FR-PaOEC)5jlpq7qvxc6f-en (EBP)061284602 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02864cam a22004572 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061284602</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121425.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061284602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061284602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)5jlpq7qvxc6f-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061284602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J17</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J18</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I18</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I38</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I31</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I32</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boarini, Romina</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Multi-dimensional Living Standards</subfield><subfield code="b">A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences</subfield><subfield code="c">Romina, Boarini ... [et al]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (53 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Statistics Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.2016/05</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We compute a distribution-adjusted welfare measure that aggregates outcomes in three dimensions of well-being, namely income, employment and longevity. Aggregation weights reflect preferences of people on these dimensions. The welfare measure is calculated for 26 OECD countries and selected emerging economies, and covers about three decades. Relying on a single theoretical model of a hypothetical representative agent, we combine life satisfaction regressions to capture the full welfare losses of unemployment with a calibration approach to capture the value of longevity. We test for robustness of results over a series of datasets and specifications and find that the resulting estimated shadow prices of (one percentage point of) unemployment and one year of longevity average 2% and 6% of income respectively. While we assume an identical utility function for all individuals, shadow prices of unemployment and longevity vary both across countries and within countries across income groups. We find that economic growth differs significantly from the growth of our welfare measure. The latter grew faster than GDP thanks to the gains that countries experienced on longevity, but was also more volatile due to changes in unemployment. Rising income inequality exerts a negative effect on our welfare measure. Gains in longevity have almost the same impact on welfare as income growth, while the long-term impact of employment was smaller.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Issues/Migration/Health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Murtin, Fabrice</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schreyer, Paul</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fleurbaey, Marc</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-061284602 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:59Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (53 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Statistics Working Papers |
spelling | Boarini, Romina VerfasserIn aut Multi-dimensional Living Standards A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences Romina, Boarini ... [et al] Paris OECD Publishing 2016 1 Online-Ressource (53 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Statistics Working Papers no.2016/05 We compute a distribution-adjusted welfare measure that aggregates outcomes in three dimensions of well-being, namely income, employment and longevity. Aggregation weights reflect preferences of people on these dimensions. The welfare measure is calculated for 26 OECD countries and selected emerging economies, and covers about three decades. Relying on a single theoretical model of a hypothetical representative agent, we combine life satisfaction regressions to capture the full welfare losses of unemployment with a calibration approach to capture the value of longevity. We test for robustness of results over a series of datasets and specifications and find that the resulting estimated shadow prices of (one percentage point of) unemployment and one year of longevity average 2% and 6% of income respectively. While we assume an identical utility function for all individuals, shadow prices of unemployment and longevity vary both across countries and within countries across income groups. We find that economic growth differs significantly from the growth of our welfare measure. The latter grew faster than GDP thanks to the gains that countries experienced on longevity, but was also more volatile due to changes in unemployment. Rising income inequality exerts a negative effect on our welfare measure. Gains in longevity have almost the same impact on welfare as income growth, while the long-term impact of employment was smaller. Social Issues/Migration/Health Economics Murtin, Fabrice MitwirkendeR ctb Schreyer, Paul MitwirkendeR ctb Fleurbaey, Marc MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en Volltext |
spellingShingle | Boarini, Romina Multi-dimensional Living Standards A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences Social Issues/Migration/Health Economics |
title | Multi-dimensional Living Standards A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences |
title_auth | Multi-dimensional Living Standards A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences |
title_exact_search | Multi-dimensional Living Standards A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences |
title_full | Multi-dimensional Living Standards A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences Romina, Boarini ... [et al] |
title_fullStr | Multi-dimensional Living Standards A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences Romina, Boarini ... [et al] |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-dimensional Living Standards A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences Romina, Boarini ... [et al] |
title_short | Multi-dimensional Living Standards |
title_sort | multi dimensional living standards a welfare measure based on preferences |
title_sub | A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences |
topic | Social Issues/Migration/Health Economics |
topic_facet | Social Issues/Migration/Health Economics |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boariniromina multidimensionallivingstandardsawelfaremeasurebasedonpreferences AT murtinfabrice multidimensionallivingstandardsawelfaremeasurebasedonpreferences AT schreyerpaul multidimensionallivingstandardsawelfaremeasurebasedonpreferences AT fleurbaeymarc multidimensionallivingstandardsawelfaremeasurebasedonpreferences |