Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs?: FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level
That global networks provide positive externalities to participating firms is a well‑documented fact. Less is known about how the performance of non-participating firms, especially those that are small or medium-sized, changes with exposure to an increase in the presence of globally integrated firms...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2020
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Regional Development Working Papers
no.2020/02 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | That global networks provide positive externalities to participating firms is a well‑documented fact. Less is known about how the performance of non-participating firms, especially those that are small or medium-sized, changes with exposure to an increase in the presence of globally integrated firms in their vicinity. With global trade being dominated by large firms, the benefits for SMEs are often indirect, e.g. through input relationships with larger companies or through knowledge spillovers that facilitate the adoption of best practices in firms with access to globally integrated peers. This paper combines industry and regional exposure to global links in form of foreign ownership. It uses firm-level microdata for 13 OECD countries, allowing for local spillovers (or crowding out) within the same industry and across industries. Foreign investment in the firm in the same region is associated with increasing productivity of local firms, especially in form of cross-sector externalities. Horizontal (same sector) externalities are negative, especially if they are coming from foreign firms locating in distanced regions. FDI tends to be associated with employment decline in manufacturing firms, but some growth in small firms. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (50 p.) |
| DOI: | 10.1787/47763241-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061245402 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204120922.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/47763241-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)061245402 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061245402 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)47763241-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)061245402 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a F14 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a F21 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a F23 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a R12 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a D22 |2 jelc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lembcke, Alexander C... |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? |b FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level |c Alexander C., Lembcke and Lenka, Wildnerova |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (50 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Regional Development Working Papers |v no.2020/02 | |
| 520 | |a That global networks provide positive externalities to participating firms is a well‑documented fact. Less is known about how the performance of non-participating firms, especially those that are small or medium-sized, changes with exposure to an increase in the presence of globally integrated firms in their vicinity. With global trade being dominated by large firms, the benefits for SMEs are often indirect, e.g. through input relationships with larger companies or through knowledge spillovers that facilitate the adoption of best practices in firms with access to globally integrated peers. This paper combines industry and regional exposure to global links in form of foreign ownership. It uses firm-level microdata for 13 OECD countries, allowing for local spillovers (or crowding out) within the same industry and across industries. Foreign investment in the firm in the same region is associated with increasing productivity of local firms, especially in form of cross-sector externalities. Horizontal (same sector) externalities are negative, especially if they are coming from foreign firms locating in distanced regions. FDI tends to be associated with employment decline in manufacturing firms, but some growth in small firms. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Urban, Rural and Regional Development | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wildnerova, Lenka |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/47763241-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061245402 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1804748660679901184 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Lembcke, Alexander C.. |
| author2 | Wildnerova, Lenka |
| author2_role | ctb |
| author2_variant | l w lw |
| author_facet | Lembcke, Alexander C.. Wildnerova, Lenka |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lembcke, Alexander C.. |
| author_variant | a c l ac acl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061245402 (DE-599)KEP061245402 (FR-PaOEC)47763241-en (EBP)061245402 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/47763241-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02542cam a22004092 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061245402</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204120922.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/47763241-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061245402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061245402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)47763241-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061245402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F14</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F21</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F23</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">R12</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D22</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lembcke, Alexander C...</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs?</subfield><subfield code="b">FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level</subfield><subfield code="c">Alexander C., Lembcke and Lenka, Wildnerova</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (50 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Regional Development Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.2020/02</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">That global networks provide positive externalities to participating firms is a well‑documented fact. Less is known about how the performance of non-participating firms, especially those that are small or medium-sized, changes with exposure to an increase in the presence of globally integrated firms in their vicinity. With global trade being dominated by large firms, the benefits for SMEs are often indirect, e.g. through input relationships with larger companies or through knowledge spillovers that facilitate the adoption of best practices in firms with access to globally integrated peers. This paper combines industry and regional exposure to global links in form of foreign ownership. It uses firm-level microdata for 13 OECD countries, allowing for local spillovers (or crowding out) within the same industry and across industries. Foreign investment in the firm in the same region is associated with increasing productivity of local firms, especially in form of cross-sector externalities. Horizontal (same sector) externalities are negative, especially if they are coming from foreign firms locating in distanced regions. FDI tends to be associated with employment decline in manufacturing firms, but some growth in small firms.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Urban, Rural and Regional Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wildnerova, Lenka</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/47763241-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-061245402 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-16T15:07:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (50 p.) |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Regional Development Working Papers |
| spelling | Lembcke, Alexander C... VerfasserIn aut Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level Alexander C., Lembcke and Lenka, Wildnerova Paris OECD Publishing 2020 1 Online-Ressource (50 p.) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Regional Development Working Papers no.2020/02 That global networks provide positive externalities to participating firms is a well‑documented fact. Less is known about how the performance of non-participating firms, especially those that are small or medium-sized, changes with exposure to an increase in the presence of globally integrated firms in their vicinity. With global trade being dominated by large firms, the benefits for SMEs are often indirect, e.g. through input relationships with larger companies or through knowledge spillovers that facilitate the adoption of best practices in firms with access to globally integrated peers. This paper combines industry and regional exposure to global links in form of foreign ownership. It uses firm-level microdata for 13 OECD countries, allowing for local spillovers (or crowding out) within the same industry and across industries. Foreign investment in the firm in the same region is associated with increasing productivity of local firms, especially in form of cross-sector externalities. Horizontal (same sector) externalities are negative, especially if they are coming from foreign firms locating in distanced regions. FDI tends to be associated with employment decline in manufacturing firms, but some growth in small firms. Urban, Rural and Regional Development Wildnerova, Lenka MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/47763241-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Lembcke, Alexander C.. Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level Urban, Rural and Regional Development |
| title | Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level |
| title_auth | Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level |
| title_exact_search | Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level |
| title_full | Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level Alexander C., Lembcke and Lenka, Wildnerova |
| title_fullStr | Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level Alexander C., Lembcke and Lenka, Wildnerova |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level Alexander C., Lembcke and Lenka, Wildnerova |
| title_short | Does FDI benefit incumbent SMEs? |
| title_sort | does fdi benefit incumbent smes fdi spillovers and competition effects at the local level |
| title_sub | FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level |
| topic | Urban, Rural and Regional Development |
| topic_facet | Urban, Rural and Regional Development |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/47763241-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lembckealexanderc doesfdibenefitincumbentsmesfdispilloversandcompetitioneffectsatthelocallevel AT wildnerovalenka doesfdibenefitincumbentsmesfdispilloversandcompetitioneffectsatthelocallevel |