Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions: Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning
The current focus of transportation policy around disruptive events is to adopt an engineering resilience-oriented approach, which focuses on returning assets to good workable order as soon as possible. This will remain critically important in the future to reduce the scale and severity of disruptiv...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2016
|
Schriftenreihe: | International Transport Forum Discussion Papers
no.2016/09 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | DE-862 DE-863 |
Zusammenfassung: | The current focus of transportation policy around disruptive events is to adopt an engineering resilience-oriented approach, which focuses on returning assets to good workable order as soon as possible. This will remain critically important in the future to reduce the scale and severity of disruptive events which are likely to become more commonplace in many locations due to climate change. It is, however, only one part of ensuring that such events have more limited impacts on society and the economy. A broader consideration of societal resilience and responses outside the transport sector is needed. People travel in order to take part in activities (work, education, caring and so on), and a smarter resilience response requires us to better understand these activity patterns and intervene accordingly. There is significant adaptive capacity within society that could be better harnessed to reduce the impacts of disruptive events. The work also shows that many of our assumptions about the short and long run impacts of disruptive events need re-examining to get a fuller picture of the true economic effects of disruptive events on society and the economy. Without this it will be difficult to make the case for many types of resilience investment. This briefing paper presents evidence collected from new studies of behavioural adaptation during disruptive events and uses this to identify four areas for action to improve how we plan for resilience and how we assess the worth of different types of investment strategy: 1. The development of Smart Resilience Strategies - which are a combination of transport and non-transport responses which work together to minimize the impacts of temporary infrastructure loss; 2. Measures to improve the usefulness, impact and co-ordination of communications with the public and businesses during disruptions, enabling social adaptation and reducing time wasted in unnecessarily perilous and extended journeys; 3. A continued programme of developing the capacity of travellers and businesses to adapt to different events through greater multi-modality and an increase in smart and flexible working practices; and 4. A reassessment of the approach to understanding the economic impacts of disruptive events which extends well beyond the apparent reductions in flows and increases in journey times observed on the networks and captures the societal and economic impacts in a more holistic way. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061251860 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20241028113742.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210204s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/153e234a-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061251860 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061251860 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)153e234a-en | ||
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061251860 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Marsden, Greg |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions |b Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning |c Greg, Marsden ... [et al] |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2016 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a International Transport Forum Discussion Papers |v no.2016/09 | |
520 | |a The current focus of transportation policy around disruptive events is to adopt an engineering resilience-oriented approach, which focuses on returning assets to good workable order as soon as possible. This will remain critically important in the future to reduce the scale and severity of disruptive events which are likely to become more commonplace in many locations due to climate change. It is, however, only one part of ensuring that such events have more limited impacts on society and the economy. A broader consideration of societal resilience and responses outside the transport sector is needed. People travel in order to take part in activities (work, education, caring and so on), and a smarter resilience response requires us to better understand these activity patterns and intervene accordingly. There is significant adaptive capacity within society that could be better harnessed to reduce the impacts of disruptive events. The work also shows that many of our assumptions about the short and long run impacts of disruptive events need re-examining to get a fuller picture of the true economic effects of disruptive events on society and the economy. Without this it will be difficult to make the case for many types of resilience investment. This briefing paper presents evidence collected from new studies of behavioural adaptation during disruptive events and uses this to identify four areas for action to improve how we plan for resilience and how we assess the worth of different types of investment strategy: 1. The development of Smart Resilience Strategies - which are a combination of transport and non-transport responses which work together to minimize the impacts of temporary infrastructure loss; 2. Measures to improve the usefulness, impact and co-ordination of communications with the public and businesses during disruptions, enabling social adaptation and reducing time wasted in unnecessarily perilous and extended journeys; 3. A continued programme of developing the capacity of travellers and businesses to adapt to different events through greater multi-modality and an increase in smart and flexible working practices; and 4. A reassessment of the approach to understanding the economic impacts of disruptive events which extends well beyond the apparent reductions in flows and increases in journey times observed on the networks and captures the societal and economic impacts in a more holistic way. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Transport | |
700 | 1 | |a Anable, Jillian |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Shires, Jeremy |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Docherty, Iain |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
966 | 4 | 0 | |l DE-862 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/153e234a-en |m X:OECD |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
966 | 4 | 0 | |l DE-863 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/153e234a-en |m X:OECD |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC-ebook | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a BO | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-862 | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061251860 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1826942529765900288 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Marsden, Greg |
author2 | Anable, Jillian Shires, Jeremy Docherty, Iain |
author2_role | ctb ctb ctb |
author2_variant | j a ja j s js i d id |
author_facet | Marsden, Greg Anable, Jillian Shires, Jeremy Docherty, Iain |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Marsden, Greg |
author_variant | g m gm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC ZDB-13-SOC-ebook |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061251860 (DE-599)KEP061251860 (FR-PaOEC)153e234a-en |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03765cam a22003852 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061251860</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241028113742.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/153e234a-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061251860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061251860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)153e234a-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061251860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marsden, Greg</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions</subfield><subfield code="b">Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning</subfield><subfield code="c">Greg, Marsden ... [et al]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International Transport Forum Discussion Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.2016/09</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The current focus of transportation policy around disruptive events is to adopt an engineering resilience-oriented approach, which focuses on returning assets to good workable order as soon as possible. This will remain critically important in the future to reduce the scale and severity of disruptive events which are likely to become more commonplace in many locations due to climate change. It is, however, only one part of ensuring that such events have more limited impacts on society and the economy. A broader consideration of societal resilience and responses outside the transport sector is needed. People travel in order to take part in activities (work, education, caring and so on), and a smarter resilience response requires us to better understand these activity patterns and intervene accordingly. There is significant adaptive capacity within society that could be better harnessed to reduce the impacts of disruptive events. The work also shows that many of our assumptions about the short and long run impacts of disruptive events need re-examining to get a fuller picture of the true economic effects of disruptive events on society and the economy. Without this it will be difficult to make the case for many types of resilience investment. This briefing paper presents evidence collected from new studies of behavioural adaptation during disruptive events and uses this to identify four areas for action to improve how we plan for resilience and how we assess the worth of different types of investment strategy: 1. The development of Smart Resilience Strategies - which are a combination of transport and non-transport responses which work together to minimize the impacts of temporary infrastructure loss; 2. Measures to improve the usefulness, impact and co-ordination of communications with the public and businesses during disruptions, enabling social adaptation and reducing time wasted in unnecessarily perilous and extended journeys; 3. A continued programme of developing the capacity of travellers and businesses to adapt to different events through greater multi-modality and an increase in smart and flexible working practices; and 4. A reassessment of the approach to understanding the economic impacts of disruptive events which extends well beyond the apparent reductions in flows and increases in journey times observed on the networks and captures the societal and economic impacts in a more holistic way.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anable, Jillian</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shires, Jeremy</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Docherty, Iain</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">DE-862</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/153e234a-en</subfield><subfield code="m">X:OECD</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/153e234a-en</subfield><subfield code="m">X:OECD</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC-ebook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-061251860 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2025-03-18T14:29:28Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-862 DE-BY-FWS DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-862 DE-BY-FWS DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC ZDB-13-SOC ZDB-13-SOC-ebook |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | International Transport Forum Discussion Papers |
spelling | Marsden, Greg VerfasserIn aut Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning Greg, Marsden ... [et al] Paris OECD Publishing 2016 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier International Transport Forum Discussion Papers no.2016/09 The current focus of transportation policy around disruptive events is to adopt an engineering resilience-oriented approach, which focuses on returning assets to good workable order as soon as possible. This will remain critically important in the future to reduce the scale and severity of disruptive events which are likely to become more commonplace in many locations due to climate change. It is, however, only one part of ensuring that such events have more limited impacts on society and the economy. A broader consideration of societal resilience and responses outside the transport sector is needed. People travel in order to take part in activities (work, education, caring and so on), and a smarter resilience response requires us to better understand these activity patterns and intervene accordingly. There is significant adaptive capacity within society that could be better harnessed to reduce the impacts of disruptive events. The work also shows that many of our assumptions about the short and long run impacts of disruptive events need re-examining to get a fuller picture of the true economic effects of disruptive events on society and the economy. Without this it will be difficult to make the case for many types of resilience investment. This briefing paper presents evidence collected from new studies of behavioural adaptation during disruptive events and uses this to identify four areas for action to improve how we plan for resilience and how we assess the worth of different types of investment strategy: 1. The development of Smart Resilience Strategies - which are a combination of transport and non-transport responses which work together to minimize the impacts of temporary infrastructure loss; 2. Measures to improve the usefulness, impact and co-ordination of communications with the public and businesses during disruptions, enabling social adaptation and reducing time wasted in unnecessarily perilous and extended journeys; 3. A continued programme of developing the capacity of travellers and businesses to adapt to different events through greater multi-modality and an increase in smart and flexible working practices; and 4. A reassessment of the approach to understanding the economic impacts of disruptive events which extends well beyond the apparent reductions in flows and increases in journey times observed on the networks and captures the societal and economic impacts in a more holistic way. Transport Anable, Jillian MitwirkendeR ctb Shires, Jeremy MitwirkendeR ctb Docherty, Iain MitwirkendeR ctb |
spellingShingle | Marsden, Greg Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning Transport |
title | Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning |
title_auth | Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning |
title_exact_search | Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning |
title_full | Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning Greg, Marsden ... [et al] |
title_fullStr | Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning Greg, Marsden ... [et al] |
title_full_unstemmed | Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning Greg, Marsden ... [et al] |
title_short | Travel Behaviour Response to Major Transport System Disruptions |
title_sort | travel behaviour response to major transport system disruptions implications for smarter resilience planning |
title_sub | Implications for Smarter Resilience Planning |
topic | Transport |
topic_facet | Transport |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marsdengreg travelbehaviourresponsetomajortransportsystemdisruptionsimplicationsforsmarterresilienceplanning AT anablejillian travelbehaviourresponsetomajortransportsystemdisruptionsimplicationsforsmarterresilienceplanning AT shiresjeremy travelbehaviourresponsetomajortransportsystemdisruptionsimplicationsforsmarterresilienceplanning AT dochertyiain travelbehaviourresponsetomajortransportsystemdisruptionsimplicationsforsmarterresilienceplanning |