Rancière's counter-sociology: politics, history, education
Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of Pierre Bourdieu—it characterises his thinking about politics, emancipation, democracy, history, a...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cham, Switzerland
Palgrave Macmillan
[2024]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of Pierre Bourdieu—it characterises his thinking about politics, emancipation, democracy, history, aesthetics, and social class; it extends into a rejection of Marxist or marxisant modes of analysis. For Rancière’s harshest critics, this hostility to sociology reflects an interpretative negligence on his part, an intellectual, political, or moral flaw. Even his more favorable commentators typically upbraid him for failing to specify the historical conditions of possibility of democratic emancipation. This book argues that such reactions are fundamentally mistaken and fail to grasp what is at stake in Rancière’s rejection of sociological modes of enquiry. This rejection is attributable neither to his negligence nor to some moral flaw, and nor is it merely incidental to his thought. On the contrary, Rancière understands sociology to constitute a problematic, a set of assumptions and interpretative procedures whose blind spots must be identified and thought through in order that the possibility of intellectual and political emancipation, of democracy, and of history can be thought at all. Rancière’s thought thus represents a counter-sociology and his rejection of the sociological problematic serves as the positive condition of possibility of his theory of democracy, equality, and emancipation. This new study both clarifies the nature of Rancière’s critique of the sociological problematic and shows what his counter-sociology allows him to think in the domains of politics, history, and education. Jeremy F. Lane is Professor of French & Critical Theory in the Department of Modern Languages & Cultures at the University of Nottingham, UK. |
Beschreibung: | ix, 261 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9783031598791 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a22000001c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV050120226 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 250114s2024 sz |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9783031598791 |c Festeinband |9 978-3-031-59879-1 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV050120226 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a sz |c XA-CH | ||
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 190 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Lane, Jeremy F. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1061018016 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rancière's counter-sociology |b politics, history, education |c Jeremy F. Lane |
264 | 1 | |a Cham, Switzerland |b Palgrave Macmillan |c [2024] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2024 | |
300 | |a ix, 261 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of Pierre Bourdieu—it characterises his thinking about politics, emancipation, democracy, history, aesthetics, and social class; it extends into a rejection of Marxist or marxisant modes of analysis. For Rancière’s harshest critics, this hostility to sociology reflects an interpretative negligence on his part, an intellectual, political, or moral flaw. Even his more favorable commentators typically upbraid him for failing to specify the historical conditions of possibility of democratic emancipation. This book argues that such reactions are fundamentally mistaken and fail to grasp what is at stake in Rancière’s rejection of sociological modes of enquiry. This rejection is attributable neither to his negligence nor to some moral flaw, and nor is it merely incidental to his thought. On the contrary, Rancière understands sociology to constitute a problematic, a set of assumptions and interpretative procedures whose blind spots must be identified and thought through in order that the possibility of intellectual and political emancipation, of democracy, and of history can be thought at all. Rancière’s thought thus represents a counter-sociology and his rejection of the sociological problematic serves as the positive condition of possibility of his theory of democracy, equality, and emancipation. This new study both clarifies the nature of Rancière’s critique of the sociological problematic and shows what his counter-sociology allows him to think in the domains of politics, history, and education. Jeremy F. Lane is Professor of French & Critical Theory in the Department of Modern Languages & Cultures at the University of Nottingham, UK. | |
653 | 0 | |a Continental Philosophy. | |
653 | 0 | |a Political science | |
653 | 0 | |a Critical theory. | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-3-031-59880-7 |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035457080 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1821206694094438400 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Lane, Jeremy F. |
author_GND | (DE-588)1061018016 |
author_facet | Lane, Jeremy F. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Lane, Jeremy F. |
author_variant | j f l jf jfl |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV050120226 |
ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV050120226 |
dewey-full | 190 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 190 - Modern western philosophy |
dewey-raw | 190 |
dewey-search | 190 |
dewey-sort | 3190 |
dewey-tens | 190 - Modern western philosophy |
discipline | Philosophie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a22000001c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV050120226</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">250114s2024 sz |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783031598791</subfield><subfield code="c">Festeinband</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-031-59879-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV050120226</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">sz</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-CH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">190</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lane, Jeremy F.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1061018016</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rancière's counter-sociology</subfield><subfield code="b">politics, history, education</subfield><subfield code="c">Jeremy F. Lane</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham, Switzerland</subfield><subfield code="b">Palgrave Macmillan</subfield><subfield code="c">[2024]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ix, 261 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of Pierre Bourdieu—it characterises his thinking about politics, emancipation, democracy, history, aesthetics, and social class; it extends into a rejection of Marxist or marxisant modes of analysis. For Rancière’s harshest critics, this hostility to sociology reflects an interpretative negligence on his part, an intellectual, political, or moral flaw. Even his more favorable commentators typically upbraid him for failing to specify the historical conditions of possibility of democratic emancipation. This book argues that such reactions are fundamentally mistaken and fail to grasp what is at stake in Rancière’s rejection of sociological modes of enquiry. This rejection is attributable neither to his negligence nor to some moral flaw, and nor is it merely incidental to his thought. On the contrary, Rancière understands sociology to constitute a problematic, a set of assumptions and interpretative procedures whose blind spots must be identified and thought through in order that the possibility of intellectual and political emancipation, of democracy, and of history can be thought at all. Rancière’s thought thus represents a counter-sociology and his rejection of the sociological problematic serves as the positive condition of possibility of his theory of democracy, equality, and emancipation. This new study both clarifies the nature of Rancière’s critique of the sociological problematic and shows what his counter-sociology allows him to think in the domains of politics, history, and education. Jeremy F. Lane is Professor of French & Critical Theory in the Department of Modern Languages & Cultures at the University of Nottingham, UK.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Continental Philosophy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Critical theory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-031-59880-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035457080</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV050120226 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2025-01-14T07:00:48Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9783031598791 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035457080 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | ix, 261 Seiten |
publishDate | 2024 |
publishDateSearch | 2024 |
publishDateSort | 2024 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Lane, Jeremy F. Verfasser (DE-588)1061018016 aut Rancière's counter-sociology politics, history, education Jeremy F. Lane Cham, Switzerland Palgrave Macmillan [2024] © 2024 ix, 261 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of Pierre Bourdieu—it characterises his thinking about politics, emancipation, democracy, history, aesthetics, and social class; it extends into a rejection of Marxist or marxisant modes of analysis. For Rancière’s harshest critics, this hostility to sociology reflects an interpretative negligence on his part, an intellectual, political, or moral flaw. Even his more favorable commentators typically upbraid him for failing to specify the historical conditions of possibility of democratic emancipation. This book argues that such reactions are fundamentally mistaken and fail to grasp what is at stake in Rancière’s rejection of sociological modes of enquiry. This rejection is attributable neither to his negligence nor to some moral flaw, and nor is it merely incidental to his thought. On the contrary, Rancière understands sociology to constitute a problematic, a set of assumptions and interpretative procedures whose blind spots must be identified and thought through in order that the possibility of intellectual and political emancipation, of democracy, and of history can be thought at all. Rancière’s thought thus represents a counter-sociology and his rejection of the sociological problematic serves as the positive condition of possibility of his theory of democracy, equality, and emancipation. This new study both clarifies the nature of Rancière’s critique of the sociological problematic and shows what his counter-sociology allows him to think in the domains of politics, history, and education. Jeremy F. Lane is Professor of French & Critical Theory in the Department of Modern Languages & Cultures at the University of Nottingham, UK. Continental Philosophy. Political science Critical theory. Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-3-031-59880-7 |
spellingShingle | Lane, Jeremy F. Rancière's counter-sociology politics, history, education |
title | Rancière's counter-sociology politics, history, education |
title_auth | Rancière's counter-sociology politics, history, education |
title_exact_search | Rancière's counter-sociology politics, history, education |
title_full | Rancière's counter-sociology politics, history, education Jeremy F. Lane |
title_fullStr | Rancière's counter-sociology politics, history, education Jeremy F. Lane |
title_full_unstemmed | Rancière's counter-sociology politics, history, education Jeremy F. Lane |
title_short | Rancière's counter-sociology |
title_sort | ranciere s counter sociology politics history education |
title_sub | politics, history, education |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanejeremyf rancierescountersociologypoliticshistoryeducation |