Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate:
About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2025
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-473 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous scholarship argues intense minorities can secure favorable policy outcomes when facing off against a more diffuse and less motivated majority, creating incongruence between public opinion and policy. This Element focuses on the ways that preference intensity and partisan polarization have contributed to the current policy landscape surrounding abortion rights. Using survey data from the American National Election Studies, the authors identify Americans with intense preferences about abortion and investigate the role they play in electoral politics. They observe a shift in the relationship between partisanship and preference intensity coinciding with Dobbs and speculate about what this means for elections and policy congruence in the future |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 10 Jan 2025) |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (100 Seiten) |
ISBN: | 9781009533119 |
DOI: | 10.1017/9781009533119 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV050208251 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 250318s2025 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781009533119 |9 978-1-009-53311-9 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009533119 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1510755402 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV050208251 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 363.460973 | |
100 | 1 | |a Cassese, Erin C. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate |c Erin C. Cassese, Heather L. Ondercin, Jordan Randall |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2025 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (100 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 10 Jan 2025) | ||
520 | |a About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous scholarship argues intense minorities can secure favorable policy outcomes when facing off against a more diffuse and less motivated majority, creating incongruence between public opinion and policy. This Element focuses on the ways that preference intensity and partisan polarization have contributed to the current policy landscape surrounding abortion rights. Using survey data from the American National Election Studies, the authors identify Americans with intense preferences about abortion and investigate the role they play in electoral politics. They observe a shift in the relationship between partisanship and preference intensity coinciding with Dobbs and speculate about what this means for elections and policy congruence in the future | ||
650 | 4 | |a Abortion / United States / Public opinion | |
650 | 4 | |a Abortion / Political aspects / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Polarization (Social sciences) / United States | |
700 | 1 | |a Ondercin, Heather L. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Randall, Jordan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9781009533133 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9781009533157 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533119?locatt=mode:legacy |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035543459 | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533119?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533119?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1828134445270433792 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Cassese, Erin C. Ondercin, Heather L. Randall, Jordan |
author_facet | Cassese, Erin C. Ondercin, Heather L. Randall, Jordan |
author_role | aut aut aut |
author_sort | Cassese, Erin C. |
author_variant | e c c ec ecc h l o hl hlo j r jr |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV050208251 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009533119 (OCoLC)1510755402 (DE-599)BVBBV050208251 |
dewey-full | 363.460973 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 363 - Other social problems and services |
dewey-raw | 363.460973 |
dewey-search | 363.460973 |
dewey-sort | 3363.460973 |
dewey-tens | 360 - Social problems and services; associations |
discipline | Soziologie |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781009533119 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV050208251</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">250318s2025 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009533119</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-009-53311-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009533119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1510755402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV050208251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">363.460973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cassese, Erin C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate</subfield><subfield code="c">Erin C. Cassese, Heather L. Ondercin, Jordan Randall</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (100 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 10 Jan 2025)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous scholarship argues intense minorities can secure favorable policy outcomes when facing off against a more diffuse and less motivated majority, creating incongruence between public opinion and policy. This Element focuses on the ways that preference intensity and partisan polarization have contributed to the current policy landscape surrounding abortion rights. Using survey data from the American National Election Studies, the authors identify Americans with intense preferences about abortion and investigate the role they play in electoral politics. They observe a shift in the relationship between partisanship and preference intensity coinciding with Dobbs and speculate about what this means for elections and policy congruence in the future</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abortion / United States / Public opinion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abortion / Political aspects / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Polarization (Social sciences) / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ondercin, Heather L.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Randall, Jordan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9781009533133</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9781009533157</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533119?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035543459</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533119?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533119?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV050208251 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2025-03-31T18:14:27Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781009533119 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035543459 |
oclc_num | 1510755402 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (100 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 2025 |
publishDateSearch | 2025 |
publishDateSort | 2025 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Cassese, Erin C. Verfasser aut Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate Erin C. Cassese, Heather L. Ondercin, Jordan Randall Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2025 1 Online-Ressource (100 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 10 Jan 2025) About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous scholarship argues intense minorities can secure favorable policy outcomes when facing off against a more diffuse and less motivated majority, creating incongruence between public opinion and policy. This Element focuses on the ways that preference intensity and partisan polarization have contributed to the current policy landscape surrounding abortion rights. Using survey data from the American National Election Studies, the authors identify Americans with intense preferences about abortion and investigate the role they play in electoral politics. They observe a shift in the relationship between partisanship and preference intensity coinciding with Dobbs and speculate about what this means for elections and policy congruence in the future Abortion / United States / Public opinion Abortion / Political aspects / United States Polarization (Social sciences) / United States Ondercin, Heather L. Verfasser aut Randall, Jordan Verfasser aut Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9781009533133 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9781009533157 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533119?locatt=mode:legacy Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Cassese, Erin C. Ondercin, Heather L. Randall, Jordan Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate Abortion / United States / Public opinion Abortion / Political aspects / United States Polarization (Social sciences) / United States |
title | Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate |
title_auth | Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate |
title_exact_search | Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate |
title_full | Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate Erin C. Cassese, Heather L. Ondercin, Jordan Randall |
title_fullStr | Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate Erin C. Cassese, Heather L. Ondercin, Jordan Randall |
title_full_unstemmed | Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate Erin C. Cassese, Heather L. Ondercin, Jordan Randall |
title_short | Abortion attitudes and polarization in the American electorate |
title_sort | abortion attitudes and polarization in the american electorate |
topic | Abortion / United States / Public opinion Abortion / Political aspects / United States Polarization (Social sciences) / United States |
topic_facet | Abortion / United States / Public opinion Abortion / Political aspects / United States Polarization (Social sciences) / United States |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533119?locatt=mode:legacy |
work_keys_str_mv | AT casseseerinc abortionattitudesandpolarizationintheamericanelectorate AT ondercinheatherl abortionattitudesandpolarizationintheamericanelectorate AT randalljordan abortionattitudesandpolarizationintheamericanelectorate |