Reading the Constitution: why I chose pragmatism, not textualism
An analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Simon & Schuster
2024
|
| Ausgabe: | First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | An analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution |
| Beschreibung: | xxix, 335 Seiten 25 cm |
| ISBN: | 9781668021538 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049633228 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240529 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 240403s2024 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781668021538 |9 978-1-6680-2153-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1437846917 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049633228 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.7302 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Breyer, Stephen G. |d 1938- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)132174731 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reading the Constitution |b why I chose pragmatism, not textualism |c Stephen Breyer |
| 250 | |a First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |b Simon & Schuster |c 2024 | |
| 300 | |a xxix, 335 Seiten |c 25 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Preface: My way. (Part I: Purpose vs. textualism): Purpose-based approaches -- The textualist approach. (Part II: Interpreting statutory law): The traditional use of text and purpose -- The text/purpose divide -- Static or dynamic? -- Consequences -- Legislative history -- Constitutional values -- Resolving the text/purpose tension -- Why judges should consider purposes: a summary. (Part III: Interpreting the Constitution): The Constitution -- The traditional approach to constitutional interpretation -- Constitutional textualism -- When the text runs out: the limits of constitutional textualism -- Legal stability: stare decisis. (Part IV: Why values, purposes, and workability provide a better way to interpret the Constitution): Workability: history and practical experience -- Workability: deciding where values conflict -- Workability: direct application of basic values. (Part V: Paradigm shifts on the court): Three paradigm shifts -- Are we undergoing the next paradigm shift? Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- Author's note -- Notes -- Index | |
| 520 | 3 | |a An analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Constitution | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Supreme Court | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Constitutional law / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Constitutional history / United States | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-6680-2155-2 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1805082073155764224 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Breyer, Stephen G. 1938- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)132174731 |
| author_facet | Breyer, Stephen G. 1938- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Breyer, Stephen G. 1938- |
| author_variant | s g b sg sgb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049633228 |
| contents | Preface: My way. (Part I: Purpose vs. textualism): Purpose-based approaches -- The textualist approach. (Part II: Interpreting statutory law): The traditional use of text and purpose -- The text/purpose divide -- Static or dynamic? -- Consequences -- Legislative history -- Constitutional values -- Resolving the text/purpose tension -- Why judges should consider purposes: a summary. (Part III: Interpreting the Constitution): The Constitution -- The traditional approach to constitutional interpretation -- Constitutional textualism -- When the text runs out: the limits of constitutional textualism -- Legal stability: stare decisis. (Part IV: Why values, purposes, and workability provide a better way to interpret the Constitution): Workability: history and practical experience -- Workability: deciding where values conflict -- Workability: direct application of basic values. (Part V: Paradigm shifts on the court): Three paradigm shifts -- Are we undergoing the next paradigm shift? Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- Author's note -- Notes -- Index |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1437846917 (DE-599)BVBBV049633228 |
| dewey-full | 342.7302 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.7302 |
| dewey-search | 342.7302 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.7302 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049633228</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240529</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240403s2024 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781668021538</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-6680-2153-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1437846917</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049633228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7302</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Breyer, Stephen G.</subfield><subfield code="d">1938-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132174731</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reading the Constitution</subfield><subfield code="b">why I chose pragmatism, not textualism</subfield><subfield code="c">Stephen Breyer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Simon & Schuster</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxix, 335 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Preface: My way. (Part I: Purpose vs. textualism): Purpose-based approaches -- The textualist approach. (Part II: Interpreting statutory law): The traditional use of text and purpose -- The text/purpose divide -- Static or dynamic? -- Consequences -- Legislative history -- Constitutional values -- Resolving the text/purpose tension -- Why judges should consider purposes: a summary. (Part III: Interpreting the Constitution): The Constitution -- The traditional approach to constitutional interpretation -- Constitutional textualism -- When the text runs out: the limits of constitutional textualism -- Legal stability: stare decisis. (Part IV: Why values, purposes, and workability provide a better way to interpret the Constitution): Workability: history and practical experience -- Workability: deciding where values conflict -- Workability: direct application of basic values. (Part V: Paradigm shifts on the court): Three paradigm shifts -- Are we undergoing the next paradigm shift? Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- Author's note -- Notes -- Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">An analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Constitution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constitutional history / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-6680-2155-2</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049633228 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T23:38:38Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-20T07:26:51Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781668021538 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034977007 |
| oclc_num | 1437846917 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-188 |
| physical | xxix, 335 Seiten 25 cm |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Simon & Schuster |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Breyer, Stephen G. 1938- Verfasser (DE-588)132174731 aut Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism Stephen Breyer First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition New York Simon & Schuster 2024 xxix, 335 Seiten 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Preface: My way. (Part I: Purpose vs. textualism): Purpose-based approaches -- The textualist approach. (Part II: Interpreting statutory law): The traditional use of text and purpose -- The text/purpose divide -- Static or dynamic? -- Consequences -- Legislative history -- Constitutional values -- Resolving the text/purpose tension -- Why judges should consider purposes: a summary. (Part III: Interpreting the Constitution): The Constitution -- The traditional approach to constitutional interpretation -- Constitutional textualism -- When the text runs out: the limits of constitutional textualism -- Legal stability: stare decisis. (Part IV: Why values, purposes, and workability provide a better way to interpret the Constitution): Workability: history and practical experience -- Workability: deciding where values conflict -- Workability: direct application of basic values. (Part V: Paradigm shifts on the court): Three paradigm shifts -- Are we undergoing the next paradigm shift? Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- Author's note -- Notes -- Index An analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution United States / Constitution United States / Supreme Court Constitutional law / United States Constitutional history / United States Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-6680-2155-2 |
| spellingShingle | Breyer, Stephen G. 1938- Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism Preface: My way. (Part I: Purpose vs. textualism): Purpose-based approaches -- The textualist approach. (Part II: Interpreting statutory law): The traditional use of text and purpose -- The text/purpose divide -- Static or dynamic? -- Consequences -- Legislative history -- Constitutional values -- Resolving the text/purpose tension -- Why judges should consider purposes: a summary. (Part III: Interpreting the Constitution): The Constitution -- The traditional approach to constitutional interpretation -- Constitutional textualism -- When the text runs out: the limits of constitutional textualism -- Legal stability: stare decisis. (Part IV: Why values, purposes, and workability provide a better way to interpret the Constitution): Workability: history and practical experience -- Workability: deciding where values conflict -- Workability: direct application of basic values. (Part V: Paradigm shifts on the court): Three paradigm shifts -- Are we undergoing the next paradigm shift? Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- Author's note -- Notes -- Index |
| title | Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism |
| title_auth | Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism |
| title_exact_search | Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism |
| title_full | Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism Stephen Breyer |
| title_fullStr | Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism Stephen Breyer |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reading the Constitution why I chose pragmatism, not textualism Stephen Breyer |
| title_short | Reading the Constitution |
| title_sort | reading the constitution why i chose pragmatism not textualism |
| title_sub | why I chose pragmatism, not textualism |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT breyerstepheng readingtheconstitutionwhyichosepragmatismnottextualism |