Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies:
In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of i...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2012
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Environment Working Papers
no.38 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of interventions are being realised and to help improve the design of future interventions. This paper is the first empirical assessment of M&E frameworks used by development co-operation agencies for projects and programmes with adaptation-specific or adaptation-related components. It has analysed 106 project documents across six bilateral development agencies. Based on this, it identifies the characteristics of M&E for adaptation and shares lessons learned on the choice and use of indicators for adaptation. This analysis has found that Result Based Management, the Logical Framework Approach and the accompanying logframe are the most common M&E approaches used for adaptation. In applying these approaches, the long-term perspective of most adaptation initiatives means that it is particularly important to clearly differentiate between outcomes, outputs and activities. In addition, M&E frameworks for adaptation should combine qualitative, quantitative and binary indicators. The baselines for these indicators should include the effects of future climate change, particularly for projects with long-term implications, such as investments in infrastructure. Significant challenges remain in relation to dealing with shifting baselines, attribution and time lags between interventions and outcomes. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (49 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061282359 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204121421.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)061282359 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061282359 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)5kg20mj6c2bw-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)061282359 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a O22 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a H43 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a Q54 |2 jelc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lamhauge, Nicolina |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |c Nicolina, Lamhauge, Elisa, Lanzi and Shardul, Agrawala |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (49 p.) |c 21 x 29.7cm. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Environment Working Papers |v no.38 | |
| 520 | |a In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of interventions are being realised and to help improve the design of future interventions. This paper is the first empirical assessment of M&E frameworks used by development co-operation agencies for projects and programmes with adaptation-specific or adaptation-related components. It has analysed 106 project documents across six bilateral development agencies. Based on this, it identifies the characteristics of M&E for adaptation and shares lessons learned on the choice and use of indicators for adaptation. This analysis has found that Result Based Management, the Logical Framework Approach and the accompanying logframe are the most common M&E approaches used for adaptation. In applying these approaches, the long-term perspective of most adaptation initiatives means that it is particularly important to clearly differentiate between outcomes, outputs and activities. In addition, M&E frameworks for adaptation should combine qualitative, quantitative and binary indicators. The baselines for these indicators should include the effects of future climate change, particularly for projects with long-term implications, such as investments in infrastructure. Significant challenges remain in relation to dealing with shifting baselines, attribution and time lags between interventions and outcomes. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Environment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Development | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lanzi, Elisa |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Agrawala, Shardul |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061282359 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816797338187857920 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Lamhauge, Nicolina |
| author2 | Lanzi, Elisa Agrawala, Shardul |
| author2_role | ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | e l el s a sa |
| author_facet | Lamhauge, Nicolina Lanzi, Elisa Agrawala, Shardul |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lamhauge, Nicolina |
| author_variant | n l nl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061282359 (DE-599)KEP061282359 (FR-PaOEC)5kg20mj6c2bw-en (EBP)061282359 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02913cam a22004092 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061282359</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121421.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061282359</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061282359</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)5kg20mj6c2bw-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061282359</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O22</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H43</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Q54</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lamhauge, Nicolina</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies</subfield><subfield code="c">Nicolina, Lamhauge, Elisa, Lanzi and Shardul, Agrawala</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (49 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Environment Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.38</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of interventions are being realised and to help improve the design of future interventions. This paper is the first empirical assessment of M&E frameworks used by development co-operation agencies for projects and programmes with adaptation-specific or adaptation-related components. It has analysed 106 project documents across six bilateral development agencies. Based on this, it identifies the characteristics of M&E for adaptation and shares lessons learned on the choice and use of indicators for adaptation. This analysis has found that Result Based Management, the Logical Framework Approach and the accompanying logframe are the most common M&E approaches used for adaptation. In applying these approaches, the long-term perspective of most adaptation initiatives means that it is particularly important to clearly differentiate between outcomes, outputs and activities. In addition, M&E frameworks for adaptation should combine qualitative, quantitative and binary indicators. The baselines for these indicators should include the effects of future climate change, particularly for projects with long-term implications, such as investments in infrastructure. Significant challenges remain in relation to dealing with shifting baselines, attribution and time lags between interventions and outcomes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lanzi, Elisa</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Agrawala, Shardul</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-061282359 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:59Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (49 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Environment Working Papers |
| spelling | Lamhauge, Nicolina VerfasserIn aut Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Nicolina, Lamhauge, Elisa, Lanzi and Shardul, Agrawala Paris OECD Publishing 2012 1 Online-Ressource (49 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Environment Working Papers no.38 In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of interventions are being realised and to help improve the design of future interventions. This paper is the first empirical assessment of M&E frameworks used by development co-operation agencies for projects and programmes with adaptation-specific or adaptation-related components. It has analysed 106 project documents across six bilateral development agencies. Based on this, it identifies the characteristics of M&E for adaptation and shares lessons learned on the choice and use of indicators for adaptation. This analysis has found that Result Based Management, the Logical Framework Approach and the accompanying logframe are the most common M&E approaches used for adaptation. In applying these approaches, the long-term perspective of most adaptation initiatives means that it is particularly important to clearly differentiate between outcomes, outputs and activities. In addition, M&E frameworks for adaptation should combine qualitative, quantitative and binary indicators. The baselines for these indicators should include the effects of future climate change, particularly for projects with long-term implications, such as investments in infrastructure. Significant challenges remain in relation to dealing with shifting baselines, attribution and time lags between interventions and outcomes. Environment Development Lanzi, Elisa MitwirkendeR ctb Agrawala, Shardul MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Lamhauge, Nicolina Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Environment Development |
| title | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_auth | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_exact_search | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_full | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Nicolina, Lamhauge, Elisa, Lanzi and Shardul, Agrawala |
| title_fullStr | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Nicolina, Lamhauge, Elisa, Lanzi and Shardul, Agrawala |
| title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Nicolina, Lamhauge, Elisa, Lanzi and Shardul, Agrawala |
| title_short | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_sort | monitoring and evaluation for adaptation lessons from development co operation agencies |
| topic | Environment Development |
| topic_facet | Environment Development |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lamhaugenicolina monitoringandevaluationforadaptationlessonsfromdevelopmentcooperationagencies AT lanzielisa monitoringandevaluationforadaptationlessonsfromdevelopmentcooperationagencies AT agrawalashardul monitoringandevaluationforadaptationlessonsfromdevelopmentcooperationagencies |