Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement: Japan and The United States
In many industries, competition is far from perfect and managerial efficiency (or a fixed cost) varies among firms. However, traditional measurement of technological progress assumes perfect competition and no fixed cost. This paper incorporates these two factors in the technological-progress measur...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2000
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Economics Department Working Papers
no.273 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | In many industries, competition is far from perfect and managerial efficiency (or a fixed cost) varies among firms. However, traditional measurement of technological progress assumes perfect competition and no fixed cost. This paper incorporates these two factors in the technological-progress measurement and investigates the biases caused by their omission. We show that if capital growth exceeds non-capital-input growth and that firms earn a positive pure profit, then traditional measurement underestimates the true technological progress. We apply this methodology to Japanese and US industries, and find that imperfect competition and managerial efficiency are important. However, the magnitude of the bias is not large ... |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (42 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| DOI: | 10.1787/260256735077 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061262765 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204121332.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/260256735077 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)061262765 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061262765 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)260256735077 | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)061262765 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a L16 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a L11 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a O33 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a O30 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a O47 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a O53 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a O51 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a D24 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a D20 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a D43 |2 jelc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nishimura, Kiyohiko G... |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement |b Japan and The United States |c Kiyohiko G., Nishimura and Masato, Shirai |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2000 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (42 p.) |c 21 x 29.7cm. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers |v no.273 | |
| 520 | |a In many industries, competition is far from perfect and managerial efficiency (or a fixed cost) varies among firms. However, traditional measurement of technological progress assumes perfect competition and no fixed cost. This paper incorporates these two factors in the technological-progress measurement and investigates the biases caused by their omission. We show that if capital growth exceeds non-capital-input growth and that firms earn a positive pure profit, then traditional measurement underestimates the true technological progress. We apply this methodology to Japanese and US industries, and find that imperfect competition and managerial efficiency are important. However, the magnitude of the bias is not large ... | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Japan | |
| 650 | 4 | |a United States | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shirai, Masato |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/260256735077 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061262765 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1804748657954652160 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Nishimura, Kiyohiko G.. |
| author2 | Shirai, Masato |
| author2_role | ctb |
| author2_variant | m s ms |
| author_facet | Nishimura, Kiyohiko G.. Shirai, Masato |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Nishimura, Kiyohiko G.. |
| author_variant | k g n kg kgn |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061262765 (DE-599)KEP061262765 (FR-PaOEC)260256735077 (EBP)061262765 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/260256735077 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02199cam a22004932 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061262765</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121332.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/260256735077</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061262765</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061262765</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)260256735077</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061262765</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">L16</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">L11</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O33</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O30</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O47</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O53</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O51</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D24</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D20</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D43</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nishimura, Kiyohiko G...</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement</subfield><subfield code="b">Japan and The United States</subfield><subfield code="c">Kiyohiko G., Nishimura and Masato, Shirai</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (42 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Economics Department Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.273</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In many industries, competition is far from perfect and managerial efficiency (or a fixed cost) varies among firms. However, traditional measurement of technological progress assumes perfect competition and no fixed cost. This paper incorporates these two factors in the technological-progress measurement and investigates the biases caused by their omission. We show that if capital growth exceeds non-capital-input growth and that firms earn a positive pure profit, then traditional measurement underestimates the true technological progress. We apply this methodology to Japanese and US industries, and find that imperfect competition and managerial efficiency are important. However, the magnitude of the bias is not large ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Japan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shirai, Masato</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/260256735077</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-061262765 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-16T15:07:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (42 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2000 |
| publishDateSearch | 2000 |
| publishDateSort | 2000 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Economics Department Working Papers |
| spelling | Nishimura, Kiyohiko G... VerfasserIn aut Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement Japan and The United States Kiyohiko G., Nishimura and Masato, Shirai Paris OECD Publishing 2000 1 Online-Ressource (42 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Economics Department Working Papers no.273 In many industries, competition is far from perfect and managerial efficiency (or a fixed cost) varies among firms. However, traditional measurement of technological progress assumes perfect competition and no fixed cost. This paper incorporates these two factors in the technological-progress measurement and investigates the biases caused by their omission. We show that if capital growth exceeds non-capital-input growth and that firms earn a positive pure profit, then traditional measurement underestimates the true technological progress. We apply this methodology to Japanese and US industries, and find that imperfect competition and managerial efficiency are important. However, the magnitude of the bias is not large ... Economics Japan United States Shirai, Masato MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/260256735077 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Nishimura, Kiyohiko G.. Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement Japan and The United States Economics Japan United States |
| title | Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement Japan and The United States |
| title_auth | Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement Japan and The United States |
| title_exact_search | Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement Japan and The United States |
| title_full | Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement Japan and The United States Kiyohiko G., Nishimura and Masato, Shirai |
| title_fullStr | Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement Japan and The United States Kiyohiko G., Nishimura and Masato, Shirai |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement Japan and The United States Kiyohiko G., Nishimura and Masato, Shirai |
| title_short | Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement |
| title_sort | fixed cost imperfect competition and bias in technology measurement japan and the united states |
| title_sub | Japan and The United States |
| topic | Economics Japan United States |
| topic_facet | Economics Japan United States |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/260256735077 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nishimurakiyohikog fixedcostimperfectcompetitionandbiasintechnologymeasurementjapanandtheunitedstates AT shiraimasato fixedcostimperfectcompetitionandbiasintechnologymeasurementjapanandtheunitedstates |