Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management:
Top-down budgeting emerged in the 1990s as a response to fiscal crisis. Previously, the traditional bottom-up approach to budget formulation had conferred centralised authority for resource allocation on the finance ministry. Then, in an attempt to control the growing fiscal deficits in the 1990s, t...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | |
Format: | Elektronisch Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2006
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Top-down budgeting emerged in the 1990s as a response to fiscal crisis. Previously, the traditional bottom-up approach to budget formulation had conferred centralised authority for resource allocation on the finance ministry. Then, in an attempt to control the growing fiscal deficits in the 1990s, the finance ministry only set the overall expenditure ceiling and subceilings, and delegated detailed resource allocation decisions to line ministries. However, the level of delegation and the method of determining the expenditure ceilings vary across countries. This article describes country experiences with top-down budgeting and makes policy suggestions for its use as a tool for central resource management. The article also explores the relative advantages, disadvantages, and complementarities of the two approaches. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (40 p.) |
DOI: | 10.1787/budget-v6-art4-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061283312 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20231204121051.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210204s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/budget-v6-art4-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061283312 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061283312 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)budget-v6-art4-en | ||
035 | |a (EBP)061283312 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kim, John M... |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management |c John M., Kim and Chung-Keun, Park |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2006 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (40 p.) | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Top-down budgeting emerged in the 1990s as a response to fiscal crisis. Previously, the traditional bottom-up approach to budget formulation had conferred centralised authority for resource allocation on the finance ministry. Then, in an attempt to control the growing fiscal deficits in the 1990s, the finance ministry only set the overall expenditure ceiling and subceilings, and delegated detailed resource allocation decisions to line ministries. However, the level of delegation and the method of determining the expenditure ceilings vary across countries. This article describes country experiences with top-down budgeting and makes policy suggestions for its use as a tool for central resource management. The article also explores the relative advantages, disadvantages, and complementarities of the two approaches. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Governance | |
700 | 1 | |a Park, Chung-Keun |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t OECD Journal on Budgeting |g Vol. 6, no. 1, p. 87-125 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2006 |g number:1 |g pages:87-125 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v6-art4-en |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC-article | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061283312 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816797353140551681 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Kim, John M.. |
author2 | Park, Chung-Keun |
author2_role | ctb |
author2_variant | c k p ckp |
author_facet | Kim, John M.. Park, Chung-Keun |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Kim, John M.. |
author_variant | j m k jm jmk |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC ZDB-13-SOC-article |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061283312 (DE-599)KEP061283312 (FR-PaOEC)budget-v6-art4-en (EBP)061283312 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/budget-v6-art4-en |
format | Electronic Article |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02041caa a22003732 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061283312</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121051.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/budget-v6-art4-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061283312</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061283312</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)budget-v6-art4-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061283312</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, John M...</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management</subfield><subfield code="c">John M., Kim and Chung-Keun, Park</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (40 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Top-down budgeting emerged in the 1990s as a response to fiscal crisis. Previously, the traditional bottom-up approach to budget formulation had conferred centralised authority for resource allocation on the finance ministry. Then, in an attempt to control the growing fiscal deficits in the 1990s, the finance ministry only set the overall expenditure ceiling and subceilings, and delegated detailed resource allocation decisions to line ministries. However, the level of delegation and the method of determining the expenditure ceilings vary across countries. This article describes country experiences with top-down budgeting and makes policy suggestions for its use as a tool for central resource management. The article also explores the relative advantages, disadvantages, and complementarities of the two approaches.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Park, Chung-Keun</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">OECD Journal on Budgeting</subfield><subfield code="g">Vol. 6, no. 1, p. 87-125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:87-125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v6-art4-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC-article</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-061283312 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:56:13Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (40 p.) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC ZDB-13-SOC-article |
publishDate | 2006 |
publishDateSearch | 2006 |
publishDateSort | 2006 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Kim, John M... VerfasserIn aut Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management John M., Kim and Chung-Keun, Park Paris OECD Publishing 2006 1 Online-Ressource (40 p.) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Top-down budgeting emerged in the 1990s as a response to fiscal crisis. Previously, the traditional bottom-up approach to budget formulation had conferred centralised authority for resource allocation on the finance ministry. Then, in an attempt to control the growing fiscal deficits in the 1990s, the finance ministry only set the overall expenditure ceiling and subceilings, and delegated detailed resource allocation decisions to line ministries. However, the level of delegation and the method of determining the expenditure ceilings vary across countries. This article describes country experiences with top-down budgeting and makes policy suggestions for its use as a tool for central resource management. The article also explores the relative advantages, disadvantages, and complementarities of the two approaches. Governance Park, Chung-Keun MitwirkendeR ctb Enthalten in OECD Journal on Budgeting Vol. 6, no. 1, p. 87-125 volume:6 year:2006 number:1 pages:87-125 FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v6-art4-en Volltext |
spellingShingle | Kim, John M.. Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management Governance |
title | Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management |
title_auth | Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management |
title_exact_search | Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management |
title_full | Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management John M., Kim and Chung-Keun, Park |
title_fullStr | Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management John M., Kim and Chung-Keun, Park |
title_full_unstemmed | Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management John M., Kim and Chung-Keun, Park |
title_short | Top-down Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management |
title_sort | top down budgeting as a tool for central resource management |
topic | Governance |
topic_facet | Governance |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v6-art4-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjohnm topdownbudgetingasatoolforcentralresourcemanagement AT parkchungkeun topdownbudgetingasatoolforcentralresourcemanagement |