Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force: application to future logistics concepts
RAND researchers present a Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework, which is a disciplined, systematic way to assess proposed future logistics concepts to meet the requirements of the National Defense Strategy. The idea is to reveal the most-promising concepts and prune the least promising bef...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Santa Monica, Calif.
RAND
[2022]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Research reports
RR-A534-1 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | RAND researchers present a Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework, which is a disciplined, systematic way to assess proposed future logistics concepts to meet the requirements of the National Defense Strategy. The idea is to reveal the most-promising concepts and prune the least promising before significant resources are invested. The methods outlined in this report should help the U.S. Air Force avoid regrets from pursuing future logistics concepts that eventually disappoint. But even sound ideas can falter if their advocates are not prepared to defend them. It is imperative that the U.S. Air Force successfully advocate for new concepts within government (and against the legacy concept that would be replaced). The arguments the framework produces also will be useful for justifying and defending budget positions once the concept is adopted. To ensure stable funding, the U.S. Air Force also will need to anticipate and address counterarguments for any future logistics concept that the Office of the Secretary of Defense or Congress might raise, show that the concept objectively provides the robustness needed during wartime, and show that its costs are affordable. Systematic, objective, and reproduceable analysis is essential to form these arguments. It is the goal of this report to provide a systematic way to inform these decisions |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 57 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 1977408672 9781977408679 |
| DOI: | 10.7249/RR-A534-1 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049624337 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240321s2022 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 1977408672 |9 1977408672 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781977408679 |9 9781977408679 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.7249/RR-A534-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1429564034 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049624337 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-706 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Snyder, Don |d 1962- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force |b application to future logistics concepts |c Don Snyder, Kristin F. Lynch, Alexis A. Blanc, Jonathan L. Brosmer, John G. Drew, Kyle D. Haak, Myron Hura, Daniel Ish, Kelly Klima, Fabian Villalobos |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Assessing the Effectiveness of Future Concepts in the United States Air Force |
| 264 | 1 | |a Santa Monica, Calif. |b RAND |c [2022] | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 57 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Research reports |v RR-A534-1 | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Chapter One: Future Challenges for Logistics -- Chapter Two: Assessing Versatility in Terms of Benefits and Downsides -- Chapter Three: Assessing Implementation Challenges -- Chapter Four: Case Study of the Assessment Processes -- Chapter Five: Afterword -- Appendix: Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework Checklist | |
| 520 | 3 | |a RAND researchers present a Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework, which is a disciplined, systematic way to assess proposed future logistics concepts to meet the requirements of the National Defense Strategy. The idea is to reveal the most-promising concepts and prune the least promising before significant resources are invested. The methods outlined in this report should help the U.S. Air Force avoid regrets from pursuing future logistics concepts that eventually disappoint. But even sound ideas can falter if their advocates are not prepared to defend them. It is imperative that the U.S. Air Force successfully advocate for new concepts within government (and against the legacy concept that would be replaced). The arguments the framework produces also will be useful for justifying and defending budget positions once the concept is adopted. To ensure stable funding, the U.S. Air Force also will need to anticipate and address counterarguments for any future logistics concept that the Office of the Secretary of Defense or Congress might raise, show that the concept objectively provides the robustness needed during wartime, and show that its costs are affordable. Systematic, objective, and reproduceable analysis is essential to form these arguments. It is the goal of this report to provide a systematic way to inform these decisions | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Air Force / Operational readiness | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Air Force / Appropriations and expenditures | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Air Force / Planning | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Logistics | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Armed Forces / Operational readiness | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Armed Forces / Appropriations and expenditures | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Armed Forces / Planning | |
| 653 | 2 | |a États-Unis / Air Force / État de préparation opérationnelle | |
| 653 | 2 | |a États-Unis / Air Force / Crédits budgétaires et dépenses | |
| 653 | 2 | |a États-Unis / Air Force / Planification | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Logistique | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Forces armées / État de préparation opérationnelle | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Forces armées / Crédits budgétaires et dépenses | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Forces armées / Planification | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lynch, Kristin F. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Blanc, Alexis A. |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1209958228 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brosmer, Jonathan L. |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1294119796 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Drew, John G. |d 1956- |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Haak, Kyle |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hura, Myron |d 1943- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)120991364X |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ish, Daniel |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1222050625 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Klima, Kelly |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1211739465 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Villalobos, Fabian |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1294107712 |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.7249/RR-A534-1 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ebook | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034968306 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1806595741925244928 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Snyder, Don 1962- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1209958228 (DE-588)1294119796 (DE-588)120991364X (DE-588)1222050625 (DE-588)1211739465 (DE-588)1294107712 |
| author_facet | Snyder, Don 1962- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Snyder, Don 1962- |
| author_variant | d s ds |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049624337 |
| collection | ebook |
| contents | Chapter One: Future Challenges for Logistics -- Chapter Two: Assessing Versatility in Terms of Benefits and Downsides -- Chapter Three: Assessing Implementation Challenges -- Chapter Four: Case Study of the Assessment Processes -- Chapter Five: Afterword -- Appendix: Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework Checklist |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1429564034 (DE-599)BVBBV049624337 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.7249/RR-A534-1 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049624337</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240321s2022 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1977408672</subfield><subfield code="9">1977408672</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781977408679</subfield><subfield code="9">9781977408679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.7249/RR-A534-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1429564034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049624337</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Snyder, Don</subfield><subfield code="d">1962-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force</subfield><subfield code="b">application to future logistics concepts</subfield><subfield code="c">Don Snyder, Kristin F. Lynch, Alexis A. Blanc, Jonathan L. Brosmer, John G. Drew, Kyle D. Haak, Myron Hura, Daniel Ish, Kelly Klima, Fabian Villalobos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Assessing the Effectiveness of Future Concepts in the United States Air Force</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Santa Monica, Calif.</subfield><subfield code="b">RAND</subfield><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (viii, 57 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Research reports</subfield><subfield code="v">RR-A534-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chapter One: Future Challenges for Logistics -- Chapter Two: Assessing Versatility in Terms of Benefits and Downsides -- Chapter Three: Assessing Implementation Challenges -- Chapter Four: Case Study of the Assessment Processes -- Chapter Five: Afterword -- Appendix: Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework Checklist</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RAND researchers present a Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework, which is a disciplined, systematic way to assess proposed future logistics concepts to meet the requirements of the National Defense Strategy. The idea is to reveal the most-promising concepts and prune the least promising before significant resources are invested. The methods outlined in this report should help the U.S. Air Force avoid regrets from pursuing future logistics concepts that eventually disappoint. But even sound ideas can falter if their advocates are not prepared to defend them. It is imperative that the U.S. Air Force successfully advocate for new concepts within government (and against the legacy concept that would be replaced). The arguments the framework produces also will be useful for justifying and defending budget positions once the concept is adopted. To ensure stable funding, the U.S. Air Force also will need to anticipate and address counterarguments for any future logistics concept that the Office of the Secretary of Defense or Congress might raise, show that the concept objectively provides the robustness needed during wartime, and show that its costs are affordable. Systematic, objective, and reproduceable analysis is essential to form these arguments. It is the goal of this report to provide a systematic way to inform these decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Air Force / Operational readiness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Air Force / Appropriations and expenditures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Air Force / Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Logistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Armed Forces / Operational readiness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Armed Forces / Appropriations and expenditures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Armed Forces / Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">États-Unis / Air Force / État de préparation opérationnelle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">États-Unis / Air Force / Crédits budgétaires et dépenses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">États-Unis / Air Force / Planification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Logistique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forces armées / État de préparation opérationnelle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forces armées / Crédits budgétaires et dépenses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forces armées / Planification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lynch, Kristin F.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Blanc, Alexis A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1209958228</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brosmer, Jonathan L.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1294119796</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Drew, John G.</subfield><subfield code="d">1956-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haak, Kyle</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hura, Myron</subfield><subfield code="d">1943-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)120991364X</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ish, Daniel</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1222050625</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klima, Kelly</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1211739465</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Villalobos, Fabian</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1294107712</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7249/RR-A534-1</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034968306</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049624337 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T23:37:35Z |
| indexdate | 2024-08-06T00:25:59Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1977408672 9781977408679 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034968306 |
| oclc_num | 1429564034 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-706 |
| owner_facet | DE-706 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 57 Seiten) |
| psigel | ebook |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | RAND |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Research reports |
| spelling | Snyder, Don 1962- Verfasser aut Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts Don Snyder, Kristin F. Lynch, Alexis A. Blanc, Jonathan L. Brosmer, John G. Drew, Kyle D. Haak, Myron Hura, Daniel Ish, Kelly Klima, Fabian Villalobos Assessing the Effectiveness of Future Concepts in the United States Air Force Santa Monica, Calif. RAND [2022] 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 57 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Research reports RR-A534-1 Chapter One: Future Challenges for Logistics -- Chapter Two: Assessing Versatility in Terms of Benefits and Downsides -- Chapter Three: Assessing Implementation Challenges -- Chapter Four: Case Study of the Assessment Processes -- Chapter Five: Afterword -- Appendix: Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework Checklist RAND researchers present a Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework, which is a disciplined, systematic way to assess proposed future logistics concepts to meet the requirements of the National Defense Strategy. The idea is to reveal the most-promising concepts and prune the least promising before significant resources are invested. The methods outlined in this report should help the U.S. Air Force avoid regrets from pursuing future logistics concepts that eventually disappoint. But even sound ideas can falter if their advocates are not prepared to defend them. It is imperative that the U.S. Air Force successfully advocate for new concepts within government (and against the legacy concept that would be replaced). The arguments the framework produces also will be useful for justifying and defending budget positions once the concept is adopted. To ensure stable funding, the U.S. Air Force also will need to anticipate and address counterarguments for any future logistics concept that the Office of the Secretary of Defense or Congress might raise, show that the concept objectively provides the robustness needed during wartime, and show that its costs are affordable. Systematic, objective, and reproduceable analysis is essential to form these arguments. It is the goal of this report to provide a systematic way to inform these decisions United States / Air Force / Operational readiness United States / Air Force / Appropriations and expenditures United States / Air Force / Planning Logistics Armed Forces / Operational readiness Armed Forces / Appropriations and expenditures Armed Forces / Planning États-Unis / Air Force / État de préparation opérationnelle États-Unis / Air Force / Crédits budgétaires et dépenses États-Unis / Air Force / Planification Logistique Forces armées / État de préparation opérationnelle Forces armées / Crédits budgétaires et dépenses Forces armées / Planification Lynch, Kristin F. Sonstige oth Blanc, Alexis A. Sonstige (DE-588)1209958228 oth Brosmer, Jonathan L. Sonstige (DE-588)1294119796 oth Drew, John G. 1956- Sonstige oth Haak, Kyle Sonstige oth Hura, Myron 1943- Sonstige (DE-588)120991364X oth Ish, Daniel Sonstige (DE-588)1222050625 oth Klima, Kelly Sonstige (DE-588)1211739465 oth Villalobos, Fabian Sonstige (DE-588)1294107712 oth https://doi.org/10.7249/RR-A534-1 Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Snyder, Don 1962- Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts Chapter One: Future Challenges for Logistics -- Chapter Two: Assessing Versatility in Terms of Benefits and Downsides -- Chapter Three: Assessing Implementation Challenges -- Chapter Four: Case Study of the Assessment Processes -- Chapter Five: Afterword -- Appendix: Future Logistics Concept Assessment Framework Checklist |
| title | Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts |
| title_alt | Assessing the Effectiveness of Future Concepts in the United States Air Force |
| title_auth | Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts |
| title_exact_search | Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts |
| title_full | Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts Don Snyder, Kristin F. Lynch, Alexis A. Blanc, Jonathan L. Brosmer, John G. Drew, Kyle D. Haak, Myron Hura, Daniel Ish, Kelly Klima, Fabian Villalobos |
| title_fullStr | Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts Don Snyder, Kristin F. Lynch, Alexis A. Blanc, Jonathan L. Brosmer, John G. Drew, Kyle D. Haak, Myron Hura, Daniel Ish, Kelly Klima, Fabian Villalobos |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force application to future logistics concepts Don Snyder, Kristin F. Lynch, Alexis A. Blanc, Jonathan L. Brosmer, John G. Drew, Kyle D. Haak, Myron Hura, Daniel Ish, Kelly Klima, Fabian Villalobos |
| title_short | Assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the U.S. Air Force |
| title_sort | assessing the effectiveness of future concepts in the u s air force application to future logistics concepts |
| title_sub | application to future logistics concepts |
| url | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR-A534-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT snyderdon assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT lynchkristinf assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT blancalexisa assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT brosmerjonathanl assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT drewjohng assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT haakkyle assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT huramyron assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT ishdaniel assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT klimakelly assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT villalobosfabian assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheusairforceapplicationtofuturelogisticsconcepts AT snyderdon assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT lynchkristinf assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT blancalexisa assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT brosmerjonathanl assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT drewjohng assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT haakkyle assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT huramyron assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT ishdaniel assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT klimakelly assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce AT villalobosfabian assessingtheeffectivenessoffutureconceptsintheunitedstatesairforce |