Intersectionality: a philosophical framework
"Intersectionality occurs when people already oppressed, experience more oppression. Examples include women who experience racism or poor people who are under-served. Identifying such intersections allows for more precise analysis of oppression, as well as newly recognized identities, such as b...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY
Oxford University Press
[2024]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | "Intersectionality occurs when people already oppressed, experience more oppression. Examples include women who experience racism or poor people who are under-served. Identifying such intersections allows for more precise analysis of oppression, as well as newly recognized identities, such as blackwomen or homeless people of colour. Identifying oppression always compares one group to another group that is not oppressed and both groups form units. The method of intersectionality can be expanded to many areas of progressive thought, across disciplines. The injustice of oppression logically requires a broad humanistic framework. Despite its immense popularity, intersectionality is often confused with diversity and inclusion and its broad applications are often not recognized. A Philosophical View of Intersectionality precisely explains what intersectionality is in theory and reality, with vivid examples of contemporary intersected groups. The three parts of this book encompass the nature of intersectionality as a theory, how the indeterminacy of intersectional method allows for the identification of new intersections such as victims of sudden violence, and intersections that result when minority students are "firsts" in higher education. intersectional analysis compares those oppressed with those unoppressed in a same unit. The lack of oppression is justified by moral requirements for more general groups to which units ultimately belong.. Intersectionality logically depends on universal egalitarian humanism. We owe other human beings certain goods and recognition and are prohibited from harming them in certain ways. For example, black and Asian people belong to the unit of racial groups that includes whites and should be treated as whites are; the justification of how whites are already treated is based on their membership in the total human group, and that treatment should be extended to black and Asian people"-- |
Beschreibung: | xxii, 178 pages 18,6 cm |
ISBN: | 9780197693070 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049754807 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20240806 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 240625s2024 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780197693070 |c hardback |9 978-0-19-769307-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1450748713 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049754807 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zack, Naomi |d 1944- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)172646790 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Intersectionality |b a philosophical framework |c Naomi Zack |
264 | 1 | |a New York, NY |b Oxford University Press |c [2024] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2024 | |
300 | |a xxii, 178 pages |c 18,6 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a "Intersectionality occurs when people already oppressed, experience more oppression. Examples include women who experience racism or poor people who are under-served. Identifying such intersections allows for more precise analysis of oppression, as well as newly recognized identities, such as blackwomen or homeless people of colour. Identifying oppression always compares one group to another group that is not oppressed and both groups form units. The method of intersectionality can be expanded to many areas of progressive thought, across disciplines. The injustice of oppression logically requires a broad humanistic framework. Despite its immense popularity, intersectionality is often confused with diversity and inclusion and its broad applications are often not recognized. A Philosophical View of Intersectionality precisely explains what intersectionality is in theory and reality, with vivid examples of contemporary intersected groups. The three parts of this book encompass the nature of intersectionality as a theory, how the indeterminacy of intersectional method allows for the identification of new intersections such as victims of sudden violence, and intersections that result when minority students are "firsts" in higher education. intersectional analysis compares those oppressed with those unoppressed in a same unit. The lack of oppression is justified by moral requirements for more general groups to which units ultimately belong.. Intersectionality logically depends on universal egalitarian humanism. We owe other human beings certain goods and recognition and are prohibited from harming them in certain ways. For example, black and Asian people belong to the unit of racial groups that includes whites and should be treated as whites are; the justification of how whites are already treated is based on their membership in the total human group, and that treatment should be extended to black and Asian people"-- | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Intersektionalität |0 (DE-588)7729679-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
653 | 0 | |a Intersectionality (Sociology) / Philosophy | |
653 | 0 | |a Intersectionnalité / Philosophie | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Intersektionalität |0 (DE-588)7729679-5 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Online version |a Zack, Naomi, 1944- |t Intersectionality |d New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2024] |z 9780197693094 |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035096369 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1806685088334741504 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Zack, Naomi 1944- |
author_GND | (DE-588)172646790 |
author_facet | Zack, Naomi 1944- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Zack, Naomi 1944- |
author_variant | n z nz |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049754807 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1450748713 (DE-599)BVBBV049754807 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049754807</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240806</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240625s2024 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780197693070</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-769307-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1450748713</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049754807</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zack, Naomi</subfield><subfield code="d">1944-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)172646790</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intersectionality</subfield><subfield code="b">a philosophical framework</subfield><subfield code="c">Naomi Zack</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2024]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxii, 178 pages</subfield><subfield code="c">18,6 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Intersectionality occurs when people already oppressed, experience more oppression. Examples include women who experience racism or poor people who are under-served. Identifying such intersections allows for more precise analysis of oppression, as well as newly recognized identities, such as blackwomen or homeless people of colour. Identifying oppression always compares one group to another group that is not oppressed and both groups form units. The method of intersectionality can be expanded to many areas of progressive thought, across disciplines. The injustice of oppression logically requires a broad humanistic framework. Despite its immense popularity, intersectionality is often confused with diversity and inclusion and its broad applications are often not recognized. A Philosophical View of Intersectionality precisely explains what intersectionality is in theory and reality, with vivid examples of contemporary intersected groups. The three parts of this book encompass the nature of intersectionality as a theory, how the indeterminacy of intersectional method allows for the identification of new intersections such as victims of sudden violence, and intersections that result when minority students are "firsts" in higher education. intersectional analysis compares those oppressed with those unoppressed in a same unit. The lack of oppression is justified by moral requirements for more general groups to which units ultimately belong.. Intersectionality logically depends on universal egalitarian humanism. We owe other human beings certain goods and recognition and are prohibited from harming them in certain ways. For example, black and Asian people belong to the unit of racial groups that includes whites and should be treated as whites are; the justification of how whites are already treated is based on their membership in the total human group, and that treatment should be extended to black and Asian people"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intersektionalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7729679-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intersectionality (Sociology) / Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intersectionnalité / Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intersektionalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7729679-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Online version</subfield><subfield code="a">Zack, Naomi, 1944-</subfield><subfield code="t">Intersectionality</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2024]</subfield><subfield code="z">9780197693094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035096369</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV049754807 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-08-07T00:06:06Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780197693070 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035096369 |
oclc_num | 1450748713 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | xxii, 178 pages 18,6 cm |
publishDate | 2024 |
publishDateSearch | 2024 |
publishDateSort | 2024 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Zack, Naomi 1944- Verfasser (DE-588)172646790 aut Intersectionality a philosophical framework Naomi Zack New York, NY Oxford University Press [2024] © 2024 xxii, 178 pages 18,6 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "Intersectionality occurs when people already oppressed, experience more oppression. Examples include women who experience racism or poor people who are under-served. Identifying such intersections allows for more precise analysis of oppression, as well as newly recognized identities, such as blackwomen or homeless people of colour. Identifying oppression always compares one group to another group that is not oppressed and both groups form units. The method of intersectionality can be expanded to many areas of progressive thought, across disciplines. The injustice of oppression logically requires a broad humanistic framework. Despite its immense popularity, intersectionality is often confused with diversity and inclusion and its broad applications are often not recognized. A Philosophical View of Intersectionality precisely explains what intersectionality is in theory and reality, with vivid examples of contemporary intersected groups. The three parts of this book encompass the nature of intersectionality as a theory, how the indeterminacy of intersectional method allows for the identification of new intersections such as victims of sudden violence, and intersections that result when minority students are "firsts" in higher education. intersectional analysis compares those oppressed with those unoppressed in a same unit. The lack of oppression is justified by moral requirements for more general groups to which units ultimately belong.. Intersectionality logically depends on universal egalitarian humanism. We owe other human beings certain goods and recognition and are prohibited from harming them in certain ways. For example, black and Asian people belong to the unit of racial groups that includes whites and should be treated as whites are; the justification of how whites are already treated is based on their membership in the total human group, and that treatment should be extended to black and Asian people"-- Intersektionalität (DE-588)7729679-5 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Intersectionality (Sociology) / Philosophy Intersectionnalité / Philosophie Intersektionalität (DE-588)7729679-5 s Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s DE-604 Online version Zack, Naomi, 1944- Intersectionality New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2024] 9780197693094 |
spellingShingle | Zack, Naomi 1944- Intersectionality a philosophical framework Intersektionalität (DE-588)7729679-5 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)7729679-5 (DE-588)4045791-6 |
title | Intersectionality a philosophical framework |
title_auth | Intersectionality a philosophical framework |
title_exact_search | Intersectionality a philosophical framework |
title_full | Intersectionality a philosophical framework Naomi Zack |
title_fullStr | Intersectionality a philosophical framework Naomi Zack |
title_full_unstemmed | Intersectionality a philosophical framework Naomi Zack |
title_short | Intersectionality |
title_sort | intersectionality a philosophical framework |
title_sub | a philosophical framework |
topic | Intersektionalität (DE-588)7729679-5 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Intersektionalität Philosophie |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zacknaomi intersectionalityaphilosophicalframework |