Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up?:
For implementing their economic and social policies, governments have traditionally relied on direct spending but increasingly use "non-standard" policy instruments, such as loans and guarantees. However, in many OECD countries, loans and guarantees are not yet submitted to the same scruti...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2023
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | For implementing their economic and social policies, governments have traditionally relied on direct spending but increasingly use "non-standard" policy instruments, such as loans and guarantees. However, in many OECD countries, loans and guarantees are not yet submitted to the same scrutiny than direct spending as part of the budget process, and future costs associated with the use of these policy instruments are often not estimated, nor provisioned, making them appear initially costless. In turn, this generates risks of potentially biased budgetary decision making, deviations from medium-term spending plans and limited transparency. Considering experiences of OECD countries, this paper advises that budget offices take a leading role in proposing budgetary treatments for loans and guarantees that ensure an even-level playing field with traditional spending and put considerations of efficiency of spending above optimisation of short-term fiscal outcomes |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (17 Seiten) |
DOI: | 10.1787/b58f0956-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV050074952 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 241209s2023 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/b58f0956-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)101205295 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV050074952 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Moretti, Delphine |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? |c Delphine, Moretti |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2023 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (17 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a For implementing their economic and social policies, governments have traditionally relied on direct spending but increasingly use "non-standard" policy instruments, such as loans and guarantees. However, in many OECD countries, loans and guarantees are not yet submitted to the same scrutiny than direct spending as part of the budget process, and future costs associated with the use of these policy instruments are often not estimated, nor provisioned, making them appear initially costless. In turn, this generates risks of potentially biased budgetary decision making, deviations from medium-term spending plans and limited transparency. Considering experiences of OECD countries, this paper advises that budget offices take a leading role in proposing budgetary treatments for loans and guarantees that ensure an even-level playing field with traditional spending and put considerations of efficiency of spending above optimisation of short-term fiscal outcomes | ||
650 | 4 | |a Finance and Investment | |
650 | 4 | |a Governance | |
650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/b58f0956-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035412313 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1817990477784285184 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Moretti, Delphine |
author_facet | Moretti, Delphine |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Moretti, Delphine |
author_variant | d m dm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV050074952 |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)101205295 (DE-599)BVBBV050074952 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/b58f0956-en |
format | Electronic Book Chapter |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000naa a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV050074952</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">241209s2023 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/b58f0956-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)101205295</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV050074952</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moretti, Delphine</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up?</subfield><subfield code="c">Delphine, Moretti</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (17 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For implementing their economic and social policies, governments have traditionally relied on direct spending but increasingly use "non-standard" policy instruments, such as loans and guarantees. However, in many OECD countries, loans and guarantees are not yet submitted to the same scrutiny than direct spending as part of the budget process, and future costs associated with the use of these policy instruments are often not estimated, nor provisioned, making them appear initially costless. In turn, this generates risks of potentially biased budgetary decision making, deviations from medium-term spending plans and limited transparency. Considering experiences of OECD countries, this paper advises that budget offices take a leading role in proposing budgetary treatments for loans and guarantees that ensure an even-level playing field with traditional spending and put considerations of efficiency of spending above optimisation of short-term fiscal outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/b58f0956-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035412313</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV050074952 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-12-09T19:00:26Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035412313 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (17 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2023 |
publishDateSearch | 2023 |
publishDateSort | 2023 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Moretti, Delphine Verfasser aut Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? Delphine, Moretti Paris OECD Publishing 2023 1 Online-Ressource (17 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier For implementing their economic and social policies, governments have traditionally relied on direct spending but increasingly use "non-standard" policy instruments, such as loans and guarantees. However, in many OECD countries, loans and guarantees are not yet submitted to the same scrutiny than direct spending as part of the budget process, and future costs associated with the use of these policy instruments are often not estimated, nor provisioned, making them appear initially costless. In turn, this generates risks of potentially biased budgetary decision making, deviations from medium-term spending plans and limited transparency. Considering experiences of OECD countries, this paper advises that budget offices take a leading role in proposing budgetary treatments for loans and guarantees that ensure an even-level playing field with traditional spending and put considerations of efficiency of spending above optimisation of short-term fiscal outcomes Finance and Investment Governance Economics https://doi.org/10.1787/b58f0956-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Moretti, Delphine Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? Finance and Investment Governance Economics |
title | Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? |
title_auth | Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? |
title_exact_search | Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? |
title_full | Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? Delphine, Moretti |
title_fullStr | Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? Delphine, Moretti |
title_full_unstemmed | Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? Delphine, Moretti |
title_short | Rise of non-standard policy Instruments: Can budgeting catch up? |
title_sort | rise of non standard policy instruments can budgeting catch up |
topic | Finance and Investment Governance Economics |
topic_facet | Finance and Investment Governance Economics |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/b58f0956-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morettidelphine riseofnonstandardpolicyinstrumentscanbudgetingcatchup |