Aggrieved labor strikes back: inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs
Why do we see large-scale labor protests and strikes under some IMF programs such as in Greece in 2010 and not in others such as in Ireland in the same year? This Element argues that extensive labor market reform conditions in an immobile labor market generate strong opposition to programs. Labor ma...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2024
|
Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge elements
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-473 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Why do we see large-scale labor protests and strikes under some IMF programs such as in Greece in 2010 and not in others such as in Ireland in the same year? This Element argues that extensive labor market reform conditions in an immobile labor market generate strong opposition to programs. Labor market reform conditions that decentralize and open up an immobile labor market cause workers either to lose in terms of rights and benefits, while being stuck in the same job or to fall into a less protected sector with fewer benefits. Conversely, in more mobile labor markets, wage and benefit differentials are low, and movement across sectors is easier. In such markets, labor groups do not mobilize to the same extent to block programs. The author tests this theory in a global sample and explores the causal mechanism in four case studies on Greece, Ireland, Latvia, and Portugal |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 15 Apr 2024) |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (85 Seiten) |
ISBN: | 9781009455749 |
DOI: | 10.1017/9781009455749 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049827403 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240821s2024 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781009455749 |c Online |9 978-1-009-45574-9 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781009455749 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009455749 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1454749871 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049827403 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 332.152 | |
100 | 1 | |a Metinsoy, Saliha |d 1985- |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aggrieved labor strikes back |b inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs |c Saliha Metinsoy |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2024 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (85 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Cambridge elements | |
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 15 Apr 2024) | ||
520 | |a Why do we see large-scale labor protests and strikes under some IMF programs such as in Greece in 2010 and not in others such as in Ireland in the same year? This Element argues that extensive labor market reform conditions in an immobile labor market generate strong opposition to programs. Labor market reform conditions that decentralize and open up an immobile labor market cause workers either to lose in terms of rights and benefits, while being stuck in the same job or to fall into a less protected sector with fewer benefits. Conversely, in more mobile labor markets, wage and benefit differentials are low, and movement across sectors is easier. In such markets, labor groups do not mobilize to the same extent to block programs. The author tests this theory in a global sample and explores the causal mechanism in four case studies on Greece, Ireland, Latvia, and Portugal | ||
610 | 2 | 4 | |a International Monetary Fund |
650 | 4 | |a Labor mobility | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9781009455763 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9781009455787 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009455749?locatt=mode:legacy |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035167434 | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009455749?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009455749?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1809767844578066432 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Metinsoy, Saliha 1985- |
author_facet | Metinsoy, Saliha 1985- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Metinsoy, Saliha 1985- |
author_variant | s m sm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049827403 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009455749 (OCoLC)1454749871 (DE-599)BVBBV049827403 |
dewey-full | 332.152 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 332 - Financial economics |
dewey-raw | 332.152 |
dewey-search | 332.152 |
dewey-sort | 3332.152 |
dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781009455749 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049827403</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240821s2024 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009455749</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-009-45574-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781009455749</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009455749</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1454749871</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049827403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">332.152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Metinsoy, Saliha</subfield><subfield code="d">1985-</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aggrieved labor strikes back</subfield><subfield code="b">inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs</subfield><subfield code="c">Saliha Metinsoy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (85 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge elements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 15 Apr 2024)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Why do we see large-scale labor protests and strikes under some IMF programs such as in Greece in 2010 and not in others such as in Ireland in the same year? This Element argues that extensive labor market reform conditions in an immobile labor market generate strong opposition to programs. Labor market reform conditions that decentralize and open up an immobile labor market cause workers either to lose in terms of rights and benefits, while being stuck in the same job or to fall into a less protected sector with fewer benefits. Conversely, in more mobile labor markets, wage and benefit differentials are low, and movement across sectors is easier. In such markets, labor groups do not mobilize to the same extent to block programs. The author tests this theory in a global sample and explores the causal mechanism in four case studies on Greece, Ireland, Latvia, and Portugal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International Monetary Fund</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Labor mobility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9781009455763</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9781009455787</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009455749?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035167434</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009455749?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009455749?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV049827403 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-09-10T00:45:11Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781009455749 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035167434 |
oclc_num | 1454749871 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (85 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 2024 |
publishDateSearch | 2024 |
publishDateSort | 2024 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Cambridge elements |
spelling | Metinsoy, Saliha 1985- aut Aggrieved labor strikes back inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs Saliha Metinsoy Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2024 1 Online-Ressource (85 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge elements Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 15 Apr 2024) Why do we see large-scale labor protests and strikes under some IMF programs such as in Greece in 2010 and not in others such as in Ireland in the same year? This Element argues that extensive labor market reform conditions in an immobile labor market generate strong opposition to programs. Labor market reform conditions that decentralize and open up an immobile labor market cause workers either to lose in terms of rights and benefits, while being stuck in the same job or to fall into a less protected sector with fewer benefits. Conversely, in more mobile labor markets, wage and benefit differentials are low, and movement across sectors is easier. In such markets, labor groups do not mobilize to the same extent to block programs. The author tests this theory in a global sample and explores the causal mechanism in four case studies on Greece, Ireland, Latvia, and Portugal International Monetary Fund Labor mobility Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9781009455763 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9781009455787 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009455749?locatt=mode:legacy Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Metinsoy, Saliha 1985- Aggrieved labor strikes back inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs International Monetary Fund Labor mobility |
title | Aggrieved labor strikes back inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs |
title_auth | Aggrieved labor strikes back inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs |
title_exact_search | Aggrieved labor strikes back inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs |
title_full | Aggrieved labor strikes back inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs Saliha Metinsoy |
title_fullStr | Aggrieved labor strikes back inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs Saliha Metinsoy |
title_full_unstemmed | Aggrieved labor strikes back inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs Saliha Metinsoy |
title_short | Aggrieved labor strikes back |
title_sort | aggrieved labor strikes back inter sectoral labor mobility conditionality and unrest under imf programs |
title_sub | inter-sectoral labor mobility, conditionality, and unrest under IMF programs |
topic | International Monetary Fund Labor mobility |
topic_facet | International Monetary Fund Labor mobility |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009455749?locatt=mode:legacy |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metinsoysaliha aggrievedlaborstrikesbackintersectorallabormobilityconditionalityandunrestunderimfprograms |