Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate:

About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cassese, Erin C. (Author), Ondercin, Heather L. (Author), Randall, Jordan (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:DE-12
DE-473
Volltext
Summary:About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous scholarship argues intense minorities can secure favorable policy outcomes when facing off against a more diffuse and less motivated majority, creating incongruence between public opinion and policy. This Element focuses on the ways that preference intensity and partisan polarization have contributed to the current policy landscape surrounding abortion rights. Using survey data from the American National Election Studies, the authors identify Americans with intense preferences about abortion and investigate the role they play in electoral politics. They observe a shift in the relationship between partisanship and preference intensity coinciding with Dobbs and speculate about what this means for elections and policy congruence in the future
Item Description:Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 10 Jan 2025)
Physical Description:1 Online-Ressource (100 Seiten)
ISBN:9781009533119
DOI:10.1017/9781009533119

There is no print copy available.

Interlibrary loan Place Request Caution: Not in THWS collection! Get full text