Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts: how senescence influences the law and judges
"Cognitive aging effects all people. Judges are people. Therefore, cognitive aging must effect judges. Today's federal circuit court judges are older than ever. Yet, scholars know next-to-nothing about the consequences of cognitive aging on these judges. The central effort of this book is...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Oxford University Press
[2024]
|
Ausgabe: | First edition |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | "Cognitive aging effects all people. Judges are people. Therefore, cognitive aging must effect judges. Today's federal circuit court judges are older than ever. Yet, scholars know next-to-nothing about the consequences of cognitive aging on these judges. The central effort of this book is to examine the effects of cognitive aging on federal circuit court judges. The authors undertake a rigorous empirical approach, focusing on a variety of judicial behaviors, including opinion writing, bargaining, voting, and more. The book uncovers a number of sobering trends. Judges require more time to craft their opinions as they age. They tend to rely more on cognitive shortcuts when they bargain over opinion content. Their written opinions become less cognitively complex as they age. Aging judges increasingly rely on their law clerks to write their opinions and borrow more language from party briefs. Their judicial colleagues are less likely to cite older judges' opinions. Aging judges apply Supreme Court precedent an increasingly ideological manner. And, their legal influence on panels wanes while susceptibility to persuasion increases. Cognitive aging appears to influence nearly everything federal circuit court judges do. These findings speak to a broader policy debate about judicial tenure. The authors test public support for a handful of reforms and find surprisingly high support for them. There is no utopian or perfect cure for the problems associated with cognitively aging judges. But incremental changes that remain loyal to judicial independence might alleviate some of the most pernicious consequences"-- |
Beschreibung: | x, 254 Seiten Illustrationen, Karte 25 cm |
ISBN: | 9780197747025 0197747027 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV050100184 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 241217s2024 xx a||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780197747025 |9 9780197747025 | ||
020 | |a 0197747027 |9 0197747027 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV050100184 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-188 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 347.73/24019 | |
100 | 1 | |a Black, Ryan C. |d 1982- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts |b how senescence influences the law and judges |c Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University ; Ryan J. Owens, Florida State University ; Patrick C. Wohlfarth, University of Maryland, College Park |
250 | |a First edition | ||
264 | 1 | |a New York |b Oxford University Press |c [2024] | |
300 | |a x, 254 Seiten |b Illustrationen, Karte |c 25 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
505 | 8 | |a The neuroscience behind cognitive aging -- How cognitive aging applies to judges -- Opinion crafting and cognitive aging -- Opinion style -- Cognitive aging, law clerks, and party briefs -- Aging, opinion quality, and the diffusion of precedent -- Cognitive aging and following Supreme Court precedent -- Cognitive aging and panel composition -- Public attitudes toward aged judges -- Public support for judicial reforms | |
520 | 3 | |a "Cognitive aging effects all people. Judges are people. Therefore, cognitive aging must effect judges. Today's federal circuit court judges are older than ever. Yet, scholars know next-to-nothing about the consequences of cognitive aging on these judges. The central effort of this book is to examine the effects of cognitive aging on federal circuit court judges. The authors undertake a rigorous empirical approach, focusing on a variety of judicial behaviors, including opinion writing, bargaining, voting, and more. The book uncovers a number of sobering trends. Judges require more time to craft their opinions as they age. They tend to rely more on cognitive shortcuts when they bargain over opinion content. Their written opinions become less cognitively complex as they age. Aging judges increasingly rely on their law clerks to write their opinions and borrow more language from party briefs. Their judicial colleagues are less likely to cite older judges' opinions. Aging judges apply Supreme Court precedent an increasingly ideological manner. And, their legal influence on panels wanes while susceptibility to persuasion increases. Cognitive aging appears to influence nearly everything federal circuit court judges do. These findings speak to a broader policy debate about judicial tenure. The authors test public support for a handful of reforms and find surprisingly high support for them. There is no utopian or perfect cure for the problems associated with cognitively aging judges. But incremental changes that remain loyal to judicial independence might alleviate some of the most pernicious consequences"-- | |
653 | 0 | |a Judicial process / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Circuit courts / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Appellate courts / United States | |
653 | 2 | |a United States / Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit) | |
653 | 0 | |a Clerks of court / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Neurosciences / Law and legislation / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Cognition / Age factors | |
653 | 0 | |a Aging / Physiological aspects | |
653 | 0 | |a Processus judiciaire / États-Unis | |
653 | 0 | |a Cours de circuit / États-Unis | |
653 | 0 | |a Greffiers / États-Unis | |
653 | 0 | |a Cognition / Facteurs liés à l'âge | |
653 | 0 | |a Vieillissement / Aspect physiologique | |
653 | 0 | |a Cours d'appel / États-Unis | |
700 | 1 | |a Owens, Ryan J. |d 1976- |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wohlfarth, Patrick C. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |t Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts |b First edition |d New York : Oxford University Press, 2024 |z 9780197747032 |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035437345 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818708044926681088 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Black, Ryan C. 1982- |
author_facet | Black, Ryan C. 1982- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Black, Ryan C. 1982- |
author_variant | r c b rc rcb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV050100184 |
contents | The neuroscience behind cognitive aging -- How cognitive aging applies to judges -- Opinion crafting and cognitive aging -- Opinion style -- Cognitive aging, law clerks, and party briefs -- Aging, opinion quality, and the diffusion of precedent -- Cognitive aging and following Supreme Court precedent -- Cognitive aging and panel composition -- Public attitudes toward aged judges -- Public support for judicial reforms |
ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV050100184 |
dewey-full | 347.73/24019 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.73/24019 |
dewey-search | 347.73/24019 |
dewey-sort | 3347.73 524019 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
edition | First edition |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV050100184</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">241217s2024 xx a||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780197747025</subfield><subfield code="9">9780197747025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0197747027</subfield><subfield code="9">0197747027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV050100184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/24019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Black, Ryan C.</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts</subfield><subfield code="b">how senescence influences the law and judges</subfield><subfield code="c">Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University ; Ryan J. Owens, Florida State University ; Patrick C. Wohlfarth, University of Maryland, College Park</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2024]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">x, 254 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Karte</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The neuroscience behind cognitive aging -- How cognitive aging applies to judges -- Opinion crafting and cognitive aging -- Opinion style -- Cognitive aging, law clerks, and party briefs -- Aging, opinion quality, and the diffusion of precedent -- Cognitive aging and following Supreme Court precedent -- Cognitive aging and panel composition -- Public attitudes toward aged judges -- Public support for judicial reforms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Cognitive aging effects all people. Judges are people. Therefore, cognitive aging must effect judges. Today's federal circuit court judges are older than ever. Yet, scholars know next-to-nothing about the consequences of cognitive aging on these judges. The central effort of this book is to examine the effects of cognitive aging on federal circuit court judges. The authors undertake a rigorous empirical approach, focusing on a variety of judicial behaviors, including opinion writing, bargaining, voting, and more. The book uncovers a number of sobering trends. Judges require more time to craft their opinions as they age. They tend to rely more on cognitive shortcuts when they bargain over opinion content. Their written opinions become less cognitively complex as they age. Aging judges increasingly rely on their law clerks to write their opinions and borrow more language from party briefs. Their judicial colleagues are less likely to cite older judges' opinions. Aging judges apply Supreme Court precedent an increasingly ideological manner. And, their legal influence on panels wanes while susceptibility to persuasion increases. Cognitive aging appears to influence nearly everything federal circuit court judges do. These findings speak to a broader policy debate about judicial tenure. The authors test public support for a handful of reforms and find surprisingly high support for them. There is no utopian or perfect cure for the problems associated with cognitively aging judges. But incremental changes that remain loyal to judicial independence might alleviate some of the most pernicious consequences"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial process / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Circuit courts / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Appellate courts / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clerks of court / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurosciences / Law and legislation / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cognition / Age factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aging / Physiological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Processus judiciaire / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cours de circuit / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Greffiers / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cognition / Facteurs liés à l'âge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Vieillissement / Aspect physiologique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cours d'appel / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Owens, Ryan J.</subfield><subfield code="d">1976-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wohlfarth, Patrick C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="t">Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts</subfield><subfield code="b">First edition</subfield><subfield code="d">New York : Oxford University Press, 2024</subfield><subfield code="z">9780197747032</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035437345</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV050100184 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-12-17T17:05:51Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780197747025 0197747027 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035437345 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-188 |
physical | x, 254 Seiten Illustrationen, Karte 25 cm |
publishDate | 2024 |
publishDateSearch | 2024 |
publishDateSort | 2024 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Black, Ryan C. 1982- Verfasser aut Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University ; Ryan J. Owens, Florida State University ; Patrick C. Wohlfarth, University of Maryland, College Park First edition New York Oxford University Press [2024] x, 254 Seiten Illustrationen, Karte 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The neuroscience behind cognitive aging -- How cognitive aging applies to judges -- Opinion crafting and cognitive aging -- Opinion style -- Cognitive aging, law clerks, and party briefs -- Aging, opinion quality, and the diffusion of precedent -- Cognitive aging and following Supreme Court precedent -- Cognitive aging and panel composition -- Public attitudes toward aged judges -- Public support for judicial reforms "Cognitive aging effects all people. Judges are people. Therefore, cognitive aging must effect judges. Today's federal circuit court judges are older than ever. Yet, scholars know next-to-nothing about the consequences of cognitive aging on these judges. The central effort of this book is to examine the effects of cognitive aging on federal circuit court judges. The authors undertake a rigorous empirical approach, focusing on a variety of judicial behaviors, including opinion writing, bargaining, voting, and more. The book uncovers a number of sobering trends. Judges require more time to craft their opinions as they age. They tend to rely more on cognitive shortcuts when they bargain over opinion content. Their written opinions become less cognitively complex as they age. Aging judges increasingly rely on their law clerks to write their opinions and borrow more language from party briefs. Their judicial colleagues are less likely to cite older judges' opinions. Aging judges apply Supreme Court precedent an increasingly ideological manner. And, their legal influence on panels wanes while susceptibility to persuasion increases. Cognitive aging appears to influence nearly everything federal circuit court judges do. These findings speak to a broader policy debate about judicial tenure. The authors test public support for a handful of reforms and find surprisingly high support for them. There is no utopian or perfect cure for the problems associated with cognitively aging judges. But incremental changes that remain loyal to judicial independence might alleviate some of the most pernicious consequences"-- Judicial process / United States Circuit courts / United States Appellate courts / United States United States / Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit) Clerks of court / United States Neurosciences / Law and legislation / United States Cognition / Age factors Aging / Physiological aspects Processus judiciaire / États-Unis Cours de circuit / États-Unis Greffiers / États-Unis Cognition / Facteurs liés à l'âge Vieillissement / Aspect physiologique Cours d'appel / États-Unis Owens, Ryan J. 1976- Sonstige oth Wohlfarth, Patrick C. Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts First edition New York : Oxford University Press, 2024 9780197747032 |
spellingShingle | Black, Ryan C. 1982- Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges The neuroscience behind cognitive aging -- How cognitive aging applies to judges -- Opinion crafting and cognitive aging -- Opinion style -- Cognitive aging, law clerks, and party briefs -- Aging, opinion quality, and the diffusion of precedent -- Cognitive aging and following Supreme Court precedent -- Cognitive aging and panel composition -- Public attitudes toward aged judges -- Public support for judicial reforms |
title | Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges |
title_auth | Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges |
title_exact_search | Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges |
title_full | Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University ; Ryan J. Owens, Florida State University ; Patrick C. Wohlfarth, University of Maryland, College Park |
title_fullStr | Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University ; Ryan J. Owens, Florida State University ; Patrick C. Wohlfarth, University of Maryland, College Park |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University ; Ryan J. Owens, Florida State University ; Patrick C. Wohlfarth, University of Maryland, College Park |
title_short | Cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts |
title_sort | cognitive aging and the federal circuit courts how senescence influences the law and judges |
title_sub | how senescence influences the law and judges |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blackryanc cognitiveagingandthefederalcircuitcourtshowsenescenceinfluencesthelawandjudges AT owensryanj cognitiveagingandthefederalcircuitcourtshowsenescenceinfluencesthelawandjudges AT wohlfarthpatrickc cognitiveagingandthefederalcircuitcourtshowsenescenceinfluencesthelawandjudges |