Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness:
There is a tendency, in contemporary epistemology, to treat 'perceptual knowledge' and 'self-knowledge' as labels for different and largely unconnected sets of philosophical problems. The project of this volume is to bring out how much is to be gained from treating the two topics...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2024
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | There is a tendency, in contemporary epistemology, to treat 'perceptual knowledge' and 'self-knowledge' as labels for different and largely unconnected sets of philosophical problems. The project of this volume is to bring out how much is to be gained from treating the two topics as, on the contrary, intimately connected. One set of questions that comes into view when we do concerns the sense in which perceptual knowledge, as understood from the first-person perspective, seem to be 'direct'. In a famous passage, Austin contrasted reliance on what we call 'evidence' with the way perceptual experience 'settles' questions. How should we understand the difference? In what sense is perceptual knowledge 'direct', in contradistinction to evidence-based, inferential knowledge? A connected set of issues has to do with the relationship between the epistemic authority of perception and self-consciousness. Is the way perceptual experience 'settles' questions inherently manifest to the perceiver? Is a perceiver's awareness of (e.g.) seeing that p to be explained by reference to the very capacities at work in seeing that p? Or does it reflect the operation of some kind of second-order perceptual capacity? Consideration of these matters, in turn, prompts questions about the nature of the first-person perspective. 'I can see that p' is a first-person self-ascription. But does it express the distinctively immediate kind of knowledge commonly labelled first-person self-knowledge? How would an affirmative answer to this question bear on a philosophical understanding of the 'first-person perspective'? These are rough indications of some of the ways in which reflection on the relationship between perceptual knowledge and self-awareness promises to shed valuable light on both topics |
Beschreibung: | 272 Seiten 562 gr |
ISBN: | 9780192869074 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV050176812 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 250219s2024 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780192869074 |9 978-0-19-286907-4 | ||
024 | 3 | |a 9780192869074 | |
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV050176812 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Giananti, Andrea |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c 2024 | |
300 | |a 272 Seiten |c 562 gr | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a There is a tendency, in contemporary epistemology, to treat 'perceptual knowledge' and 'self-knowledge' as labels for different and largely unconnected sets of philosophical problems. The project of this volume is to bring out how much is to be gained from treating the two topics as, on the contrary, intimately connected. One set of questions that comes into view when we do concerns the sense in which perceptual knowledge, as understood from the first-person perspective, seem to be 'direct'. In a famous passage, Austin contrasted reliance on what we call 'evidence' with the way perceptual experience 'settles' questions. How should we understand the difference? In what sense is perceptual knowledge 'direct', in contradistinction to evidence-based, inferential knowledge? A connected set of issues has to do with the relationship between the epistemic authority of perception and self-consciousness. Is the way perceptual experience 'settles' questions inherently manifest to the perceiver? Is a perceiver's awareness of (e.g.) seeing that p to be explained by reference to the very capacities at work in seeing that p? Or does it reflect the operation of some kind of second-order perceptual capacity? Consideration of these matters, in turn, prompts questions about the nature of the first-person perspective. 'I can see that p' is a first-person self-ascription. But does it express the distinctively immediate kind of knowledge commonly labelled first-person self-knowledge? How would an affirmative answer to this question bear on a philosophical understanding of the 'first-person perspective'? These are rough indications of some of the ways in which reflection on the relationship between perceptual knowledge and self-awareness promises to shed valuable light on both topics | ||
650 | 4 | |a bicssc / Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge | |
650 | 4 | |a bicssc / Philosophy of mind | |
650 | 4 | |a bicssc / Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology | |
700 | 1 | |a Roessler, Johannes |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Soldati, Gianfranco |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035512642 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1824528556182470657 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Giananti, Andrea |
author_facet | Giananti, Andrea |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Giananti, Andrea |
author_variant | a g ag |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV050176812 |
ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV050176812 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV050176812</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">250219s2024 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780192869074</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-286907-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780192869074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV050176812</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giananti, Andrea</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">272 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">562 gr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is a tendency, in contemporary epistemology, to treat 'perceptual knowledge' and 'self-knowledge' as labels for different and largely unconnected sets of philosophical problems. The project of this volume is to bring out how much is to be gained from treating the two topics as, on the contrary, intimately connected. One set of questions that comes into view when we do concerns the sense in which perceptual knowledge, as understood from the first-person perspective, seem to be 'direct'. In a famous passage, Austin contrasted reliance on what we call 'evidence' with the way perceptual experience 'settles' questions. How should we understand the difference? In what sense is perceptual knowledge 'direct', in contradistinction to evidence-based, inferential knowledge? A connected set of issues has to do with the relationship between the epistemic authority of perception and self-consciousness. Is the way perceptual experience 'settles' questions inherently manifest to the perceiver? Is a perceiver's awareness of (e.g.) seeing that p to be explained by reference to the very capacities at work in seeing that p? Or does it reflect the operation of some kind of second-order perceptual capacity? Consideration of these matters, in turn, prompts questions about the nature of the first-person perspective. 'I can see that p' is a first-person self-ascription. But does it express the distinctively immediate kind of knowledge commonly labelled first-person self-knowledge? How would an affirmative answer to this question bear on a philosophical understanding of the 'first-person perspective'? These are rough indications of some of the ways in which reflection on the relationship between perceptual knowledge and self-awareness promises to shed valuable light on both topics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc / Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc / Philosophy of mind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc / Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roessler, Johannes</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soldati, Gianfranco</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035512642</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV050176812 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2025-02-19T23:00:23Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780192869074 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035512642 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 272 Seiten 562 gr |
publishDate | 2024 |
publishDateSearch | 2024 |
publishDateSort | 2024 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Giananti, Andrea Verfasser aut Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness Oxford Oxford University Press 2024 272 Seiten 562 gr txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier There is a tendency, in contemporary epistemology, to treat 'perceptual knowledge' and 'self-knowledge' as labels for different and largely unconnected sets of philosophical problems. The project of this volume is to bring out how much is to be gained from treating the two topics as, on the contrary, intimately connected. One set of questions that comes into view when we do concerns the sense in which perceptual knowledge, as understood from the first-person perspective, seem to be 'direct'. In a famous passage, Austin contrasted reliance on what we call 'evidence' with the way perceptual experience 'settles' questions. How should we understand the difference? In what sense is perceptual knowledge 'direct', in contradistinction to evidence-based, inferential knowledge? A connected set of issues has to do with the relationship between the epistemic authority of perception and self-consciousness. Is the way perceptual experience 'settles' questions inherently manifest to the perceiver? Is a perceiver's awareness of (e.g.) seeing that p to be explained by reference to the very capacities at work in seeing that p? Or does it reflect the operation of some kind of second-order perceptual capacity? Consideration of these matters, in turn, prompts questions about the nature of the first-person perspective. 'I can see that p' is a first-person self-ascription. But does it express the distinctively immediate kind of knowledge commonly labelled first-person self-knowledge? How would an affirmative answer to this question bear on a philosophical understanding of the 'first-person perspective'? These are rough indications of some of the ways in which reflection on the relationship between perceptual knowledge and self-awareness promises to shed valuable light on both topics bicssc / Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge bicssc / Philosophy of mind bicssc / Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology Roessler, Johannes Sonstige oth Soldati, Gianfranco Sonstige oth |
spellingShingle | Giananti, Andrea Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness bicssc / Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge bicssc / Philosophy of mind bicssc / Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology |
title | Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness |
title_auth | Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness |
title_exact_search | Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness |
title_full | Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness |
title_fullStr | Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness |
title_short | Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness |
title_sort | perceptual knowledge and self awareness |
topic | bicssc / Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge bicssc / Philosophy of mind bicssc / Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology |
topic_facet | bicssc / Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge bicssc / Philosophy of mind bicssc / Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gianantiandrea perceptualknowledgeandselfawareness AT roesslerjohannes perceptualknowledgeandselfawareness AT soldatigianfranco perceptualknowledgeandselfawareness |